VARK Analysis Paper

VARK Analysis Paper
VARK Analysis Paper
Learning Styles
Learning is an intricate and diverse cycle that shifts from one individual to another. Understanding one’s favored learning style is fundamental to compelling learning and education. The VARK survey is an important instrument that evaluates people’s learning styles inclinations in light of four principal classes: visual, aural, read/compose, and sensation. The identification of individual learning styles, as evaluated by the VARK questionnaire, influences the adequacy of education and health promotion, encouraging better comprehension and behavior change.
My VARK Learning Style
As indicated by the VARK survey, my learning style inclinations are as follows: visual = 6, auditory = 14, read and write = 16, and kinesthetic = 16. The results propose that I have a multimodal learning style with a solid tendency towards aural, read/compose, and kinesthetic styles. As a multimodal student, I get information through auditory, visual, perusing/composing, and sensational encounters.
Preferred and Comparison of Learning Styles
My preferred learning styles adjust intimately to the identified procedures for my multimodal learning style. I benefit from a blend of auditory, reading/writing, and kinesthetic approaches. I appreciate attending talks or conversations, taking nitty-gritty notes during classes or while perusing, and participating in involved exercises or trials to build my comprehension.
BUY  PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Contrasting my favored learning methodologies with those recognized for my multimodal learning style, there exists a close match. The VARK results demonstrate that I lean towards aural, read/write, and kinesthetic strategies, which align with my inclinations.
Impact of Learning Styles on Learning and Teaching
Awareness of learning styles fundamentally impacts the view of teaching and learning. Educators who comprehend their students’ learning styles can tailor their teaching techniques to tend to different inclinations. This personalization improves students’ commitment, inspiration, and, by and large, learning results (AL-Roomy, 2023). Alternatively, students who comprehend their learning styles can adjust their review methods to enhance their growth opportunities.
Recognizing individual learning styles is fundamental for educators while working with students. Perceiving and obliging different learning styles creates a more comprehensive and powerful learning climate. For example, a student with solid visual learning might profit from visual guides like outlines and diagrams, while a sensation student might succeed in involved practices.
Learning Styles in Health Promotion
Understanding learning styles turns out to be especially significant for health promotion. Compelling health promotion expects people to assimilate information about healthy behaviors and lifestyle changes (Umali, 2022). Fitting wellbeing training projects to match members’ learning styles can work on the viability of these initiatives. Understanding and embracing learning styles in health promotion is fundamental to guaranteeing the achievement and viability of medical care initiatives. By fitting educational strategies to match people’s inclinations, health advertisers can further develop data maintenance, improve commitment, modify approaches, and lessen health incongruities.
Learning Styles Impact behavioral change.
Learning styles essentially affect the chance of behavior change. People will embrace better behavior when they get data from an organization that resonates with their learning style (BAU, 2021). For instance, an individual with a kinesthetic learning style might be more likely to work out routinely if they participate in intuitive wellness classes. Then again, a read/write student might find following a composed eating regimen plan more straightforward.
Accommodating Different Learning Styles
In health promotion, obliging different learning styles can be accomplished by offering various instructive assets and configurations. This might incorporate integrating visual materials like infographics, directing gathering conversations for aural students, giving composed materials to peruse or compose students, and arranging intelligent studios for kinesthetic students. By obliging different learning styles, well-being advancement projects can successfully contact a more extensive crowd and improve the probability of conducting change.
Conclusion
The VARK questionnaire is a significant device for distinguishing individual learning styles and inclinations. Understanding one’s learning style and that of others can impact the adequacy of education and learning. Regarding health promotion, fitting learning styles to match members’ learning styles can prompt more fruitful results and add to better ways of behaving in the public arena. Perceiving and obliging different learning styles is fundamental to education and health promotion, encouraging a more comprehensive and powerful learning climate.
 
References
AL-Roomy, M. A. (2023). The Relationship Among Students’ Learning Styles, Health Sciences Colleges, and Grade Point Average (GPA). Advances in Medical Education and Practice, Volume 14, 203–213. https://doi.org/10.2147/amep.s395720
BAU. (2021, September 27). 4 Types of Learning Styles: How Do Students Learn Best? Bay Atlantic University. https://bau.edu/blog/types-of-learning-styles/
Umali, G. (2022). What Is Effective Patient Education? Psychiatric News, 57(02). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.pn.2022.2.30
 
VARK Analysis Paper
Assessment Description

Learning styles represent the different approaches to learning based on preferences, weaknesses, and strengths. For learners to best achieve the desired educational outcome, learning styles must be considered when creating a plan. Complete “The VARK Questionnaire,” located on the VARK website, and then complete the following:

Complete “The VARK Questionnaire: How Do I Learn Best?”
http://vark-learn.com/the-vark-questionnaire/

Click “OK” to receive your questionnaire scores.
Once you have determined your preferred learning style, review the corresponding link to view your learning preference.
Review the other learning styles: visual, aural, read/write, kinesthetic, and multimodal (listed on the VARK Questionnaire Results page).
Compare your preferred learning strategies to the identified strategies for your preferred learning style.
Appraise how this awareness of learning attributes influences your perceptions of teaching and learning.

In a paper (750-1,000 words), summarize your analysis of this exercise. Include the following:

Provide a summary of your learning style.
List your preferred learning strategies.
Compare your preferred learning strategies to the identified strategies for your preferred learning style.
Discuss how the awareness of individual learning styles, preferences and strategies influence teaching (those who are in a position to teach) and learning (those who are in a position to learn).
Cite a minimum of three references in the paper.

Although the topic of this assignment refers to your individual learning style, avoid the use of first person voice (words such as, “I, we, our”) in your essay.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
 

Rubric Criteria

Collapse All Rubric CriteriaCollapse All

Preferred Learning Strategies
20 points

Criteria Description

Preferred Learning Strategies

5. Excellent
20 points
Personal learning strategy is clearly described. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is detailed. Overall discussion demonstrates insight into preferred learning strategies and how these support preferred learning styles.

4. Good
17.8 points
Personal learning strategy is described. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is presented.

3. Satisfactory
15.8 points
Personal learning strategy is summarized. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is generally described.

2. Less than Satisfactory
15 points
Personal learning strategy is partially described. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Personal learning strategy content is missing.

Documentation of Sources
3 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Excellent
3 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good
2.67 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. Satisfactory
2.37 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less than Satisfactory
2.25 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not documented.

Personal Learning Styles According to VARK Questionnaire
20 points

Criteria Description

Personal Learning Styles According to VARK Questionnaire

5. Excellent
20 points
Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified and described in detail. Summary offers examples that display personal insight or reflection.

4. Good
17.8 points
Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified and described.

3. Satisfactory
15.8 points
Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified and basic summary is provided.

2. Less than Satisfactory
15 points
Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified, but summary is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Personal learning style content is missing. Personal learning style presented is not reflective of VARK questionnaire.

Learning Styles
20 points

Criteria Description

Learning Styles (Effect on educational performance and importance of identifying learning styles for learners as an educator)

5. Excellent
20 points
Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is thoroughly discussed. The importance of learning styles for learners participating in healthy promotion, and identifying them as an educator, is clearly established. Strong rationale and evidence support discussion.

4. Good
17.8 points
Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is discussed. The importance of learning styles for learners participating in healthy promotion, and identifying them as an educator, is established. Some rationale or evidence is needed for support.

3. Satisfactory
15.8 points
Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is generally discussed. The importance of learning styles for learners participating in healthy promotion, and identifying them as an educator, is generally established. There are minor inaccuracies. More rationale or evidence is needed for support.

2. Less than Satisfactory
15 points
Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is partially presented. The importance of learning styles for learners participating in healthy promotion, and identifying them as an educator, is unclear. There are inaccuracies.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is not presented.

Argument Logic and Construction
5 points

Criteria Description

Argument Logic and Construction

5. Excellent
5 points
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

4. Good
4.45 points
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

3. Satisfactory
3.95 points
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

2. Less than Satisfactory
3.75 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
2 points

Criteria Description

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5. Excellent
2 points
All format elements are correct.

4. Good
1.78 points
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

3. Satisfactory
1.58 points
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

2. Less than Satisfactory
1.5 points
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Excellent
5 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good
4.45 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

3. Satisfactory
3.95 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

2. Less than Satisfactory
3.75 points
Frequ