Jesus and Higher Order Thinking

Christian Perspectives in Education Christian Perspectives in Education Send out your light and your truth! Let them guide me. Psalm 43:3 Send out your light and your truth! Let them guide me. Psalm 43:3

Volume 1 Issue 2 Spring 2008 Article 5

May 2008

The Greatest Constructivist Educator Ever: The Pedagogy of The Greatest Constructivist Educator Ever: The Pedagogy of

Jesus Christ in the Gospel of Matthew in the Context of the 5Es Jesus Christ in the Gospel of Matthew in the Context of the 5Es

William H. Robertson The University of Texas at El Paso, [email protected]

Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cpe

Part of the Christianity Commons

Recommended Citation Recommended Citation Robertson, William H. (2008) "The Greatest Constructivist Educator Ever: The Pedagogy of Jesus Christ in the Gospel of Matthew in the Context of the 5Es," Christian Perspectives in Education, 1(2). Available at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cpe/vol1/iss2/5

This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Education at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Christian Perspectives in Education by an authorized editor of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected].

Greatest Constructivist Educator 1

Christian Perspectives in Education, Vol. 1, No. 2, Spring 2008

Jesus as a Constructivist Educator

The teaching methods utilized by Jesus Christ as recorded in the New Testament Gospel

of Matthew demonstrated the use of a constructivist methodology as a pedagogical approach.

Jesus continually challenged his disciples and followers through the use of experiences, parables,

and questions in order to relate the context of His eternal message to their practical and daily

lives. In this way, He centered His instruction on developing conceptually correct understandings

that had to be discovered and personalized by the learner. For example, in the parable of the

Sower (Matt. 13:3-9), Jesus described four types of environments where seed could be planted in

order to grow into healthy crops. In only one of the four scenarios presented did the seed fall into

fertile ground and provide a crop worthy of harvest. In the agrarian society of Israel, many would

have had extensive previous knowledge and experience with growing crops from seeds and also

would have understood the inherent need for rich soil that was well tended in which to plant and

grow crops. For the learners, this parable metaphorically ties their previous learning and

experiences to the truths of God, ultimately connecting to the need for personal salvation. As

such, this process demonstrates a constructivist educator leading learners through a critical

thinking exercise within a problem-solving context. It is the assertion of this article that the

educational practices utilized by Jesus Christ embodied the foundations of constructivism. It is

the purpose of this essay to demonstrate how Jesus implemented constructivist methodologies

and sound pedagogical approaches in facilitating the learning process for His followers within

the Gospel of Matthew.

Definition of Constructivism

Constructivism is a learning strategy that builds upon students' existing knowledge,

beliefs, and skills (Brooks and Brooks, 1993). Within a constructivist approach, as students

1

Robertson: The Greatest Constructivist Educator Ever

Published by Scholars Crossing, 2008

Greatest Constructivist Educator 2

Christian Perspectives in Education, Vol. 1, No. 2, Spring 2008

encounter new information, they work to synthesize new understandings based on their current

experiences and their prior learning. In other words, the constructivist approach to learning states

that learners of all ages build new ideas on top of their personal conceptual understandings

(Eisenkraft, 2003). In this process, students and teachers experience common activities, while

applying and building on prior knowledge. Learners construct meaning while continually

assessing their understandings of concepts.

Constructivism can be characterized as a five-phased process known as the 5Es, in which

each phase begins with the letter E. The 5Es include the engagement phase, the exploration

phase, the explanation phase, the elaboration phase and the evaluation phase (Bybee, 2006).

Students and adults are enabled to construct a deeper and more comprehensive understanding

through activities that match their cognitive capabilities: "The important point is that each

(learner) has their own construction, their own understanding, rather than some common reality"

(Duffy and Jonassen, 1992, p. 6). The key is to build on previous learning and to apply new

learning in a meaningful context.

Attributes of a Constructivist Educator

In facilitating classroom learning, a constructivist teacher demonstrates a number of

pedagogical attributes that characterize his or her individual teaching approach. The

constructivist teacher sets up problems and monitors student exploration, guides student inquiry,

and promotes critical thinking. Constructivist teachers ask students to explore concepts with their

own data and to learn to direct their own explanations (Bybee, 2006). Ultimately, students begin

to think of learning as an accumulated and evolving body of knowledge that relates directly to

their own personal life and experiences.

2

Christian Perspectives in Education, Vol. 1, Iss. 2 [2008], Art. 5

https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cpe/vol1/iss2/5

Greatest Constructivist Educator 3

Christian Perspectives in Education, Vol. 1, No. 2, Spring 2008

In the constructivist classroom, the teacher utilizes questions in response to student ideas

in order to uncover their fundamental understandings of topics. This instructional strategy forms

the foundation for an inquiry-based classroom, one that is built on open-ended questions that

reflect the learner's reality (Hofstein and Yager, 1982). This approach provides the instructor

with a way to probe for deeper meanings, a fundamental goal in the teaching process. It is the

student’s inquisitive nature that needs to be activated and enhanced. Yet, without a process

model with which to show and lead the learner, this may not be achieved. In this way, learning is

not prescribed, but explored, and the learner has an active participation in the learning process.

Meanings are assigned by students when they learn something, and in order to be effective, "any

curriculum of a new education would have to be centered around question asking" (Postman and

Weingartner, 1969, p. 81). Students are meaning makers, and classroom facilitators have to

contribute to developing understanding in a conceptually correct manner for the learner.

Currently, an instructor who facilitates through questioning impacts learning best within a

structured discussion that raises basic issues, probes beneath surface meanings and pursues

problematic areas of thought (Paul and Binker, 1990). This technique aids students in

discovering their own thought structure and helps them develop clarity, accuracy, and relevance

in their thinking. Learners search for evidence and reason, recognize and reflect upon

assumptions, discover implications and consequences, and extrapolate from what is really known

versus merely believed (Roth, 1989). The learning emphasizes the need to question the answers,

not answer the questions. Teachers who effectively model questioning strategies in a

constructivist framework show that students’ ideas are respected and valued (Gould, 2000). The

teacher is not only a communicator, but a model. “To communicate knowledge and to provide a

model of competence, the teacher must be free to teach and to learn" (Bruner, 1960, p. 90).

3

Robertson: The Greatest Constructivist Educator Ever

Published by Scholars Crossing, 2008

Greatest Constructivist Educator 4

Christian Perspectives in Education, Vol. 1, No. 2, Spring 2008

The Engagement Phase

Constructivism usually begins with the engagement phase. An activity of engagement

should help the learner to make connections between past and present learning experiences. The

process of engagement should also help focus the students to become thoughtfully involved in

the concept, process, or skill to be learned. In other words, the student should relate to the

problem being posed and be invested in pursuing a solution.

Constructivism may be defined as an active process of learning in which learners

construct new ideas or concepts based upon their current and past knowledge (Bruner, 1960).

The learner encounters and processes information, formulates hypotheses, and makes decisions,

relying on a cognitive structure to do so. Cognitive structure (i.e., schema, mental models)

provides meaning and organization to experiences and allows the individual to move past

supplied information (Bruner, 1960). A successful pedagogical method, constructivism

stimulates enthusiasm in students and helps them deepen their understanding through experience.

It is the individual’s experience that ultimately provides the meaning of learning opportunities

(Brown, Collins and Duguid, 1989). In constructivist teaching, it is the engagement in activities

that uniquely shapes each person's gain in content understanding (von Glasersfeld, 1989).

In the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus employed a number of engagement strategies that

integrated the familiar settings and experiences of His audience into his teaching. For example,

Jesus presented the truths of heaven in a way that allowed the listeners to see themselves in the

fabric of His message. This became a key point for having them become engaged in the process

of personal salvation. He stated, “You are the light of the world, a city set on a hill cannot be

hidden nor do they light a lamp and put in under a basket, but on a lamp stand, so that it may

give light to all who see it. Let your light so shine before men that they see your good works and

4

Christian Perspectives in Education, Vol. 1, Iss. 2 [2008], Art. 5

https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cpe/vol1/iss2/5

Greatest Constructivist Educator 5

Christian Perspectives in Education, Vol. 1, No. 2, Spring 2008

glorify your Father in heaven” (Matt. 5:18-22). The central idea that each person can experience

spiritual salvation was built around topics that were familiar and real in the lives of the people in

the audience. This engagement process helped the learners to see themselves in the teaching of

Jesus, to become connected to His message and to the process to follow.

Fundamentally, constructivism centers on the idea that students learn by doing and that

learning is the responsibility of the learner (Dewey, 1902). The constructivist approach allows

students to have experiences in order that they may address misconceptions and develop proper

conceptual connections (Rutherford and Algren, 1990). It is important that the curriculum be

aligned with the learner and the learner’s experiences, so that it can be seen as evolving and ever

changing. In constructivist education, it is "the development of experience and into experience

that is really wanted" (Dewey, 1902, p. 24). Constructivism builds on prior knowledge and gives

students and instructors an opportunity to make sense of the world by engaging them in

exploratory investigations (Yager, 1991). The engagement phase should activate the critical

thinking processes by integrating authentic activities that involve real world topics (Duffy and

Jonassen, 1992). In the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus presented his teachings in the environment

of the people. In this setting, on the shores of the Sea of Galilee, the audience could see nearby

cities which sat on the hillside in full view of everyone, which could not be hidden from their

sight. The audience would also understand that a lamp gives light and that the light is useful to

guide someone through the dark.

The Exploration Phase

The exploration phase provides students with a common base of experiences. The

learners identify and develop concepts, processes, and skills based on an open-ended approach in

which students actively explore their environment or manipulate materials. These approaches

5

Robertson: The Greatest Constructivist Educator Ever

Published by Scholars Crossing, 2008

Greatest Constructivist Educator 6

Christian Perspectives in Education, Vol. 1, No. 2, Spring 2008

rely on establishing real world connections, using materials and manipulatives for hands-on

interactions and providing a common base of experiences from which to grow and learn. After

Christ had engaged His early followers, He identified twelve who would become his Apostles.

These men of Israel would walk with Him, learn from him and have opportunities to explore His

teachings. In facilitating these interactions, Jesus would often pose problems in the form of

parables to the Apostles that they would in turn explore in order to understand the truth within it.

In the classroom, constructivist curriculum must be designed so that it reflects real life

situations (Bentley, 1995). For example, in the parable of the wheat and tares, Jesus described a

situation in which a person sowing seeds in a field dispersed both seeds for wheat, which

contained fruit, and tares, which were empty and without fruit (Matt. 13:3). The Apostles

themselves would readily understand how vital it was to explore the fields of wheat in order to

distinguish the differences between the wheat and tares in a physical sense. Wheat with fruit was

vial as nourishment for life, while a tare without fruit was worthless and literally taking up space

needed for fruitful crops.

Hofstein and Yager promoted using social issues as an organizer for the curriculum, and

viewed this method of content organization as contextualizing the concepts taught in distinct and

unique disciplines of study. Researchers cross over the barriers between disciplines all the time,

and seldom operate solely on isolated areas of content, but integrate the use of language,

knowledge and process application. Research based programs give students the ability to retain

facts through critical thinking by working through problems logically and making connections to

the real world. Jerome Bruner further emphasizes this point by writing, "Students should know

what it feels like to be completely absorbed in a problem. They seldom experience this feeling in

school" (Bruner, 1960. p.50). In using the parable of the Sower, Jesus went further to describe

6

Christian Perspectives in Education, Vol. 1, Iss. 2 [2008], Art. 5

https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cpe/vol1/iss2/5

Greatest Constructivist Educator 7

Christian Perspectives in Education, Vol. 1, No. 2, Spring 2008

four results that could happen from this farmer sowing seeds in his field, and states, “Some fell

on rocky ground, where it had little soil. It sprang up at once because the soil was not deep, and

when the sun rose it was scorched, and it withered for lack of roots. Some seed fell among

thorns, and the thorns grew up and choked it. But some seed fell on rich soil, and produced fruit,

a hundred or sixty or thirty fold. Whoever has ears ought to hear." (Matt. 13:5-9) In this teaching

moment, Jesus highlighted the sowing of seeds in order to produce plants as an opportunity for

His followers to explore and search for understanding. In the use of such parables, Jesus

encouraged His students to seek answers to their own questions, a fundamental approach to

guiding students in the exploration phase.

Students exploring a concept should be given opportunities to work with materials and

manipulatives so that they can have experiences that are real and primary. Hands-on learning

plays a valuable role in the constructivist paradigm, as it is the process of experiencing learning

that is utilized in the exploration phase. So much fascinating content is at the fingertips of

learners everywhere, and with the increase in affordability of technology, more and more is

present in their homes. It is important to engage students in learning situations that effectively

integrate their own experiences and familiar materials that they can use to understand specific

concepts better. For example, students who enjoy skateboarding can be given opportunities to

explore the concepts of velocity, acceleration, center of gravity, and centrifugal and centripetal

forces. They may also use the skateboard and a local skatepark to investigate topics such as

inclined planes, levers, fulcrums, and screws. The purpose of this approach is to allow the

students to explore meaningful science topics set in the context of something they enjoy doing.

As students explore concepts, they develop a broader understanding of those concepts.

When they relate what they are learning, seeing or doing to others, they can begin to see

7

Robertson: The Greatest Constructivist Educator Ever

Published by Scholars Crossing, 2008

Greatest Constructivist Educator 8

Christian Perspectives in Education, Vol. 1, No. 2, Spring 2008

similarities in their understandings with others, as well as to self-identify misconceptions they

may have about content material. This is evident in the parables that Jesus uses in the Gospel of

Matthew, in which he uses situations and materials that were familiar and readily available to his

followers, such as mustard seeds and salt. Further, by framing his teaching in terms of parables

and questions, Jesus facilitated discussion between his followers as they explored for meaning

themselves. This sharing within cooperative groups is a fundamental strategy in constructivism

as it allows the teacher to facilitate the learning process, and also helps to develop a common

base of experiences on which to help make connections to content. Problem-solving strategies

depend on conceptual understandings, and hands-on exploration of simple topics combined with

collaborative interaction among students helps to build an understanding of processes and

concepts (Apple, 1993).

The Explanation Phase

The explanation phase helps students uncover the content surrounding the concepts they

have been exploring. Students should now have opportunities to verbalize their conceptual

understanding, to encounter new content material or to demonstrate new skills. This phase also

provides opportunities for teachers to introduce primary content materials such as formal terms,

definitions, and other content information. The implementation of this phase provides the learner

with opportunities to identify skills and behavior in order to both experience and discover

content that may be useful in context. For example, the Apostles were inherently familiar with

the law and scriptures of the Old Testament, and they were infused into the everyday life of the

Jews living in Israel. The Jews combed these scriptures in order to understand the characteristics

and circumstances that the Messiah, their new King of Israel, would bring to the Promised Land.

Although the Apostles clearly knew this by tradition, they did not completely understand how

8

Christian Perspectives in Education, Vol. 1, Iss. 2 [2008], Art. 5

https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cpe/vol1/iss2/5

Greatest Constructivist Educator 9

Christi