+1 (951) 902-6107 info@platinumressays.com

DM ll

Pathophysiology & Clinical Findings of the Disease

  1. Review the lab findings and decide if the diagnosis is Type 2 or Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.
  2. Explain the pathophysiology associated with your chosen diagnosis
  3. Identify at least three subjective findings from the case which support the chosen diagnosis.
  4. Identify at least three objective findings from the case which support the chosen diagnosis.

Management of the Disease

*Utilize the required Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) to support your treatment recommendations.

  1. Identify two (2) "Evidence A" recommended medication classes for the treatment of this condition and provide an example (drug name) for each.
  2. Describe the mechanism of action for each of the medication classes identified above.
  3. Identify two (2) "Evidence A" recommended non-pharmacological treatment options for this patient.
  4. Utilizes the required Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) to support the chosen treatment recommendations

Week 6 Case Study Template

Pathophysiology & Clinical Findings of the Disease

1. Based on the review of the history, physical and lab findings what is the most likely diabetes diagnosis for this patient?

2. Explain the pathophysiology associated with the chosen diabetes diagnosis.

3. Identify at least three subjective findings from the case which support the chosen diagnosis.

4. Identify at least three objective findings from the case which support the chosen diagnosis

Management of the Disease

*Utilize the required Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) to support your treatment recommendations.

1. Utilizes the required Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) to support the chosen treatment recommendations.

2. Identify two (2) “Evidence A” recommended medication classes for the treatment of this condition and provide an example (drug name) for each.

3. Describe the mechanism of action for each of the medication classes identified above.

4. Identify two (2) “ Evidence A” recommended non-pharmacological treatment options for this patient.

References

[Must be on a separate page and in APA format]

,

Preparing the Assignment

Requirements

Content Criteria

1. Read the case study listed below.

2. Refer to the rubric for grading requirements.

3. Utilizing the  Week 6 Case Study TemplateLinks to an external site. , provide your responses to the case study questions listed below.

4. You must use at least one scholarly reference to provide pathophysiology statements. For this class, use of the textbook for pathophysiology statements is acceptable. You may also use an appropriate evidence-based journal.

5. You must use the current Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) for the Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes -Abridged for Primary Care Providers provided by the American Diabetes Association to determine the patient's type of diabetes and answer the treatment recommendation questions. The most current guideline can be found at the following web address:  https://professional.diabetes.org/content-page/practice-guidelines-resourcesLinks to an external site.  At the website, locate the current year’s CPG for use. 

6. Proper APA format (in-text citations, reference page, spelling, English language, and grammar) must be used.

Case Study Scenario

Chief Complaint

J.T. is a 48-year old male who presents to the primary care clinic with fatigue, weight loss, and extreme thirst and increased appetite.

History of Present Illness

J.T. has been in his usual state of health until three weeks ago when he began experiencing symptoms of fatigue, weight loss, and extreme thirst. He reports that he would like to begin a walking program, but he feels too fatigued to walk at any point during the day. Now he is very concerned about gaining more weight since he is eating more. He reports insomnia due to having to get up and urinate greater than 4 times per night.

Past Medical History 

· Hypertension

· Hyperlipidemia

· Obesity

Family History

· Both parents deceased

· Brother: Type 2 diabetes 

Social History

· Denies smoking

· Denies alcohol or recreational drug use

· Landscaper  

Allergies

· No Known Drug Allergies 

Medications

· Lisinopril 20 mg once daily by mouth

· Atorvastatin 20 mg once daily by mouth

· Aspirin 81 mg once daily by mouth

· Multivitamin once daily by mouth

Review of Systems

· Constitutional: – fever, – chills, – weight loss.

· Neurological: denies dizziness or disorientation

· HEENT: Denies nasal congestion, rhinorrhea or sore throat.  

· Chest: (-)Tachypnea. Denies cough.

· Heart: Denies chest pain, chest pressure or palpitations.

· Lymph: Denies lymph node swelling.

General Physical Exam  

· Constitutional: Alert and oriented male in no acute distress   

· Vital Signs: BP-136/80, T-98.6 F, P-78, RR-20

· Wt. 240 lbs., Ht. 5'8", BMI 36.5

HEENT 

· Eyes: Pupils equal, round and reactive to light and accommodation, normal conjunctiva. 

· Ears: Tympanic membranes intact. 

· Nose: Bilateral nasal turbinates without redness or swelling. Nares patent. 

· Mouth: Oropharynx clear. No mouth lesions. Teeth present and intact; Oral mucous membranes and lips dry. 

Neck/Lymph Nodes 

· Neck supple without JVD. 

· No lymphadenopathy, masses or carotid bruits. 

Lungs 

· Bilateral breath sounds clear throughout lung fields. Breathing quality deep with fruity breath odor

Heart 

· S1 and S2 regular rate and rhythm; – tachycardia; no rubs or murmurs. 

Integumentary System 

· Skin warm, dry; Nail beds pink without clubbing.  

Labs

Test

Patient's Result

Reference

Glucose (fasting)

132

60-120 mg/dL

BUN

20

7-24 mg/dL

Creatinine

0.8

0.7-1.4 mg/dL

Sodium

141

135-145 mEq/L

Sodium

141

135-145 mEq/L

Chloride

97

95-105 mEq/L

HCO3

24

22-28 mEq/L

A1C

7.2

Urinalysis

Protein

Glucose

Ketones

 

Negative

Positive

Negative

Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)

220 mg/dL

J.T. is diagnosed with diabetes. Review all information provided in the case to answer the following questions.

Case Study Questions

Pathophysiology & Clinical Findings of the Disease

1. Review the lab findings and decide if the diagnosis is Type 2 or Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.

2. Explain the pathophysiology associated with your chosen diagnosis

3. Identify at least three subjective findings from the case which support the chosen diagnosis.

4. Identify at least three objective findings from the case which support the chosen diagnosis.

Management of the Disease

*Utilize the required Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) to support your treatment recommendations.

1. Identify two (2) "Evidence A" recommended medication classes for the treatment of this condition and provide an example (drug name) for each.

2. Describe the mechanism of action for each of the medication classes identified above.

3. Identify two (2) "Evidence A" recommended non-pharmacological treatment options for this patient.

4. Utilizes the required Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) to support the chosen treatment recommendations

ASSIGNMENT CONTENT

Category

Points

%

Description

Pathophysiology & Clinical Findings of the Disease

45

45%

The student:

· Identifies the likely diagnosis based on exam and lab findings. 

· Explains the pathophysiology associated with the chosen disorder.

· Supports the pathophysiology statement with at least one appropriate, scholarly reference (textbook is acceptable for pathophysiology statements only).

· Identifies at least three subjective findings from the case.

· Identifies at least three objective findings from the case.

(5 Required Elements)

Management of the Disease 

45

45%

The student:

· Utilizes the required Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) to support the chosen treatment recommendations.

· Identifies two (2)“Evidence A” recommendedmedicationclassesfor the treatment of the condition and provides an example (drug name) for each.

· Identifies two (2) “Evidence A” recommended non-pharmacological treatment options for the condition.

· Describes the mechanism of action for each of the medication classes identified above.

(4 Required Elements)

90

90%

Total CONTENT Points = 90 pts

NR507 Week 6 Diabetes Case Study

NR507 Week 6 Diabetes Case Study

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePathophysiology & Clinical Findings of the Disease

The student:  – Identifies the correct type of diabetes  – Explains the pathophysiology associated with the chosen disorder.  – Supports the pathophysiology statement with at least one appropriate, scholarly reference (textbook is acceptable for pathophysiology statements only).  – Identifies at least three subjective findings from the case.  – Identifies at least three objective findings from the case.  (5 Required Elements)

45 pts

All 5 required elements are present.

41 pts

1 required element is missing.

37 pts

2 required elements are missing

23 pts

3-4 required elements are missing.

0 pts

All 5 required elements are missing.

45 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeManagement of the Disease

The student:  – Utilizes the required Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) to support the chosen treatment recommendations.  – Identifies two (2) “Evidence A” recommended medication classes for the treatment of the condition and provides an example (drug name) for each.  – Identifies two (2) “Evidence A” recommended non-pharmacological treatment options for the condition.  – Describes the mechanism of action for each of the medication classes identified above  (4 Required Elements)

45 pts

All 4 elements are present

41 pts

1 required element is missing

37 pts

2 required elements are missing

23 pts

3 required elements are missing

0 pts

All 4 required elements are missing

45 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization, spelling, grammar & APA format

The student:  – Uses the week 6 case study template for case study responses.  – Provides correct in-text citations for responses which match the reference page.  – Has minimal spelling, grammar & APA format errors.

10 pts

Case study template is used for responses AND In-text citations are correct which match the reference page AND There are 0-2 errors in spelling, grammar or APA format.

9 pts

Case study template is used for responses AND In-text citations are correct which match the reference page AND There are 3-5 errors in spelling, grammar or APA format.

8 pts

Case study template is used for responses AND In-text citations are correct which match the reference page AND There are 6-8 errors in spelling, grammar or APA format.

5 pts

Case study template is not used for responses OR In-text citations are incorrect or do not match the reference page AND There are 0-5 errors in spelling, grammar or APA format.

0 pts

Case study template is not used for responses AND/OR In-text citations are incorrect or do not match the reference page AND There are 6 or more errors in spelling, grammar or APA format.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate penalty deductions

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.

0 pts

Manual Deductions

0 pts

Manual Deductions

0 pts

Question about Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs

Write a paragraph of 300 words or more about the association between Maslow’s Hierarchy of needs and the nursing practice.

AI and plagiarism-free. Include a minimum of two references.

    Nursing

     

    1. How might your personal experiences, self-identity, bias, and privilege impact your community and decision-making?
    2. Reflect on the demands that are or may be placed on you every day that may be compounded while in school. What strategies, resources, and/or boundaries might you implement to address these demands and why?

      GDECE106

      Task Description: In terms of physical, social-emotional and cognitive development, identify aspects of learning and development of a child (You can have an example from your placement, your family or your social circles, but please respect the confidentiality of their identity, make them unidentifiable, using a pseudonym). Explain their milestones of development, specifically identifying development across all domains. Use theoretical tools from different perspectives that we have discussed in the class, e.g.: constructivism, behaviourism, humanistic theory, cognitivism, etc. Appraise a range of intentional teaching strategies to support the child’s holistic learning and development, along with individual needs if required. Link to EYLF/NQS. Criteria • Explain the milestones achieved by the child, and any notable milestones that have not been achieved but would be expected at the child’s age. • Appraisal of strategies to support the child’s development and learning • Clear connections to EYLF, NQS • Draw on relevant academic literature to support your explanation. Due Date: 14th August, 2024, 11.59 PM Word count: 2000 words +/- 10% (excluding references) NOTE: SCEI-HE requires its students to observe the highest ethical standards in every aspect of their academic work. SCEI-HE actively demonstrates its commitment to academic integrity by recognising scholarly work and penalising all forms of academic dishonesty. Please refer to the Institute’s HEPP01 Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure for further information or speak to your lecturer, Academic Support Coordinator or Librarian. Formatting: 12-point serif font (eg. Times New Roman). 1.5 or double line spacing. Referencing: APA7 (please refer to this guide for referencing guidelines) 

      GDECE106 ASSESSMENT 2 Rubric

      Task Description:

      In terms of physical, social-emotional and cognitive development, identify aspects of learning and development of a child (You can have an example from your placement, your family or your social circles, but please respect the confidentiality of their identity, make them unidentifiable, using a pseudonym). Explain their milestones of development, specifically identifying development across all domains. Use theoretical tools from different perspectives that we have discussed in the class, e.g.: constructivism, behaviourism, humanistic theory, cognitivism, etc. Appraise a range of intentional teaching strategies to support the child’s holistic learning and development, along with individual needs if required. Link to EYLF/NQS.

      Criteria

      • Explain the milestones achieved by the child, and any notable milestones that have not been achieved but would be

      expected at the child’s age.

      • Appraisal of strategies to support the child’s development and learning

      • Clear connections to EYLF, NQS

      • Draw on relevant academic literature to support your explanation.

      Due Date: 14th August, 2024, 11.59 PM

      Word count: 2000 words +/- 10% (excluding references)

      NOTE: SCEI-HE requires its students to observe the highest ethical standards in every aspect of their academic work. SCEI-HE actively

      demonstrates its commitment to academic integrity by recognising scholarly work and penalising all forms of academic dishonesty. Please refer

      to the Institute’s HEPP01 Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure for further information or speak to your lecturer, Academic Support

      Coordinator or Librarian.

      Formatting: 12-point serif font (eg. Times New Roman). 1.5 or double line spacing.

      Referencing: APA7 (please refer to this guide for referencing guidelines)

      Grading Scale

      Criteria High Distinction (HD)

      Distinction (D) Credit (C) Pass (P) Not meeting minimum requirement (N)

      C1. Explain the milestones achieved by the child, and any notable milestones that have not been achieved but would be expected at the child’s age.

      (15 marks)

      C1.1 Explanation of milestone achievement clearly addresses all domains and contains critical reflection on child development in terms of age / development related expectations.

      C1.2 Explanation of milestone achievement clearly addresses all domains.

      C1.3 Explanation of milestone achievement addresses all domains but is mostly descriptive.

      C1.4 Child clearly introduced. Explanation of milestone achievement addresses all domains but may contain misunderstandings.

      C1.5 Child not clearly introduced. Explanation of milestone achievement doesn’t address all domains / is inaccurate or missing.

      C2. Appraisal of strategies to support the child’s development and learning

      (10 marks)

      C2.1 Relevant strategies to support the child’s development are appraised.

      C2.2 Relevant strategies to support the child’s development are explained.

      C2.3 Relevant strategies to support the child’s development are described.

      C2.4 Relevant strategies to support the child’s development are noted.

      C2.5 Appraisal of strategies to support the child’s development and learning is missing, inaccurate or irrelevant.

      C3. Clear connections to EYLF, NQS

      C3.1 Connections to EYLF and NQS are explained and justified.

      C3.2 Connections to EYLF and NQS are explained.

      C3.3 Connections to EYLF and NQS are clearly stated.

      C3.4 Connections to EYLF and NQS are note in brief.

      C3.5 Connections to EYLF and NQS are missing or inaccurate.

      (5 marks)

      C4. Draw on relevant academic literature to support your explanation.

      (5 marks)

      C4.1 A broad range of relevant academic sources cited. Sources effectively support claims / argument.

      C4.2 A range of relevant academic sources cited. Sources effectively support claims / argument.

      C4.3 Relevant academic sources cited. Sources effectively support claims / argument.

      C4.4 Minimal academic sources cited. Sources do not effectively support claims / argument.

      C4.5 No academic sources cited /irrelevant academic sources cited.

      C5. Assignment is

      formatted according

      to requirements and

      written clearly and

      cohesively. APA 7

      referencing is used.

      Word limit is

      adhered to.

      (5 marks)

      C5.1 The

      assignment is clear

      and free of

      typographical and

      structural features

      that hinder

      understanding.

      There is no

      confusion between

      author voice and

      that of sources. The

      assignment is

      formatted according

      to stated

      requirements.

      Accurate mechanics

      of in-text and end-

      of-text APA (7th

      Ed.) referencing

      C5.2 The

      assignment is clear

      with minor

      typographical and

      structural features

      that may hinder

      understanding.

      There is minimal

      confusion between

      author voice and

      that of sources.

      The assignment is

      mostly formatted

      according to stated

      requirements.

      Accurate

      mechanics of in-

      text and end-of-

      text APA (7th Ed.)

      C5.3 The assignment

      is clear with

      typographical and

      structural features

      that may hinder

      understanding. There

      is minor confusion

      between author

      voice and that of

      sources. The

      assignment is partly

      formatted according

      to stated

      requirements.

      Mechanics of in-text

      and end-of-text APA

      (7th Ed.) referencing

      style were used with

      C5.4 The

      assignment has

      typographical and

      structural features

      that significantly

      hinder

      understanding.

      There is confusion

      between author

      voice and that of

      sources.

      The assignment is

      minimally

      formatted according

      to stated

      requirements.

      Mechanics of in-

      text and end-of-text

      APA (7th Ed.)

      C5.5 The

      assignment has

      typographical and

      structural features

      that prohibit

      understanding.

      There is confusion

      between author

      voice and that of

      sources, or author’s

      voice is absent. The

      assignment is not

      formatted according

      to stated

      requirements.

      Mechanics of in-

      text and end-of-text

      APA (7th Ed.)

      referencing style

      style were used.

      Word limit met.

      referencing style

      were used with

      minor

      inconsistencies (no

      more than 2

      errors).

      Word limit met.

      inconsistencies (no

      more than 4 errors).

      Word limit met.

      referencing contain

      several errors.

      Word limit met.

      were not used

      appropriately.

      Word limit not met.

      Economics 4

        

      As health care leaders, it is important to understand strategies for advocating and lobbying elected officials. This can lead to the development of policies or laws that can help drive improved equity and outcomes for all participants in the health care environment as well as a more sustainable financial future.

        Economics 3

          

        As a master's-level health care practitioner, you are expected to consider a number of factors when supporting change by analyzing the feasibility of a new initiative or identifying an issue within your organization. For example, you must take into consideration the various types of risk (such as patient safety, physical plant, financial, or reputation), as well as the present and future value of the service line or economic opportunity you are invested in. Additionally, you must also balance your ethical and moral responsibility to provide quality care to patients and populations while protecting your organization's assets and economic viability in the near and long terms.

          Platinum Essays