+1 (951) 902-6107 info@platinumressays.com

Week 7 discussion

  1. Reflect on an experience in which you were directly involved or witnessed incivility in the workplace and answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail.
    • Provide a brief synopsis of the situation.  
    • Describe how the situation made you feel. Discuss your response or the response of others involved. 
    • What were the consequences of this situation? Provide an example of how this affected the work environment and outcomes.  
    • How could the situation have been prevented? Discuss evidence-based strategies to support a healthy work environment. 

      Use current APA format to format citations and references and is free of errors.

    Nursing NEED ASSIGNMENT BY 8/21/2025 AT 7PM. MUST FOLLOW ALL INSTRUCTIONS. NO PLAGARISM

     MY NEIGHBORHOOD IS BEDFORD STUYVESANT. LOCATED IN BROOKLYN, NY 

    Preparing for this Assignment:

    1. COMPLETE MODULE CONTENT – these are necessary to complete the assignment
    2. COMPLETE READINGS
      • Mod 7

    Part 2. Perinatal Health Indicators Assignment

    Soon, you will be a midwife serving your local community! To provide the best care to the women, childbearing people, and families within your community, you will have to understand the structural determinants that impact the health of individuals in your community. Structural determinants are “forces that influence health outcomes at levels above individual interactions” (Metzl & Hansen, 2014). Once you have this information, you will be better prepared to develop a plan to meet the needs of your community as a CNM. 

    By completing the Perinatal Health Assessment Assignment, you will:

    • Introduce your community and describe available reproductive health services, transportation options, birth options, employment options, insurance access, and community resources and services in your county. 
    • Compile and compare demographic, educational, economic, and birth rate data for your county, state, and country.
    • Compile available resources for pregnant people and families in your community.
    • Consider how the above factors may impact local reproductive and perinatal health.

    What to expect while completing the Community Assessment 

    • You will need at least 30 hours to complete this assignment. Start early and give yourself ample time!
    • The assignment has many different components, and you will need to search for information via many different internet sites. Sometimes, a Google search is a good place to start.
    • Use the assignment template. Ensure you address all the required content and remove the blue text with instructions before submitting your assignment.
    • You will need to create a key with superscripts to cite references used in some of your tables (Instructions are provided in the template)

    USE THIS TEMPLATE

    Steps for Completing This Assignment:

    1. Describe your community, access to perinatal and reproductive health services, birth options, local transportation, and access to care as described in the template

    2. Complete Perinatal Health Indicators Table

    • Change table headings to reflect your county and your state
    • View example tables in the template provided above
    • Clearly indicate the year and source for each cell as a superscript, followed by a brief citation in a key under your table. See the example table above.
    • All of the citations used for your table must be included on your APA reference page. 
    • Superscripts should be in alphabetical order in the cells from left to right. To create a superscript in Word, highlight the text you want to change to a superscript and click the superscript button (it looks like x exponent 2). It is located in the Home tab, in the font group.
    • Use lowercase letters in your table key for citations from the same source and year. This will enable you to differentiate references from the same source and year. 
    • MMR: Unless you live in a very large city (New York, LA, Detroit, etc.), you will not likely find the MMR for your county. For that cell, please insert N/A*.  Then, in the key, list two credible sources where you searched unsuccessfully for that data. Do not try to calculate your county’s MMR. The denominator is too small. 
    • Unavailable data: If you live in a rural area and are not able to find some data points for your community even after searching both national and state health data, then use a nearby county that does have data available. Use an asterisk * in the cell and describe in the key that you searched unsuccessfully for data for your county but have data for a nearby county.
    • Citing Healthy People 2030. See the Common References Document.Links to an external site.

    3. Complete Local Health Disparity Table

     Identify a local Perinatal Health disparity by displaying a correlation between one local demographic factor and one poorly performing local Perinatal Health indicator.

    • Identify a local (your county) Perinatal Health indicator (one of the 4–IMR, PTB, LBW, or EAPNC) that performs most poorly based either on the table or on disparity data that you find. Please do not use MMR as a local disparity.
    • If local data is unavailable, use state-level data for your disparity table and indicate 2 credible sources in the key where you searched unsuccessfully for county-level data. 
    • Identify one subpopulation in your community with the poorest outcomes for your chosen Perinatal Health indicator. This could be but is not limited to race, ethnicity, income level, maternal age, maternal education, marital status, smoking, substance use disorder, maternal pregestational obesity, etc. (If your health disparity is not one of these, consider checking with your course faculty).
    • Search for evidence that a certain population of childbearing people has poorer outcomes than the general population for a particular indicator. This documented difference is then considered a health disparity in your community.
    • You must compare the data of your targeted sub-population to similar sub-populations to document that there is a disparity within your target group. 
      • Example County Perinatal Indicator: High rates of low birth weight babies.
      • Example subpopulation with increased LBW: maternal age-teen mothers (hint: THIS is your disparity).
      • If you suspect that teen pregnancies are associated with low birth weight, then your documentation would include the following:
        • low birth weight rate for people aged 15-19
        • low birth weight rate for people aged 20-29, 30-39, and 40 and above.

    What if you know a high percentage of a social demographic factor in your community but cannot find the data to show a correlation to a poorly performing Perinatal Health indicator in your county? 

    This problem might arise for those who live in small or rural communities with a lower population.  If you cannot find a disparity for a perinatal health indicator in your county, you can create a disparity table with data from your state. Your table will be the same as the sample table in the template; however, instead of having a column for data in your local community (county), the column will be for data from your state. Make sure to choose a subpopulation that exists within your county. For example, don’t share data that Native American people have a higher rate of preterm birth in your state if you don’t have a Native American population in your county.

    Example: 

    • County Perinatal indicator: Low Birth Weight (LBW) 
      • Performs the most poorly based on your table (even if lower than national or HP2030 goal)
    • Suspected disparity (your theory): LBW disparity for teens
      • You think there may be a link, but you can’t find local stats on teen pregnancy and LBW.  Use state data to show that teen pregnancy is associated with increased rates of LBW at the state level. From that, you can infer that teens in your local county will also have a higher risk of LBW.

    4. Complete Social Services Resource Tables

    • Provide social services, home health or home visiting programs, homeless shelters, and mental health services resources available in your community.

    5. Response

    • Respond to these questions in 1- 2 paragraphs, considering what you've learned. All information should be factual (if you are guessing or assuming, you should say so), and data (with citation) should be used when it supports your statements. 
      • Based on the data you collected, what is the most concerning indicator from Table 1 in your population as a whole? Why?
      • What did you learn when comparing different demographic groups in your community in your disparity table? Why did you choose this disparity?
      • Looking at the data and considering the information you gathered from your community assessment and this assignment, what social and/or structural factors may contribute to this disparity in your community?

      Course: Ethics Discuss: Religion Prompt Religion is at the center of many applied ethical topics. Give two recent examples from current events. How did religious ethics play a part in these events?

       

      Discuss: Religion

      Prompt

      Religion is at the center of many applied ethical topics. Give two recent examples from current events. How did religious ethics play a part in these events?

      Guidelines

      • Compose a written response to each topic posed, and then reply to at least 2 responses to your cohort posts. This will encompass more than just an agreement to the statements posted, or “good job.” Look to create a conversational dialogue in each session.
        • In your reply posts, be sure to include the name of the original poster so that it is clear which classmate (and what post/ideas) you are replying to.
      • Your initial post should be submitted no later than 11:59pm Central Time on the Thursday before the Sunday due date for each week. Your reply posts are due by the Sunday due date for this assignment.

        Health Promotion Discussion Week 7

        This week you will devote your time to work on your health promotion proposal PowerPoint presentation.

         Please share what you consider a challenge for this activity. How did (or would) you approach the challenge? What does the evidence-based practice say? Any key strategies and interventions that you learned in the process of this course? 

        Share with your peers, so we may all learn new strategies to organize our ideas, manage our stress, and be more efficient in our scholarly work. Do not forget to utilize the EBP references within your submission.

        Please note the grading rubric for the discussion board.

        As a reminder, all discussion posts must be a minimum of 500 words, references must be cited in APA format 7th Edition, and must include a minimum of 3 scholarly resources published within the past 3 years.

        Please ensure you can LOOK UP your reference from your citation submission. 

          Organizational Leadesrship

           

          Formative Assessment

          This assignment aims to enhance your understanding of systems thinking in healthcare quality analysis. 

          Instructions: 

          1. Choose a relevant healthcare quality issue, such as patient wait times, medication errors, or infection control. 
          2. Create a visual map identifying key factors influencing your selected quality issue. Use shapes representing each factor and arrows to illustrate their interconnections and relationships. 
          3. Indicate any feedback loops where changes in one factor may influence another. 
          4. Reflection: Write a brief reflection (150 words) discussing how systems thinking changed your understanding of the quality issue and the insights gained from this exercise.
             

          Document Type/Template

          • You may select the platform of your choice to create the map.  

          Criteria Ratings

          Scholarly Writing

          Affirmed Writing is formal in language, avoiding colloquialisms, slang, and overly informal expressions.

          Not Affirmed Writing includes colloquialisms, slang, and overly informal expressions.

          Writing Mechanics

          Affirmed Minor spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors present, and/or sentence structure lacks minor elements of professional writing, and/or paragraphs are consistently developed. (1-2 errors)

          Not Affirmed Multiple spelling grammar and/or punctuation errors present and/or sentence structure does not meet professional writing standards, and/or paragraphs are minimally developed. (more than 2 errors)

          Clarity of Content

          Affirmed

          Writing demonstrates a strong connection between ideas, ensuring that the reader can follow the logical progression of the arguments.

          Not Affirmed

          Writing lacks a connection between ideas, and there is no logical progression of the arguments.

          All Aspects Addressed

          Affirmed Writing addresses multiple relevant aspects of the topic with sufficient detail and analysis, providing a thorough understanding.

          Not Affirmed Writing fails to address relevant aspects of the topic with insufficient detail or analysis.

          APA Sources (when appropriate)

          Affirmed

          Citations and references follow the APA style guide, with less than 2 errors.

          Not Affirmed

          Citations and references are not included when appropriate or do not follow the appropriate APA style guide. There are more than 2 errors.

          quality improvement and program evaluation

           

          Write an analysis of the key principles and elements of quality improvement.

          • Describe the purpose of QI in healthcare.
          • What methods or models are often used for QI?

          This analysis should be 2 pages (double spaced) and utilize APA format and style (title page, in-text citations, reference page) and should include at least one reference outside of what is used in the course. 

          Document Type/Template

          • Word Document 

          Criteria Ratings

          Scholarly Writing

          Affirmed Writing is formal in language, avoiding colloquialisms, slang, and overly informal expressions.

          Not Affirmed Writing includes colloquialisms, slang, and overly informal expressions.

          Writing Mechanics

          Affirmed Minor spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors present, and/or sentence structure lacks minor elements of professional writing, and/or paragraphs are consistently developed. (1-2 errors)

          Not Affirmed Multiple spelling grammar and/or punctuation errors present and/or sentence structure does not meet professional writing standards, and/or paragraphs are minimally developed. (more than 2 errors)

          Clarity of Content

          Affirmed

          Writing demonstrates a strong connection between ideas, ensuring that the reader can follow the logical progression of the arguments.

          Not Affirmed

          Writing lacks a connection between ideas, and there is no logical progression of the arguments.

          All Aspects Addressed

          Affirmed Writing addresses multiple relevant aspects of the topic with sufficient detail and analysis, providing a thorough understanding.

          Not Affirmed Writing fails to address relevant aspects of the topic with insufficient detail or analysis.

          APA Sources (when appropriate)

          Affirmed

          Citations and references follow the APA style guide, with less than 2 errors.

          Not Affirmed

          Citations and references are not included when appropriate or do not follow the appropriate APA style guide. There are more than 2 errors.

          Platinum Essays