+1 (951) 902-6107 info@platinumressays.com

careplan

instruction in attached older adult 5 template

assignment to be done in concept map template

example of a concept map is also attached

Nursing Care of the Older Adult

Module 05 Assignment – Case Study Concept Map and Plan of Care

Concept Map:

Primary Medical Diagnosis:

·

Prioritized Nursing Dx# 2

·

Prioritized Nursing Dx# 6

·

Prioritized Nursing Dx# 5

·

Prioritized Nursing Dx# 3

·

Prioritized Nursing Dx# 1

·

Prioritized Nursing Dx# 4

·

Nursing Plan of Care

Prioritized Nursing Diagnoses

Goal

Nursing Interventions

,

Example: Case Study Plan of Care and Concept Map

Case Scenario:

Mrs. J is admitted to the emergency department with a diagnosis of congestive heart failure. She was discharged from the hospital 10 days ago and comes in today stating, “I just had to come to the hospital today because I can’t catch my breath and my legs are swollen.” After further questioning, you learn that Mrs. J is strictly following the fluid and salt restriction ordered during her last hospital admission. Mrs. J reports gaining 1 to 2 pounds every day since her discharge.

Concept Map:

Identify two (2) priority nursing diagnoses for Mrs. J and develop a concept map to illustrate them (see example below).

Primary Medical Diagnosis:

· Congestive Heart Failure

Prioritized Nursing Dx# 2

· Fluid Volume Excess r/t fluid retention as evidenced by swelling

Prioritized Nursing Dx# 6

·

Prioritized Nursing Dx# 5

·

Prioritized Nursing Dx# 3

·

Prioritized Nursing Dx# 1

· Impaired Gas Exchange r/t fluid overload as evidenced by shortness of breath

Prioritized Nursing Dx# 4

·

Nursing Plan of Care

For each of the priority nursing diagnoses, establish one (1) goal. For each goal create two (2) nursing interventions.

Prioritized Nursing Diagnoses

Goal

Nursing Interventions

1. Ineffective Gas Exchange

Pt will maintain oxygen saturations greater than 95% during my shift

1. Give oxygen as ordered

2. Monitor clients oxygen saturations

2. Fluid Volume Excess

Pt will have decreased swelling in extremities by the end of my shift.

1. Administer diuretic as ordered

2. Monitor Intake and Output

,

Mrs. Y

Mrs. Y is an 84-year-old client who was recently discharged from the hospital for an infected diabetic ulcer on her left leg. During her hospitalization, Mrs. Y required intravenous antibiotic therapy through a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line.

Due to Mrs. Y's long history of diabetes, her physician ordered that intravenous antibiotic therapy be continued at home. Subsequently, home health services were initiated, a home health nurse was assigned to Mrs. Y's case, and an initial home visit was scheduled.

The home health nurse arrives at Mrs. Y's home and introduces herself to the client and the family. The nurse explains the home nursing services that will be provided, including the PICC line and intravenous antibiotic therapy treatments.

During the initial home visit, the nurse assessed the physiological, psychological, functional, and safety needs of the client. The nurse's findings were as follows:

· Mrs. Y lives alone; however, her daughter checks on her frequently throughout the day.

· The client is noted to have moderate functional issues and ambulates with a cane.

· The client has several throw rugs in the main walking quarters and minimal lighting throughout the hallways.

· Mrs. Y states "I used to get around my house with ease, but now I get a little tired and have to sit down and rest frequently."

Consider Mrs. Y's current health status and functional decline, then address the following:

· Identify three (3) priority nursing diagnoses for Mrs. Y. 

· Create a visual representation of the three (3) priority nursing diagnoses by incorporating them into the Concept Map (template in the worksheet). Be sure each nursing diagnosis includes the following elements:

· "related to (r/t)" — description of the client's problem

· "as evidenced by" — description of the client's symptoms

· Complete the Nursing Plan of Care (table in the worksheet) describing what should be implemented for Mrs. Y.

· Goals: Establish at least one (1) goal for each of the nursing diagnoses you identified (for a total of 3 goals). Goals should be: patient specific, measurable, actionable, realistic, and time limited.

· Nursing Interventions: Describe at least three (3) nursing interventions for each of the goals (for a total of 9 nursing interventions). Each intervention should be in alignment with the goal it is supporting.

· Complete the assignment using proper spelling, grammar, and APA.

Case Study Analysis

  

Case Study Analysis related to the scenario provided, study the following:

The factors that affect fertility (STDs).

Why inflammatory markers rise in STD/PID.

Why prostatitis and infection happen. Also, explain the causes of systemic reaction.

CASE STUDY ANALYSIS

An understanding of the factors surrounding women’s and men’s health can be critically important to disease diagnosis and treatment in these areas. This importance is magnified by the fact that some diseases and disorders manifest differently based on the sex of the patient.

Effective disease analysis often requires an understanding that goes beyond the human systems involved. The impact of patient characteristics, as well as racial and ethnic variables, can also have an important impact.

In this study, you examine a case study and analyze the symptoms presented. You identify the elements that may be factors in the diagnosis, and you explain the implications to patient health.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

Note: These readings are intended to serve as supplementary to the Lecturio content provided in this course. Please refer/review these supplementary resources should you need help in reinforcing concepts and in preparation for completing this week’s Assessments.

· McCance, K. L. & Huether, S. E. (2019).  Pathophysiology: The biologic basis for disease in adults and children (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby/Elsevier.

· Chapter 24: Structure and Function of the Reproductive Systems (stop at Tests of reproductive function); Summary Review

· Chapter 25: Alterations of the Female Reproductive System (stop at Organ prolapse); pp. 787–788 (start at Impaired fertility) (stop at Disorders of the female breast); Summary Review

· Chapter 26: Alterations of the Male Reproductive System (stop at Hormone levels); Summary Review

· Chapter 27: Sexually Transmitted Infections, including Summary Review

· Low, N. & Broutet N. J. (2017).  Sexually transmitted infections – Research priorities for new challenges Links to an external site. PLoS Medicine, (12), e1002481

The Assignment (1- to 2-page case study analysis)

In your Case Study Analysis related to the scenario provided, explain the following:

The factors that affect fertility (STDs).

Why inflammatory markers rise in STD/PID.

Why prostatitis and infection happens. Also explain the causes of systemic reaction.

NURS_6501_Week 10_Case Study_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6501_Week 10_Case Study_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examining the patient symptoms presented in the case study. Be sure to address the following as it relates to the case you were assigned (omit section that does not pertain to your case, faculty will give full points for that section): Explain the factors that affect fertility (STDs)

30 to >27.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and thoroughly describes the patient symptoms. … The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed explanations of the processes related to women's and men's health, and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

27 to >24.0 pts

Good

The response describes the patient symptoms. … The response includes accurate, explanations of the processes related to women's and men's health, and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

24 to >21.0 pts

Fair

The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague or inaccurate. … The response includes explanations of the processes related to women's and men's health, with explanations that are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research.

21 to >0 pts

Poor

The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague and inaccurate, or the description is missing. … The response does not include explanations of the processes related to women's and men's health, or the explanations are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain why inflammatory markers rise in STD/PID

30 to >27.0 pts

Excellent

The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific analysis of the concepts and principles of pathophysiology across the life span and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

27 to >24.0 pts

Good

The response includes an accurate explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to affect the patient and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

24 to >21.0 pts

Fair

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to affect the patient, with explanations that are based on inappropriate evidence/research.

21 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to affect the patient, with explanations that are based on inappropriate or missing evidence/research.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain why prostatitis and infection happen. Also explain the causes of systemic reaction.

25 to >22.5 pts

Excellent

The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to affect the patient and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

22.5 to >20.0 pts

Good

The response includes an accurate explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to affect the patient and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

20 to >17.5 pts

Fair

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to affect the patient, with explanations that are based on inappropriate evidence/research.

17.5 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to affect the patient, with explanations that are based on inappropriate or missing evidence/research.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. … The purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%-79% of the time….The purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader's understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

Previous Next

Nurse Burnout

Everything must be in APA 7 format. The second file is the Template from the Instructor. Please do not copy the references. Follow the Sub headings strictly (as listed below)….

Introduction, 

Significance of the problem, 

PICO format clinical question, 

Population, 

Intervention, 

Comparison, 

Outcome, 

Set Strategy and Results,

Synthesis of Literature, 

Practice Recommendation, 

Conclusion, References, 

Table 1 Synthesis Matrix, 

Table 2 Primary Research Evidence, 

Table 3 Evidence Summaries. 

TOPIC: Nurse Burnout

Purpose

The purpose of assignment is to provide experience and feedback with the development of a clinical question of interest to you using the PICO format along with designing and documenting the results of a search for scientific literature related to the clinical question. This assignment is intended to allow you to show evidence of achievement of:

1: Develop evidenced-based practice questions using PICO format.

The purpose of assignment is to provide experience and feedback with the development of evidence tables, synthesis of evidence, and a practice recommendation based on the best available evidence and related to the clinical question of interest to you. This assignment is intended to allow you to show evidence of achievement of:

2: Conduct a literature search for research evidence related to a practice question.

3: Summarize high quality evidence to synthesize into a practice recommendation.

4: Develop a planned change process and a data-driven evaluation for a practice change.

5: Add your plan to implement and evaluate your proposed practice change

Requirements

An APA template is provided which describes the expectations for each section of this scholarly paper. Graduate level writing is expected. The following rubric will be used to score this assignment.

More than 15 references with at least 10 research references AND only websites used were .org, .edu, or .gov. All research studies are from the United States

Requirements

This scholarly paper is due on day 7 of week 6. For this assignment, you will need to revise your practice problem and PICO sections of the previous paper using feedback from your instructor because this paper is a continuation of that paper. An APA template is provided which describes the expectations for each section of this scholarly paper but also refer to the rubric. The evidence tables, one for primary single research studies and one for evidence summaries, are included as appendices, as well as a synthesis matrix to help you organize the information for your paper and must be submitted.

You are summarizing and synthesizing the evidence to make a practice recommendation, rather than reviewing each study.

RUBRIC

Synthesis Project: Part II Rubric

help with OT

Pageof 2ZOOM

Student Name_________________________
Formulate the Research Question
Provide the following answers below using the PICOT format to structure your research question.
P(Population): Who are the clients or population group?
I (Intervention): What intervention are you considering?
C (Comparison): What is another treatment or condition you can compare to?
O (Outcome): What are the expected results or outcomes?
T (Time): Over what time period is the outcome measured?
Example PICOT Question:
In children with autism (P), how does the use of sensory integration therapy (I) compared to behavioral
therapy (C) affect self-regulation skills (O) over a six-month period (T)?
Confirm the credibility of your source by verifying the following criteria. Each item should be marked
as 'Yes' or 'Verified.' If any item does not meet this criterion, the source cannot be considered
reputable.
"Peer-Reviewed: Yes No
Within Last 10 Years: Yes No
Relevant to OT: Yes No
Authors’ Credentials: Verified Not Verified
Cited by Others: Yes No
Provide the credible source in APA format:
Provide a summary of the research:Goal that your treatment addresses:
Approach focuses on: ___ health promotion ___ compensation ___ adaptation ___ prevention ___
restoration ___ maintenance
Thoroughly describe in detail the progression of the treatment intervention to increase the skill
performance for the client until discharge. Be sure to include ways the treatment could be graded
or modified.
Skill being addressed (Use OTPF Terms)?
Grade Up:
Grade Down:

Student Name_________________________

Formulate the Research Question

Provide the following answers below using the PICOT format to structure your research question.

P(Population): Who are the clients or population group?

I (Intervention): What intervention are you considering?

C (Comparison): What is another treatment or condition you can compare to?

O (Outcome): What are the expected results or outcomes?

T (Time): Over what time period is the outcome measured?

Example PICOT Question:

In children with autism (P), how does the use of sensory integration therapy (I) compared to behavioral therapy (C) affect self-regulation skills (O) over a six-month period (T)?

Confirm the credibility of your source by verifying the following criteria. Each item should be marked as 'Yes' or 'Verified.' If any item does not meet this criterion, the source cannot be considered reputable.

"Peer-Reviewed: Stop outline Yes Stop outline No

Within Last 10 Years: Stop outline Yes Stop outline No

Relevant to OT: Stop outline Yes Stop outline No

Authors’ Credentials: Stop outline Verified Stop outline Not Verified

Cited by Others: Stop outline Yes Stop outline No

Provide the credible source in APA format:

Provide a summary of the research:

Goal that your treatment addresses:

Approach focuses on: ___ health promotion ___ compensation ___ adaptation ___ prevention ___ restoration ___ maintenance

Thoroughly describe in detail the progression of the treatment intervention to increase the skill performance for the client until discharge. Be sure to include ways the treatment could be graded or modified.

Skill being addressed (Use OTPF Terms)?

Grade Up:

Grade Down:

NURSE PRACTITIONER PROFESSIONAL CAREER PLANNER

Develop a cover letter, resume, philosophy statement, and other professional resources that meet the requirements outlined in the Career Planner Guide.

NRNP 6675: PMHNP Care Across the Lifespan II

Career Planner Guide

Your Nurse Practitioner Professional Career Planner is due by Day 7 of Week 10. It is highly recommended that you begin planning and working on this Assignment as early in the quarter as is feasible for you. The following checklists outline all of the items you should include in your Career Planner. Additionally, the resources below have been provided to assist you in its development.

Refer to the Walden University Career Center website for resources and information on how to create cover letters, resumes, and professional portfolios. You may also choose to make certain portions of your Career Planner accessible online to members of your professional network or potential employers through platforms such as LinkedIn. Sharing on social media is a useful way to network for many, but it is not a requirement for this assignment.

Checklist for Cover Letter

Cover letters are typically tailored to individual jobs and companies. For this Assignment, you will select a job posting you would like to or could potentially apply for and create a cover letter for it. Your cover letter should be:

· Presented and formatted in professional business manner

· Addressed properly

· Clear and concise (no more than one page) and include:

· Content introduction

· Content body

· Content conclusion

· Written in a professional tone and include:

· Correct spelling, punctuation, and grammar

· Clear and accurate sentence structure

Checklist for Resume

Your resume should be clear, concise, and well organized, and it should also include your:

· Name, location (city/town and state), business phone number, and email address (centered at top of resume)

· Objective: 2–3 sentences describing your goal/objective for employment

· Certifications & licenses

· Education

· Professional experience

· Honors/Awards (as applicable)

Checklist for Portfolio

Your Portfolio should be clear, concise, and well organized, and it should also include your:

· Personal philosophy statement (1-page)

· Personal goals (short term and long term)

· Self-assessment

The following items do not have to be submitted but should be available on request for employers:

· Achievements

· Letters of recommendation (2)

· References (list names, affiliation, and contact information) (3)

· Certifications and licenses

· Prior degrees

· Transcripts (Note: An unofficial transcript will meet this requirement.)

· Certificates of attendance for continuing education

· Publications

· Research

· Oral presentations and/or poster presentations

Learning Resources

Resume and Cover Letter Resources:

Canva. (n.d.). https://www.canva.com/

Canva has many resume templates and formats that may inspire your creativity. (Using Canva is optional.)

Cover Letter Advice (n.d.). Nurse practitioner cover letter sample 1. http://www.coverletter.us/nurse-practitioner-cover-letter/

DeCapua, M. (2019). A nurse practitioner’s guide to the perfect cover letter. Health eCareers. https://www.healthecareers.com/article/healthcare-news/np-cover-letter

Hicks, R. W., & Roberts, M. E. E. (2016). Curriculum vitae: An important tool for the nurse practitioner.  Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners28(7), 347–352.

Gibson, A. (n.d.). Nurse.org career guide series: Ultimate guide to nursing resumes. Nurse.org. https://nurse.org/resources/nursing-resume/

Walden University Career Services. (n.d.). Resumes & more. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/careerservicescenter/resumesandmore

Portfolio Resources:

Chamblee, T. B., Dale, J. C., Drews, B., Spahis, J., & Hardin, T. (2015). Implementation of a professional portfolio: A tool to demonstrate professional development for advanced practice.  Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 29(1), 113–117.

Clarke, M. (2019). The importance of a professional nursing portfolio. HealthLeaders. https://www.healthleadersmedia.com/nursing/importance-professional-nursing-portfolio

Nurse Practitioner Business Owner. (n.d.). This is why you want to create your professional portfolio today! https://npbusiness.org/professional-portfolio/

Portfolium. (n.d.). https://portfolium.com/

Portfolium is one example of portfolio software that you could use to create a portfolio. You may choose your own tool, and it may be online (Google Sites, Portfolium) or offline (Word, pdf), as long as you can easily submit the portfolio files or link to your Instructor.

DISCUSSION: PATIENT PREFERENCES AND DECISION MAKING

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and reflect on a time when you experienced a patient being brought into (or not being brought into) a decision regarding their treatment plan.
  • Review the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute's Decision Aids Inventory at https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/Links to an external site..
    • Choose "For Specific Conditions," then Browse an alphabetical listing of decision aids by health topic.
  • After you have chosen a topic (or condition) and a decision aid, consider if social determinants of healthLinks to an external site. were considered in the treatment plan Social determinants of health can affect a patient's decision as these are conditions in the patient's environment, such as economic stability, education access, health care access and quality, neighborhood, and social and community context.
  • NOTE: To ensure compliance with HIPAA rules, please DO NOT use the patient's real name or any information that might identify the patient or organization/practice.

Assignment 

Post a brief description of the situation you experienced and explain how incorporating or not incorporating patient preferences, social determinants of healthLinks to an external site., and values impacted the outcome of their treatment plan. Be specific and provide examples. Then, explain how including patient preferences, social determinants of health, and values might impact the trajectory of the situation and how these were reflected in the treatment plan. Finally, explain the value of the patient decision aid you selected and how it might contribute to effective decision making, both in general and in the experience you described. Describe how you might use this decision aid inventory in your professional practice or personal life.

(Please Note: The underlined "social determinants of health" in the above content is meant to hotlink to the following Walden webpage and content:

Social Determinants of Health – Social Determinants of Health – Academic Guides at Walden Links to an external site.University)

    Platinum Essays

    Synthesis Project: Part II Rubric

    Criteria

    Ratings

    Pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Introduction

    10 to >9.0 pts

    Exceeds Expectations

    The introduction clearly and concisely states the paper’s purpose in a single sentence that is engaging and thought-provoking. The introduction clearly states and describes the main topic and previews the structure and content of the paper.

    9 to >8.0 pts

    Meets expectations

    The introduction states the paper’s purpose in a single sentence but it fails to be engaging. The introduction states the main topic but does not adequately preview the structure of the paper.

    8 to >7.0 pts

    Barely meets expectations

    The introduction does state the paper’s purpose but it is convoluted and not engaging. The introduction does not clearly state the topic or preview the structure and content of the paper.

    7 to >0 pts

    Does not meet expectations

    Incomplete or unfocused purpose statement. There is no clear introduction of main topic and/or the structure of the paper is missing.

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Significance of the Practice Problem

    20 to >18.0 pts

    Exceeds Expectations

    This section effectively describes the significance of the problem including human and societal impact as well as other areas of impact. The problem is significant to the student’s identified practice area and has significant impact on the student’s discipline and patient outcomes. Current data on incidence and/or prevalence is included. Exemplary discussion of cultural, political, legal, ethical, quality, safety, and financial implications is included if appropriate. There is substantiation with adequate number and quality of professional references with no uncited statements of fact. The student made all of the corrections recommended in the practice problem/PICO assignment

    18 to >16.0 pts

    Meets Expectations

    This section describes the significance of the problem including human and societal impact. The problem is significant to the student’s identified practice area. Current data on incidence and/or prevalence is included. Cultural, political, legal, ethical, quality, safety, and financial implications are included if appropriate. There is substantiation with adequate number and quality of professional references with no uncited statements of fact. The student made most of the corrections recommended in the practice problem/PICO paper assignment.

    16 to >14.0 pts

    Barely meets expectations

    This section provides a brief description of the problem but fails to describes the significance of the problem including human and societal impact. The problem is significant to the student’s identified practice area. Current data on incidence and/or prevalence is limited and cultural, political, legal, ethical, quality, and safety implications are either not included even when appropriate. There is substantiation with only a limited number and quality of professional references with no uncited statements of fact. The student made some of the corrections recommended in the practice problem/PICO paper assignment.

    14 to >0 pts

    Does not meet expectations

    This section identifies the problem but does not effectively describe the significance of the problem. The problem is not a current issue or the issue does have significance to the student’s identified practice area. Current data on incidence and/or prevalence and/or cultural, political, legal, ethical, quality, safety, and financial implications are not included. There is no substantiation with an adequate number and quality of professional references and/or there are uncited statements of fact. The student did not make corrections recommended the practice problem/PICO paper assignment.

    20 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome PICO

    20 to >18.0 pts

    Exceeds Expectations

    There is a clear description of the population/problem of interest, intervention, comparison, outcome, and timing. The student made all corrections recommended in the practice problem/PICO paper assignment.

    18 to >16.0 pts

    Meets Expectations

    There is a description of the population/problem of interest, intervention, comparison, outcome, and timing. The student made most of corrections recommended in the practice problem/PICO paper assignment.

    16 to >14.0 pts

    Barely meets expectations

    There is a superficial description of the population/problem of interest, intervention, comparison, outcome, and timing. The student made some of corrections recommended in the practice problem/PICO paper assignment.

    14 to >0 pts

    Does not meet expectations

    There is an incomplete description of the population/problem of interest, intervention, comparison, outcome, and timing. The student did not make corrections recommended in the practice problem/PICO paper assignment.

    20 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Search Strategy and Results

    20 to >18.0 pts

    Exceeds Expectations

    There is an exemplary discussion of the search strategy which includes keywords (with alternate spellings, abbreviations, etc.), MESH headings, inclusion and exclusion criteria, databases used and results of the search. Any studies which meet inclusion criteria and do not meet exclusion criteria but are excluded are explained. The search is clearly replicable by any reader.

    18 to >16.0 pts

    Meets Expectations

    The discussion of the search strategy includes keywords, inclusion and exclusion criteria, databases used and results of the search. Any studies which meet inclusion criteria and do not meet exclusion criteria but are excluded are explained. The search may not be replicable by any reader.

    16 to >14.0 pts

    Barely meets expectations

    The discussion of the search strategy includes keywords, inclusion and exclusion criteria, data bases used and results of the search. There is not explanation of exclusion of studies which meet inclusion criteria and do not meet exclusion criteria. The search is not replicable.

    14 to >0 pts

    Does not meet expectations

    The search strategy and results are superficial and/or difficult to understand.

    20 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Synthesis of the Literature

    40 to >36.0 pts

    Exceeds Expectations

    Substantial review of the literature is evident in the synthesis and covers all facets of the problem with numerous (more than 5 primary research articles and/or summaries) references linking the practice problem and the selected intervention. This section is a synthesis rather than a study by study review of the literature. Only research evidence is included in the synthesis; no secondary sources are included. Studies from US only are include unless valid reason is given for inclusion of international studies.

    36 to >32.0 pts

    Meets Expectations

    Substantial review of the literature is evident in the synthesis and covers all facets of the problem with numerous (at least 5 primary research articles and/or summaries) references linking the practice problem and the selected intervention. This section is a synthesis rather than a study by study review of the literature. Only research evidence is included in the synthesis; no secondary sources are included. Studies from US only are include unless valid reason is given for inclusion of international studies.

    32 to >30.0 pts

    Barely meets expectations

    A review of the literature is evident in the synthesis and covers most facets of the problem with fewer than 5 primary research articles and/or summaries linking the practice problem and the selected intervention OR this section is a study by study review of the literature rather than a synthesis OR nonresearch and secondary sources are included. International studies are included and a valid reason is not given for their inclusion.

    30 to >0 pts

    Does not meet expectations

    Only a superficial review of the literature is evident with fewer than 3 primary research articles and/or summaries linking the practice problem and the selected intervention OR this section is a study by study review of the literature rather than a synthesis AND nonresearch and secondary sources are included.

    40 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Synthesis Matrix

    10 to >9.0 pts

    Exceeds Expectations

    There is an exemplary synthesis matrix with multiple main ideas included as a Table. The main ideas are logically extracted from the evidence and each one is cited in three or more references. All studies that were not excluded by identified exclusion criteria are included on the matrix.

    9 to >8.0 pts

    Meets Expectations

    The synthesis matrix has at least 3 main ideas is included as a Table. The main ideas are logically extracted from the evidence and each one is cited in at least two references. All studies that were not excluded by identified exclusion criteria are included on the matrix. Incorrect formatting used.

    8 to >7.0 pts

    Barely meets expectations

    The synthesis matrix included as a Table has fewer than 3 main ideas OR only 1-2 studies that were not excluded by identified exclusion criteria were not included on the matrix. Incorrect formatting used.

    7 to >0 pts

    Does not meet expectations

    The synthesis matrix included as a Table has fewer than 3 main ideas AND several studies that were not excluded by identified exclusion criteria were not include on the matrix. Incorrect formatting used.

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Practice Recommendations

    20 to >17.0 pts

    Exceeds Expectations

    There is an exemplary description of the practice recommendation and it is based on only high level evidence (levels I-III). The practice recommendations are consistent with the synthesis of the literature. There is logical progression from the synthesis of the literature to the practice recommendation. The recommendation is written succinctly and consistent with the scientific evidence. The Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice rating for level and quality is included and appropriate.

    17 to >14.0 pts

    Meets Expectations

    There is a description of the practice recommendation and it is based on only high level evidence. The practice recommendation is consistent with the scientific evidence and there is a logical progression from the synthesis of the literature to the practice recommendation. The Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice rating for level and quality is included and appropriate.

    14 to >10.0 pts

    Barely meets expectations

    There is a description of the practice recommendation but it is not based on high level evidence and/or the recommendation is convoluted and not consistent with high level scientific evidence. The Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice rating for level and quality is included but not appropriate.

    10 to >0 pts

    Does not meet expectations

    There is a superficial practice recommendation but it is based on nonscientific evidence and/or the recommendation is not consistent with the scientific evidence and/or the Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice rating for level and quality is not included.

    20 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Evidence Tables

    50 to >45.0 pts

    Exceeds Expectations

    Evidence tables of primary research and systematic reviews are included as tables and include more than 7 primary research and/or summaries. Only research evidence is included on the evidence table and is appropriate to use in the setting and population. No secondary sources are included. The tables show an excellent extraction of information from the published reports. Used the provided template with the correct formatting. Paraphrased and did not copy directly from source.

    45 to >40.0 pts

    Meets Expectations

    Evidence tables of primary research and systematic reviews are included as tables and include more than 5 primary research and/or summaries. Only research evidence is included on the evidence table. and is appropriate to use in the setting and population. No secondary sources are included. The tables are complete and accurate.

    40 to >35.0 pts

    Barely meets expectations

    Evidence tables of primary research and systematic reviews are included as tables but include 5 primary research and/or summaries. Only research evidence is included on the evidence table and is appropriate to use in the setting and population. No secondary sources are included. The tables are incomplete or the information in the tables is inaccurate.

    35 to >0 pts

    Does not meet expectations

    Evidence tables of primary research and systematic reviews are not included as tables OR the evidence tables contain nonresearch publications OR secondary sources OR the number of primary research studies plus the systematic reviews is less than 5 OR studies are inappropriate to setting or population.

    50 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Conclusion

    10 to >9.0 pts

    Exceeds Expectations

    The conclusion reviews the main topics presented and clearly and effectively summarizes significant conclusions. Does not introduce new information.

    9 to >8.0 pts

    Meets Expectations

    The conclusion reviews the main topics presented and summarizes significant conclusions.

    8 to >7.0 pts

    Barely meets expectations

    There is either a summary OR a conclusion.

    7 to >0 pts

    Does not meet expectations

    There is neither a conclusion or summary.

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Communication in Writing

    20 to >18.0 pts

    Exceeds Expectations

    There is logical sequencing of ideas through well-developed paragraphs; transitions are used to enhance organization. There are no more than 2 errors in punctuation, capitalization, or spelling. There are no errors in sentence structure or word usage. Paraphrasing is used effectively. No more than 1 direct quotation used.

    18 to >16.0 pts

    Meets Expectations

    There is logical sequencing of ideas through well-developed paragraphs; transitions are usually effective in enhancing organization. There are few (2-4) errors in punctuation, capitalization, spelling, sentence structure or word usage. There are no more than 2 quotations.

    16 to >14.0 pts

    Barely meets expectations

    There is logical organization but some ideas are not fully or consistently developed OR transitions are awkward at times although the flow is adequately maintained. There are several (5-8) errors in punctuation, capitalization, spelling, sentence structure or word usage. There are more than 2 quotations.

    14 to >0 pts

    Does not meet expectations

    There is no evidence of structure or organization. Ideas are not fully developed. Minimal use of transitions throughout the paper. There are >8 errors in punctuation, capitalization, spelling, sentence structure, or word usage with significant impact on the content and detracts from the paper. There are more than 4 quotations.

    20 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA 7th

    • Title page • Headings • Citations • Reference page • Font, layout, margins