Identify a proposed state and federal policy that aligns with your advocacy priorities for your vulnerable population. Clearly describe and provide evidence to support this policy. If the policy needs to change, describe and provide evidence to support the proposed change.
A variety of models for making decisions are available. Three of these models are paternalistic, informative, and shared decision making.
Submission Instructions:
This assignment is an analysis of the principles of practice management including conceptional and practical strategies for balancing productivity with quality of care. You will develop a concept map to illustrate the relationship between practice management, productivity, and the quality of care. The concept map will show key ideas and provide your audience with an easy-to-read visual summary.
Instructions:
C3: Summative Assessment Rubric
Criteria Ratings
Writing Mechanics
Sources
APA formatting
MASTERY Only minimal spelling, grammar, and/or punctation errors present (1-2 errors). The overall sentence structure is well developed throughout, and paragraphs are fully developed with consistent style and clear communication.
PROFICIENT Minor spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors present, and/or sentence structure lacks minor elements of professional writing, and/or paragraphs are consistently developed. (3-4 errors)
DEVELOPING Minimal spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors present, and/or sentence structure lacks elements of professional writing, and/or paragraphs are not consistently developed. (5-7 errors)
EMERGING Multiple spelling grammar and/or punctuation errors present and/or sentence structure does not meet professional writing standards, and/or paragraphs are minimally developed. (more than 7-9 errors)
NOT EVIDENT Significant spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors present, and/or sentence structure does not meet professional writing standards, and/or paragraphs are poorly developed. (10 or more errors
MASTERY The use of sources was consistent throughout the document in all areas to support claims and/or statements in the artifact.
PROFICIENT In most areas, sources were consistently used throughout the submission to support claims and/or statements in the artifact.
DEVELOPING Sources were occasionally used to support some claims and/or statements in the artifact, but statements were not consistently supported with sources throughout.
EMERGING Minimal usage of sources present in the artifact, and/or the overall communication lacked appropriate research support.
NOT EVIDENT Sources were not used to support major statements and/or claims, where needed in the artifact
MASTERY Citations, references, and formatting follow APA style guide, with only one or two minor errors.
PROFICIENT Citations, references, and formatting follow APA style guide, with more than 2 errors, but they are minor.
DEVELOPING APA style is demonstrated with some consistency, but the majority of the citation, references, and/or formatting is not correct.
EMERGING Formatting, citations, and/or references, are attempted, but do not follow APA style guidelines consistently.
NOT EVIDENT Formatting, citations, and references are not included, or do not follow appropriate APA style guide.
Criteria Ratings
Use each of these as a separate concept at the top of your map: practice management, productivity, quality of care.
For each of the three concepts, provide 3 supporting ideas or characteristics. Using arrows or other methods, show how the concepts are related.
The concept map should be easy-to-read, attractive to the eye, and logical
MASTERY Identified the three key concepts at the top of the map. Clearly presented.
PROFICIENT Included three key concepts but not at the top of the map.
DEVELOPING Included 2 key concepts at the top of the map.
EMERGING Included 1 key concept at the top of the map.
NOT EVIDENT Did not include any key concepts at the top of the map.
MASTERY Provided more than 3 or more appropriate supporting details. Used appropriate arrows or other method to show relationships.
PROFICIENT Provided 3 appropriate supporting details. Used appropriate arrows or other method to show relationships.
DEVELOPING Provided 2 appropriate supporting details for each. Arrows or other indicators did not show relationship clearly.
EMERGING Provided 1 appropriate supporting details for each. Arrows or other indicators did not clearly show relationship.
NOT EVIDENT Did not provide supporting details for the 3 main concepts. Arrows or other methods not used to show relationships.
MASTERY Concept map is very easy to read, very attractive to the eye, and is logical.
PROFICIENT Concept map is easy to read, attractive, and mostly logical.
DEVELOPING Concept map is somewhat easy to read, somewhat attractive, and somewhat logical.
EMERGING Concept map is difficult to read, and/or not visually attractive, and/or lacks logic.
NOT EVIDENT Concept map not easy-to- read.
This assessment aims to help with reflection on implicit biases to foster cultural awareness and sensitivity in healthcare. Understanding these biases is crucial for providing equitable, patient-centered care.
Instructions:
Criteria Ratings
Scholarly Writing
Affirmed Writing is formal in language, avoiding colloquialisms, slang, and overly informal expressions.
Not Affirmed Writing includes colloquialisms, slang, and overly informal expressions.
Writing Mechanics
Affirmed Minor spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors present, and/or sentence structure lacks minor elements of professional writing, and/or paragraphs are consistently developed. (1-2 errors)
Not Affirmed Multiple spelling grammar and/or punctuation errors present and/or sentence structure does not meet professional writing standards, and/or paragraphs are minimally developed. (more than 2 errors)
Clarity of Content
Affirmed
Writing demonstrates a strong connection between ideas, ensuring that the reader can follow the logical progression of the arguments.
Not Affirmed
Writing lacks a connection between ideas, and there is no logical progression of the arguments.
All Aspects Addressed
Affirmed Writing addresses multiple relevant aspects of the topic with sufficient detail and analysis, providing a thorough understanding.
Not Affirmed Writing fails to address relevant aspects of the topic with insufficient detail or analysis.
APA Sources (when appropriate)
Affirmed
Citations and references follow the APA style guide, with less than 2 errors.
Not Affirmed
Citations and references are not included when appropriate or do not follow the appropriate APA style guide. There are more than 2 errors.
Review peer presentations.
For this 1-2 page assignment, you are going to watch the video of a speech and write a peer review as if the speaker would get the feedback from you in written form.
In the review please address the following aspects of the speech, giving clear examples from the speech and then critique the student’s performance.
