N 510 Module 2: Assignment: the pathophysiologic difference between cluster headaches, migraines, and tension-type headaches

N 510 Module 2: Assignment: the pathophysiologic difference between cluster headaches, migraines, and tension-type headaches

N 510 Module 2: Assignment
N 510 Module 2: Assignment:
Exercises: 

Explain the pathophysiologic difference between cluster headaches, migraines, and tension-type headaches.
Classify and differentiate at least four types of stroke
Elaborate on the difference between primary and secondary Parkinson’s disease
Summarize the five categories of pain. Discuss their pathways. Explain the etiology of chronic and acute pain.

Case Study

Complete Case Study #59 (hypothyroid) in the Bruyere textbook.

Professional Development

Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on N 510 Module 2: Assignment: the pathophysiologic difference between cluster headaches, migraines, and tension-type headaches done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Meet my deadline

Write an essay on the following topic:

Diabetes Mellitus Type II

The essay should contain at least two scholarly sources in addition to the textbook. It should cover the following points:

Explain the pathophysiology of the disease
Discuss common clinical manifestations
List differential diagnoses
Determine which lab tests would confirm the diagnosis and expected results
Analyze a current protocol for treatment and discuss how the treatment works from the pathophysiological perspective

ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOMIZED ACADEMIC PAPER ON N 510 Module 2: Assignment
Explain the pathophysiologic difference between cluster headaches, migraines, and tension-type headaches
Mathew and Peterlin (2016) opine that migraines and cluster headaches are vascular headaches and the tension is not a vascular headache. The cases of cluster headaches occur in clusters and at a short time before going away. In addition, cluster headaches occur in the same spot and are characterized by unilateral sweating and having a facial sensation that is not normal. A cluster headache occurs as an extreme pain that one feels burning in the head. Moreover, cluster headaches are treated using the same medication that is used in the treatment of migraine headaches.
On the other hand, tension headaches are not vascular headaches and one does not have the experience of a pounding headache nature. The headache results in a constant ache and the parts that are involved include the neck of the side of the neck. The cases of migraine headaches are unilateral as opposed to the global nature of the tension headaches. In addition, the same medication that is used for the treatment of a migraine cannot be used for the treatment of tension headaches.
N 510 Module 2: Assignment: the pathophysiologic difference between cluster headaches, migraines, and tension-type headaches
Criteria

Topic is inappropriate to assignment, inaccurate understanding of concepts, unclear and difficult to understand; does not address many assignment requirements. Information has weak or no connection to the assignment topic.

21 points
Topic is mostly covered and appropriate to assignment, but does not adequately demonstrate accurate understanding of concepts; mostly clear and understandable; lacks some of the requirements of the assignment description and/or provides little detail; Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given.

24 points
Topic is covered completely and appropriate to assignment; overview of key concept dimensions is evident; clear and understandable; addresses all of the requirements of the assignment description, with adequate attention to detail.

30 points
In-depth coverage of topic; outstanding clarity and explanation of concepts demonstrated in information presented; approaches assignment with depth and breadth, without redundancy, using clear and focused details.

30 / 30
Organization Weight: 25%

0 points
Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas.  Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic, or is missing or irrelevant.

17.5 points
Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; Flow is sometimes choppy; somewhat clear organization. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new information.

20 points
Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good flow and an obvious framework.  Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic.  Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information.

25 points
Exceptionally clear, logical, mature, and thorough organization permitting smooth flow of ideas; Introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic in clear, unambiguous terms.  Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader.

25 / 25
Logic/Argument Weight: 15%

0 points
Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical.

10.5 points
Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment; Some claims are weak.

12 points
Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment.

15 points
Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment.

15 / 15
Support Weight: 20%

0 points
Lacks support; Uses poor sources for references; Citations lack credibility, relevance, or academic quality or are not current; Does not meet the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.  APA format and style are not evident.

14 points
Provides weak support or not enough support; Citations are not consistently credible, current, relevant or academic; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description   Missing APA elements; in-text citations, where necessary, are used but formatted inaccurately and not referenced.

16 points
Provides sufficient support with credible, current, relevant academic citations; Meets the minimum number of required citations in assignment description. ; In-text citations and a reference page are present with few format errors. Mechanics of writing are reflective of APA style.

20 points
Provides very strong support from credible, current, relevant, academic citations; Meets or exceeds the minimum number of required citations in assignment description.  Accurate citations and references are presented. No APA errors are evident.

20 / 20
Quality of Written Communication Weight: 10%

0 points
Style and voice inappropriate or do not address given audience, purpose, etc. Word choice is excessively redundant, clichéd, and unspecific. Inconsistent grammar, spelling, punctuation, and paragraphing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

7 points
Style and voice are somewhat appropriate to given audience and purpose. Word choice is often unspecific, generic, redundant, and clichéd. Repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.

8 points
Style and voice are appropriate to the given audience and purpose. Word choice is specific and purposeful, and somewhat varied throughout. Minimal mechanical or typographical errors are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

10 points
Style and voice are not only appropriate to the given audience and purpose, but also show originality and creativity. Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic and varied. Free of mechanical and typographical errors. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Don’t wait until the last minute
Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.
Start My Order