+1 (951) 902-6107 info@platinumressays.com

Can someone do my Week 5 discussion in MHA 612 Financial & Managerial Accounting?

 

Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum,

Cost information is an important part of the financial system of a healthcare organization. As Cleverley and Cleverley (2018) explain,

Cost information is produced through an entity’s cost accounting system. In most situations, cost information is shaped by the financial accounting system and the generally accepted principles of financial accounting on which financial accounting is based. However, cost information must be flexible, because it usually provides information for identifiable and specific decision-making groups, such as budgetary cost variance reports to department managers, cost reports to third-party payers, and forecasted project cost reports to planning agencies. (p. 336)

Additionally, various concepts of cost need to be considered for different decision-making purposes.

In your initial post,

  • Discuss the four major categories of cost as they relate to
    • traceability to the object being costed.
    • behavior of cost to output or activity.
    • management responsibility for control.
    • future cost versus historical cost.
  • Describe the three basic questions that must be addressed before effective cost accounting systems for healthcare organizations can become a reality.
  • Define the two possible theories that may be used to detect out-of-control costs.

Guidelines:

  • Your main post must be a minimum of 500 words.
  • Cite sources, if necessary, using APA style.
  • Refer to APA StyleLinks to an external site. for citing within your paper and formatting your references list.
  • Use your textbook or other sources as needed.

    Criminal

    Review the Week 1 data sets. Each spreadsheet contains productivity data sets for employees within three major subdomains of criminal justice:

    • Data Set 1: Police Officers and Detectives
    • Data Set 2: Prosecutors
    • Data Set 3: Case Workers in Corrections and Community Programs

    Select one data set that is most interesting or relevant to you.

    Respond to the following questions in 45 to 90 words each. Each response you provide will help you organize your ideas and prepare for next week’s summative assessment.

    Determine the measures of central tendency (mean, median, mode) for each category within the data set.

    1)Determine the measures of central tendency (mean, median, mode) for each category within the data set.

    • What is the mean? Use a calculator, if needed.
    • What is the median?
    • What is the mode?

    2)Compare the measures of central tendency for each employee by month. 

    • Which employees are performing above average? 
    • Which employees are performing at average performance levels? 
    • Which employees need improvement?
    • Justify your responses.
    • What is the median?
    • What is the mode?

    1. Question 3
      25 PointsA supervisor analyzing data should be prepared to also analyze relevant factors and trends that may have an impact on the results. Distinguishing between what is known and what is unknown about data is critical to effective data analysis.
      • What are 1-2 conclusions a supervisor can make from the central tendency calculations?
      • What are 1-2 details a supervisor may need to investigate or research before using this data to address employee performance? 
      • Text Editor
    2. Question 4Question 4
      25 PointsHow might a supervisor benefit from measuring employee productivity through central tendencies? How might employees benefit from reviewing data about their work performance? Text Editor
    3. Question 5Question 5
      25 PointsReflect on what you learned this week about organizing and displaying statistical data. 
      • Describe the advantages and disadvantages of using a spreadsheet to organize and display data. 
      • Explain how you might present the data differently if you were the supervisor. Justify your response.
      • Text Editor

    1

    Tulsa Police Critical Incident Response Guide

    Christina Simpson

    University of Phoenix

    CJA/376: Interagency Communication

    September 8,2025

    Tulsa Police Critical Incident Response Guide

    Organized criminal gangs pose significant threats to community safety in Tulsa, requiring coordinated multi-agency responses. This reference guide equips emergency responders of partner organizations to work efficiently in cooperation with each other through the use of National Incident Management System (NIMS) and Incident Command System (ICS) guidelines in the event of gang-related incidents. Such standardized methods guarantee a smooth flow of information and coordination between law enforcement, emergency services and supporting agencies in responding to complex criminal activities that cut across jurisdictional lines.

    Components of Government Agencies that Facilitate Communication

    Government agencies utilize three critical components to facilitate communication during emergencies. Personnel elements include incident commanders who set the strategic course, public information officers who handle communication with the outside world, law enforcement officers who carry out operations, emergency medical services that offer medical assistance, intelligence teams that examine gang activities, and community liaison officers who ensure that the population remains trusting (FEMA, 2017). Technological components encompass interoperable radio systems, encrypted communication platforms, mobile data terminals for real-time information sharing, and incident management software that tracks resources and personnel. Organizational structures include established hierarchies within law enforcement agencies, multi-agency task forces specifically designed for gang enforcement, and emergency operations centers that serve as coordination hubs during extended incidents.

    Agencies facilitate effective communication through Joint Information Systems (JIS), which maintain consistent messaging across all responding entities. The Tulsa Police Department utilizes pre-established mutual aid agreements and communication protocols with surrounding jurisdictions, ensuring that partner organizations can seamlessly integrate into response operations (Dyer, 2006). These systems ensure that all agencies operate from common situational awareness and can coordinate tactical responses to evolving gang threats without confusion or duplication of efforts.

    NIMS and ICS Protocols Relevant to Interagency Communication

    NIMS provides standardized frameworks that directly impact interagency communication and collaboration. The command and coordination component establishes unified command structures that incorporate representatives from all major responding agencies, ensuring shared decision-making authority (FEMA, 2017). Resource management components provide standardized systems for requesting, tracking, and deploying personnel and equipment across organizational boundaries. Communications and information management components mandate common terminology and integrated communication systems that enable seamless information exchange between disparate agencies and jurisdictions.

    ICS protocols specifically structure interagency communication through defined roles and responsibilities. The incident commander and command staff, including public information officers and safety officers, maintain clear communication channels both within the response structure and with external stakeholders (FEMA, 2018). The general staff sections, operations, planning, logistics, and finance/administration, create natural collaboration points where multiple agencies can coordinate their specific contributions to the overall response. These protocols are vital to an organization's emergency management structure because they create predictable, organized frameworks that reduce confusion during complex operations involving multiple law enforcement agencies, emergency services, and supporting organizations.

    Effectiveness of NIMS/ICS in Interagency Collaboration

    NIMS and ICS protocols significantly enhance collaboration during gang-related emergencies by ensuring all responding agencies share common objectives and strategies. The unified command structure specifically enables law enforcement agencies, including Tulsa Police, FBI, ATF, and DEA representatives, to collectively develop operational plans that address all aspects of gang criminality (Dyer, 2006). The standardized resource management processes allow for efficient sharing of specialized resources like SWAT teams, investigative units, and intelligence assets without bureaucratic delays. These systems promote continuous situational awareness through structured reporting mechanisms and regular briefings that keep all agencies informed of developing situations and emerging threats.

    Impact of a Presidential Disaster Declaration

    Disaster declaration by the president has a considerable impact on the capacity of an organization to launch NIMS and ICS procedures through the mobilization of federal resources and authorities. These proclamations allow mobilizing such resources as FBI, ATF, and DHS, and also have the potential to mobilize the support of National Guard in case of gang-related crises escalating to the status of major disasters. The declaration activates federal funding systems via FEMA that assist in the continuity of operations and the acquisition of resources, but also compels all the responding agencies to act according to the standardized federal guidelines instead of deviations at the local level.

    Interagency communication and coordination are influenced by presidential declarations because they increase coordination by using Joint Field Offices (JJS) as a central coordination point. Such statements simplify the communication process by imposing national standards and procedures on all responding agencies and allowing intelligence sharing in real-time across jurisdictional boundaries that could otherwise impede investigations (U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 2020). The implementation of NIMS and ICS protocols enhances Tulsa’s response to gang-related emergencies by ensuring clear command structures, efficient communication, and resource management across agencies. Despite initial bureaucratic challenges, these systems improve coordination, enable federal support when needed, and strengthen preparedness, ultimately ensuring public safety through structured, multi-agency collaboration and effective interagency action.

    References

    Dyer, D. A. (2006). Center, Tulsa Public Affairs.  Navy Medicine5088.

    Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2017).  National Incident Management System (3rd ed.). U.S. Department of Homeland Security.  https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/2020-07/fema_nims_doctrine-2017.pdf

    Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2018).  Incident Command System resources. U.S. Department of Homeland Security.  https://training.fema.gov/icsresource/

    U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (2020).  National Response Framework (4th ed.).  https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/2020-04/NRF_FINALApproved_2011028.pdf

    Discussion board GOLDEN RECTANGLE

    Create a post on the discussion board, and answer all of the following prompts. 3 to 5 sentences for each question please separate the questions so that I can read them each THIS IS NOT A PAPER SO I AM PAYING WHAT IT IS WORTH.

    • Take and upload a photo of an object around you that you believe fits the Golden Rectangle. Provide the length and width measurements and include the ratio calculations.
    • Does your object’s ratio come close to 1.618? If not, how could the object be redesigned to better match the Golden Ratio? Show the new measurements and ratio calculations for a ratio that is more “Golden”.
    • Upload a photo of a real-world object that displays a fractal pattern. This could be something found in nature, artwork, or architecture. You also have the option to create your own fractal design, either by hand or using digital tools. Be sure to submit a clear image of your creation or discovery.
    • Explain what characteristics make it fractal-like? What drew you to this image?

      discussion

       

      Criteria 

      1. 750 words (excluding reference list);
      2. First-person is permitted.
      3. Organize work using headings that correlate to each section of the discussion.
      4. Follow APA format for all in-text citations and references (line spacing may be single-spaced in the discussion forum). 
      5. Avoid the use of direct quotes. Provide in-text citations for information from sources.
      6. Use of generative AI is not allowed except where indicated for the PICOT question development.
      7. Use current, peer-reviewed references, in addition to textbook.

       

      Introduction (3 points)

      1. Describe the topic being explored by your group. ( Rheumatoid arthritis )

      2. Discuss the population you plan to investigate related to the topic/problem (men, women, children, adolescents, adults, elderly, specific race or gender). 

      3. Describe the topic/problem in relation to nursing and nursing care.

      4. Describe how each of the following affect client outcomes:

      • the care provided
      • patient education
      • health disparities

      5. Support with at least one peer-reviewed reference.

      Research, EBP, & Quality Improvement (3 points)

      1. Describe the differences between research, evidence-based practice (EBP), and quality improvement. Be specific and make sure to differentiate the concepts.

      2. Describe the purpose of an EBP project.

      3. Support this section with at least one reference (may be a website or article) other than the textbook.

      PICOT Question Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) (3 points)

      1. Using the template below, develop a PICOT (population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and time) question related to your assigned topic. See Chapter 4 in your textbook.

      In ____________ (P), how does _________________________ (I), compared to _________________________ (C) affect __________________________________ (O) within _______________________ (T)?

      2. Next, create a PICOT on ChatGPT using the same topic.

      • Go to ChatGPT: https://chatgpt.com/Links to an external site.
      • Follow the directions below once you reach the ChatGPT site. 
        • You can Sign Up or Login if you desire, or you can simply copy and paste the information needed into the search box.
        • Take your group topic and ask ChatGPT to form a PICOT and clinical question for you. 
      • Reflect on the question you created and the ones provided by ChatGTP. Which do you prefer and why? Are there parts of your question and the AI generated questions that you would like to blend together?
      • Write the PICOT question you would use moving forward for your research.

      Finding Evidence (3 points)

      1. Provide basic background information for at least two databases used to locate literature for your topic (see Ch. 5). You must discuss two from this list:

      • PubMed
      • CINAHL
      • PsycINFO
      • Google Scholar
      • Joanna Briggs
      • Cochrane Library

      2. Discuss terms related to your topic that may be used for the keywords, subject headings (CINAHL), or MeSH (PubMed) when searching in the selected databases. You can use words from the PICOT question to build a search strategy.

      3. Describe the use of Boolean operators when searching for evidence. Provide an example using your topic.

      4. Discuss the use of limits and filters. Provide an example using your topic.

      5. Support with at least one reference other than the textbook (may use a website).

      Plagiarism, Paraphrasing, and Artificial Intelligence (3 points)

      1. Describe the differences between:

      • quoting
      • paraphrasing
      • and summarizing information from a source (See APA Manual 7th Edition and Ch. 5). 

      2. What strategies can be used to avoid potential plagiarism, including self-plagiarism?

      3. Discuss the purpose of a copyright and what may be viewed as potential violations.

      4. How can artificial intelligence (AI) be used in scholarly writing? Present at least one positive and one negative aspect related to student use.

      5. Support with at least one reference other than the textbook

      textbooks

       American Psychological Association. (2019). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). American Psychological Association.
      Schmidt, N.A., & Brown, J.M. (2024). Evidence-based practice for nurses: Appraisal and application of
      research (6th ed.) Jones & Bartlett Learning. 

        1

         Assignment will be based off of a 14 yr old 9th grade Interrelated resource (IRR) student with a Specific Learning Disability (SLD) 

        Weeks 8-10 Overview.htm

        For Weeks 7, 8, 9:

         

        1. Read Ch. 8 in your text.

         

        1. Read Chapter 8 Lecture Points

         

        1. Read the Guidelines for Assessing Reading Comprehension Skills

         

        1. Review a Sample of Comprehension Questions designed by one of your peers from the previous semester taking this class to get some further ideas on how to design your own comprehension questions

         

        1. Review Reading Comprehension Skills Assessment Points

         

        1. Review Reading Comprehension Skills Assessment Submission Directions

         

        1. Completed reading comprehension skills assessments should be submitted to the Assignment Box no later than October 22, 2024 @ 11:30 pm.

         

        1. Make sure that you continue to record your assessment activities in your Assessment Activities Log

         

        1. As you work on your reading comprehension skills assessments don’t forget to login at least twice a week in order to earn participation points.

         

         

         

         

        Fall 09/W 8-10/Chapter 8 Lecture Points.pdf

        Chapter 8

        Howell (1999, pp. 7-8)

        1. Reading comprehension is an interactive process in which the reader brings what she

        knows about the world to the printed page. What is known is used to construct meaning

        from what is written. Readers draw upon decoding skills, vocabulary knowledge,

        language, prior knowledge and d strategies to make sense of what is written.

        2. Text variables influence reading comprehension. Text variables include text structure

        as well as vocabulary difficulty and density of ideas. Text structure refers to both general

        organizers and overall structure. The authors define general organizers as: (1)

        introductory overviews, (2) focus questions, (3) headings, and (4) summaries. Overall

        structure is the way ideas in the text are related to convey a message.

        3. Assumed causes for reading comprehension failure may include absence or

        deficiencies in the following Comprehension strategies: active reading, monitoring,

        adjustment to text, merging with prior knowledge and/or clarification.

        4. Assumed causes for reading comprehension failure may include absence or

        deficiencies in the following enabling skills: prior knowledge, decoding skills,

        vocabulary (semantics), language (syntax), and/or strategies.

        5. Automatic Decoding significantly influences reading comprehension and is one of the

        most frequent causes of comprehension failure.

        6. Sampling a complex process like reading comprehension is difficult. Since most

        survey measures have limitations, it is recommended that multiple measures be

        employed. Of the available measures "questioning after passage reading" seems to have

        the most serious limitations.

        7. Directions for constructing, administering, and interpreting survey and specific level

        reading procedures are detailed in this chapter.

        8. Advantages of cloze format include: large sample size; item difficulty randomly

        distributed; ease of scoring; and high fidelity to the reading act (for example, text look-

        backs and look-aheads are allowed).

        9. Disadvantages of cloze and maze format include: it is not a direct measure of the

        student’s recognition of the most important part of passage; and, it can only be used with

        redundant/predictable text).

        10. Advantages of maze format include: ease of scoring ; success depends on passage

        clues (fidelity to reading); distractors can be used to alter test difficulty; and it collects a

        large sample of behavior.

        11. Disadvantages of maze format include: the risk of poorly selected distractors.

        12. Advantages of paraphrasing include: the fact that student responses are not influenced

        by questions; it supplies an overall impression of student's understanding; and can it be

        used with daily lessons.

        13. Disadvantages of paraphrasing: it is hard to score; and, it is difficult to control

        spontaneous responses without adding questions (which negates one of the advantages).

        14. Advantages of story retelling include: the retell is not influenced by questions; it

        provides the number of idea units recalled; it can be used with daily lessons so high it has

        good fidelity; and, it can be compared to the text structure or a story map.

        15. Disadvantages of story retelling include: it is sometimes awkward to transcribe

        student responses; idea unit analysis is time consuming; and it may only tap recall, not

        understanding.

        16. Advantages of questioning after passage reading include: teacher can focus on

        specific information.

        17. Disadvantages of questions include: hard to score; only a few questions possible per

        paragraph; levels of comprehension may not match questions or may not exist; the risk of

        poorly written questions; and student responses limited by question.

        18. Advantages of oral reading include: ease of scoring; sensitivity to instruction; highly

        interactive (reflects all reading skills).

        19. Disadvantages of oral reading: because it may have low "face validity” to some

        teachers you may need to explain why you are using it; it is only useful for screening and

        monitoring (doesn't yield much information which guides teaching).

        20. Good readers are flexible and capably shift among enabling skills and strategies to

        construct meaning from text.

        21. Reading teachers should be prepared to work with students who exhibit cultural

        diversity or those who are bilingual. The following topics should be discussed in relation

        to reading comprehension: discourse style and its interaction with reading

        comprehension; text structure and its relationship to discourse style; the influence of

        vocabulary and prior knowledge on comprehension.

        Howell, K. (1999). Wadsworth Publishing Curriculum-Based Evaluation: Teaching and

        Decision Making, 3e: Sample Course Syllabi in Instructor Manual, Syllabus, Evaluation

        Retrieved February 23, 2009 from http://www.wadsworth.com/cgi-

        wadsworth/course_products_wp.pl?fid=M20bI&product_isbn_issn=9780534343705&dis

        cipline_number=3&token=C42F437771554B07DAA8767670438C43340AAD8F43C65

        0C43EFA8F5B32B681834CA7F5AA285BED476642621CB81FA6F5

        Reading Comprehension Skills Assessment Directions (1).docx

        Reading Comprehension Skills Assessment- Submission Directions

         

         

        Reading comprehension skills assessments should be submitted no later than by 11: 30 P.M. on March 15, 2022.

        Your Reading Comprehension Skills Assessment should be submitted to the Assignment Box and include the following components:

         

        Your Name:                                                                          

         

        Date:

         

        Passage Identification:

         

         

        Report here what reading passages you have used for your comprehension assessment.

         

        If you needed to use reading passages at lower grade level (functional level) than your student’s current grade level for developing your questions report this and provide your justification for doing so.

         

        Number your reading passages and use this numbering system consistently while further writing your report.

         

         

        Comprehension Assessment (Comprehension Questions Design and Administration):

         

        Report here how you went about the process of designing your questions, which standards and skills you specifically focused your questions on.

         

        Talk about how you established scoring criteria for pass or fail on your comprehension questions.

         

        Talk about who did the reading of the passages before the administration of the questions, in what order you used these passages and asked your comprehension questions.

         

        For each used passage, provide comprehension questions and student’s answers to these questions (include the skills pertaining to the designed comprehension questions).

         

        For each used passage, report obtained scores on the comprehension questions based on your established scoring criteria for pass or fail.

         

        Report student’s general attitude and any other relevant factors related to the administration of your comprehension questions.

        Comprehension Interview Results:

         

        Report here which passage you used for the comprehension interview.

         

        Provide the typed interview questions and student’s answers to these questions based on the Interview Questions (Exhibit 8.7 Comprehension Interview) (Howell & Nolet, 2000, p. 231). Maintain the same numbering of questions as provided in the text.

         

        Report student’s general attitude and any other relevant factors related to the comprehension interview.

         

        Report the obtained status of student’s performance (“Pass” “No-Pass” or “Unsure”) on these three categories (Reading Awareness, Planning, and Regulation) using Exhibit 8.8 Status Sheet for Awareness of the Reading Process (Howell & Nolet, 2000, p.232).

         

        Do not engage here into your analysis and interpretation of Reading Comprehension Assessments. You will be asked to do so in your final report. So save all the detail for later.

         

        Scanned Reading Passages and All Other Materials used in the comprehensions assessments submitted in one or more separate documents. Label each document with your last name and the title of this assessment.

         

        Again: Be sure to reference all sources of your passages and the used standards in your document using APA style.

         

         

        Howell, K. & Nolet, V. (2000). Curriculum-based evaluation: Teaching and decision making (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.

         

         

         

        Guidelines for Assessing Reading Comprehension Skills (2).docx

        Assessing Reading Comprehension Skills

         

        Reading comprehension skills assessments should be submitted no later than by 11:30 P.M. on

        March 15, 2022.

        After reading Chapter 8 in your textbook, you will understand that comprehension is seen as a very complex task. “Reading comprehension is an interactive process through which the reader uses code, context analysis, prior knowledge, vocabulary, and language, along with executive-control strategies, to understand text (Adams, 1990). It is a multidimensional construct and, as such, not easily observed” argued (Howell & Nolet, 2000, p. 203).

         

        Although it is important to read the information in Chapter 8, you will not be using all of the assessment tasks in Chapter 8.  Your authors discuss the use of “rate” of reading as a predictor of comprehension strength, and” maze” and “cloze” procedures as indicators of whether or not a child will experience comprehension problems (Howell & Nolet,2000, pp. 214-215). 

         

        Since the student you are assessing for this course is presumed to be in special education, or is experiencing learning problems, we do not need to test them in order to determine whether or not they have comprehension problems. The problem with these tests, and with state standards testing in general, is that they rely upon a child’s ability to read.  Since almost 100% of students in special education experience problems in learning to read, and it is the most frequent area in which students are not benefiting from the standard curriculum, we can assume that the students you choose to assess are experiencing problems in reading comprehension.  Rather than ‘is the student experiencing comprehension difficulties?’ let’s concentrate on the question, ‘at which levels of comprehension is the student proficient and where does he/she start to experience problems?’ Answers to the latter question will lead us to functional and realistic objectives in comprehension.

         

        Although the authors of your text assert that questioning is “is one of the worst ways to have students react to reading” (Howell & Nolet, 2000, p. 220), it certainly is the most realistic way.  Students pass or fail tests in science and social studies, pass or fail state standards tests, and pass or fail all standardized tests of acquired knowledge based upon their answers to questions about content they’ve read or learned. Therefore, your assessment for reading comprehension skills will be designed using questions that you make up regarding reading content.

         

        It will be necessary for you to explore two state departments of education websites which describe the standards in reading comprehension on which all students are assessed.  You should access the following websites:

        North Carolina Department of Public Instruction

        http://www.dpi.nc.gov/districts-schools/classroom-resources/k-12-standards-curriculum-and-instruction

         

        Under K-12 Standards, Curriculum, & Instruction, choose Standard Course of Study

        Choose English Language Arts

        Finally choose grade level for your target student.

        Georgia Standards of Excellence

        Many content areas have replaced Georgia Performance Standards (GPS) with Georgia Standards of Excellence (GSE). Reference the Georgia Standards of Excellence page for the most recent Georgia Standards.

        http://www.georgiastandards.org /Georgia-Standards/Pages/default.aspx

         

        Under “Welcome to GaStandards.org” click on Georgia Standards of Excellence. Choose English Language Art and click on the appropriate grade level(s) for your student.

         

        After you have familiarized yourself with the way two different states describe standards in comprehension, you should have a good idea of the types of questions you wish to design to assess your student. 

        For purposes of this course, we will define comprehension “skills in reacting to read text as defined by state standards and our text.” Your task is to:

         

        1.  Identify three graded reading passages which would be appropriate assessment materials for your student.  You may use short stories or children’s books for younger students. You may use various genres, including poetry and drama, for older students.  You may use the graded passages in your texts, from interventioncentral.org, from published criterion referenced assessments, or from graded reading books.  (Be careful of basal texts in science, etc. – they do not necessarily reflect a reading level for the grade in which they are taught).

         

        2.  Design at least 2 questions to ask pertaining to at least 5 different skills having to do with comprehension per graded reading passage.  The skills you choose to assess should be relevant to the standards your state chooses to assess.  Your text is a valuable resource.  Use Exhibit 8.1 to help narrow your focus about the types of questions you will design.    [See Sample of Reading Comprehension Questions designed by one of the student’s previously taking this course and located in the Weeks 7-8 organizer ]

         

        So your reading assessment for comprehension skills should contain at least 10 questions per graded passage. 

         

        BE SURE TO STATE, NEXT TO THE QUESTIONS YOU DESIGN, WHICH SKILL YOU ARE ASSESSING AS DEFINED BY STATE STANDARDS OR OUR TEXT.  

         

        These questions should help you determine what skills your student needs to work on to improve his or her comprehension. Any problems you discover should become IEP objectives for your student. You will write these objectives toward the end of the semester.

        3.   Once you have developed your comprehension questions, you will administer these comprehension questions to your target student and score themRecord the student’s answers to your comprehension questions as you will be asked to type and submit these student’s answers to your comprehension questions with this assignment’s report.

         

        Determine what criteria you will use to decide whether your student passes or fails the questions you have designed. 

         

        4.   Finally, interview your student in terms of his or her reading awareness skills, planning, and regulation. Choose the passage that the student has had most difficulty with while answering to your comprehension questions and interview your student in context of this passage by using the questions from 14-27 from the Exhibit 8.7 Comprehension Interview (Howell & Nolet, 2000, p.231). Record the student’s answers to these interview questions as you will be asked to type and submit these student’s answers with this assignment’s report.

        After the interview is finished, type your student’s responses to each of these questions into a word document and record and report the status of student’s performance (“Pass” “No-Pass” or “Unsure”) on these three categories (Reading Awareness, Planning, and Regulation) using Exhibit 8.8 Status Sheet for Awareness of the Reading Process (Howell & Nolet, 2000, p.232).

        STOP HERE! DO NOT GO INTO QUALITATIVE INTERPRETATION

         

         

        Howell, K. & Nolet, V. (2000). Curriculum-based evaluation: Teaching and decision making (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.

         

         

        Fall 09/W 8-10/Sample of Comprehension Questions.pdf

        1

        Sample of Reading Comprehension Questions designed by one of the student’s

        previously taking this class.

        I. Passage from Intervention Central: Yellow Triangle 1a:

        Whitt, J (2002). Reading center: Fourth grade yellow triangle level 1-6. Retrieved

        November 2, 2008, from Intervention Central Web site:

        http://www.joewitt.org/fourth_grade.htm

        Comprehension Questions:

        Question: What are the reasons given that makes the person qualified to be the

        president?

        Questions: What was given away to during the campaign?

        Skill : “Locates facts that answer the reader’s questions” GA ELA4R1a

        Question: Read me a sentence in the story that is an opinion.

        Question: Read me a sentence in the story that is a fact.

        Skill : “Distinguishes fact from opinion or fiction” GA ELA4R1h

        Question: What do you think would be a good title for this passage?

        Question: What is the main idea of this passage?

        Skill: 4. Connects text with prior knowledge: Student can “answers “best title”

        and main ideas questions accurately” (Howell & Nolet, 2000, p. 207)

        Question: Where do you think this story is taking place and how do you know it is taking

        place there?

        Question: Do you think that the person in the passage will win the election and why do

        you think that?

        Skill: “Makes judgments and inferences about setting, characters, and events and

        supports them with elaborating and convincing evidence from the text” GA

        ELA4R1f

        Question: How does this passage relate to the presidential election now?

        Question: How does this passage relate to the Mock Election that you did last week?

        Skill: “Relates theme in works of fiction to personal experience” GA ELA4R1a

        2

        II. Passage from Intervention Central Yellow Triangle 1b:

        Whitt, J (2002). Reading center: Fourth grade yellow triangle level 1-6. Retrieved

        November 2, 2008, from Intervention Central Web site:

        http://www.joewitt.org/fourth_grade.htm

        Comprehension Questions:

        Question: What do you think Carl will do when he see who he will be following for

        career day?

        Question: What makes you think that Carl will do that?

        Skill: Skill: “Identifies and shows the relevance of foreshadowing clues” GA

        ELA4R1e

        Question: Where did the event take place?

        Question: What is the plot of this passage?

        Skill: “ Identifies and analyzes the elements of plot, character, and setting in

        stories read, written, viewed, or performed” GA ELA4R1b

        Question: What does Carl do first?

        Question: Tell me in chronological order what Carl does when he finds out that he is to

        follow a president of a residential bank?

        Skill: “Identifies and uses knowledge of common organizational structures (e.g.,

        chronological order, cause and effect)” GA ELA4R1d

        Question: What does the word assistant mean in the passage?

        Question: What does the word scans mean in the passage?

        Skill: Skill: 2. Vocabulary: The student “can define words in the passage”

        (Howell & Nolet, 2000, p. 209)

        Question: What was the cause of Carl’s excitement in the passage?

        Question: What was the effect after Carl saw that he was to follow a residential

        president of a bank around for the day?

        Skill: “Distinguishes cause from effect in context” GA ELA4R1e

        3

        III. Passage from Intervention Central Yellow Triangle 1c:

        Whitt, J (2002). Reading center: Fourth grade yellow triangle level 1-6. Retrieved

        November 2, 2008, from Intervention Central Web site:

        http://www.joewitt.org/fourth_grade.htm

        Comprehension Questions:

        Question: Which sentences tell you that the person’s gender is a female?

        Question: Which sentences lets you know what the writer wants to be when they grow

        up?

        Skill: 1. Monitors meaning: The student “identifies when additional information

        is needed, or specifically what kind of information is needed to answer questions”

        (Howell & Nolet, 2000, p. 206)

        Question: What made the author think that she wants to be the president when she grows

        up?

        Question: Why did the author write that she wondered if her husband would be called

        the “First Man”?

        Skill: “Makes perceptive and well-developed connections” GA ELA4R1g

        Question: Which sentence tells the main idea of this passage?

        Question: Which sentences tell you why the person thinks they will be a good president?

        Skill: 5. Clarifies: The student “is more likely to recall important passage details,

        not trivial ones” (Howell & Nolet, 2000, p. 208)

        Question: What is the main idea of this passage?

        Question: What are three supporting details of the main idea?

        Skill: “Summarizes main ideas and supporting details” GA ELA4R1f

        Question: How is this passage similar to the other two passages?

        Question: How is this passage different from the other two passages?

        Skill: “Identifies similarities and differences between the characters or events and

        theme in a literary work and the actual experiences in an author’s life” GA

        ELA4R1g

        4

        References:

        4 th

        Grade, ELA Standards, Georgia Department of Education 2008. Retrieved

        November 2, 2008 from:

        http://public.doe.k12.ga.us/DMGetDocument.aspx/Grade%20Four.pdf?p=6CC6

        799F8C1371F6E70DFD7C0C0C1AB02D5B16D23C58BF0AEA4AFBC1808A

        1709&Type=D

        Howell, K. & Nolet, V. (2000). Curriculum-based evaluation: Teaching and decision

        making (3 rd

        ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.

        5

        Comprehension Assessment Points.htm

        Reading Comprehension Skills Assessment Points

         

        Name____________________________________

         

                                                                                                      

         Reading Passages

         

        Identifies at least three grade level

        (current or functional) reading passages for reading comprehension assessment (follows directions for submission, scanned copies of the reading passages are included; references are cited using APA style)                                                                                                      ____/10

         

        Comprehension Assessment

         

        Designs as directed at least 2 questions to ask pertaining to at least 5 different skills having to do with comprehension per each reading passage used

        (follows directions for submission, questions are typed; references are cited using APA style)                                   ____/25

         

         

        Administers the comprehension questions to the student and scores them according to self-developed scoring criteria

        (follows directions for submission, answers are typed                                                                              ___/15

         

        Comprehension Interview

         

        Interviews the student using the Exhibit 8.7 Comprehension Interview and reports the status of student's performance

        using Exhibit 8.8 Status Sheet for Awareness of the Reading Process (follows directions for submission, answers are typed;

        scanned and scored Status Sheet for Awareness of the Reading Process are included)                                             ____/15 

         

        Total Points                                                                                                                                                           ___/65 

        Comments:                                                                                     

         

         

        ,

        Weeks 6-7 Overview.htm

        For Weeks 5-6:

         

        1. Read Chapter 9 Lecture Points

         

        1. Review Wright’s (2001) manual pages 1-11

         

        1. Read the Detailed Guidelines for Assessing Reading (Decoding Skills)

         

        1. Read the Decoding Assessment Points

         

        1. Download the Student Interview form and complete with your target student. Will be submitted with your Final Report.

         

        1. Download the description of Assessment Activities and the Assessment Activities Log. Keep good records of the date and time you completed the work and assignments in this course. The Assessment Activities Log is due on 12-3 along with your Final Report.

         

        1. Read the Decoding Assessment Submission Directions

         

        1. Submit the signed parent permission letter and form. Make a note that you are not allowed to conduct any assessments if you haven’t obtained written parental consent to do so and submitted the signed form.

         

        1. While I do not expect you to have the decoding skills reading assessment completed by the end of the week, you should plan to have it completed. 

         

        Since we are moving toward the most important part of this course: work on varied curriculum-based assessments it is critical that you submit all your work on time and stay on top of all the assessments.

         

        Plan in advance both your submissions and use of any technology so that you are not late for the assignment submissions. Each assessment assignment is valuable to your final grade. Missing points could jeopardize your success in this class.

         

        1. As you work on your assessments don’t forget to login at least twice a week in order to earn participation points.

        Fall 09/W 6-7/Wright Manual.pdf

        April 2001

        Curriculum Based Assessment

        (CBA)

        Directions and Materials

        Seth Aldrich, Ph.D.

        James Wright

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 2

        About this manual This manual was prepared by Seth Aldrich, Ph.D. and Jim Wright. Dr. Aldrich is a Bilingual School Psychologist for Syracuse City Schools and New York State licensed psychologist. Jim Wright is a school psychologist who coordinates the Syracuse City Schools School Based Intervention Team (SBIT) project. The manual is intended to provide educators with directions, guidelines and some materials for conducting Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA). It is not intended to provide the training necessary to become proficient at conducting, scoring, interpreting and or using CBA for school based decision-making. While CBA is not difficult to learn, inservice as well as the references listed below are recommended so that educators can take full advantage of the information that CBA has to offer.

        This manual may be copied for use by any non for profit organization. Any reproduction for the purpose of distribution must include the name of the manual’s authors. Modifications of this manual are prohibited without the written consent of the author with the exception of forms which may be modified to suit the user’s needs.

        Seth Aldrich may be contacted through Syracuse City Schools, Teacher Center, 1153 West Fayette St., Syracuse, N.Y., 13204 (315-435-6314) or <[email protected]>.

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 3

        Table of Contents An overview of Curriculum Based Assessment ………………..………………………. 5

        Qualities of CBA………………..….….…………………………………………… 8 Purposes of CBA……….…..………………………………..…………………… 8

        Advantages of using CBA ………..….……..…………………………………… 9 Preparing CBA probes ……….………………………………………………… 10 References ……………..…………………………………….…………………………………….. 11

        Standard directions for conducting CBA in Spanish Reading Assessment Reading passages directions … ………………….………………………………….. 13 Letter reading directions …………………………………..……………………………… 14

        Letter sounds directions …………………………………..……………………………… 14 Word lists directions …………………………………………………………………………. 15

        Writing Assessment Writing directions …………………………………………………………………………….. 16

        Story Starters for writing assessment…………….………………………….. 17

        Math Assessment Math directions …………………………………………………………………………………. 18

        Guidelines for conducting, scoring and interpreting CBA Scoring guidelines for CBA reading …………………………………………………… 21 Recording reading behaviors ……………………..……………………………………… 22

        Guidelines for frustration, instructional and mastery levels ………..…………… 23

        Information recording materials Reading Survey Level Assessment Summary Data Recording Sheet .………………… 25 Progress Monitoring Data Recording Sheet …………………………………………. 26

        Word list form 1 ……………………………………………………………………………….. 27 Word list form 2 ……………………………………………………………………………….. 28 Graph for reading results ……………………………………………………….…………. 29

        Graph for letter name/sound results ……………………………………………..… 30

        Written Expression Comprehensive writing assessment recording sheet ………………..…………… 31 ‘Checking My Story’ – Student self-assessment checklist ……….…………….. 32 Cover Copy Compare Word List A ……………………………………..……………… 33

        Cover Copy Compare Word List B ………………………………….………………… 34 Writing graph..………………………………………………………………. 35

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 4

        Math Math recording sheet ……………………………………………………………….. ……… 36 Graphs for math results …………………………………………………………..………… 37 Case Studies Case example 1: Survey level assessment and ongoing monitoring ………….………… 39 Case example 2: Use of local norms to identify students with “special needs” …….. 42 Case Example 3: The new student ……………………………………………………………… 44 Reading/math materials Randomly arranged letter probes (5 probes)………………………………………… 47 Addition/subtraction (sums to 10) …………………….…………………………..………… 52 Addition/subtraction (sums to 20) …………………….…………………………..………… 60 Single digit multiplication facts (1 – 10) …………………………………………………… 74 Double digit addition subtraction (no regrouping) ……….……………………………. 80 Double digit addition subtraction (with regrouping) …..………………………..……. 86 Double digit multiplication …………………………………..………………………………. 92

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 5

        Curriculum Based Assessment: A Brief Overview Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) is a method of systematically assessing students’ basic academic skills in reading, mathematics, spelling and written expression. The instructor gives the student brief, timed samples, or “probes”, made up of academic material usually taken from the student’s curriculum.

        CBA in Reading may consist of letter/letter sound reading, word lists and or passage reading, depending on the student’s developmental level or instructional goals. Students are asked to read from letter lists, word lists or reading passages called “probes” for one minute. Students who are beyond an emergent level typically read three passages of text per grade level, and the median, or middle score is recorded. Multiple passages within a single book level are prepared so that ongoing assessment can take place without practice effects.

        CBA in Writing consists of a three-minute writing sample with a story starter. There are many scoring options including counting the number of, and percent correctly spelled words in three minutes. Qualitative scoring options are provided in this manual.

        CBA Math uses two-minute calculation probes. Probes, which may be comprised of a single skill or “mixed skills”, are selected to assess key skills from the student’s current or imminent instructional program. Different ways of collecting and using CBA information

        Survey level assessments use probes from a variety of levels to obtain a measure of a student’s current skills at each level through determining levels of instructional material used in the student’s classroom that:

        • have been mastered (mastery level material) • are appropriately challenging (instructional level material) • are considered too challenging (frustrational level material)*

        *Criteria used for mastery, instructional and frustration levels is provided on page 23 of this manual.

        The CBA survey level assessment is useful for determining instructional materials in reading and math that match individual students’ skill levels. Instructional match is defined here as the degree to which materials are appropriately challenging (neither too difficult nor too easy) for an individual student. Appropriate instructional match is crucial for students who are developing basic academic skills for the following reasons:

        • Placement in materials that have already been mastered may keep students from “moving on” and achieving their full potential.

        • Placement in materials that are too difficult reduces opportunities for practicing emerging skills. Students may actually practice computing math facts or reading words incorrectly.

        • Materials that are too challenging are difficult for students to comprehend or apply. Application of skills and or development of comprehension skills may be impeded when materials are at a frustration level.

        • Placement in materials that are too difficult may reduce motivation and increase

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 6

        chances of behavior problems. The tables below provide examples of information collected from a CBA survey

        level assessment in reading and math. In the first example, the student reads very well in first and second grade material. The student reads disfluently (less than 35 words per minute) and inaccurately (less than 85% correct) in third grade material. The survey level assessment in reading suggests that the student should be instructed in second grade material and monitored in third grade level material. Teachers and support staff can use information collected during the survey assessment as a baseline when choosing to monitor student performance. Once the student becomes solidly “instructional” at a third grade level, he may be accelerated into that level of text.

        Reading level Correctly read words (CRW) Percent correctly read words Proficiency level End of first 60 95% Mastery Second (2-1) 48 85% Instructional Second (2-2) 45 88% Instructional Third (3-1) 30 75% Frustration

        Survey level assessment in math uses probes containing a specified skill or skills

        to assess the number and percent of digits the student computes correctly in two minutes. A general rule of thumb is that students should be able to perform with at least 85% success on math probes before independent practice is advised. While this form of CBA math assessment does not assess application skills, it does assess prerequisite skills (that are frequently deficient for struggling students) necessary for students to apply math skills to solve real life problems.

        Math skill Correct Digits (CD) Percent correct Digits Proficiency level Addition sums to 10 (single skill)

        30 95% Mastery

        Double digit addition and subtraction (no regrouping – multiple skill)

        48 85% Instructional

        Double digit addition and subtraction (with regrouping – multiple skill)

        10 68% Frustration

        Single digit multiplication (single skill)

        15 75% Frustration

        CBA monitoring is useful for evaluating curriculum, interventions and or

        programs that are most effective for students. Educators can use ongoing (usually weekly) assessment, using probes from a single level, to gain information concerning student academic growth in response to various instructional approaches and or interventions. Since CBA probes are given under standardized conditions, they allow direct comparison of individual students’ performances over time (see graph below).

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 7

        John's Weekly Reading Fluency Progress in 3-2 Basal Text

        0

        5

        10

        15

        20

        25

        30

        35

        40

        0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

        Instructional Week

        C R

        W in

        3 -2

        B as

        al T

        ex t

        Goal = 1.5 CRW per week

        Median CRW in 3-2 text

        Baseline – No Intervention

        First intervention – After school small group tutoring twice per week

        Second intervention – Repeated reading with passage preview peer tutor 4 times per week

        *The dotted lines represent goal level progress of 1.5 CRW per week. The intervention was changed at week 7 after three consecutive data points fell below the goal line. Each point on the graph represents the middle of three one minute reading probes given on a weekly basis. The graph shows the student on a frustration level at baseline (weeks one through three). After week three, a goal was established with an expected progress rate of 1.5 correctly read words gain per week. The dotted line on the graph represents this rate of progress. At week seven, it was decided that the intervention is not producing the desired outcome and another intervention is put into place (passage preview and repeated reading strategies with a peer tutor). CBA monitoring shows gains subsequent to the peer tutoring intervention to be at or above goal level expectations. Without frequent ongoing assessment and graphing of data, it would have been very difficult to determine which intervention was having a significant positive impact on the student within such a short period of time.

        Curriculum Based Measurement (CBM) uses CBA information collected on groups of students from a classroom or school to compare individual students to a ‘local norm’. By assessing both typical and at risk students using CBA procedures, educators can identify students who because of their current skills in classroom materials require substantial modification or intervention. This information is relevant to decisions concerning least restrictive environment. In some states, educators use CBM for high stakes decisions such as program eligibility.

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 8

        The graph above shows how Rosa’s reading fluency in grade level text differs significantly from the median performance in the class (performance of the “middle student”). Rosa’s performance suggests that she needs more assistance than her “typical” classmates. Collecting classwide information also helps the classroom teacher and support staff to identify other students in the class who are having difficulties, as well as to become aware of the range of skill levels in his or her class. Qualities of CBA The following qualities make CBA a unique form of assessment that can be used for many types of educational decisions:

        • CBA can be administered frequently for ongoing formative evaluation. • CBA is sensitive to relatively small changes in short periods of time. • Research has shown CBA to have good measurement properties (reliable, valid). • CBA is scored objectively. • CBA can have curriculum overlap/relevance. • CBA provides information that is useful for identifying students’ instructional needs. • CBA is practical to administer (considering cost and teacher time). • CBA can be norm referenced (using local norms).

        Purposes for using CBA Because of its many positive assessment qualities, CBA can be used for a wide variety of educational decisions from instructional decisions about individual students in regular education to more high stakes decisions such as program evaluation and program eligibility. Below is a list of the various types of decisions that can be made using CBA procedures and the type of assessment (inventory and or progress monitoring) that would be used to make such a decision.

        • Identify instructional needs of students through analysis of reading behaviors (inventory and or progress monitoring).

        • Match instructional materials with the student's instructional level so that the student has

        optimal challenge and frequent opportunities for success (inventory and or progress monitoring).

        Rosa's Reading Performance in Beginning of Second Grade Text Compared to Classmates

        0

        5

        10

        15

        20

        25

        Rosa Class Median

        W o

        rd s

        C o

        rr ec

        t

        Average range: Plus or minus one standard deviation

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 9

        • Evaluate the effectiveness of instructional interventions. CBA can be used to determine whether or not interventions are being effective in helping students to achieve predetermined goals. Interventions can be modified until students begin achieving goals as determined by CBA data (progress monitoring).

        • Evaluate educational programs. Groups of students involved in educational programs to

        improve basic academic skills can be monitored using CBA. The resulting information can be used formatively to modify programs in order to be more effective or summatively to judge whether or not a program is effective (progress monitoring).

        • Decide on program eligibility. CBA can be used to identify students for whom various

        modifications and interventions have not resulted in adequate improvement. Such resistance to intervention has been used to document the need for more intensive instructional programs such as Special Education (progress monitoring). Curriculum Based Measurement (CBM) is a process in which local norms are collected to identify students who are discrepant from peers receiving similar instruction. CBM has also been used to identify students needing additional intervention such as special education services.

        Summary: Advantages of using CBA over other acasdemic measures

        Most assessments used in classrooms (e.g. teacher made tests and work samples) provide 'snapshots' of student performance. It is difficult to compare a student's performance from one assessment to another because the conditions (i.e., time allocated, assistance provided and task difficulty) vary from time to time. Commercially available tests, while designed to be consistent, are time consuming, frequently do not adequately overlap what is taught, and are typically used for long term or ‘summative’ decisions.

        CBA monitoring procedures, on the other hand, are feasible for ongoing or formative assessment since they take about five minutes to conduct. CBA typically uses materials from the student’s curriculum and is administered in a standardized format so that a given student’s performance is comparable from one assessment to another. The 'motion picture' that develops as the results of several assessments are plotted on a graph, reflects the student's progress in response to different instructional approaches or interventions. CBA probes also allow teachers to observe the nature of reading, math or writing strategies that the student uses, as well as errors in order to guide direct instruction.

        Curriculum Based Assessment can be used to answer questions that commercially available assessments are not designed to address. For example, CBA is a very useful measure when identifying needs of assessment of students with limited English proficiency as well as deciding when curriculum changes need to be made. Finally, CBA has a strong body of research to support its use for relatively high stakes decisions. If given repeatedly over time, CBA is a reliable, valid formative evaluation approach. Research has also shown that oral reading fluency and accuracy are highly correlated with a student's ability to comprehend that level of text.

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 10

        Preparing Reading Passages for CBA One of the major advantages of Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) in reading is that assessment materials can be developed directly from what students are required to do in the classroom. To prepare your own passages for CBA assessment, photocopy* or type passages. If stories are typed, pay attention to font and size so that it is similar to that of what the student is expected to read in class (younger students may read better when type is larger).

        • It is helpful when scoring CBA reading passages to have numbers corresponding with the total number of words in the story at the end of each line in the right hand margin. Student copies should have no numbers along the side of the page.

        • When preparing passages, consider how much target students will be able to read in one

        minute. Passages should probably be at least 100 to 120 words in length. When collecting CBM norms with groups of very able readers, students may need even longer passages. When using passages only to assess younger readers with relatively weak skills, shorter passages may suffice (and may be necessary considering the short length of stories in early readers).

        • It is recommended that passages not have a lot of dialogue, and should be from stories

        rather than poetry or plays. Text with unusual names or foreign words should be avoided if possible.

        • If copying from text books pictures should be deleted. The reason for this is that with

        timed probes, a student’s ability to read print independently is assessed. There is little time to stop and think about picture clues before beginning to read the story.

        * Under the Fair Use Statute, copyright laws allow for limited portions of textbooks to be copied for educational purposes. Copyright information can be obtained on the website <http://www.loc.gov/copyright/>.

        Preparing Math Probes for CBA

        Math probes may be single skill (e.g., all addition problems with sums to 10) or mixed skill problems (e.g., addition and subtraction problems sums to 10). Problems should be distributed randomly with an even mix of easier and more difficult problems so that different probes are of similar difficulty.

        Choose a skill level for monitoring that has not been mastered by the student(s) you are

        Example word count 9 (words in first line) 18 (cumulative words) 31 41 43 total words in section

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 11

        interested in assessing. That way you can observe progress in skills that are developing. You may want to include “unknown” problems that will be instructed soon to assess acquisition of new skills. While a limited number of math probes are provided with this manual, those who wish to conduct CBA in math are encouraged to obtain math probes from the website <www.interventioncentral.com>.

        References Aldrich, S.F., (1998). Curriculum Based Measures (CBM) in Spanish: A comparison of strategies for assessing students’ skills in Spanish reading. Paper presentation National Association of School Psychologists Annual National Convention, Orlando, FL. Aldrich, S.F. (2001) Spanish Curriculum Based Assessment Materials Manual. Available on the website www.scsd.k12.ny.us/sbit/index.htm. Shapiro, E. (1996). Academic Skills Problems: Direct Assessment and Intervention. New York: Guilford Press. Shinn, M.R. (1989). Curriculum Based Measurement: Assessing Special Children. New York, Guilford. Wright, J. (1992). Curriculum-Based Measurement: A Manual for Teachers.

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 12

        Standard Directions for Conducting CBA

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 13

        Directions for CBA in Reading Reading passages "When I say "begin" I want you to begin reading aloud at the top of this page (point to the first word on the page). Try to read each word. If you come to a word you don't know I'll read it for you. Be sure to do your best reading. Do you have any questions?" (Pause) "Begin".

        The examiner begins the stopwatch when the first word is read correctly by either the student or the examiner. If the student makes an error on the first word, or if the student does not read the initial word within three seconds, the examiner says the word and starts the stopwatch.

        As the student reads along in the text, the examiner records any errors by marking a slash (/) through the incorrectly read word. The examiner reads words that the student reads incorrectly. If the student hesitates for more than three (3) seconds for any word, or if the student misreads a word, the examiner says the word and marks it as an error. (More information concerning scoring is provided later in this manual pg. 21) When students read so quickly that it is difficult to correct each error, it is acceptable to not interrupt the student's reading with corrections.

        After 60 seconds, the examiner says "Stop reading" and marks a "/" after the last word that the student read.

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 14

        Directions for CBA: Reading Readiness Directions for letter naming Give the student the list of randomly arranged letters, point to the first letter and say: "I want you to name these letters. Begin here and read across the page. Try to name as many letters as you can. If you need help with a letter, I'll read it for you. Remember to do your best reading. Do you have any questions?" (These directions should be given as consistently as possible without sounding stilted.) Begin timing as soon as the first letter is read. (If the student doesn't know the first letter, begin timing as soon as you say the letter.) At the end of one minute, say "Stop". Put a slash after the last letter read within one minute. Directions for reading letter sounds Give the student the list of randomly arranged letters, point to the first letter and say: "I want you to tell me the sounds that these letters make. Begin here and read across the page. Try to say the sounds of as many letters as you can. If you need help with a letter, I'll read it for you. If a letter says more than one sound tell me all the sounds that the letter makes. Remember to do your best sounding out. Do you have any questions?" (These directions should be given as consistently as possible without sounding stilted.) Begin timing as soon as the first letter is read. (If the student doesn't know the first letter, begin timing as soon as you say the letter sound.) At the end of one minute, say "Stop". Put a slash after the last letter read within one minute. Scoring Subtract the number of errors from the total number of letters 'covered' in one minute. These are the correctly read letters (CRL) and correctly read sounds (CRS). For letter sounds, the total sounds read (TRS) is the number of letters covered. If a student reads more than one sound for a letter that makes more than one sound (a, e, i, o, u, y, c, g, s, x,) count multiple sounds when computing the TRS.

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 15

        Directions for CBA in Reading Word lists "When I say "begin" I want you to begin reading the words on this page (point to the first word on the page). Try to read each word. If you come to a word you don't know I'll read it for you. Be sure to do your best reading. Do you have any questions?" (Pause) "Begin".

        The examiner begins the stopwatch when the first word is read correctly by either the student or the examiner. If the student makes an error on the first word, or if the student does not read the initial word within three seconds, the examiner says the word and starts the stopwatch.

        As the student reads down the list, the examiner records any errors by marking a slash (/) through the incorrectly read word. The examiner reads words that the student reads incorrectly*. If the student hesitates for more than three (3) seconds for any word, or if the student misreads a word, the examiner says the word and marks it as an error and directs the student to the next word on the list. When students read so quickly that it is difficult to correct each error, it is acceptable to not interrupt the student's reading with corrections.

        After 60 seconds, the examiner says "Stop reading" and marks a "/" after the last word that the student read.

        * Some authors do not provide error correction for misread words. Providing error correction for misread words is the standard procedure implemented in the Syracuse City School District based on teacher feedback about acceptable assessment practice. Decisions to modify CBA procedures must be applied conservatively and consistently.

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 16

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) in Writing Comprehensive Assessment Directions Directions: "I want you to write a story. I am going to read a sentence to you first, and then I want you to write about what happens. You will have one minute to think about the story you will write and then have three minutes to write it. Do your best work. If you don't know how to spell a word, you should guess. Are there any questions?" "For the next minute think about:" (provide story starter*) After 60 seconds say: "Begin writing"

        After three minutes: "Stop. Please put your pencils down." The teacher then collects the writing samples. * Ideas for story starters are provided on the following page.

        Quantitative scoring options include: 1) Counting the total words written (TWW) whether they are misspelled or not. 2) Counting the number of correctly spelled words (CSW) in the story and percentage of total words written that were spelled correctly (words are scored as correct whether or not they are grammatically correct). 3) Counting the number of correctly spelled words in the story and percentage of total words written that were spelled correctly (words are scored as incorrect if they are not grammatically correct). Note: The important thing to remember is the teacher's instructional goals and that scoring methods are uniform across writing samples that are compared to monitor progress. Qualitative scoring options: Teacher evaluates writing sample using the CBA Writing Comprehensive Assessment Sheet (tailored for instructional goals). Teacher and student evaluate writing sample using the CBA Writing Comprehensive Assessment Sheet (tailored for instructional goals) and the 'Checking My Story' sheet. Optional activity: Self-assessment (after the 3 minute sample) "Now you'll have 5 minutes to use the 'Checking my Story' sheet to check your story. Rate how you did today according to the rating sheet". Student editing "Look over the 'Checking my Story' sheet and use it to edit your story using a different colored pen. For example, you could change your story by adding words, changing words, or correcting spelling or punctuation. To change words, draw one line through the word and write the new word above the crossed out word."

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 17

        Ideas for Story Starters

        1. You just won the lottery for 20 million dollars. What would you do? 2. You woke up this morning and you were two (or ten) feet tall. Write a story

        about what you would do and what might happen.

        3. You woke up this morning and you were could fly. Write a story about what you would do and what might happen.

        4. You woke up this morning and you were invisible. Write a story about what

        you would do and what might happen.

        5. A genie grants you three wishes. Write a story about what you would wish for and what might happen.

        6. Write about the scariest (happiest) thing that ever happened to you.

        7. Aliens have landed in your back yard. Write about what might happen.

        8. You have just won an all expense paid vacation to anywhere in the world.

        Write about where you would go and what you would do.

        9. You’ve invented a time machine and can go back in time. Write about where you would go and what might happen.

        10. You’ve invented a time machine and can go forward into the future. Write

        about what it is like and what might happen.

        11. You are made principal of the school. Write about what you would do and what might happen.

        12. You President of the United States. Write about what you would do and what might happen.

        13. Write about what you would like to be doing in 20 years.

        14. What if you could change anything about yourself? Write about what you would change and how your life would be different.

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 18

        Directions for CBA in Math 1) Math sheets are distributed to students face down on their desks. Students are asked to put their name on the paper before beginning. 2) Provide these instructions to students: Single skill probes: "The sheets on your desk are math facts. All of the problems are (state the type of math problem on the sheet e.g., addition)".

        Multiple skill probes: "The sheets on your desk are math facts. There are several types of problems on the sheets. Some are (state the types of math problem on the sheet e.g., addition and some are subtraction). Look at each problem carefully before you answer it". For all problems: "When I say begin, start answering the problems. Begin with the first problem and work across the page (demonstrate by pointing). Then go down to the next row. If you cannot answer a problem mark an x on it and go to the next one. Are there any questions?" 3) Say "Begin" and start timing. 4) Watch students to make sure that they are working across the page and that they are not skipping problems. 5) At the end of two minutes, sat "Stop. Please put your pencils down." Math probes Probes should be designed to cover skills currently targeted in the classroom instruction or review skills (depending on what the instructor wants to know about a student's skills. Problems on math sheets should be randomly arranged and of equal difficulty. Several math probes are included in this materials manual. Math probes may also be generated on the following website: www.interventioncentral.com. Scoring The total number of digits attempted are counted. For example:

        54 31 47 +35 -10 +22 88 21 29 6 (The number ‘6’

        indicates all possible digits for that line.)

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 19

        The total attempted = 6 (This is the number of digits had the problems been computed correctly). Errors = 2 (these are the digits that are underlined). Total digits correct = 4 Percent digits correct in two minutes = 4/6 or 67% Note: By computing correct digits CBA math is more sensitive to small change over relatively

        short periods of time.

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 20

        Guidelines for Conducting, Scoring and Interpreting CBA

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 21

        CBA Reading: What Are/ Aren't Counted as Errors As the student reads, the examiner carefully records errors that the student makes as well as other observations concerning the way the student reads. The following are counted as student errors when scoring CBA: 1) Hesitating for more than 3 seconds between words 2) Misreading words (i.e., reading bat as "bet") 3) Omitting words 4) Skipping a line (redirect the student to the missed line and count as one error) The following are not counted as student errors when scoring CBA: 1) Words that the student corrects for him or herself within 3 seconds. 2) Words that are inserted (reading I saw a dog as "I saw a big dog")

        before the examiner has a chance to correct the student. 3) Mispronunciations of words because of articulation differences that the student may have (i.e., the student reads rabbit as "wabbit"). 4) Different pronunciations of words due to non-standard English (e.g. some Latino students may delete the final 's' sound in words).

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 22

        Guidelines for Recording Student Reading Behaviors Misreads – Mark a slash through words that are misread (e.g., the student reads store as “stop”) and write what the student reads over the word. (Count as one error.) Hesitations – If the student does not read anything within 3 seconds, mark a slash through the word. (Count as one error.) Skipped lines – If the student skips a line, re-direct the student to the c correct line and mark the error by putting an arrow at the corresponding lines. (Count as one error.)

        Ommissions – If the student skips a word (“I went to store” in this example), put an “x” through the omitted word. (Count as one error.) Insertions – If the student inserts a word that is not in the passage and

        continues to read the following word correctly, it is considered an insertion. The examiner may write the

        word where it was inserted with an inverted “v”. (No error is scored.)

        Self-corrections – If a student misreads a word but then corrects him/herself within three seconds, sc may be used

        to indicate the self-correction. (No error is scored.) Misarticulations/ – If a student exhibits a consistent pattern of Mispronunciations misarticulation or reads words differently

        because they speak with an accent or non standard English, you may want to note the pattern by noting a few examples. (No error is scored.)

        Note: Recording these reading behaviors is optional when conducting CBA. Resulting information may be used to identify students’ instructional needs. Accurate administration and scoring procedures should not be compromised when recording the nature of student errors.

        I went to the store to buy some milk, but when I got there

        I went to the store to buy some milk

        very He won on his first try.

        SC wane He won on his first

        “He wan as fa as he could” He ran as far as he could.

        Stare Store

        Store

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 23

        Reading: Guidelines for frustration, instructional and mastery levels Grade 1 through grade 3 text* Fluency Accuracy Frustration Below 35 CRW** Below 85% accuracy Instructional 35 – 60 CRW 85 – 95% accuracy Mastery Above – 60 CRW Above 95% accuracy Grade 4 through grade 6 text Fluency Accuracy Frustration Below 50 CRW Below 85% accuracy Instructional 50 – 100 CRW 85 – 95% accuracy Mastery Above 100 CRW Above 95% accuracy * Guidelines for frustration, instructional and mastery levels of fluency vary in the literature. Fluency rates corresponding with functional Spanish reading are unknown. **CRW – Median correctly read words in one minute out of three readings

        Math: Guidelines for frustration, instructional and mastery levels Grade 1 through grade 3 problems* Fluency Accuracy Frustration 0-9 CD Below 85% accuracy Instructional 10-19 CD 85 – 95% accuracy Mastery 20+ CD Above 95% accuracy Grade 4 and above problems Fluency Accuracy Frustration 0-19 CD Below 85% accuracy Instructional 20-39 CD 85 – 95% accuracy Mastery 40+ CD Above 95% accuracy CD- Correct digits computed in two minutes *Math guidelines are adapted from Shapiro (1996)

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 24

        Information Recording Materials

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 25

        Survey Level Assessment Summary Student TRW – Total read words E – Errors CRW – Correctly read words % CRW= Median CRW Median CRW + Median E

        Date Notes Book (level) Reading 1: TRW ___ E ____ CRW ____ Reading 2: TRW ___ E ____ CRW ____ Reading 3: TRW ___ E ____ CRW ____ Median CRW ____ E ____ % CRW ____ Book (level) Reading 1: TRW ___ E ____ CRW ____ Reading 2: TRW ___ E ____ CRW ____ Reading 3: TRW ___ E ____ CRW ____ Median CRW ____ E ____ % CRW Book (level) Reading 1: TRW ___ E ____ CRW ____ Reading 2: TRW ___ E ____ CRW ____ Reading 3: TRW ___ E ____ CRW ____ Median CRW ____ E ____ % CRW ____ Book (level) Reading 1: TRW ___ E ____ CRW ____ Reading 2: TRW ___ E ____ CRW ____ Reading 3: TRW ___ E ____ CRW ____ Median CRW ____ E ____ % CRW ____ Book (level) Reading 1: TRW ___ E ____ CRW ____ Reading 2: TRW ___ E ____ CRW ____ Reading 3: TRW ___ E ____ CRW ____ Median CRW ____ E ____ % CRW ____ Frustration level(s) Instructional level(s) Mastery level(s)

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 26

        Progress Monitoring Data Recording Sheet Student Book (level) TRW – Total read words E – Errors CRW – Correctly read words % CRW = Median CRW Median CRW + Median E

        Date Notes Reading 1: TRW ___ E ____ CRW ____ Reading 2: TRW ___ E ____ CRW ____ Reading 3: TRW ___ E ____ CRW ____ Median CRW ____ E ____ % CRW Words misread Read as: Words misread Read as: 1) 4) 2) 5) 3) 6)

        Date Notes Reading 1: TRW ___ E ____ CRW ____ Reading 2: TRW ___ E ____ CRW ____ Reading 3: TRW ___ E ____ CRW ____ Median CRW _______ E ____ % CRW Words misread Read as: Words misread Read as: 1) 4) 2) 5) 3) 6)

        Date Notes Reading 1: TRW ___ E ____ CRW ____ Reading 2: TRW ___ E ____ CRW ____ Reading 3: TRW ___ E ____ CRW ____ Median CRW _______ E ____ % CRW Words misread Read as: Words misread Read as: 1) 4) 2) 5) 3) 6)

        Date Notes Reading 1: TRW ___ E ____ CRW ____ Reading 2: TRW ___ E ____ CRW ____ Reading 3: TRW ___ E ____ CRW ____ Median CRW _______ E ____ % CRW Words misread Read as: Words misread Read as: 1) 4) 2) 5) 3) 6)

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 27

        CBA Word Drill List

        Directions for Word Drill: Write down selected words that were misread in the CBA passage. Point to each word and ask the student to read it. If the student reads the word incorrectly read the word and have the student repeat the word twice. Repeat the procedure until the student reads all of the words with 100% accuracy.

        1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10)

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 28

        CBA Word Drill List Directions for Word Drill: Write down selected words that were misread in the CBA passage. Point to each word and ask the student to read it. If the student reads the word incorrectly read the word and have the student repeat the word twice. Repeat the procedure until the student reads all of the words with 100% accuracy. 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) 11) 12) 13) 14) 15) 16) 17) 18) 19) 20)

        10095908580757065605550454035302520151050 9/1

        9/7 9/15

        9/22 10/1

        10/7 10/15

        10/22 11/1

        11/7 11/15

        11/22 12/1

        12/7 12/15

        12/22 1/1

        1/7 1/15

        1/22 2/1

        2/7 2/15

        2/22 3/1

        3/7 3/15

        3/22 4/1

        4/7 4/15

        4/22 5/1

        5/7 5/15

        5/22 6/1

        6/7 6/15

        6/22

        CRW

        % CRW

        Describe interventions here C

        urriculum B

        ased A ssessm

        ent G raph

        Student:

        CRW in level text

        o o Percent CRW Goal: Student will m

        ake CRW progress per week

        R eading

        10095908580757065605550454035302520151050 9/1

        9/7 9/15

        9/22 10/1

        10/7 10/15

        10/22 11/1

        11/7 11/15

        11/22 12/1

        12/7 12/15

        12/22 1/1

        1/7 1/15

        1/22 2/1

        2/7 2/15

        2/22 3/1

        3/7 3/15

        3/22 4/1

        4/7 4/15

        4/22 5/1

        5/7 5/15

        5/22 6/1

        6/7 6/15

        6/22

        CS

        % CS

        Describe interventions here C

        urriculum B

        ased A ssessm

        ent G raph

        Student:

        Correct Sounds in One M inute

        o o Percent Correct Sounds Goal: Student will increase sounds read in one m

        inute by per week

        Sounds

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 31

        Curriculum Based Assessment – Writing (Comprehensive Assessment Sheet)

        Writing the Story Spelling _____ Total Words Written _____ Correctly Spelled Words _____ Percent Correctly Spelled Words Mechanics (rate the mechanics by the following criteria) 1 2 3 Incorrect or very Inconsistent use Correct, consistent use infrequent use _____ Capitals ____ " " Quotations _____ . Period ____ : or ; colon/semi-colon _____ , Comma ____ ' (apostrophe for contraction – i.e., can't) _____ ! Exclamation mark ____ ' (apostrophe for possession – i.e., Mary's) _____ ? Question mark Quality of Writing – The story: Student Teacher ratings ___ ___ has a title. ___ ___ is consistent with the title. ___ ___ has a good leading sentence. ___ ___ has (no, few, many) omitted words (comments: ). ___ ___ has (no, few, many) grammatical errors (comments: ). ___ ___ has (no, few, many) capital letter errors (comments: ). ___ ___ has (no, few, many) run on sentences (comments: ). ___ ___ has (no, few, many) incomplete sentences (comments: ). ___ ___ has (many, few, no) descriptive words (comments: ). communicates the writer's thoughts clearly. communicates the writer's thoughts in an organized manner. is interesting to the reader. ___ ___ has good ending sentence. ___ ___ is an example of the student's personal best. *Add/delete/modify the above descriptors according to student objectives

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 32

        Checking My Story Name ________________ Date ________________ 1) Did I use my map? _______ 2) Did I give my story a title? _______ 3) Does my title tell about the story? ________ 4) Did I write a good lead sentence? _____ 5) Does my story have a plot? _____ 6) Did I separate my words? _____ 7) Did I write in complete sentences (not begin sentences with 'then' 'and' or 'so') ? _____ 8) Did I leave out any words? _____ 9) Did I correct grammatical errors? _____ 10) Did I correct spelling errors? _____ 11) Did I correct capitals letters where needed? _____ 12) Did I add punctuation marks where needed? ____ 13) Did I use descriptive words? _____ 14) Does my story have a good ending sentence? ____ 15) Did I do my personal best? _____

        * add/delete/modify these descriptors according to student objectives

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 33

        Cover Copy Compare Word List

        Directions for Cover Copy Compare: 1) Write down selected words that you want the student to be able to spell. 2) Instruct the student to look at the word and memorize it using whatever strategy will be effective. 3) Provide the student with an index card to cover each word. 4) Cover the word and then ask the student to write the word from his or her own memory. 5) Uncover the word and compare the student's response with the correct spelling. 6) Correct any errors and repeat until the student spells each word from memory with 100% accuracy.

        1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10)

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 34

        Cover Copy Compare Word List

        Directions for Cover Copy Compare: 1) Write down selected words that you want the student to be able to spell. 2) Instruct the student to look at the word and memorize it using whatever strategy will be effective. 3) Provide the student with an index card to cover each word. 4) Cover the word and then ask the student to write the word from his or her own memory. 5) Uncover the word and compare the student's response with the correct spelling. 6) Correct any errors and repeat until the student spells each word from memory with 100% accuracy. 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) 11) 12) 13) 14) 15)

        10095908580757065605550454035302520151050 9/1

        9/7 9/15

        9/22 10/1

        10/7 10/15

        10/22 11/1

        11/7 11/15

        11/22 12/1

        12/7 12/15

        12/22 1/1

        1/7 1/15

        1/22 2/1

        2/7 2/15

        2/22 3/1

        3/7 3/15

        3/22 4/1

        4/7 4/15

        4/22 5/1

        5/7 5/15

        5/22 6/1

        6/7 6/15

        6/22

        C

        % C

        Describe interventions here C

        urriculum B

        ased A ssessm

        ent G raph

        Student:

        Correct

        o o Percent Goal: Student will m

        ake progress per week in

        W riting

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 36

        CBA Math Summary Sheet

        Student name: Date Sheet Code DA CD %CD Comments

        DA-Digits attempted CD-Correct Digits %CD-Percent Correct Digits

        10095908580757065605550454035302520151050 9/1

        9/7 9/15

        9/22 10/1

        10/7 10/15

        10/22 11/1

        11/7 11/15

        11/22 12/1

        12/7 12/15

        12/22 1/1

        1/7 1/15

        1/22 2/1

        2/7 2/15

        2/22 3/1

        3/7 3/15

        3/22 4/1

        4/7 4/15

        4/22 5/1

        5/7 5/15

        5/22 6/1

        6/7 6/15

        6/22

        CD

        % CD

        Describe interventions here C

        urriculum B

        ased A ssessm

        ent G raph

        Student:

        CD in (skill)

        o o Percent CD Goal: Student will m

        ake CD progress per week

        M ath

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 38

        Case Studies

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 39

        Case example 1: Survey level assessment and ongoing monitoring

        The following example illustrates how CBA can be used to survey students’ skills in classroom materials and then monitor individual student progress through weekly reading probes. First, CBA survey level assessment of the student’s skills at various levels was collected to provide information about book levels that were too easy (mastery), too hard (frustration) and appropriately challenging (instructional). Based on this information, the student’s teacher was able to determine which instructional materials would set the student up for success.

        CBA monitoring provided information concerning the effectiveness of the instructional strategies, interventions and or programs being used to promote academic skills. The main question addressed by CBA monitoring is “How well is this particular approach working for the student?”

        Background Michael is a nine year old boy attending Smith Elementary School in the third grade.

        While Michael’s behavior, motivation and attendance are currently good, they were very problematic during first and second grade. Michael was retained in second grade. His current teacher estimated his reading level to be at a mid-second grade level and her lowest reading group, which includes Michael, uses an end of second grade textbook. She feels that Michael has the capability of learning but is behind due to his past troubles and is having difficulty “catching up” to his classmates.

        Michael was referred to his school’s pre-referral intervention team because his teacher was concerned about his reading skills. While he was making progress in reading, his reading delays made many aspects of the school day, including content areas, a struggle for him.

        After reviewing Michael’s educational history, it was clear that his history of attendance and limited motivation were key issues contributing to Michael’s difficulties.

        Step 1: Survey level assessment The school psychologist in Michael’s school conducted a CBA survey level

        assessment that inventoried Michael’s skills at different grade levels. She asked Michael to read three randomly selected passages from the end of first, beginning of second, end of second and third grade textbooks used in his classroom. She found that, in the end of second grade book used in Michael’s reading group, Michael was reading on average only 30 words correctly in one minute, with 75% accuracy. At this level Michael would probably not be able to practice enough known words when reading independently to improve his reading skills. Michael was able to read at an instructional level in the beginning of second grade basal (45 words correctly in one minute with 89% accuracy). Michael was at mastery level fluency and accuracy in the end of first grade book (see table below).

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 40

        Michael’s CBA Reading Survey Level Assessment Results

        Because Michael’s current reading book was so difficult for him, he probably would

        find it difficult to comprehend what he was reading. Furthermore, he would be at risk for low motivation and behavior problems given the high degree of frustration if not given substantial support in current instructional materials. Step 2: Set a goal

        Michael’s teacher and the pre-referral intervention team used the survey level; assessment information to set a realistic but ambitious goal for Michael to improve his reading fluency and accuracy:

        “After four weeks of flash cards drill with the teacher Michael will increase his reading fluency in the third grade textbook by 6 words (1.5 CRW increase per week)”.

        Step 3: Plan an intervention Rather than move Michael out of his current reading group and into an easier

        book (which may have been an appropriate modification based on the survey level assessment), his teacher decided that she would provide interventions to make the end of second grade text easier for Michael through preparatory activities. She would do this initially by having a teacher assistant in the school tutor Michael using flash cards with difficult words from his reading book. Step 4: CBA monitoring The intervention team along with Michael’s teacher decided that their goal was for Michael to read fluently and accurately in the third grade book. The teacher assistant conducting the flash card intervention would be trained to administer CBA on a weekly basis to monitor Michael’s progress. Each week Michael would read from three different randomly selected passages from the third grade book. The TA would then graph the median (or middle score out of three) correctly read words (CRW) per minute and percent accuracy that Michael achieved each week. The goal, interventions attempted, and results would be shared with Michael and his parents.

        The graph below shows the goal line reflecting expected progress, interventions used, as well as actual progress made (reflected by fluency in third grade materials) with each intervention.

        Reading level Correctly read words (CRW) Percent correctly read words Proficiency level End of first 75 96% Mastery Second (2-1) 45 89% Instructional Second (2-2) 30 75% Frustration Third (3-1) 13 60% Frustration

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 41

        Michael's Weekly Reading Fluency Progress in Third Grade Basal Text

        0

        5

        10

        15

        20

        25

        30

        35

        40

        0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

        Instructional Week

        C R

        W in

        T h

        ir d

        G ra

        d e

        B as

        al T

        ex t

        Goal = 1.5 CRW per week Median CRW in third grade text

        Baseline – No Intervention

        First intervention – Flash card with adult tutor twice per week

        Second intervention – Paired reading with peer tutor 4 times per week

        Step 5: Evaluate intervention effectiveness and make necessary modifications After five weeks of the initial intervention, Michael’s teacher and the intervention

        team decided that Michael was not meeting his goal (see graph). They decided to train an older student to be Michael’s tutor. Michael and the tutor would spend 25 minutes, four days per week reading from the second grade basal which was being used for instruction in Michael’s classroom. The goal of 1.5 words per week gain would be kept the same.

        Step 6: Continue to assess and re-evaluate effectiveness Throughout six weeks of the peer tutoring intervention, Michael demonstrated

        reading gains that were at or above his goal. The degree of improvement was such that Michael was projected to be reading instructionally in third grade material before the end of the school year. While his reading skills would still be delayed compared to other nine year olds, he was “catching up”.

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 42

        Case example 2: Use of local norms to identify students with “special needs” Educators have a responsibility of identifying students with special needs.

        Knowing what to expect of groups of students whose difficulties may be explained by factors not related to educational disability (e.g., students with limited English proficiency, and curriculum casualties) is a difficult task.

        Collection of local norms through Curriculum Based Measures (CBM) is very useful for determining expected levels of skills and or progress of students who have problematic educational backgrounds. The purpose of standardization samples is to help educators know what to expect from students from similar backgrounds at a particular age/grade level. Collecting ‘local norms’ using CBM procedures allows educators to compare the academic skills of referred students to students who have had similar language histories and or educational experiences. Background

        Maria is an eight year old girl finishing the second grade in a classroom that includes several students who have limited English proficiency. Maria was born in Puerto Rico and did not begin speaking English until she entered kindergarten when she was five years old. Her parents and teacher are concerned that Maria struggles when she reads books estimated to be at a first grade level. Maria decodes many of her words and does not demonstrate a fluent sight word vocabulary. Her teacher feels that the energy she devotes to decoding interferes with her reading comprehension. They are concerned that Maria may have a learning disability.

        Step 1. Assess what the student is able to do compared to “typical students”

        Several of Maria’s classmates have a similar language and instructional history. Maria’s teacher identified students in her class that had similar histories and randomly selected five of them to establish a “local norm”. She administered three CBA probes from the second grade book that she was using for instruction in her class (making sure to not use passages that students had already read). She also administered a page of randomly arranged letters to assess fluency in letter naming and sounding out. Maria’s teacher had significant concerns about another student in her class, Anna, and decided to conduct CBA assessment with her as well.

        Step 2. Decide whether the student exhibits significant weaknesses relative to classmates

        Results of the assessment revealed that Maria’s performance was not significantly different from that of her Spanish speaking classmates. Furthermore, her teacher was able to see that many students in her class were struggling in the class materials and that they needed additional support and practice before they could read independently at that level. Maria and five other students had not yet mastered the basic phonetic skills needed to decode English words. Vowel sounds were particularly difficult for Maria and other students assessed. This would be a target for direct instruction.

        The graph below illustrates that Maria’s reading fluency is similar to the median performance of the students she assessed. Maria’s performance on both assessments is within one standard deviation of the average performance of her classmates. In other words, her performance is not “atypical” for her class. Informal analysis of the data reveals that five other students performed similar to Maria on the reading tasks.

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 43

        Maria's Reading Performance Compared to Classmates

        0

        5

        10

        15

        20

        25

        30

        35

        2-1 Basal Letter Sounds

        N um

        be r

        R ea

        d Maria Class Median

        Anna, on the other hand, exhibited basic reading skills that were very discrepant from other students in the classroom (see graph below). Her performance suggests that without significant intervention in reading she will continue to experience difficulties in language arts. Her teacher consulted with the building’s intervention committee to design an individualized intervention and monitoring plan for Anna. Ongoing CBA monitoring would be used to evaluate her progress. Lack of progress would indicate the need for a more thorough evaluation to investigate the presence of an educational disability. CBA information would provide substantial evidence for or against the presence of a disability, as well as the nature of intervention required to address Anna’s needs.

        Anna's Reading Performance Compared to Classmates

        0

        5

        10

        15

        20

        25

        30

        35

        2-1 Basal Letter Sounds

        N um

        be r

        R ea

        d

        Anna Class Median

        Range: plus or minus one standard deviation

        + 1 SD

        Average range (+ 1 SD)

        + 1 SD

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 44

        Case Example 3: The new student Background

        Joe is an eight year old student who recently began attending Eagle Street Elementary School in February. On the first day of school, Joe’s second grade teacher attempted to work with Joe and found that his academic skills appeared to be limited. He struggled in the literature selections that most other students in his class were able to read. Joe was able to perform simple calculation skills that his teacher gave to him but his math skills were unknown. He had difficulty communicating ideas in writing that he was able to convey verbally. His teacher had many questions about Joe’s ability to acquire academic skills. A primary question is whether or not Joe’s academic skills necessitated substantial modification of instruction and instructional materials for him to be successful in second grade.

        Assessment

        CBA was conducted in reading, math and written expression to collect information about the skills that Jose was able to develop in his previous school. Results Reading

        When asked to read second grade text used in the classroom, Joe read fluently and accurately (see table below). His teacher was able to conclude that Joe does not have a problem with reading decoding and that his basic skills are adequate for him to apply what he reads. She will continually monitor Joe’s ability to answer questions about what he read and provide intervention as necessary. Text level Fluency (CRW) Accuracy (%CRW) Challenge End of second 68 96% Mastery Third 40 83% Frustration Written expression

        Joe’s teacher conducted a CBM writing assessment to measure Joe’s ability to write a short story compared to his classmates. The entire class was asked to write a three minute story with a story starter. Joe wrote 25 correctly spelled words (76% accuracy), while the median performance in the class was 30 correctly spelled words with 78% accuracy (see table below). Joe used capital letters and periods and his story was imaginative and quite descriptive. His story had a logical sequence and he stuck to the story theme. Thus Joe appears to have developed some written expression skills. Joe’s teacher decided that Joe’s skills were not very different from other students in the classroom.

        Table illustrating Joe’s writing compared to median class performance

        *CSW – correctly spelled words in 3 minutes

        CSW in 3 minutes % CSW in 3 minutes Joe 25 76% Class median (middle score) 30 78%

        Curriculum Based Assessment (CBA) Materials Manual Page 45

        Math Joe’s class is currently working on double-digit addition and subtraction. Most students in the class have mastered single-digit addition and subtraction. Joe’s performance on the CBA math assessment indicated that he has mastered double-digit addition but needs additional practice in subtraction. He sometimes does not pay attention to whether he is supposed to add or subtract and he sometimes subtracts the top number from the bottom number. Through error analysis, his teacher was able to identify specific skills that Jose needs to learn in order to perform successfully. Table showing Joe’s fluency and accuracy in math calculations

        Summary

        The CBA reading, math and written expression screening provided information concerning basic skill acquisition during Jose’s previous schooling. Understanding his prior skill acquisition helps those working with him to know if he has academic proficiencies that he will be able to apply in his new classroom. In this case the teacher determined that Joe’s current skills are such that the instruction in the classroom is at his level and that Joe needs minimal to no instructional modifications.

        Advantages of this screening format include:

        • Feasibility: Total screening time: approximately 25 minutes. • Curriculum relevance: All skills observed were related to the second grade curriculum

        and materials used in his classroom. Furthermore, the assessment gathered information about basic skills that Jose had been taught in his previous school.

        • Structured format: The assessment used directions and tasks that could be understood by the student. His performance could be objectively observed, and his current performance can be compared wth future performance if his teacher wants to evaluate progress.

        • Easy to administer.

        Skill Fluency (CD) Accuracy (%CD) Challenge Addition/subtraction single digit

        25 90% Instructional

        Double digit addition/subtraction

        10 45% Frustration

        Fall 09/W 6-7/Chapter 9 Lecture Points.pdf

        Chapter 9

        Howell (1999, pp. 8-9)

        1 Reading methods are more similar than different and are a function of the task of

        reading itself. All reading methods deal with language and code. Reading isn’t bottom up

        or top down (although reading instruction may be). It is a highly integrated process and

        most instructional practices reflect this.

        2 If you want to discuss which methods/programs are best for remedial/corrective

        students include the following variables: (1) degree of structure; (2) degree to which a

        method can be adapted to small group instruction; (3) the existence of, and quality of,

        placement tests; (4) the use of teacher monitored reading; (5) attention to sequencing; (6)

        length of daily lessons; and, (7) the level of student active participation.

        3 A well-designed reading curriculum features: (1) knowledge, skills and strategies that

        can be generalized; (2) efficient sequences which promote positive transfer of learning;

        and, (3) only essential subtasks and strategies.

        4 Measures of pre-reading skills require item formats which have fidelity with the task of

        reading. These are called "Awareness of print and sounds". (See the DIEBELS)

        5 Adequate specific level measures will include tests of blending.

        6 Good readers decode fluently (automatically) and when presented with new words draw

        upon a variety of skills and strategies to give meaning and sound to the unknown word.

        7 Survey and specific level decoding testing leads to decision making and treatment

        recommendations. These treatment recommendations include: (1) use a balanced

        approach (phonics and language-based) to teaching both decoding and comprehension);

        (2) emphasis on decoding (grapheme-phoneme correspondence) to help the student use

        these skills more automatically; (3) teaching beginning reading skills and concepts; (4)

        building oral reading rate because comprehension is limited by the number of words the

        student can read within typical time limits; (5) focus of instruction on error patterns such

        as mispronunciation, insertion, omission, hesitation, repetition, and inattention to

        punctuation; (6) monitor decoding but emphasize fluency and teach higher level reading

        skills (summarizing, questioning, self-monitoring, and predicting); and (7) teach specific

        "active reading" strategies to improve comprehension.

        8 Survey level testing begins with collecting errors on reading passages from books used

        at the student's grade level (the expected level). These passages are used to obtain the

        discrepancy but they may be too difficulty for collection of an error sample.

        9 The best error samples are obtained with passages on which the student is 80% to 85%

        accurate. A high percentage of errors, which interfere with meaning, always warrants

        additional specific level analysis.

        10 Specific level assessment of phonics covers a large domain. Assessment in this

        domain can be narrowed by adequate survey level assessment.

        11 Specific level assessment of skills in isolation should be employed after assessment in

        context has been exhausted. Formats for sampling skills in isolation at the mastery level

        require one and a half times more items than the CAP for the task requires, to ensure that

        the test doesn't place a ceiling on responses.

        12 While the use of nonsense words in specific level assessment for phonics skills is

        appropriate, nonsense formats are not appropriate for delivery of instruction.

        13 “Remedial" readers are progressing through the curriculum uniformly but more slowly

        than expected.

        14 "Corrective" readers lag behind in the curriculum just as remedial students do, but

        may present other problems. They have gaps in skill development. Equally important,

        they have developed erroneous patterns for working academic tasks. They often have

        practiced these erroneous patterns (strategies) to automaticity. Corrective readers need

        interventions which address learned erroneous patterns.

        Howell, K. (1999). Wadsworth Publishing Curriculum-Based Evaluation: Teaching and

        Decision Making, 3e: Sample Course Syllabi in Instructor Manual, Syllabus,

        Evaluation Retrieved February 23, 2009 from http://www.wadsworth.com/cgi-

        wadsworth/course_products_wp.pl?fid=M20bI&product_isbn_issn=97805343437

        05&discipline_number=3&token=C42F437771554B07DAA8767670438C43340

        AAD8F43C650C43EFA8F5B32B681834CA7F5AA285BED476642621CB81FA

        6F5

        Fall 09/W 6-7/Student Interview Form.doc

        week 3 dicussion Organizational Behavior

         What are the factors that influence our perception? What is the link between perception and decision making? How do individual differences and organizational constraints influence decision making? 

          Nursing Med Assignment

          Medication AssignmentSelect a medication that is either classified as an antidepressant or mood stabilizer. Based on your selection discuss the following information related to the medication you selected.

          • Evidence based treatment selection (FDA approved uses)
          • Off label uses, if any
          • Contraindications, if any to use
          • Mechanism of action
          • Potential side effects
          • Lab monitoring/ follow up
          • Role of the Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner in the role of prescribing and managing the medication

          Include a minimum of 4 evidence-based articles to support your paper that are 5 years old or less (exceptions: DSM-5 and course textbooks).

          Submission Instructions

          3 PAGES

          • The paper is original work and logically organized, formatted, and cited in the current APA (7th Edition) style, including citation of references.
          •  Be sure to validate your responses with citations and references in APA format
          •  Check for grammar, spelling, and mechanical errors.
          • NO MORE THAN 10% PLAGIARISM ALLOWED
          • DUE DATE SEPT 16, 2025

            Organizational Report

             Create a concise and thorough program evaluation report on the financial state of the organization for the board of directors. You will utilize and revise the previous four weeks of work by applying the attached feedback, but also develop each section to incorporate the required information below for each section. Must use the provided section headers indicated below.

            Executive Summary 

            • Create      a one-page executive summary of your findings and recommendations.
            • Analyze      if the organization’s mission statement is aligned with its practices.
            • Discuss      leadership and governance practices to enhance financial stability and      ethical oversight.

            Mission and Values 

            • Include      the revised report from section 1, incorporating feedback attached.
            • Note:        You will be developing an appendix section where detailed data must be        provided and referenced for each section.

            Financial Form Literacy

            • Include      the revised report from section 2 incorporating feedback attached.
            • Note:        You will be developing an appendix section where detailed data must be        provided and referenced for each section

            Endowment Recommendation 

            · Include the revised report from section 3 incorporating feedback attached.

            • Develop      a summary of the financial strength of the organization – building on what      you have already in section 3.
              • Make       sure this section is very analytical, evaluative, and concise.
                • Note:        You will be developing an appendix section where detailed data must be        provided and referenced for each section.

            Ethical Evaluation (use APA Level 1 section header)

            • Include      the revised report from section 4 incorporating feedback attached.
            • Note:        You will be developing an appendix section where detailed data must be        provided and referenced for each section.

            Conclusion 

            • Develop      an overall conclusion section that summarizes your findings and reminds      readers of the main points of your report.

            Appendix

            • Create      a set of appendices that align with each section of the reports that      includes adapted data from the information you provided in each of the sections      1, 2, 3, and 4. The appendices can be in graph form or include the specific      documents or forms referred to in each section that were reviewed for the      audit. The appendix should be organized as follows:

            Appendix A: Section 1

            Appendix B: Section 2

            Appendix C: Section 3

            Appendix D: Section 4

            The Organizational Audit,

            • The Report must      be twelve to fifteen double-spaced pages in length (not including title      and reference pages) and formatted according to APA Style.
            • Must      organize your audit with APA level headings.
            • Must      include an introduction and a conclusion paragraph. Your introduction      paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the      purpose of your paper.

            · Must use at least six credible sources and document any information used from sources in APA style.

            Audit Sections Feedback

            Section 1 Feedback:

            1) Summarize/Condense the information from this piece in the evaluation.

            2) Incorporate a summary of how the ARC has implemented the Benefits Theory in its governance and programs (explain the benefit theory and then evaluate its impact).

            3) Incorporate the Mission Statement more concisely.

            Section 2 Feedback:

            1) Summarize/Condense the information from this piece in the evaluation.

            Section 3 Feedback:

            1) Summarize/Condense the information from this piece in the evaluation.

            2) Be sure to start this section with an introduction that provides a clear thesis statement to prepare your reader for what is to come, and reserve the specific content and details for the body of the section.

            Section 4 Feedback:

            1) Summarize/Condense the information from this piece in the evaluation.

            2) Be sure to use current resources. Always use research on things published within the last five to ten years. Replace the one outdated resource from 2009.

            Platinum Essays