NURS 6120: Population Health and Inter-professional Collaboration Population Health Paper
NURS 6120: Population Health and Inter-professional Collaboration
Population Health Paper Guidelines
This assignment addresses the following course outcomes:
Program outcomes
Course outcomes
Demonstrate scholarly activity in research, evidence based practice and adapting theoretical frameworks to clinical practice. (TAE, CCE)
Employ collaborative strategies in the design, coordination, and evaluation of patient-centered care.
Synthesize broad ecological, global and social determinants of health; principles of genetics and genomics; and epidemiologic data to design and deliver evidence-based, culturally relevant clinical prevention intervention s and strategies.
Assume clinical and/or educational leadership in diverse healthcare settings (CCE, TCC).
Advocate for the value and role of the professional nurse as member and leader of inter-professional healthcare teams.
Understand other health professions’ scopes of practice to maximize contributions within the healthcare team.
Advocate for diverse populations and demonstrate social responsibility in healthcare delivery. (CCE, SSR)
Evaluate the effectiveness of clinical prevention interventions affecting individual and population-based health outcomes using health information technology and data sources.
Students model ethical behavior; demonstrate integrity and honesty in the role of leader and educator. (TCC)
Understand other health professions’ scopes of practice to maximize contributions within the healthcare team.
Understand the foundations of care and the art and science of the nursing profession and practice as it relates to self, individuals, families and clinical populations across the lifespan. (TCC, SSR)
Synthesize broad ecological, global and social determinants of health; principles of genetics and genomics; and epidemiologic data to design and deliver evidence-based, culturally relevant clinical prevention interventions and strategies.
NURS 6120: Population Health and Inter-professional Collaboration Population Health Paper
In this paper, you will develop a plan addressing a problem experienced by your population. At minimum, you will
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NURS 6120: Population Health and Inter-professional Collaboration Population Health Paper done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Meet my deadline
Identify the problem – using research literature as evidence the problem exists
Describe the issues relevant to the problem
Description of the population
Social determinants of health
Social justice
Epidemiological perspectives
Collaborative partnerships that could help to manage the problem
Use examples from the literature that could apply to your population/issue
Theory or model that could support a population-focused health intervention
Be sure to check back with Theory at a Glance for theory/model ideas
Significance to Nursing
Why is it important for nursing to address these issues for this population?
What outcomes will this new knowledge provide?
Justify the need for future research in this area
How will future research add to nursing’s body of knowledge in this area?
Use of references:
use a variety of resources as appropriate to the issue
the majority of resources must be from peer reviewed scholarly journals
web sites can be used provided you demonstrate the credibility (e.g. S. census, the ADA, AHA)
Wikipedia is NOT an acceptable resource
you must include some research studies as evidence to support your discussion
only 20% of the resources can be from class materials.
For this length of paper – you will need to use 10-15 resources to adequately cover the content.
Your paper must include an, introduction, and conclusion, significance to nursing/future research, references. Evidence of synthesis and logical presentation of ideas should be evident.
Appropriate length: 9-12 pages (excluding title page and references). Papers under or over the stated length will receive deductions. You will need at least 9 pages to adequately cover the topic.
Due Date: Refer to NURS6120 Course Calendar
See Population Evaluation Rubric for grading criteria
Submit your assignment via CANVAS Assignment Link
Population Health Paper Evaluation Rubric
This rubric will be used by faculty for evaluation and scoring: The following grade scale will be utilized:
A –Mastering: 205-225
B –Developing: 180-204
C – Emerging: 158-179
D –Keep working: 135-157
F – Challenges abound: less than 135; evidence of plagiarism in any category may result in a failing grade in either the assignment or the course.
NURS 6120: Population Health and Inter-professional Collaboration Population Health Paper
A-Mastering
B-Developing
C-Emerging
D-Keep Working
F-Challenges Abound
Points
Audience
10%
–Uses language appropriate to audience knowledge level.
–Uses examples to illustrate, clarify, & create interest for reader.
20.5-23 points possible
–Generally uses language appropriate to audience knowledge level.
–While does use examples to illustrate, clarify, & create interest for reader, paper could benefit from strengthening some areas.
18-20 points possible
–Attempts to use language appropriate for audience.
–Explanations & examples not always clear; general idea apparent but more explanation and/or examples needed.
16-17 points possible
–Language & examples used that are not understood/appropriate for audience.
–Little use of examples to illustrate, clarify, &/or create interest for reader.
–Minimal evidence overall that audience has been considered & understood in the writing process.
14-15 points possibl2
–Fails to turn in paper.
OR
–Problems in paper addressing audience.
–Not apparent that language & examples are being used that will be understood by audience.
–Few/no examples illustrate, clarify, & create interest for reader.
–Little/no evidence that audience has been considered & understood in the writing process.
0-13 points possible
Analysis and synthesis of Population health Issue
50%
5%
–Purpose coherent & explicit early in paper.
–Describes population using research literature
9% each of 6 concepts
–Correctly includes all course concepts relevant to the population and problem (SDH, Social Justice, Theory, Epi, EBP, Collaboration)
–Clear use and understanding of course concepts demonstrated in author’s application to discussion
–Creative and feasible approach to collaborative partnerships
9%
–detailed discussion of significance to nursing and future research
102-112 point possible
–Purpose fairly clear & explicit early in paper.
— Describes population fairly well using research literature
–Course concepts applied well in most instances to analysis (SDH, Social Justice, Theory, Epi, EBP, Collaboration)
–Fairly clear understanding demonstrated; could benefit from strengthening in 1-2 minor areas.
— Reasonable approach to collaborative partnerships
–Fairly detailed discussion of significance to nursing and future research
90-101 points possible
–Purpose may be implied, lacking clarity; writer searching for topic.
— Describes population using research literature, could use more detail or references
–May/may not apply relevant course concepts to analysis; may limit or superficially apply concepts. (SDH, Social Justice, Theory, Epi, EBP, Collaboration)
–Demonstrates some understanding of course concepts but may lack depth, clarity, and/or inadequate understanding of some concepts in use.
–Limited discussion of partnerships
–limited discussion of significance to nursing and future research
79-89 points possible
–Purpose implied, lacking clarity; writer seems to be “thinking aloud” on paper.
–May superficially address population or may not explain fully enough for reader to understand.
–May not apply relevant course concepts to analysis; may limit, superficially, or incorrectly apply concepts. (SDH, Social Justice, Theory, Epi, EBP, Collaboration)
— Attempts to demonstrate some understanding of course concepts but may lack depth, clarity, and/or inadequate understanding of some concepts in use.
–Inadequate discussion of partnerships
–Inadequate discussion of significance to nursing and future research
68-78 point possible
–Fails to turn in paper.
OR
–Purpose implied or unstated lacking clarity in paper at any point.
–Superficially addresses population and/or does not explain fully enough for reader to understand.
–Does not apply relevant course concepts to analysis; may limit, superficially, or incorrectly apply concepts.
— Attempts to demonstrate some understanding of course concepts but may lack depth, clarity, and/or inadequate understanding of some concepts in use.
–lacks discussion on partnerships
–lacks discussion on significance to nursing and future research
0-67 points possible
Resource Use
20%
–Discussion connected to predominantly primary, credible sources.
–All sources clearly identified & credited using APA format.
–Range of resources used well exceeds course texts/articles.
–Information is accurate & current.
– 80% of sources are from peer-reviewed scholarly journals
43-45 point possible
–Discussion connected to a majority of primary, credible sources.
–Most sources clearly identified & credited using APA format.
–Range of resources used exceeds course texts/articles.
–Information is generally accurate & current.
– 70% of sources are from peer-reviewed scholarly journals
36-40 points possible
–Discussion connected to sources; primary source use is not always clear. May be some over-reliance on secondary & other sources.
–Most sources identified & credited using APA format; citations make it possible to trace resources used.
–Resources limited to course texts/articles.
–While information is mostly accurate & current, there may be an area which is incomplete, out-of-date, &/or incorrect.
– 60% of sources are from peer-reviewed scholarly journals
32-34 points possible
–Discussion may/may not be supported with sources; primary source use is not clear.
–Over reliance on secondary and other sources.
–Difficulty identifying & crediting sources using APA format; citations may not make it possible to trace resources used.
–Range of resources used may/may not include course texts/articles.
–Information may be incomplete, out-of-date, &/or incorrect.
28-30 points possible
–Fails to turn in paper.
OR
–Discussion not well-supported with sources; primary source use is not clear.
–Over reliance on secondary and other sources.
–May have difficulty identifying & crediting sources using APA format.
–Sources may be omitted; citations may not make it possible to trace resources used.
–Range of resources used may/may not include course texts/articles.
–Information may be incomplete, out-of-date, &/or incorrect.
0-27 points possible
Communication
10%
–Consistent clarity of ideas, thought, & language throughout paper.
–Clear logical flow/pattern from beginning to end.
–Tone is appropriate and professional.
–Body of paper well-organized & easy to read.
–Focused, clear & keeps the reader’s attention.
20.5-22.5 points possible
–Good overall clarity of ideas, thought, & language with only minor areas which could benefit from further revision.
–Information, data & arguments flow logically with only minor strengthening needed in these areas.
–Tone is good professional.
–Body of paper generally well-organized and easy to read.
18-20 points possible
–Thoughts and ideas in narrative are fairly clear overall but with more areas of “fuzzy” or “clouded” thinking needing explication for reader; more revision needed to clarify, expand, &/or revise to increase reader understanding.
–Hard for reader to follow flow of ideas & information.
–Tone is mostly professional though some areas may need revision to increase connection to course concepts and/or decrease use of “I” language.
–Body of paper less organized, sometimes hard to follow.
16-17 points possible
–Several areas showing confusion, lack of clear thought, & problems with language use.
–Hard for reader to follow flow of ideas & information.
–Tone of writing less professional,
–Body of paper not well organized; hard to follow information as presented.
14-15 points possible
–Fails to turn in paper.
OR
–Ideas, thoughts, & language consistently unclear through paper for audience.
–Very hard for reader to follow flow of ideas & information.
–Tone of writing less professional
–Body of paper not well organized; difficult to understand as presented.
0-13 points possible
Technical Presentation & Format
10%
–Concisely & clearly presents ideas in 9-12 pages excluding title page, and references
–Very professional presentation with excellent technical & grammar usage.
–Uses APA format very well with 0-2 minor types of errors
20.5-23 points possible
–Adheres to 9-12 page limit.
–Overall, very good presentation of product with few flaws in technical presentation & grammar usage.
–Follows APA format through paper & references with only minor problems, 3-6 types of errors
18-20 points possible
–May adhere to page limits; may go slightly under or over limits with subsequent lack of information or wordiness.
–Generally a fair presentation of paper showing some editing/revision of technical/grammar needed.
–Uses APA format; several problems using format in paper &/or reference section, 7-10 types of errors
16-17 points possible
–May adhere to page limits OR paper too short (< 9 pages) & missing significant information, concepts OR is too long (>4 pages)
–Major problems in using APA format in paper, more than 10 types of errors
14-15 points possible
–Fails to turn in paper.
OR
–Paper too short (< 3 pages) & missing significant data, research, development OR is too long (>4 pages)
–Major problems in using APA format in paper
–Significant problems with grammar & technical writing interfere with reader understanding & professional appearance.
–Major editing required.
0-13 points possible
Total 225
Don’t wait until the last minute
Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.
Start My Order
