Consumer Health Information Website Analysis Assignment
Consumer Health Information Website Analysis
The purpose of this assignment is to apply knowledge of reliable and valid information sources to patient education in clinical nursing practice and to evaluate patient educational materials posted on the internet.
The assignment for this week consists of 4 pages paper evaluating consumer/patient health information on the web. You will be required to find a website that is designed to provide health information to the consumer/patient and analyze it according to the criteria described below. You are required to report your analysis in a formal course paper.
ORDER NOW FOR ORIGINAL PAPER
Consumer Health Information Website Analysis Assignment
• Choose a health topic/issue in which you want to educate your patient/consumer/family about (diabetes, heart failure, teenage pregnancy, depression, etc…) and briefly describe in your paper :
An explanation of your health topic/issue and why you selected it (Significance of the topic/issue selected).
• Find an internet source that is designed to provide information/education about your selected health topic/issue and analyze the following:
describe the website (main title, information)
describe the overall impression about the design of the website (organization, easiness of finding information, easiness to read, table of content/index, colors, font, does it look professional).
Who is sponsoring the website?
How often is the site updated? When was the site created? Was it updated recently?
Does it state that the content is not medical advice?
Who is the intended audience? Does the site have a clear target audience? is the information presented appropriate to the target population?
• How credible are the information presented:
Is there any evidence that the author of the web information has some authority in the field about which she or he is providing information? Who is responsible for the information? What are the author’s credentials? Is a mechanism in place for you to contact the author?
Are there clues that the author/s are biased? For example, is he/she selling or promoting a product? Is the author taking a personal stand on a social/political issue or is the author being objective ? Bias is not necessarily “bad,” but the connections should be clear.
Does the information have a complete list of works cited, which reference credible, authoritative sources? Is the information valid and supported by evidence? Are omissions noted? Is the author’s point of view objective and unbiased? Are the information accurate? any inconsistencies, inaccuracies, errors, false information, etc…
Are there links that point to additional, valuable resources with minimum effort?
• Adequacy:
Over all, does the site provide consumer/patient education? is the education adequate or does the consumer have to go somewhere else to find answers about the topic?
• Sophistication of the information:
Is this source too elementary, too technical, too advanced, or just right?
Is the purpose of the site clearly stated? Does the site match its purpose? Is the site intended to educate or sell?
• Submit a 4 pages analysis paper following APA format (include title page, running head, introduction, headings, Summary paragraph, reference page, in-text citation). You need to include at least 5 reliable references of which at least 3 journal articles to complete the Consumer Health Information Website Analysis Assignment.
Health Information Technology Project Evaluation
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on Consumer Health Information Website Analysis Assignment done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Meet my deadline
Program LO: 3
3: Educator / Consultant
DNP Essential: 4
4: Information Systems/Technology and Patient Care Technology for the Improvement and Transformation of Health Care
(Scroll down for table)
ASSIGNMENT PROMPT
Target
5 points
Acceptable
3 points
Unacceptable
1 point
Score/Level
Abbreviated Research Proposal Paper
Part 1: Information on Organization
(5 points)
Program LO: 3
DNP Essential: 4
Exemplary quality.
Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses every major subsection in the assignment description of health information technology system/application and the organization type; key reasons for development of this health information technology system/application; management and administrative structure of health information technology system/application using advanced critical thinking skills; does not summarize or paraphrase the content of the literature review, rather demonstrates content mastery using examples and/or personalized reflections about the content of the literature review; demonstrates an applied level of understanding through personalized reflections about the content area. Excels in meeting expectations for graduate level work.
Fully meets expectations for LO 3
Fully meets expectations for Essential 4
Well-developed, good quality work. Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses at least 80% of the major subsections in the assignment using adequate critical thinking skills; includes some summarizing or paraphrasing of literature review; demonstrates content mastery using examples and/or personalized reflections about the content of the literature review; demonstrates an applied level of understanding through personalized reflections about the content area. Fully meets expectations for graduate level work.
Meets expectations for LO3
Meets expectations for Essential 4
Superficially developed, unacceptable quality.
Content needs substantial revision for it to be of a professional portfolio quality; addresses less than 50% of the major subsections in the assignment using weak critical thinking skills; consists primarily of a summary of main ideas from the literature review; does not demonstrate an applied level of understanding. Lags behind expectations for graduate level work.
Insufficient to meet expectations for LO 3
Insufficient to meet expectations for Essential 4
Part 2: Information System Application: Design
(5 points)
Program LO: 3
DNP Essential: 4
Exemplary quality.
Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses every major subsection in the assignment clearly and succinctly addresses how stakeholders worked together to design and fund the system application including a detailed description of who manages the budget, and any organizational or political challenges that impacted the initial or ongoing funding of the system/application and how these challenges were addressed using advanced critical thinking skills; does not summarize or paraphrase the content of the literature that supports this section, rather demonstrates content mastery using examples and/or personalized reflections about the content of the literature; demonstrates an applied level of understanding through personalized reflections about the content area. Excels in meeting expectations for graduate level work.
Fully meets expectations for LO3
Fully meets expectations for Essential 4
Well-developed, good quality work.
Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses at least 80% of the major subsections in the assignment using adequate critical thinking skills; addresses how stakeholders worked together to design and fund the system application including a description of who manages the budget, and any organizational or political challenges that impacted the initial or ongoing funding of the system application and how these challenges were addressed; includes some summarizing or paraphrasing of literature that supports this section; demonstrates content mastery using examples and/or personalized reflections about the content of the literature; demonstrates an applied level of understanding through personalized reflections about the content area. Fully meets expectations for graduate level work.
Meets expectations for LO 3
Meets expectations for Essential 4
Superficially developed, unacceptable quality.
Content needs substantial revision for it to be of a professional portfolio quality; addresses less than 50% of the major subsections in the assignment using weak critical thinking skills; consists primarily of a summary of main ideas from the literature that supports this section; does not demonstrate an applied level of understanding. Lags behind expectations for graduate level work.
Insufficient to meet expectations for LO 3
Insufficient to meet expectations for Essential 4
Part 3: Information System Application: Implementation
(5 points)
Program LOs: 3
DNP Essential: 4
Exemplary quality.
Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses every major subsection in the assignment; identifies key security issues and provides a detailed description on how the issues have been addressed; provides an in-depth portrayal of management of health information technology system, including quality of health care records, training of users, and planning for downtime and scheduled updates; includes a thoughtful analysis of system changes in response to health care reform/legislation and well-reasoned recommendation of additional changes needed using advanced critical thinking skills; does not summarize or paraphrase the content of the literature review, rather demonstrates content mastery using examples and/or personalized reflections about the content of the literature review; demonstrates an applied level of understanding through personalized reflections about the content area. Excels in meeting expectations for graduate level work.
Fully meets expectations for LO 3
Fully meets expectations for Essential 4
Well-developed, good quality work.
Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses at least 80% of the major subsections in the assignment using adequate critical thinking skills; identified security issues and described how they have been addressed; provides an overview of management of health information technology system, including quality of health care records, training of users, and planning for downtime and scheduled updates; describes system changes in response to health care reform/legislation and recommendation of additional changes needed; includes some summarizing or paraphrasing of literature review; demonstrates content mastery using examples and/or personalized reflections about the content of the literature review; demonstrates an applied level of understanding through personalized reflections about the content area. Fully meets expectations for graduate level work.
Meets expectations for LO 3
Meets expectations for Essential 4
Superficially developed, unacceptable quality.
Content needs substantial revision for it to be of a professional portfolio quality; addresses less than 50% of the major subsections in the assignment using weak critical thinking skills; consists primarily of a summary of main ideas from the literature review; does not demonstrate an applied level of understanding. Lags behind expectations for graduate level work.
Insufficient to meet expectations for LO 3
Insufficient to meet expectations for Essential 4
Part 4: Innovative Aspects of the System
(5 points)
Program LO: 3
DNP Essential: 4
Exemplary quality.
Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses every major subsection in the assignment; provides a succinct description of the role of innovation in the health information technology system/application and thoughtful recommendations for additional use of innovations using advanced critical thinking skills; does not summarize or paraphrase the content of the literature review, rather demonstrates content mastery using examples and/or personalized reflections about the content of the literature review; demonstrates an applied level of understanding through personalized reflections about the content area. Excels in meeting expectations for graduate level work.
Fully meets expectations for LO 3
Fully meets expectations for Essential 4
Well-developed, good quality work.
Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses at least 80% of the major subsections in the assignment; provides a description of the role of innovation in the health information technology system/application and recommendations for additional use of innovations using adequate critical thinking skills; includes some summarizing or paraphrasing of the literature review; demonstrates content mastery using examples and/or personalized reflections about the content of the literature review; demonstrates an applied level of understanding through personalized reflections about the content area. Fully meets expectations for graduate level work.
Meets expectations for LO 3
Meets expectations for Essential 4
Superficially developed, unacceptable quality.
Needs substantial revision to be worthy of a professional portfolio; addresses less than half the major subsections in the assignment using weak critical thinking skills; consists primarily of a summary of main ideas from the literature review; does not demonstrate an applied level of understanding. Lags behind expectations for graduate level work.
Insufficient to meet expectations for LO 3
Insufficient to meet expectations for Essential 4
Part 5: End Product
(5 points)
The majority of references are from scholarly journals, support the topic well, and are current. All sources are peer reviewed. Minimum of 7 citations used. Paper stays within page requirements. APA format is used correctly throughout.
Report leaves the reader with confidence in understanding the informatics system; graphics are used to illustrate key points.
Excels in meeting expectations for graduate level work.
Most references are from scholarly journals and support the topic. Most references are fairly current. All sources are peer reviewed. Minimum of 7 citations used. The paper stays within page requirements. APA format is used with minimal errors.
Report leaves the reader with confidence in understanding the informatics system; graphics are used to illustrate key points.
Meets expectations for graduate level work.
References are not sufficient or are mostly from the lay literature or out of date. Sources identified are a combination of peer reviewed and nonpeer reviewed. Fewer than 7 citations used. The paper is either too long or too short. Weak writing quality and/or little evidence of correctness of APA format.
Report does not leave the reader with confidence in understanding the informatics system; graphics are minimally used or not used to illustrate key points.
Work lags behind expectations for graduate level work.
Health Information Technology Project Assignment:
Write a 12- to 15-page (plus references) paper that includes the following:
Organization Information (5 points)
Briefly describe the health information technology system/application and the organization type (hospital, clinic, public health agency, software company, government health information website, private virtual health information site, etc.).
Is the health information technology system/application clinical, administrative, educational, or research related?
What were the key reasons for development of this health information technology system/application?
Who manages this health information technology system/application and where are they located within the organization’s administrative structure?
Information System Application: Design (5 points)
Many health systems have multiple independent entities that work together toward a common goal of providing health care. How did the various stakeholders work together to make decisions related to this health information technology system/application? Were the end users involved in the development of this health information technology system/application
How was this health information system/application initially funded?
Have organizational or political issues impacted the ongoing funding for this health information technology system/application?
Who manages the budget for this health information technology system/application?
Information System Application: Implementation (5 points)
How are security issues addressed; how does this health information technology system/application support a legally sound health care record?
How are individuals trained to use the health information technology system/application?
What are the plans for planned or unplanned downtime?
How are health information technology system/application upgrades scheduled or planned?
How has the health information technology system/application changed in response to health care reform and related legislation?
What suggestions could you make regarding changes needed to support health care reform and related legislation?
Innovative Aspects of the System (5 points)
How are technology innovations being used in the health information technology system/application?
What technology innovations could you recommend for this organization?
End Product (5 points)
The paper is 12- to 15-page report.
The report leaves the reader with confidence in understanding the informatics system.
Graphics are used to illustrate key points.
The report is a scholarly paper and includes a minimum of 7 citations from peer-reviewed journals.
Appropriate APA format is used.
*Note: Up to 5 points (20%) may be deducted for grammar and APA style errors.
Don’t wait until the last minute
Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.
Start My Order
