+1 (951) 902-6107 info@platinumressays.com

How can health care professionals navigate conflicts of interest and remain unbiased in their ethical decision-making process?

How can health care professionals navigate conflicts of interest and remain unbiased in their ethical decision-making process? Consider the arguments for and against a free-market value system within the health care system. Briefly explain your position on a free-market value system within the health care system and the impact it would have in the future.

Use scholarly references from credible sources to support your response. Two of the three resources must be from a peer-reviewed journal published within the past 5 years and must be appropriate for the discussion criteria and health care setting.

    What are the personal and/or communal ethical factors that may be involved in determining the moral position of either side in that debate?

    Read/review the following resources for this activity:

    • Textbook: Chapters 9, 10
    • Lesson
    • Minimum of 5 scholarly sources (in addition to the textbook)

    Instructions

    First, return to your topic chosen in the week three assignment.

    • Answer this question: What are the personal and/or communal ethical factors that may be involved in determining the moral position of either side in that debate?
    • Next, articulate and then evaluate the ethical positions  using Kantian ethics (that is, the categorical imperative) relative to the long standing debate (that is your topic chosen in the week three assignment).
    • Finally, create a complete annotated bibliography for 5 academic scholarly sources. You will annotate each source. The sources should be relevant to your topic chosen in the week three assignment.

    Include the following:

    • Publication details
    • Annotation (a detailed reading of the source)

    Each annotation section should include the following:

    • Summarize key points and identify key terms (using quotation marks, and citing a page in parentheses).
    • Describe the controversies or "problems" raised by the articles.
    • State whether you agree or disagree and give reasons.
    • Locate one or two quotations to be used in the final research project.
    • Evaluate the ways in which this article is important and has helped you focus your understanding.

    Use the following as a model:

    APA Reference
    Mezirow, J. (2003). Transformative learning as discourse. Journal of Transformative Education, 1(1), 58-63.

    Annotation Example
    In this article, Mezirow (2003) makes a distinction between "instrumental" and "communicative" learning. "Instrumental learning" refers to those processes which measure and gauge learning, such as tests, grades, comments, quizzes, attendance records and the like. "Communicative learning," on the other hand, refers to understanding created over time between individuals in what Mezirow calls "critical-dialectical-discourse," (p. 59) which is a fancy way of saying, important conversation between 2 or more speakers. Another key idea Mezirow discusses is "transformative learning," (p. 61) which changes the mind, the heart, the values and beliefs of people so that they may act better in the world. Mezirow argues that "hungry, desperate, homeless, sick, destitute, and intimidated people obviously cannot participate fully and freely in discourse" (p. 59). On the one hand, he is right: there are some people who cannot fully engage because their crisis is so long and deep, they are prevented. But, I don't think Mezirow should make the blanket assumption that everyone in unfortunate circumstances is incapable of entering the discourse meaningfully. One thing is certain: if we gave as much attention to the non-instrumental forms of intelligence–like goodness, compassion, forgiveness, wonder, self-motivation, creativity, humor, love, and other non-measured forms of intelligence in our school curriculums, we'd see better people, actors in the world, and interested investigators than we currently have graduating high school.

    Requirements

    • Length: 4-7 pages (not including title page or references page)
    • 1-inch margins
    • Double spaced
    • 12-point Times New Roman font
    • Title page

    The book is the elements of moral philosophy james rachel tenth edition stuart rachels 

      RCA is a tool designed to help identify not only what and how an event occurred, but also why it happened

      RCA is a tool designed to help identify not only what and how an event occurred,

      but also why it happened.

      Below is the article we will be doing the root cause analysis on. Please copy and paste the article in browser.

      Article: https://kstp.com/kstp-news/local-news/mdh-officials-say-nurse-gave-patient-dose-of-morphine-20-times-higher-than-prescribed/

      Attached is the questions that should be answered. I also attached an example of this assignment.

      APA Format. Reference page. 5 pages

      QUESTIONS FOR ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS Participants (job titles): Description of event:

      1. What happened?

      2. Where did process go wrong? What steps were involved in (contributed to) the event?

      3. What are the usual steps in the process(es)?

      4. Why do you think it happened? Human Factors

      1. What role did human performance play in this event? 2. What human factors were relevant to this case? I.e. fatigue, staff illness, noise, temperature,

      scheduling, personal problems, stress, rushing, cognitive errors?

      3. Were distractions or interruptions a factor in this case? Communication among staff / Information availability

      1. Was communication adequate and timely in this event?

      2. Are there obstacles to communication relating to this event?

      3. Was the needed information available, accurate, and complete?

      4. Was patient identification an issue in this case?

      5. Does the medical record documentation adequately provide a clear picture of what happened?

      6. Were there issues related to continuity of care?

      Aspects of care and care planning:

      1. What issues related to physical or behavioral assessment were a factor in this event?

      2. What policies or procedure relate to the level and frequency of observation and monitoring?

      3. Did the level and frequency of patient observation or monitoring meet standard of care?

      4. What issues relating to philosophy of care or care planning had an impact on this case? Staffing

      1. How did staffing levels compare with ideal levels? (Give #s)

      2. Was workload a factor in this event?

      3. How are staffing contingencies handled? Training/Competency/

      1. Were issues relating to staff training or staff competency a factor in this event? Is training provided prior to the start of the work process?

      2. Was an individual performing in a situation for which they were inappropriately trained or prepared?

      3. How is staff performance assessed? Are competencies documented?

      4. Are the results of training monitored over time?

      5. Is there a program to identify what training is needed? Supervision of Staff and Credentialing (Includes physicians in training)

      1. Was supervision of staff an issue in this case?

      2. Was the staff physician involved in the case in a timely way?

      3. Are there issues related to credentialing?

      Adequacy of Technological Support

      1. Was technological support adequate? Equipment / Equipment Maintenance/Management

      1. What equipment / products were involved in this case/event?

      2. Did equipment / products function properly?

      3. Did alarms, monitoring systems function properly? 4. Was equipment used as designed?

      5. Has staff been adequately trained in the use of the equipment / products?

      6. Was equipment maintenance an issue?

      7. Is there a maintenance program? Environmental aspects

      1. Was the work area or environment designed to support the function for which it was being used? (i.e space, privacy, safety, access)

      2. Does the work environment provide physical stressors for staff? (i.e. temperature, noise, improper lighting)

      3. Does the work environment meet current codes, specifications, and regulations?

      4. What systems are in place to identify environmental risks?

      5. What security systems and processes relate to this event? Were there issues related to security systems and processes?

      6. What emergency and failure modes responses have been tested? (safety evaluations, disaster drills, etc?)

      Control of Medications: Storage/Access

      1. Was storage or access to medications an issue?

      Labeling of Medication

      1. Was labeling medications (manufacturer or HCMC labeling) an issue?

      Leadership: 1. To what degree is the culture conducive to risk identification and reduction?

      2. What are the barriers to communication of potential risk factors?

      3. How is the prevention of adverse outcomes communicated as a high priority? Other questions:

      1. Are there any other factors that influenced this outcome?

      2. Were there uncontrollable external factors?

      3. What can be done to protect against the uncontrollable factors?

      4. What other areas or services are impacted (might have a similar event)?

      Communication with Patient/Family 1. Was communication with patient and family adequate?

      2. Was there disclosure regarding the untoward outcome, details of the event? Summary of Root Causes and contributing factors:

      ,

      Running head: MEDICATION ERRORS IN THE HEATHCARE SETTING 1

      MEDICATION ERRORS 9

      Medication Errors in the Healthcare Setting

      Student Name

      X Community College

      NURS 2448 Restorative 2

      Melissa Wolff

      Due Date

      Abstract

      This root cause analysis paper focuses on medications errors which occur in the healthcare setting from lack of communication and distractions. These factors are present in a statement where two nurses fail to use communication and are distracted by environmental influences, which overall lead to a medication error which could have caused a sentinel event to occur. Through data collection and analyzing the sequence of events which lead to the error, this paper will examine ways in which evidenced based practice can be implemented to prevent medication errors like this from occurring in the future.

      Keywords: medication errors, communication, distractions

      Medication errors cause at least one death every day, and injure approximately 1.3 million people annually in the United States (“Medication Error Report,” n.d.). A medication error can occur at any time during the medication administration process, from when the doctor writes the order to when the patient takes the medication. It is important for those who administer medications to be competent about the medication, while also following the seven rights of medication administration. There are many factors which can lead to medication errors, specifically lack of communication and distractions. Through utilizing evidence based practice, one will be able to learn ways to prevent medication errors from occurring.

      Header

      One day while at work I witnessed a medication error occur between two nurses. Sally, one of the residents, suffers from major anxiety which impairs her ability to function normally. As part of Sally’s morning medications, she receives an Ativan along with her other medications. On this particular day, the primary nurse was in charge of passing medications and was also training, which lengthened her medication pass. It takes longer to explain how things are done when training in a new employee. When the primary nurse went to give Sally her pills, Sally refused her medications. Normal protocol when a resident on the memory care unit refuses their medications is to have another staff member attempt giving the medication before documenting a refusal. After Sally refused the medication, the primary nurse called the nurse supervisor to attempt giving Sally her pills. In preventing Sally feeling overwhelmed when taking her pills, the nurse supervisor took just the Ativan out of the medication cup, and left the remaining pills on the medication cart with the primary nurse. The primary nurse placed Sally’s medication to the side on top of the cart, so she was able to get other patients pills started in attempt to stay on track. As the nurse supervisors attempt also failed at giving Sally her Ativan, the nurse supervisor then returned the Ativan to the medication cart to put it back with her other pills. The nurse supervisor dumped the Ativan in another patient’s cup not realizing they were not Sally’s pills, and left in a hurry returning to her work. The primary nurse did not realize this at the time, because one of the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) was talking to them about another issue. After her conversation, the primary nurse went to deliver other patients pills. When they returned, they were again going to attempt to give the Ativan to Sally. When the primary nurse went to take the Ativan out of Sally’s medication cup, the primary nurse realized it was not in her cup and the Ativan must have been dumped into the other patient’s cup, which she just gave. When a medication error occurs, a rapid letter must be sent to the patient doctor explaining what happened, along with starting a 24 hour vital sheet, and corrective action taken for the staff who were involved in the error. All of this could have been prevented with better communication and lack of distraction.

      Header

      After reviewing the problem statement, we will now collect data based on the situation to determine the contributing factors which lead to the event. One of the reasons the medication error occurred was due to the primary nurse training in a new employee and already being behind in their medication pass. On top of training, the primary nurse was also on a memory care unit, which can often times be nosey and one can easily become distracted. According to Choo, Hutchinson & Bucknall (2010), environmental conditions such as poor lighting, interruptions and poor communication within teams lead to medication errors. Distractions play a huge role in a person’s work environment and involve events which hinder the medication administration process through sidetracking the nurse’s attention. With the nurse having to talk to the CNA, this was another factor which led to the event. A study by Mayo and Duncan found nurses who were distracted by other patients, co-workers or events happening on the unit reported they made medication errors (Choo et al., 2010). When the house supervisor came to return the Ativan, she was in a hurry to get back to her work, which is why she assumed she had the correct medication cup and proceeded to dump the Ativan in it. According to Judd (2013), failure in communication is the main cause of sentinel events, medication errors, and preventable costs which result in inadequate treatment for patients. Keeping in mind these outcomes from poor communication, it is important to analyze the events which lead to medication errors and determine ways in which they can be prevented.

      Sub Header (if needed and fits)

      After collecting data, we will look at ways in which the communication between the nurses could have been improved and ultimately prevented the medication error for happening. The nurse supervisor could have waited until the primary nurse was done with their conversation with the CNA. This way, the nurse supervisor could ask which medication cup was Sally’s, which would ensure the Ativan was being placed in the correct medication cup. In this case, the nurse supervisor assumed she had the right medication cup and ended up putting the Ativan in another patient’s cup. The nurse supervisor was also in a hurry to get back to her work, which also lead to the medication error occurring. Communication could have been improved through having the primary nurse stopping the conversation with the CNA to make sure the Ativan was put back in Sally’s cup. If active listening was implemented in this situation, the medication error could have been prevented. Nonverbal communication could have been implemented by the nurse supervisor labeling a separate cup with the residents initials and room number (since rooms numbers do not change in this facility), and then the primary nurse could have put the Ativan in the correct cup once they were done discussing a situation with the CNA. In this case, too many people were in charge of the medications which lead to a breech in communication and ultimately resulting in the medication error. Possessing good interpersonal communication skills leads to professional relationships which provide growth in the nursing profession and allow employees to work well together.

      Header

      After analyzing the sequence of events which lead to the error, we will look at ways to implement evidenced based practice so future errors can be prevented. In a study done by Flynn, Evanish, Fernald, Hutchinson, and Lefaiver (2016), they implemented the Nurses Uninterrupted Passing Medications Safely (NUPASS) guidelines for nurses to follow while passing medications to decrease the amount of medication errors from occurring. For nurses to not be interrupted during their medication pass, they should don a yellow safety vest before leaving the medication room (Flynn et al., 2016). Not only did they design a vest to wear to alert others the nurse was passing medications, and should not be interrupted, but they also designated a room for those who are passing medications to have a “quiet zone”. Designating a proper administration room for medications would also be beneficial to reduce the interruptions which occurred in the problem statement. This would significantly decrease distractions by allowing the nurse to work in a quite environment and allow them to concentrate and have their attention on dispensing their medications. According to Flynn et al. (2016), implementing a No Interruption Zone (NIZ), would be beneficial by outlining an area on the floor. When a nurse is within the NIZ, no one is to interrupt the nurse. By doing this, one study showed avoidable interruptions decreases from 18 to 3 (83%) on one unit and from 19 to 9 (53%) on another unit after applying the NUPASS guidelines (Flynn et al., 2016). This study greatly supported the use of evidenced based practice to eliminate disruptions pertaining to medication errors.

      Header

      After reviewing evidenced based practice for disruptions, we will now use evidenced based practice and look at ways it can improve communication among coworkers. Current research indicates that ineffective communication among health care professionals is one of the leading causes of medical errors and patient harm (Dingley, Daugherty, Derieg, & Persing, 2008). Medication errors are often caused by lack of appropriate communication between staff members which in turn plays a contributing role in adverse events. In a study done by Dingley et al. (2008), they found “using daily briefings was useful in assessing change in clinical workload, and identifying relevant issues of the day, and provided a means to prioritize.” This study also developed a toolkit which can be purchased on the internet and be implemented in different healthcare settings. This toolkit provides information on ways to improve teamwork and communication in the healthcare setting. According to Dingley et al. (2008), they also encourage management and leaders to demonstrate teamwork and communication to show how important these factors are in contributing to patient safety and staff satisfaction. Overall, teamwork and communication are vital factors which contribute to the patient’s safety and wellbeing.

      Nurses deal with a great amount of responsibly and challenges every day at work, along with having to deal with multiple demands. This results in nurses being in situations which put them at increased risk for making a medication error. “Medication errors are never the result of a single, isolated human error but comprise a chain of events leading to an error” (Choo et al., 2010). It is important safe practices are put in place to prevent these errors from occurring in the future. By initiating “quiet zones”, NIZ, and wearing vests to alter others you are passing medications, will ultimately result in fewer interruptions during a medication pass. Having staff properly educated on teamwork and collaboration will also positively impact the work environment and prevent errors from occurring. Overall, patient safety is the number one priority in any healthcare setting. Through implementing these practices this will greatly reduce the likely hood of a sentinel event from occurring in the future.

      Casual Factor Chart

      Sally is due for her morning medications

      Steps leading up to event

      Root Cause

      Primary Nurse- Give Sally her medications

      Sally refuses her medications

      Sally takes her medications

      Primary Nurse continues with med pass (sets up other patient’s pills)

      Primary Nurse contacts House Supervisor to attempt

      Successful

      House Supervisor attempts to give medication

      Not successful return to med cart

      Take out Ativan

      Sally’s pills are pushed to the side on top of med cart

      Other patient’s pills are set up on top of med cart

      Ativan was put in wrong resident medication cup

      Attempt to give just the Ativan

      Return Ativan to medication cup

      Sally’s pills are set up on med cart

      Not successful

      If successful, will come back later to give rest of pills

      References

      Choo, J., Hutchinson, A., & Bucknall, T. (2010). Nurses' role in medication safety. Journal of Nursing Management, 18(7), 853-861. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01164.x

      Dingley, C., Daugherty, K., Derieg, M., & Persing, R. (2008). Improving Patient Safety Through Provider Communication Strategy Enhancements. Retrieved November 9, 2016, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK43663/?report=reader.

      Flynn, F., Evanish, J. Q., Fernald, J. M., Hutchinson, D. E., & Lefaiver, C. (2016). Progressive Care Nurses Improving Patient Safety by Limiting Interruptions During Medication Administration. Critical Care Nurse, 36(4), 19-35. doi:10.4037/ccn2016498

      Judd, M. (2013). Broken Communication in Nursing Can Kill: Teaching Communication Is Vital. Creative Nursing, 19(2), 101-104. doi:10.1891/1078-4535.19.2.10

      Medication Error Reports. (n.d.). Retrieved October 30, 2016, from http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/MedicationErrors/ucm080629.htm

      address an alternative or complementary therapy or theory of health

      1. Type and submit a one (1) page report/summary of book/article addressing an alternative or complementary therapy or theory of health.
      2. The book or journal article needs to be published within five (5) years by a credentialed author(s) and be about a specific CAM therapy not just a general book or article about therapies.
      3. Try the techniques or therapies learned and describe your experience in your report/summary.

      part 2

      1. Copy and paste your one (1) page book report (cliff note) into this discussion forum (so we do not have to download or click on links).
        • Keep in mind that a cliff note is like reading the book without having to read the book. A Cliff Note is not a summary of the book that makes us want to read it.
      2. Include in your cliff note things we can try to improve our health or treat symptoms.
      3. Describe your experience when you tried the technique or therapy described in your Report/Summary.
      4. Post must be 150-200 words.

        Develop care coordination strategy based on a health care concern

        For this assessment, you will develop the final care coordination strategy you based on your health care concern and population in Assessment 2 using best practices found in the literature.

        Four Spheres of Care Activity

        Use  at least 100 words and no more than 400 words for each of the four required journal entries in this activity. You do not need to include scholarly resources or a reference list. Your reflections should be your own original thoughts. Please do not include patient or clinic identifying information.

        When you are finished with all four, select Save Entries and then Output Activity. Submit the resulting PDF to your assessment.

        Wellness and Disease Prevention:

        Reflect on the health promotion disease prevention interventions you witnessed in your practicum site, as it relates to the social determinants of health most prevalent in your community. What did you see? What does this time mean to you as a professional nurse in your role?

        Respond with at least 100 words.

        0/100 min words

        Chronic Disease Management:

        Reflect on the integration of interprofessional team-based care as it relates to chronic disease management in your practicum site this week. What did you see? What does this time mean to you as a professional nurse in your role?

        Respond with at least 100 words.

        0/100 min words

        Regenerative and Restorative Care:

        Reflect on the acute management of illnesses such as stroke, mental illness, and falls in your practicum site this week. What did you see? What does this time mean to you as a professional nurse in your role?

        Respond with at least 100 words.

        0/100 min words

        Hospice and Palliative Care:

        Reflect on end-of-life nursing and advanced illness and hospice care in your practicum site this week. What did you see? What does this time mean to you as a professional nurse in your role?

        Respond with at least 100 words.

        0/100 min words

        ,

        For this assessment, you will develop the final care coordination strategy you based on your health care concern and population in Assessment 2 using best practices found in the literature.

        Expand All

        Introduction

        This assessment builds on your initial care coordination infographic by providing an opportunity to research the literature and apply evidence to support what communication, teaching, and learning best practices are needed for your selected health care problem.

        Note: You are required to complete this assessment  only after Assessment 2 is successfully completed.

        Professional Context

        Care coordination is the process of providing a smooth and seamless transition of care as part of the health continuum. Nurses must be aware of community resources, ethical considerations, policy issues, cultural norms, safety, and the physiological needs of patients. Nurses play a key role in providing the necessary knowledge and communication to ensure seamless transitions of care. They draw upon evidence-based practices to promote health and disease prevention to create a safe environment conducive to improving and maintaining the health of individuals, families, or aggregates within a community. When provided with a plan and the resources to achieve and maintain optimal health, patients benefit from a safe environment conducive to healing and a better quality of life.

        Please watch the following brief video message for an overview of what to keep in mind as you complete your Care Coordination Strategy.

        · Final Care Coordination Strategy .

        Preparation

        You are encouraged to complete the Vila Health: Cultural Competence activity prior to completing this assessment. Completing course activities before submitting your first attempt has been shown to make the difference between basic and proficient assessment.

        In this assessment, you will evaluate the preliminary care coordination infographic you developed in Assessment 2 using best practices found in the literature.

        To prepare for your assessment, you will research the literature on your selected health care problem. You will describe the priorities that a care coordinator would establish when discussing the plan with a patient and family members. You will identify changes to the strategy based upon evidence-based practice and discuss how the strategy includes elements of  Healthy People 2030 .

        Instructions

        Build on your preliminary care infographic and selected health concern and population and create a detailed comprehensive final care coordination strategy.

        It is suggested that you use the following outline to organize your 5–7 page paper, including headings:

        · Design patient-centered health interventions and timelines for your selected healthcare problem. 

        · Address three patient healthcare issues related to your selected healthcare problem and patient population

        · Example: Healthcare problem: Type 1 diabetes in pediatric patients.

        · Health issues.

        · Depression.

        · Exercise.

        · Poor glucose control.

        · Design an intervention for each health issue.

        · Identify three community resources for each health intervention.

        · Establish timelines for implementing these interventions.

        · Include evidence to support your ideas.

        · Consider the ethical decisions in designing patient-centered health interventions for your selected healthcare problem.

        · Include the ethical questions that generate uncertainty about the decisions you have made.

        · Include evidence to support your ideas.

        · Identify relevant health policy implications for the coordination and continuum of care of your selected healthcare problem and population.

        · Cite  specific health policy provisions.

        · Include evidence to support your ideas.

        · Describe the priorities a care coordinator would establish when discussing the plan with a patient and family members.

        · Include evidence to support your ideas

        · Use the literature on evaluation as a guide to compare learning session content with best practices, including how to align teaching sessions to Healthy People 2030.

        · Clearly explain the need for the changes to the plan.

        The requirements, outlined above correspond to the grading criteria in the Final Care Coordination Strategy scoring guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

        Format and Length

        · Write a 5–7 page APA-formatted scholarly paper (excluding title page and reference list).

        · Include five evidence-based resources.

        · Properly cite evidence throughout your paper.

        Good luck with your care coordination plan!

        Practicum Hours Submission

        · Use  Capella Academic Portal  to submit your practicum hours.

        · You must  complete any remaining practicum hours, for a total of 40 hours, approved by your preceptor. Submit practicum hour documentation to Capella Academic Portal.

        · Failure to complete the required practicum hours will result in a  non-performance for this assessment.

        Please review the  BSN Practicum  Campus page for more information and instructions on how to log your hours.

        Nursing Reflection Journal: Four Spheres of Care

        Reflective Journaling

        Reflective journaling serves as a powerful tool for self-reflection during your academic journey. Reflective journaling enables you to assess your performance and to develop the regular practice of self-reflection. During your practicum, you’ll complete  four reflective journal entries, each aligned with one of the four spheres of care.

        For your first entry, you can choose any of the four spheres, but you will need to complete all four by the end of the course. Remember that you’ll need to submit your completed nursing reflection as part of the final assessment for the course.

        Instructions

        Complete your first entry in 100–400 words in the  Nursing Reflection Journal: Four Spheres of Care  activity. You do not need to include scholarly resources or a reference list. Your reflections should be your own original thoughts. Please do not include patient or clinic identifying information.

        As you complete your practicum hours (total of 40 hours required), it is good practice to complete a reflection journal entry every 10 hours. Take a moment to review the four spheres of care and the assigned readings for each assessment. This can help you focus your practicum time on specifics of learning and experiencing the courseroom content.

        AACN Definition of the Four Spheres of Care

        Wellness and disease prevention: This sphere emphasizes health promotion, as well as the treatment of minor uncomplicated diseases or injuries for those not experiencing chronic illness or life-limiting conditions. Prenatal care, screenings, immunizations, and health promotion are some examples of care in this sphere (AACN, 2021). Nursing knowledge and competency in disease prevention and addressing social determinants of health are vital to promoting wellness across populations.

        Chronic disease management: This sphere encompasses caring for those with one or more chronic diseases and preventing adverse outcomes associated with them. Specialized nursing care is often needed for this population due to the complex needs, along with integrated interprofessional team-based care. Four in 10 Americans have two or more chronic diseases, and those diagnosed with multiple comorbidities are projected to increase.

        Regenerative and restorative care: This sphere includes critical and trauma care, complex acute care, acute exacerbations of chronic disease, and care of unstable patients who are typically in acute care hospital settings (AACN, 2021). This sphere includes the acute management of illness, such as a stroke or mental health crisis, and progression through the rehabilitative phase. Nursing skills and management of these populations are resource-intensive and specialized.

        Hospice and palliative care: The final sphere relates to competencies surrounding palliative care in advanced illness and hospice care at the end of life. All registered nurses provide generalist palliative care in compassionate and patient-centered care while managing pain and other symptoms associated with advanced, progressive illness. The End-of-Life Nursing Education Consortium has mapped its Competencies and Recommendations for Educating Nursing Students competencies to the new AACN Essentials to assist educators in this endeavor.

        Reflection Questions

        By the end of your practicum, make sure that you have answered each of these questions.

        · Wellness and disease prevention: Reflect on the health promotion disease prevention interventions you witnessed in your practicum site, as it relates to the social determinants of health most prevalent in your community. What did you see? What does this time mean to you as a professional nurse in your role? 

        · Chronic disease management: Reflect on the integration of interprofessional team-based care as it relates to chronic disease management in your practicum site. What did you see? What does this time mean to you as a professional nurse in your role?

        · Regenerative and restorative care: Reflect on the acute management of illnesses such as stroke, mental illness, and falls in your practicum site. What did you see? What does this time mean to you as a professional nurse in your role?

        · Hospice and palliative care: Reflect on end-of-life nursing and advanced illness and hospice care in your practicum site. What did you see? What does this time mean to you as a professional nurse in your role?

        Reference

        American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2021).  The essentials: Core competencies for professional nursing education. https://www.aacnnursing.org/Portals/0/PDFs/Essentials/Essentials-Executive-Summary.pdf

        Completion Checklist

        ·

        Competencies Measured

        By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

        · Competency 1: Create a patient centered strategy to achieve desired health outcomes.

        · Design patient-centered health interventions and timelines for a selected healthcare problem.

        · Describe priorities that a care coordinator would establish when discussing the plan with a patient and family members.

        · Competency 2: Apply the code of ethics for nursing to care coordination decisions.

        · Consider the ethical decisions in designing patient-centered health interventions for a selected healthcare problem, supporting ideas with the literature.

        · Competency 3: Explain how health care policies affect the coordination of patient centered care.

        · Identify relevant health policy implications for the coordination and continuum of care.

        · Use the literature on evaluation as a guide to compare learning session content with best practices, including how to align teaching sessions to Healthy People 2030.

        · Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead patient-centered care.

        · Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

        · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

        · Complete any remaining practicum hours, for a total of 40 hours, approved by your preceptor. Submit practicum hour documentation to Capella Academic Portal.

        Scoring Guide

        Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

         

        Expand All

        Criterion 1

        Design patient-centered health interventions and timelines for a selected healthcare problem.

        Distinguished

        Designs patient-centered health interventions and timelines for a selected healthcare problem that includes community resources.

        Proficient

        Designs patient-centered health interventions and timelines for a selected healthcare problem.

        Basic

        Designs patient-centered health intervention for a selected healthcare problem.

        Non Performance

        Does not design patient-centered health interventions and timelines for a selected healthcare problem.

        Criterion 2

        Consider the ethical decisions in designing patient-centered health interventions for a selected healthcare problem, supporting ideas with the literature.

        Distinguished

        Considers the ethical decisions in designing patient-centered health interventions for a selected healthcare problem, including ethical questions that generate uncertainty about the decisions made. Ideas are supported by the literature.

        Proficient

        Considers the ethical decisions in designing patient-centered health interventions for a selected healthcare problem, supporting ideas with the literature.

        Basic

        Considers ethical decisions.

        Non Performance

        Does not consider the ethical decisions in designing patient-centered health interventions for a selected healthcare problem or support ideas with the literature.

        Criterion 3

        Identify relevant health policy implications for the coordination and continuum of care.

        Distinguished

        Identifies relevant health policy implications for the coordination and continuum of care, based on accurate interpretations of policy provisions and supporting evidence. 

        Proficient

        Identifies relevant health policy implications for the coordination and continuum of care.

        Basic

        Identifies health policy implications that are inconsistent with the goals and objectives for the coordination and continuum of care.

        Non Performance

        Does not identify relevant health policy implications for the coordination and continuum of care.

        Criterion 4

        Describe priorities that a care coordinator would establish when discussing the plan with a patient and family members.

        Distinguished

        Describes priorities that a care coordinator would establish when discussing the plan with a patient and family members, including evidence to support ideas.

        Proficient

        Describes priorities that a care coordinator would establish when discussing the plan with a patient and family members.

        Basic

        Identifies priorities that a care coordinator would establish when discussing the plan with a patient and family members.

        Non Performance

        Does not describe priorities that a care coordinator would establish when discussing the plan with a patient and family members.

        Criterion 5

        Use the literature on evaluation as a guide to compare learning session content with best practices, including how to align teaching sessions to Healthy People 2030.

        Distinguished

        Uses the literature on evaluation as a guide to compare learning session content with best practices, including how to align teaching sessions to Healthy People 2030. Explains the need for changes to the plan.

        Proficient

        Uses the literature on evaluation as a guide to compare learning session content with best practices, including how to align teaching sessions to Healthy People 2030.

        Basic

        Discusses evaluation but does not use the literature as a guide to compare learning session content with best practices, or does not include how to align teaching sessions to Healthy People 2030.

        Non Performance

        Does not use the literature on evaluation as a guide to compare learning session content with best practices, and does not include how to align teaching sessions to Healthy People 2030.

        Criterion 6

        Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

        Distinguished

        Exhibits strict and flawless adherence to APA formatting of headings, in-text citations, and references. Correctly uses quotes and paraphrasing.

        Proficient

        Applies APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

        Basic

        Applies APA formatting to in-text citations, headings and references incorrectly and/or inconsistently, detracting noticeably from the content. Inconsistently uses headings, quotes, and/or paraphrasing.

        Non Performance

        Does not apply APA formatting to headings, in-text citations, and references. Does not use quotes or paraphrase correctly.

        Criterion 7

        Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

        Distinguished

        Organizes content with a clear purpose. Content flows logically with smooth transitions using coherent paragraphs, correct grammar/punctuation, word choice, and free of spelling errors.

        Proficient

        Organizes content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

        Basic

        Organizes content with some logical flow and smooth transitions. Contains errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

        Non Performance

        Does not organize content for ideas. Lacks logical flow and smooth transitions.

        Criterion 8

        Complete any remaining practicum hours, for a total of 40 hours, approved by your preceptor. Submit practicum hour documentation to Capella Academic Portal.

        Distinguished

        Completes any remaining practicum hours, for a total of 40 hours, along with a detailed description of activities, approved by your preceptor to Capella Academic Portal.

        Proficient

        Completes any remaining practicum hours, for a total of 40 hours, approved by your preceptor. Submits practicum hour documentation to Capella Academic Portal.

        Basic

        Completes any remaining practicum hours, for a total of 40 hours, approved by your preceptor. Documents activities in Capella Academic Portal, but not detailed.

        Non Performance

        Total hours submitted does not equal 40 hours. Does not submit practicum hour documentation to Capella Academic Portal.

        Platinum Essays