+1 (951) 902-6107 info@platinumressays.com

Contextual Factors Digital Flyer: create a 2-page digital flyer to share with teachers in Grades K-8 that provides specific strategies to create instruction for students with diverse cultures and developmental abilities.

 Contextual factors are influences that exist beyond the individual but can affect how students learn in both positive and negative ways. These factors can include social interactions, language, culture, technology, and socioeconomic status. Contextual factors play an integral role in the learning process. Teachers who recognize these factors equip themselves to meet the learning needs of diverse student populations. Additionally, by modifying instruction or procedures to address all of the students’ contextual factors, they will have an increased likelihood of academic success. Collaboration with colleagues to examine best practices for addressing individual student needs is an integral step in promoting positive learning outcomes. 

 Imagine you are a teacher and your administrator has asked you to share strategies with other staff members on how to respond to contextual factors in the classroom. Using a digital platform of your choice (e.g., Canva, Word, Genially, or Visme), create a 2-page digital flyer to share with teachers in Grades K-8 that provides specific strategies to create instruction for students with diverse cultures and developmental abilities. The digital flyer should include the following:

  • An explanation or example of how the socioeconomic status, language, and culture of diverse students can affect development and readiness for learning.
  • At least two strategies to create appropriate and culturally responsive instruction and classroom environments for students with diverse cultures.
  • Minimum of two strategies to create appropriate and culturally responsive instruction and classroom environments for students with diverse linguistic needs.
  • At least two strategies to create appropriate instruction and classroom environments for a classroom of students with diverse socioeconomic statuses.
  • More than two strategies to address the diverse social needs of students in the classroom.
  • At least two strategies for utilizing technology in the classroom to promote student engagement, motivation, and success. Include how each strategy may need to be adapted for diverse student needs (cultural, linguistic, socioeconomic, or social).

The digital flyer should include graphics that are relevant to the content, visually appealing, and use space appropriately. Support your digital flyer with 2-3 scholarly resources. Submit a link to or PDF of your digital flyer and your scholarly resources as a single document. Ensure that others can access and view the link prior to submitting.  While APA Style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.  

Contextual Factors Digital Flyer – Rubric

Effects of Contextual Factors 15 points

Criteria Description

5. Target 15 points

An explanation or example of how the socioeconomic status, language, and culture

of diverse students can affect development and readiness for learning is thought-

provoking and thorough.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

An explanation or example of how the socioeconomic status, language, and culture

of diverse students can affect development and readiness for learning is direct and

logical.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

An explanation or example of how the socioeconomic status, language, and culture

of diverse students can affect development and readiness for learning is brief or

somewhat connected.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

An explanation or example of how the socioeconomic status, language, and culture

of diverse students can affect development and readiness for learning is unclear or

undeveloped.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

An explanation or example of how the socioeconomic status, language, and culture

of diverse students can affect development and readiness for learning is incomplete

or omitted.

Collapse All

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Strategies to Support Diverse Cultures 15 points

Criteria Description

5. Target 15 points

The strategies to demonstrate appropriate and culturally responsive instruction and

classroom environments for students with diverse cultures are insightful and

original.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

The strategies to demonstrate appropriate and culturally responsive instruction and

classroom environments for students with diverse cultures are descriptive and

credible.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

The strategies to demonstrate appropriate and culturally responsive instruction and

classroom environments for students with diverse cultures are basic or overly

simplistic.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

The strategies to demonstrate appropriate and culturally responsive instruction and

classroom environments for students with diverse cultures are illogical or unclear.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The strategies to demonstrate appropriate and culturally responsive instruction and

classroom environments for students with diverse cultures are unrelated or not

addressed.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Strategies to Support Diverse Linguistic Needs 15 points

Criteria Description

5. Target 15 points

At least two strategies to create appropriate and culturally responsive instruction

and classroom environments for students with diverse linguistic needs are

insightful and original.

4. Acceptable 12.75 points

At least two strategies to create appropriate and culturally responsive instruction

and classroom environments for students with diverse linguistic needs are

descriptive and credible.

3. Approaching 11.25 points

At least two strategies to create appropriate and culturally responsive instruction

and classroom environments for students with diverse linguistic needs are basic or

overly simplistic.

2. Insufficient 9.75 points

At least two strategies to create appropriate and culturally responsive instruction

and classroom environments for students with diverse linguistic needs are illogical

or unclear.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

At least two strategies to create appropriate and culturally responsive instruction

and classroom environments for students with diverse linguistic needs are

unrelated or not addressed.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Ensuring Quality Care is Delivered-MODULE 2 DNP845

  

Ensuring Quality Care is Delivered

Based on what you have learned so far in this course, create a 20-slide PowerPoint presentation. 

Be thorough and include rationale and references for your recommendations.  

7/21/25, 12:47 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate PowerPoint Assignment Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

7/21/25, 12:47 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate PowerPoint Assignment Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

7/21/25, 12:47 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate PowerPoint Assignment Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

Graduate PowerPoint Assignment Rubric v1

Course: DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings

Criteria

Does Not Meet 0%

Approaches 70%

Meets 80%

Exceeds 100%

Criterion Score

Content/Quality

of Information

Weight: 40%

/ 40

0

points

Topic is

inappropriate to

assignment, not

based on scholarly

information (if

required), unclear

and difficult to

understand, no

hyperlinks to

credible sites; did

not include required

assignment

components; slide

notes missing (if

required).

28

points

Topic is mostly

covered and

appropriate to

assignment, but not

based on scholarly

information (if

required); mostly

clear and

understandable;

may contain

hyperlinks to non-

credible sites; some

of required

assignment

components are

present; minimal

use of slide notes (if

required).

32

points

Good coverage of

topic and

appropriate to

assignment; sound,

research-based (if

required)

information; clear

and understandable;

hyperlinks to

credible sites; all

required assignment

components are

accurate and

present; slide notes

used appropriately

if required

(

).

40

points

In-depth coverage

of topic and

assignment

components;

outstanding clarity

of information;

detailed slide notes

ensure all required

content is well

explained (if

required).

Presentation

Weight: 20%

0 points

Unattractive; difficult to interpret; poor color choice and slide contrast; slide presentation unorganized; slide effects detract from the content; missing slide headings or sub-headings (if required for organization purposes); missing title/reference slides.

14 points

Attractive but somewhat difficult to interpret; somewhat pleasing contrast between text and background, slide presentation may be somewhat

disorganized; transitions and slide effects detract from the content; may be missing title or reference slides; included slide headings/subheadings may detract from presentation.

16 points

Attractive; easy to interpret, pleasing colors with strong contrast between text and background, slide presentation organized, good use of transitions and slide effects which enhance the presentation; both title and reference slides are present. Slide headings/subheadings are used appropriately to organize the presentation.

20 points

Excellent use of transitions and effects that enhance the presentation. Presentation is organized and designed for maximum impact of content.

/ 20

Use of

Multimedia,

Graphics,

Diagrams, and/or

Illustrations

Weight: 30%

0 points

Does not include required multimedia, graphics, diagrams, and/or illustrations or they are irrelevant to topic or detract from slide content or presentation as a whole.

21 points

Required multimedia, graphics, diagrams, and/or illustrations are generally relevant but some may not appropriately support the slide content.

24 points

Required multimedia, graphics, diagrams, and/or illustrations are highly relevant and acceptably support the slide content; sized and positioned appropriately.

30 points

Required multimedia, graphics, diagrams, and/or illustrations add clarity and sophistication to the presentation content; they improve the effectiveness of the presentation.

/ 30

Total

/ 100

Writing,

Mechanics, and

APA Weight: 10%

/ 10

0

points

Style is

inappropriate or

does not address

given audience,

purpose, etc.

Inconsistent

grammar, spelling,

and punctuation;

APA format and

style are not

evident throughout

the presentation.

7

points

Style is somewhat

appropriate to given

audience and

purpose. Repetitive

mechanical errors

distract the reader.

Inconsistencies in

language, sentence

structure, and/or

word choice are

present. There are

missing APA

elements or some

are incorrectly

formatted

throughout the

presentation.

points

8

Style is appropriate

to the given

audience and

purpose. Word

choice is specific

and purposeful, and

somewhat varied

throughout.

Minimal mechanical

or typographical

errors are present,

but are not overly

distracting.

Reference slide and

in-text citations

have few formatting

errors.

points

10

Style shows

originality and

creativity. Word

choice is dynamic

and varied. Free of

mechanical and

typographical

errors. Reference

slide and other in-

text citations are

formatted correctly

using APA elements.

7/21/25, 12:47 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate PowerPoint Assignment Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

7/21/25, 12:47 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate PowerPoint Assignment Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

Criteria

Does Not Meet 0%

Approaches 70%

Meets 80%

Exceeds 100%

Criterion Score

7/21/25, 12:47 PM Preview Rubric: Graduate PowerPoint Assignment Rubric v1 – DNP845 Sect1 Theoretical and Scientific Underpinnings – Aspen University Classroom

Criteria

Does Not Meet 0%

Approaches 70%

Meets 80%

Exceeds 100%

Criterion Score

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956649/View 1/5

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956649/View 1/5

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956649/View 1/5

Overall Score

Level 1

0

points minimum

Level 2

70

points minimum

Level 3

80

points minimum

Level 4

100

points minimum

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956649/View 1/5

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956649/View 1/5

https://classroom.aspen.edu/d2l/le/content/113330/viewContent/5956649/View 1/5

,

Ensuring Quality Care is Delivered

Based on what you have learned so far in this course, create a 20-slide PowerPoint presentation.

Be thorough and include rationale and references for your recommendations.

Be sure to completely answer all the points below.

Use clear headings that allow your professor to know which bullet you are addressing on the slides in your presentation.

Support your content with at least four (4) sources throughout your presentation.

Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the presentation.

Include a slide for your references at the end.

Follow best practices for PowerPoint presentations related to text size, color, images, effects, wordiness, and multimedia enhancements. Include detailed speaker notes for each slide. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.

 

Performing in the role of a DNP, you determine a need for a practice change to improve the quality of care and outcomes. You are to prepare a presentation for the staff. The presentation should be based on research and evidence from the literature to justify the implementation.

 

· Identify the problem and background and need for quality improvement.

· Describe the theoretical or conceptual framework that will support your recommendation for the practice change. 

· Address a plan to measure and evaluate outcomes; include the implications and significance for nursing practice.

Include slides as follows:

· Introduction (1 slide)

· Identify the problem (1 slide)

· Background (2 slides)

· Quality improvement needs (2 slides)

· Theoretical or conceptual frameworks description (3 slides)

· Recommendations for practice change based on theoretical or conceptual frameworks (4 slides)

· Plan to measure and evaluate outcomes (4 slides)

· Implications and significance for nursing practice (4 slides)

· References (1 slide)

 

You might find the C-T-E model (included in Butts & Rich, fig. 5-2) to be useful.

Be clear and convincing, remember that you are attempting to change practice behaviors that should be maintained and sustained as part of the healthcare delivery at your organization.

1. Study the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommended resources. Some answers may require you to do additional research on the Internet or in other reference sources. Choose your sources carefully.

2. Consider the discussion and any insights you gained from it.

3. Review the rubric and the specifications below to ensure that your response aligns with all assignment expectations.

· Length: 20-slide PowerPoint presentation; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner.

· Structure: APA style, including an introduction, rationale, conclusion, references, and detailed speaker notes for each slide.

· References: Use the APA style citations and references for all resources used to support the content. Include at least four (4) scholarly sources to support your claims.

· Format: Save your assignment as a PowerPoint document (.pptx)

Required test books.

Masters, K. (2023).Role development in professional nursing practice (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN: 9781284233421. Look over chapters 1, 2, 3

Butts, J.B. & Rich, K.L. (2022). Philosophies and theories for advanced nursing practice (4th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN:9781284228823. Look over chapters 1, 2, & 3.

APA FORMAT, AND REFERENCES, peer-reviewed scholarly resources cited in APA format from 2020-2025 only. (Within the last five years)

Please do not solely use a website as your scholarly reference. It is fine to use it as a supplement, but all journal articles or text should be referenced.

Please use North American peer-reviewed journals ONLY.DO NOT use any European Journal..

Theory for doctoral Nursing Practice: evaluate your ability to critically assess a nursing theory or framework, identify areas for improvement in conceptual clarity, and propose revisions to enhance its applicability in modern clinical practice

 

This formative assessment aims to evaluate your ability to critically assess a nursing theory or framework, identify areas for improvement in conceptual clarity, and propose revisions to enhance its applicability in modern clinical practice. 

Instructions: 

  1. Select a Nursing Theory or Framework:
    • Choose a nursing theory or conceptual framework that you believe could benefit from improved conceptual clarity. This could be a well-known theory such as Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Theory, Peplau’s Interpersonal Relations Theory, or Roy’s Adaptation Model, or a lesser-known framework.
  2. Evaluate the Theory’s Conceptual Clarity:
    • Briefly describe the theory and its key concepts. Evaluate the clarity and coherence of these concepts. Consider the following: 
      • Are the concepts clearly defined? 
      • Do the concepts relate to one another logically? 
      • Are the definitions of these concepts relevant to contemporary clinical practice? 
      • Are there any gaps, ambiguities, or vague terms that may hinder practical application?
  3. Propose Revisions to Improve Conceptual Clarity:
    • Suggest specific changes to the theory’s concepts or relationships between concepts that would enhance its clarity and improve its application in today’s healthcare environment. These revisions should address current challenges in nursing practice, such as technological advancements, interdisciplinary collaboration, patient-centered care, or evolving healthcare systems.
  4. Discuss the Potential Impact of Your Revisions:
    • Explain how the proposed revisions would make the theory more relevant and practical for guiding clinical decision-making and improving patient outcomes in today’s healthcare setting. Consider how your revisions could support evidence-based practice, foster patient engagement, or enhance nursing interventions. 

Document Type/Template

  • Word Document 

Criteria Ratings

Scholarly Writing

Affirmed Writing is formal in language, avoiding colloquialisms, slang, and overly informal expressions.

Not Affirmed Writing includes colloquialisms, slang, and overly informal expressions.

Writing Mechanics

Affirmed Minor spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors present, and/or sentence structure lacks minor elements of professional writing, and/or paragraphs are consistently developed. (1-2 errors)

Not Affirmed Multiple spelling grammar and/or punctuation errors present and/or sentence structure does not meet professional writing standards, and/or paragraphs are minimally developed. (more than 2 errors)

Clarity of Content

Affirmed

Writing demonstrates a strong connection between ideas, ensuring that the reader can follow the logical progression of the arguments.

Not Affirmed

Writing lacks a connection between ideas, and there is no logical progression of the arguments.

All Aspects Addressed

Affirmed Writing addresses multiple relevant aspects of the topic with sufficient detail and analysis, providing a thorough understanding.

Not Affirmed Writing fails to address relevant aspects of the topic with insufficient detail or analysis.

APA Sources (when appropriate)

Affirmed

Citations and references follow the APA style guide, with less than 2 errors.

Not Affirmed

Citations and references are not included when appropriate or do not follow the appropriate APA style guide. There are more than 2 errors.

Nursing Dnp Essentials: Develop a nursing policy based on a specific patient safety initiative

 

Develop a nursing policy based on a specific patient safety initiative. Include the following:

  • The specific patient safety initiative
  • Purpose of the policy
  • Policy objective – include desired metrics or outcomes
  • Identify roles that will be impacted by the policy
  • Policy statement
  • Policy details – thoroughly describe
  • How often will the policy be revised?
  • Who is responsible for oversight and monitoring? What will be measured to determine effectiveness of the policy?
  • References to support the policy

Document Type/Template

  • Word Document 

Criteria Ratings

Scholarly Writing

Affirmed Writing is formal in language, avoiding colloquialisms, slang, and overly informal expressions.

Not Affirmed Writing includes colloquialisms, slang, and overly informal expressions.

Writing Mechanics

Affirmed Minor spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors present, and/or sentence structure lacks minor elements of professional writing, and/or paragraphs are consistently developed. (1-2 errors)

Not Affirmed Multiple spelling grammar and/or punctuation errors present and/or sentence structure does not meet professional writing standards, and/or paragraphs are minimally developed. (more than 2 errors)

Clarity of Content

Affirmed

Writing demonstrates a strong connection between ideas, ensuring that the reader can follow the logical progression of the arguments.

Not Affirmed

Writing lacks a connection between ideas, and there is no logical progression of the arguments.

All Aspects Addressed

Affirmed Writing addresses multiple relevant aspects of the topic with sufficient detail and analysis, providing a thorough understanding.

Not Affirmed Writing fails to address relevant aspects of the topic with insufficient detail or analysis.

APA Sources (when appropriate)

Affirmed

Citations and references follow the APA style guide, with less than 2 errors.

Not Affirmed

Citations and references are not included when appropriate or do not follow the appropriate APA style guide. There are more than 2 errors.

n Perspectives in Education

Spring 2008

Jesus Christ embodied this Jewish prophecy. For today’s classroom

once learners have

opportunities to engage and explore a topic

Jesus and Higher Order Thinking

  

· At least 750 words 

· Must support their assertions with broad references to the class sources in APA format.

· Draw from the sources broadly and cite per APA.

· The narrative should include numerous references to the class content.

EDCO 725

Discussion Assignment Instructions

Post one thread of at least 750 words

Discussion Thread: Jesus and Higher Order Thinking

Overview

It is instructive to consult the Master Teacher when we are considering “teaching and learning.”

To be sure, Jesus in His humanity did not know about Bloom’s Taxonomy nor the upgrade by Anderson and  Krathwohl, so He did not think about getting his audience to  evaluate, or  analyze, or  apply following the terms we use. Nor did he use active learning strategies—no think/pair/share in the Sermon on the Mount.

However, if you look carefully at what Jesus did, you see that he often  challenged thinking including challenging presuppositions, and correcting the illogic of the Pharisees. So, while he imparted a lot of information, he also used phrases like “You have heard. . . but I tell you this.” His audience had to consider that the Old Testament laws on divorce really did not get to the heart of the matter.  Jesus offered that correction in his challenge to think about God’s original intent for a husband and wife to stay together as “one flesh” and that only men and women’s  hardness of heart led to God’s concession in allowing divorce. The same challenge of thinking applied to misconceptions about hatred (tantamount to “murder”), and many other legalistic presuppositions. His use of parables also challenged thinking and was actually a learning technique that led to personal application.

Instructions

For this discussion board assignment, we want to explore Jesus’ teaching through the lens of the teaching taxonomies we have explored this term (Bloom and Anderson and Krathwohl’s revision of Bloom).

1. Review Jesus’ major teaching discourses, such as the Sermon on the Mount

2. Review Jesus’ use of parables and story telling

3. Look at Jesus’ engagement with the Pharisees and those who opposed him

4. Contrast that with Jesus’ engagement with those who sought him

All the Gospels contain great demonstrations of Jesus’ teaching, but you could review in particular Jesus’ teaching in the book of John.

Your task in this discussion thread is to identify how Jesus demonstrated HOTS in his teaching. Pick out several examples from Jesus teaching that illustrate at least  two of the higher levels of thought from Bloom/Anderson and Krathwohl. Explain the link and suggest why those examples showed how Jesus challenged thinking.

Then think of the active learning strategies we have reviewed this term—case analysis, examination of viewpoints, Devil’s advocate, scenario analysis, discussion, think/pair/share, etc. While you will not find examples of many of the active learning strategies mentioned in our texts, can you identify some elements of  active learning in Jesus’ teaching?

Response

The student must then post at least 1 reply of at least 400 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of the assigned Module: Week. Additional length beyond the suggestion may be necessary in order to display complete thoughts and critique commensurate with insight and depth at this level of study.

· At least 750 words

· Must support their assertions with broad references to the class sources in APA format.

· Draw from the sources broadly and cite per APA.

· The narrative should include numerous references to the class content.

,

https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/816250/pages/watch-jesus-a-master-critical-thinker?module_item_id=88097645

,

Christian Perspectives in Education Christian Perspectives in Education Send out your light and your truth! Let them guide me. Psalm 43:3 Send out your light and your truth! Let them guide me. Psalm 43:3

Volume 1 Issue 2 Spring 2008 Article 5

May 2008

The Greatest Constructivist Educator Ever: The Pedagogy of The Greatest Constructivist Educator Ever: The Pedagogy of

Jesus Christ in the Gospel of Matthew in the Context of the 5Es Jesus Christ in the Gospel of Matthew in the Context of the 5Es

William H. Robertson The University of Texas at El Paso, [email protected]

Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cpe

Part of the Christianity Commons

Recommended Citation Recommended Citation Robertson, William H. (2008) "The Greatest Constructivist Educator Ever: The Pedagogy of Jesus Christ in the Gospel of Matthew in the Context of the 5Es," Christian Perspectives in Education, 1(2). Available at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cpe/vol1/iss2/5

This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Education at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Christian Perspectives in Education by an authorized editor of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected].

Greatest Constructivist Educator 1

Christian Perspectives in Education, Vol. 1, No. 2, Spring 2008

Jesus as a Constructivist Educator

The teaching methods utilized by Jesus Christ as recorded in the New Testament Gospel

of Matthew demonstrated the use of a constructivist methodology as a pedagogical approach.

Jesus continually challenged his disciples and followers through the use of experiences, parables,

and questions in order to relate the context of His eternal message to their practical and daily

lives. In this way, He centered His instruction on developing conceptually correct understandings

that had to be discovered and personalized by the learner. For example, in the parable of the

Sower (Matt. 13:3-9), Jesus described four types of environments where seed could be planted in

order to grow into healthy crops. In only one of the four scenarios presented did the seed fall into

fertile ground and provide a crop worthy of harvest. In the agrarian society of Israel, many would

have had extensive previous knowledge and experience with growing crops from seeds and also

would have understood the inherent need for rich soil that was well tended in which to plant and

grow crops. For the learners, this parable metaphorically ties their previous learning and

experiences to the truths of God, ultimately connecting to the need for personal salvation. As

such, this process demonstrates a constructivist educator leading learners through a critical

thinking exercise within a problem-solving context. It is the assertion of this article that the

educational practices utilized by Jesus Christ embodied the foundations of constructivism. It is

the purpose of this essay to demonstrate how Jesus implemented constructivist methodologies

and sound pedagogical approaches in facilitating the learning process for His followers within

the Gospel of Matthew.

Definition of Constructivism

Constructivism is a learning strategy that builds upon students' existing knowledge,

beliefs, and skills (Brooks and Brooks, 1993). Within a constructivist approach, as students

1

Robertson: The Greatest Constructivist Educator Ever

Published by Scholars Crossing, 2008

Greatest Constructivist Educator 2

Christian Perspectives in Education, Vol. 1, No. 2, Spring 2008

encounter new information, they work to synthesize new understandings based on their current

experiences and their prior learning. In other words, the constructivist approach to learning states

that learners of all ages build new ideas on top of their personal conceptual understandings

(Eisenkraft, 2003). In this process, students and teachers experience common activities, while

applying and building on prior knowledge. Learners construct meaning while continually

assessing their understandings of concepts.

Constructivism can be characterized as a five-phased process known as the 5Es, in which

each phase begins with the letter E. The 5Es include the engagement phase, the exploration

phase, the explanation phase, the elaboration phase and the evaluation phase (Bybee, 2006).

Students and adults are enabled to construct a deeper and more comprehensive understanding

through activities that match their cognitive capabilities: "The important point is that each

(learner) has their own construction, their own understanding, rather than some common reality"

(Duffy and Jonassen, 1992, p. 6). The key is to build on previous learning and to apply new

learning in a meaningful context.

Attributes of a Constructivist Educator

In facilitating classroom learning, a constructivist teacher demonstrates a number of

pedagogical attributes that characterize his or her individual teaching approach. The

constructivist teacher sets up problems and monitors student exploration, guides student inquiry,

and promotes critical thinking. Constructivist teachers ask students to explore concepts with their

own data and to learn to direct their own explanations (Bybee, 2006). Ultimately, students begin

to think of learning as an accumulated and evolving body of knowledge that relates directly to

their own personal life and experiences.

2

Christian Perspectives in Education, Vol. 1, Iss. 2 [2008], Art. 5

https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cpe/vol1/iss2/5

Greatest Constructivist Educator 3

Christian Perspectives in Education, Vol. 1, No. 2, Spring 2008

In the constructivist classroom, the teacher utilizes questions in response to student ideas

in order to uncover their fundamental understandings of topics. This instructional strategy forms

the foundation for an inquiry-based classroom, one that is built on open-ended questions that

reflect the learner's reality (Hofstein and Yager, 1982). This approach provides the instructor

with a way to probe for deeper meanings, a fundamental goal in the teaching process. It is the

student’s inquisitive nature that needs to be activated and enhanced. Yet, without a process

model with which to show and lead the learner, this may not be achieved. In this way, learning is

not prescribed, but explored, and the learner has an active participation in the learning process.

Meanings are assigned by students when they learn something, and in order to be effective, "any

curriculum of a new education would have to be centered around question asking" (Postman and

Weingartner, 1969, p. 81). Students are meaning makers, and classroom facilitators have to

contribute to developing understanding in a conceptually correct manner for the learner.

Currently, an instructor who facilitates through questioning impacts learning best within a

structured discussion that raises basic issues, probes beneath surface meanings and pursues

problematic areas of thought (Paul and Binker, 1990). This technique aids students in

discovering their own thought structure and helps them develop clarity, accuracy, and relevance

in their thinking. Learners search for evidence and reason, recognize and reflect upon

assumptions, discover implications and consequences, and extrapolate from what is really known

versus merely believed (Roth, 1989). The learning emphasizes the need to question the answers,

not answer the questions. Teachers who effectively model questioning strategies in a

constructivist framework show that students’ ideas are respected and valued (Gould, 2000). The

teacher is not only a communicator, but a model. “To communicate knowledge and to provide a

model of competence, the teacher must be free to teach and to learn" (Bruner, 1960, p. 90).

3

Robertson: The Greatest Constructivist Educator Ever

Published by Scholars Crossing, 2008

Greatest Constructivist Educator 4

Christian Perspectives in Education, Vol. 1, No. 2, Spring 2008

The Engagement Phase

Constructivism usually begins with the engagement phase. An activity of engagement

should help the learner to make connections between past and present learning experiences. The

process of engagement should also help focus the students to become thoughtfully involved in

the concept, process, or skill to be learned. In other words, the student should relate to the

problem being posed and be invested in pursuing a solution.

Constructivism may be defined as an active process of learning in which learners

construct new ideas or concepts based upon their current and past knowledge (Bruner, 1960).

The learner encounters and processes information, formulates hypotheses, and makes decisions,

relying on a cognitive structure to do so. Cognitive structure (i.e., schema, mental models)

provides meaning and organization to experiences and allows the individual to move past

supplied information (Bruner, 1960). A successful pedagogical method, constructivism

stimulates enthusiasm in students and helps them deepen their understanding through experience.

It is the individual’s experience that ultimately provides the meaning of learning opportunities

(Brown, Collins and Duguid, 1989). In constructivist teaching, it is the engagement in activities

that uniquely shapes each person's gain in content understanding (von Glasersfeld, 1989).

In the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus employed a number of engagement strategies that

integrated the familiar settings and experiences of His audience into his teaching. For example,

Jesus presented the truths of heaven in a way that allowed the listeners to see themselves in the

fabric of His message. This became a key point for having them become engaged in the process

of personal salvation. He stated, “You are the light of the world, a city set on a hill cannot be

hidden nor do they light a lamp and put in under a basket, but on a lamp stand, so that it may

give light to all who see it. Let your light so shine before men that they see your good works and

4

Christian Perspectives in Education, Vol. 1, Iss. 2 [2008], Art. 5

https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cpe/vol1/iss2/5

Greatest Constructivist Educator 5

Christian Perspectives in Education, Vol. 1, No. 2, Spring 2008

glorify your Father in heaven” (Matt. 5:18-22). The central idea that each person can experience

spiritual salvation was built around topics that were familiar and real in the lives of the people in

the audience. This engagement process helped the learners to see themselves in the teaching of

Jesus, to become connected to His message and to the process to follow.

Fundamentally, constructivism centers on the idea that students learn by doing and that

learning is the responsibility of the learner (Dewey, 1902). The constructivist approach allows

students to have experiences in order that they may address misconceptions and develop proper

conceptual connections (Rutherford and Algren, 1990). It is important that the curriculum be

aligned with the learner and the learner’s experiences, so that it can be seen as evolving and ever

changing. In constructivist education, it is "the development of experience and into experience

that is really wanted" (Dewey, 1902, p. 24). Constructivism builds on prior knowledge and gives

students and instructors an opportunity to make sense of the world by engaging them in

exploratory investigations (Yager, 1991). The engagement phase should activate the critical

thinking processes by integrating authentic activities that involve real world topics (Duffy and

Jonassen, 1992). In the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus presented his teachings in the environment

of the people. In this setting, on the shores of the Sea of Galilee, the audience could see nearby

cities which sat on the hillside in full view of everyone, which could not be hidden from their

sight. The audience would also understand that a lamp gives light and that the light is useful to

guide someone through the dark.

The Exploration Phase

The exploration phase provides students with a common base of experiences. The

learners identify and develop concepts, processes, and skills based on an open-ended approach in

which students actively explore their environment or manipulate materials. These approaches

5

Robertson: The Greatest Constructivist Educator Ever

Published by Scholars Crossing, 2008

Greatest Constructivist Educator 6

Christian Perspectives in Education, Vol. 1, No. 2, Spring 2008

rely on establishing real world connections, using materials and manipulatives for hands-on

interactions and providing a common base of experiences from which to grow and learn. After

Christ had engaged His early followers, He identified twelve who would become his Apostles.

These men of Israel would walk with Him, learn from him and have opportunities to explore His

teachings. In facilitating these interactions, Jesus would often pose problems in the form of

parables to the Apostles that they would in turn explore in order to understand the truth within it.

In the classroom, constructivist curriculum must be designed so that it reflects real life

situations (Bentley, 1995). For example, in the parable of the wheat and tares, Jesus described a

situation in which a person sowing seeds in a field dispersed both seeds for wheat, which

contained fruit, and tares, which were empty and without fruit (Matt. 13:3). The Apostles

themselves would readily understand how vital it was to explore the fields of wheat in order to

distinguish the differences between the wheat and tares in a physical sense. Wheat with fruit was

vial as nourishment for life, while a tare without fruit was worthless and literally taking up space

needed for fruitful crops.

Hofstein and Yager promoted using social issues as an organizer for the curriculum, and

viewed this method of content organization as contextualizing the concepts taught in distinct and

unique disciplines of study. Researchers cross over the barriers between disciplines all the time,

and seldom operate solely on isolated areas of content, but integrate the use of language,

knowledge and process application. Research based programs give students the ability to retain

facts through critical thinking by working through problems logically and making connections to

the real world. Jerome Bruner further emphasizes this point by writing, "Students should know

what it feels like to be completely absorbed in a problem. They seldom experience this feeling in

school" (Bruner, 1960. p.50). In using the parable of the Sower, Jesus went further to describe

6

Christian Perspectives in Education, Vol. 1, Iss. 2 [2008], Art. 5

https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cpe/vol1/iss2/5

Greatest Constructivist Educator 7

Christian Perspectives in Education, Vol. 1, No. 2, Spring 2008

four results that could happen from this farmer sowing seeds in his field, and states, “Some fell

on rocky ground, where it had little soil. It sprang up at once because the soil was not deep, and

when the sun rose it was scorched, and it withered for lack of roots. Some seed fell among

thorns, and the thorns grew up and choked it. But some seed fell on rich soil, and produced fruit,

a hundred or sixty or thirty fold. Whoever has ears ought to hear." (Matt. 13:5-9) In this teaching

moment, Jesus highlighted the sowing of seeds in order to produce plants as an opportunity for

His followers to explore and search for understanding. In the use of such parables, Jesus

encouraged His students to seek answers to their own questions, a fundamental approach to

guiding students in the exploration phase.

Students exploring a concept should be given opportunities to work with materials and

manipulatives so that they can have experiences that are real and primary. Hands-on learning

plays a valuable role in the constructivist paradigm, as it is the process of experiencing learning

that is utilized in the exploration phase. So much fascinating content is at the fingertips of

learners everywhere, and with the increase in affordability of technology, more and more is

present in their homes. It is important to engage students in learning situations that effectively

integrate their own experiences and familiar materials that they can use to understand specific

concepts better. For example, students who enjoy skateboarding can be given opportunities to

explore the concepts of velocity, acceleration, center of gravity, and centrifugal and centripetal

forces. They may also use the skateboard and a local skatepark to investigate topics such as

inclined planes, levers, fulcrums, and screws. The purpose of this approach is to allow the

students to explore meaningful science topics set in the context of something they enjoy doing.

As students explore concepts, they develop a broader understanding of those concepts.

When they relate what they are learning, seeing or doing to others, they can begin to see

7

Robertson: The Greatest Constructivist Educator Ever

Published by Scholars Crossing, 2008

Greatest Constructivist Educator 8

Christian Perspectives in Education, Vol. 1, No. 2, Spring 2008

similarities in their understandings with others, as well as to self-identify misconceptions they

may have about content material. This is evident in the parables that Jesus uses in the Gospel of

Matthew, in which he uses situations and materials that were familiar and readily available to his

followers, such as mustard seeds and salt. Further, by framing his teaching in terms of parables

and questions, Jesus facilitated discussion between his followers as they explored for meaning

themselves. This sharing within cooperative groups is a fundamental strategy in constructivism

as it allows the teacher to facilitate the learning process, and also helps to develop a common

base of experiences on which to help make connections to content. Problem-solving strategies

depend on conceptual understandings, and hands-on exploration of simple topics combined with

collaborative interaction among students helps to build an understanding of processes and

concepts (Apple, 1993).

The Explanation Phase

The explanation phase helps students uncover the content surrounding the concepts they

have been exploring. Students should now have opportunities to verbalize their conceptual

understanding, to encounter new content material or to demonstrate new skills. This phase also

provides opportunities for teachers to introduce primary content materials such as formal terms,

definitions, and other content information. The implementation of this phase provides the learner

with opportunities to identify skills and behavior in order to both experience and discover

content that may be useful in context. For example, the Apostles were inherently familiar with

the law and scriptures of the Old Testament, and they were infused into the everyday life of the

Jews living in Israel. The Jews combed these scriptures in order to understand the characteristics

and circumstances that the Messiah, their new King of Israel, would bring to the Promised Land.

Although the Apostles clearly knew this by tradition, they did not completely understand how

8

Christian Perspectives in Education, Vol. 1, Iss. 2 [2008], Art. 5

https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cpe/vol1/iss2/5

Greatest Constructivist Educator 9

Christi

Learning to Use Your Sociological Imagination

We may assume that someone is homeless due to some personal failing, but instead, it could be the cause of larger societal issues, such as the high cost of housing.  Describe a current issue or social problem in your field and apply the sociological imagination to this issue.

    Platinum Essays