Week 2 Discussion – Relating Vulnerabilities, Threats, and Risks
Discuss the following:
- Is a vulnerability also a threat? Why or why not? Provide an example of each.
- The relationship between a threat and risk.
In what ways is your life affected by government regulation?
GOVT, Enhanced
Social Problem Research Proposal
Social Problem Research Proposal
Requirements:
This assignment requires that you write a formal research proposal that presents a research question and proposes a research design to answer it. This paper should be written in a formal, academic or scholarly manner in APA format. In this relatively short assignment you will provide a brief description of a social problem (one that falls under ADEI), a compelling rationale why social workers should try to address the social problem, and a brief description of what must be learned next and how to do it in order to address the social problem.
COVER PAGE
- Include a standard cover page, per APA format. This does not count toward your 5-7 page limit. Be sure to include the author’s note.
ABSTRACT
- Include a standard abstract, per APA format. This does not count toward your 5-7 page limit. Be sure to include your keywords.
INTRODUCTION (Do not include a heading that says “introduction” per APA format. Instead, it should match the title of your paper)
The goal of this section (based on your significance section) is to provide a brief description of a social problem, a compelling rationale why social workers should try to address the social problem or phenomenon, and a brief description of what must be learned next to address the social problem or phenomenon.
In your introduction, do the following:
- Briefly describe your chosen social issue or problem. This section may include information from other sources (e.g. a scientific journal, a credible web page, newspaper article, or book) that give statistics that help the reader understand the magnitude of the issue or problem.
- Include why this social problem or issue is important; in other words, why should we care about this social problem? Imagine you are competing for grant funding– this section should convince the funders why it is important to conduct a study focused on this social problem or social issue.
HEADING: LITERATURE REVIEW
- Briefly describe what is already known or what has already been researched on this social issue or problem. This section may highlight, for example, what we know about the causes of the social issue/problem, or what we know about the consequences of the social problem.
- This section might also highlight what kinds of interventions already exist to address this social problem.
- Use at least 10 peer-reviewed journal (books, websites, newspaper articles do not count) citations. Use your annotated bibliography to help you with this section.
Subheading: Research Question
- Link the information you have already provided in your literature review about what is known on this social issue/problem to a gap in the knowledge base. This gap should then link closely to the research question that you will be proposing.
- Your proposed research question will generate knowledge that will hopefully fill in that gap. This paragraph should provide clear logic that shows how your research question builds off and extends the existing knowledge base.
- At the end of this section, state your proposed research question(s). These research questions should be revised from your original research questions to reflect an answerable, feasible question!If you are doing an experimental design (pre/post-test) or a correlational study (seeing if one variable is correlated with another variable), include your hypothesis. If you are doing a descriptive or exploratory design or a needs assessment, do not include a hypothesis.
HEADING: METHODS
Subheading: Setting
- Describe the setting where your study will be taking place. Describe the agency or research group where this research will be conducted. Who is served by the agency? Describe the population served.
Subheading(s): Sample, Sampling Strategy, and Recruitment (this could be 2-3 separate headings)
- Describe the sampling strategy that you will use. If you are using qualitative methods, describe which sampling strategy (think Emmel reading) that you will employ. Justify why your sampling strategy is feasible and will help you answer your research question.
- If you have not already described the population from which you will draw your sample (in the setting section), describe your population and ideal sample here.
- State how many people you hope to enroll in your study, and how you will recruit them.
Subheading: Study Design and Methodology (this could be two separate headings)
- Describe the design of your study and the methods you will use. Are you doing quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods? If you are doing qualitative, are you doing interviews, focus groups, short-answer surveys, content analysis, or something else? If you are doing qual, will you use structured interviews/questionnaires, semi-structured, or open? How will you develop your interview guide? If you are doing quantitative, are you doing cross-sectional or longitudinal? If using an experimental or quasi-experimental design, specify which design type you are using. If you are doing an intervention (e.g. training, support group, class), describe the intervention. If you are doing a survey, briefly describe your measures (e.g. Beck Depression Inventory, PHQ-9, GAD-7, COPES questionnaire, etc.). Include sample questions and psychometric properties (reliability, validity) of your measures with appropriate references. If you are doing quantitative, be sure to state how you are operationalizing your variables (e.g. “depression will be measured by scores on the PHQ-9,” or “Coping skills will be measured using xyz instrument.”
Subheading: Analysis
- Quant folks: Briefly describe how you think you will collect and analyze your data. Will you be using any software (Excel, SPSS, or something else)? Describe what kind of descriptive statistics you might use to describe your sample (age, gender, race, depression scores, etc. with means, medians, etc.). If you are doing an experimental or quasi-experimental design, suggest what time of inferential statistics you might want to use (t-test, ANOVA, chi-square, correlations, etc.).
- Qual folks: Briefly describe how you think you will collect data and analyze it. Will you audio record interviews or focus groups? How will they be transcribed? Will you take notes during the groups or interviews? What type of qualitative software will you use in analysis (NVIVO, ATLAS, etc.)? How will you analyze the data? It would be best to cite a source or two in this section.
*NOTE: You are not expected to know all about your analysis methods at this point. For pointers, read the methods section of some studies that use similar methods to what you might be using.
Subheading: Ethics Considerations
- Please describe at least 3 ethical considerations that you have in conducting your study. Then explain how you plan to address these ethical concerns as a researcher. Cite any literature that is guiding your choices, such as the NASW code of ethics, the Belmont Report, or the other readings found in our ethics module. Use APA format and include references, as this section will appear in your final research proposal.
HEADING: DISCUSSION
- Include a brief concluding statement summarizing the research problem or phenomenon and how you will investigate this through your study.
Subheading: Strengths and Limitations
- Briefly discuss at least two strengths AND two limitations of your study methodology, with a particular focus on internal and external validity of your study (See slides from class 5 and class 6). You may also reference any strengths and limitations of your sampling strategy.
REFERENCES
Include APA formatted references. This does not count toward your 5-7 page limit.
APPENDIX (optional)
Feel free to include an appendix if you would like. Appendices frequently include things like: a copy of the measure you intend on using, a copy of your interview guide or questionnaire, or more specific information about your sample (like a list of treatment centers you will be calling, a list of songs you will be coding, a list of schools you will be surveying, etc.). If you include an appendix, be sure to reference the appendix in your writing (e.g. For a complete list of songs to be coded in these years, see Appendices A, B, and C).
Avoid using first-person language, idioms, stigmatizing or biased language, or informal language.
Research Proposal Outline Rubric
COVER PAGE
Include a standard cover page, per APA format. This does not count toward your 5-7 page limit. Be sure to include the author’s note.
INTRODUCTION
Briefly describe your chosen social issue or problem. This section may include information from other sources (e.g. a scientific journal, a credible web page, newspaper article, or book) that give statistics that help the reader understand the magnitude of the issue or problem.
Include why this social problem or issue is important; in other words, why should we care about this social problem? Imagine you are competing for grant funding– this section should convince the funders why it is important to conduct a study focused on this social problem or social issue.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Briefly describe what is already known or what has already been researched on this social issue or problem. This section may highlight, for example, what we know about the causes of the social issue/problem, or what we know about the consequences of the social problem.
This section might also highlight what kinds of interventions already exist to address this social problem.
Use at least 10 peer-reviewed journal (books, websites, newspaper articles do not count) citations. Use your annotated bibliography to help you with this section.
Subheading Research Question
Link the information you have already provided in your literature review about what is known on this social issue/problem to a gap in the knowledge base. This gap should then link closely to the research question that you will be proposing.
Your proposed research question will generate knowledge that will hopefully fill in that gap. This paragraph should provide clear logic that shows how your research question builds off and extends the existing knowledge base.
At the end of this section, state your proposed research question(s). These research questions should be revised from your original research questions to reflect an answerable, feasible question! If you are doing an experimental design (pre/post-test) or a correlational study (seeing if one variable is correlated with another variable), include your hypothesis. If you are doing a descriptive or exploratory design or a needs assessment, do not include a hypothesis.
Similar questions Criminology Discussion Post 3: Linking your topic to real-life situations
Action plan for Ethical Standards Compliance
Prepare an Action plan for Ethical Standards Compliance
Assignment 4 Due 10/3/2025
The organization where you work (CoreCivic) is asking you to present an action plan to ensure compliance with ethical standards. Considering this request, develop an action plan (8 pages no more than 9) based on a target ethical area. Use open access articles for references.
The plan needs to include the following:
1. Ethical standards: Identify the current ethical standards or code of ethics followed by your organization. Provide a brief synopsis about the main points stated in the ethical code (Principles or sections included in your professional code of ethics). Use it as the tool for creating the action plan.
2. Goals for your action plan: Propose the goals for your plan- What prompts the need for your action plan? Clearly indicate why it is necessary to develop a plan. Include at least one specific reason area to support the need for the plan.
3. Activities: Indicate the various ways and methods you would use to disseminate ethical standards in your organization.
4. Resources: Provide a list of suggested references and materials (at least five) a leader would use to support ongoing knowledge on ethics.
Rubric:
|
Element
|
Not Met
|
Met
|
Exceeded
|
| Identifies the ethical standards of the organization | The related standards for the organization are unclear, vague, or not identified | identified the related standards for the organization | Clearly and specifically identified the related standards for the organization. Includes source and reference for the standards. |
| Identifies an ethical area in need of attention based on the related ethical standards or code of professional behavior | Ethical area in need of attention is not clearly identified or not specified. | Ethical area in need of attention is identified. Rationale is vague. | Specifies the ethical area in need of attention and provides a supporting rationale for its selection. |
| Proposes at least two goals for the proposed plan of action | One or no goals are specifically proposed. | Two or more goals are specifically proposed. | Two or more goals are specifically proposed. Goals are feasible as part of an action plan. |
| Describes the plan of action based on the identified goals and includes methods for implementation | The plan of action is unrelated or not specified. | The plan of action is based on the identified goals and included methods for implementation. Some details are included on how to determine outcomes. | The plan of action is clearly based on the identified goals. It includes methods for implementation. Assessment outcomes based on goals is clearly included |
| References are included to support plan and as a resource | There were fewer than two or no references 3 to support ongoing learning about ethics | Three references are included to support ongoing learning about ethics | More than 3 references are included to support ongoing learning about ethics |
| APA format | Paper does not adhere or partially follows the (FSE) Written Assignment Format, the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed | Paper adheres to the (FSE) Written Assignment Format, the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed). | Paper clearly adheres to the (FSE) Written Assignment Format, the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed |
| Total: 35 points |
ResourcesDefinitive_Guide_to_Ethics_and_Compliance_Programmes
Criminology Discussion Post 3: Linking your topic to real-life situations
Criminology Discussion Post 3: Linking your topic to real-life situations
This discussion board is about refining your research proposal by linking your topic to real-life situations and applying what you’ve learned in your course.
My topic is: ( Topic you selected for Criminology Discussion Post ).
Here’s what to do:
- Reflect on real-life situations:
- Think about experiences, cases, or observations you know of that show barriers faced within your topic of choice.
- These could include discrimination, lack of job training, employer bias, lack of transportation, or legal restrictions.
- Apply course concepts:
- Review what you’ve learned in the course such as theories, research methods, systemic inequality concepts, or policy analysis and think about how these ideas can address those barriers.
- For example, consider how a particular theory could explain employer bias or how a strategy could improve reentry programs.
- Write your main post:
- Summarize your analysis in a clear, reflective post. Include:
- A description of how your topic connects to real-life challenges
- How course concepts can strengthen your research proposal
- Why your research could matter in the real world
- Summarize your analysis in a clear, reflective post. Include:
Goal:
The purpose of this discussion is to help you deepen your proposal while gaining new perspectives from your classmates that can strengthen your research approach.
STEP 5: Respond in two separate posts to two classmates (in at least 75 words). In your response, you can:
- Write about how you might approach the same topic, and how it is similar or different from your classmate’s.
- Suggest an alternative way to narrow their topic.
- Introduce a different angle they might explore.
- Pose a thought-provoking question to push their research further.
Resources
Criminology – Simple Book Publishing
similar posts
