Policy Revisions for Criminal Justice Issues

Policy Revisions for Criminal Justice Issues

In this week’s interactive media, you are a hypothetical policy analyst. For this assignment, you have been asked to evaluate how criminal justice policies affect social justice and operations in criminal justice. Recall the material on the policy process and the discussion by Peters (2021) of stages in this process from Week 1 of this course. Your job will be to explain how you would advance your proposals for revisions to policy through each stage. Remember the discussion by Peters (2021) about moving a policy issue to an agenda.

Before your final paper, please refer to  aligning your paper with the assignment promptLinks to an external site. . Your final paper should include section titles that align with the prompts. In your final paper, you will propose a change in public policy to address issues for criminal justice and a change in a criminal justice policy to address social justice. For the first two prompts (there are six prompts total), you will prepare a literature review of criminal justice policies and of effects of policies (for effects, think about research findings) on areas in social justice. Consider this material on  Writing a Literature ReviewLinks to an external site. . Consider how literature and theories may support your proposals for policy changes.

You will need to explain how to move your proposals for public and criminal policy changes through the policy process. You will also address questions about theory. Recall your study last week of interest groups, bureaucracies, political aspects, and other factors, and consider sources from the prior modules. The  Research Paper Project Management PlanLinks to an external site.  resource provides guidance on planning your paper. You must reference at least eight scholarly or credible sources in addition to the Otu (2021) text and the Peters (2021) text in your final paper.

Prompts for your Policy Revisions for Criminal Justice Issues and Social Justice final paper:

GET A CUSTOM SOLUTION HERE

In your paper,

· Examine two theories in criminal justice and how they apply to policy and organization for the criminal justice and juvenile justice systems.

· Assess the effects of criminal justice policies for law enforcement, the judiciary, and corrections on social justice and the criminal justice system.

· Construct a public policy revision to address two criminal justice issues and a criminal justice policy revision to address a social justice issue.

· Explain how a theory, policy model, and policy instrument apply to your public policy revision and criminal justice policy revision.

· Analyze interest groups, the media, the public, bureaucracy, and political interests as factors in your public policy revision and criminal justice policy revision.

· Investigate process and federal, state, and local interests for your public policy revision and your criminal justice policy revision.

Consider how each of the prompts relates to the course learning outcomes and the learning outcomes for Week 6. Think about how the materials you reviewed in earlier weeks and the assigned and recommended materials for this week could help you in your review of the prompts.

· For example, the second prompt focuses on the effects of policies on social justice and on the criminal justice system. Think about how the following could help you in your approach to this prompt:

· Measuring Complex State Policies: Pitfalls and Considerations, With an Application to Race and Welfare Policy Links to an external site.

· Peters (2021)

· Chapter 10, Conclusion: Policy success and failure

· Principles of Effective Juvenile Justice Policy Update Links to an external site.  (assigned sections)

· As another example, for the third prompt, you will construct two policy revisions. You will need to propose a change in public policy that addresses issues for criminal justice and propose a change in criminal justice policy that addresses social justice. In your thinking about social justice, review the following:

· Creating a Racial Equity & Social Justice PolicyLinks to an external site.

Reflect on the following as you review course materials:

· Reflect on how theories in criminal justice may relate to criminal and juvenile justice system organizations.

· Think about social justice policy issues, and reflect on criminal justice policy issues.

· Consider how theories and models for policy may relate to your proposals for policy revisions.

· Think about the process necessary to establish your policy revisions and what the local, state, and federal interests would be in your proposals for policy revisions.

· Respond to each of the prompts with support from scholarly or credible sources.

· must be eight pages and double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to  APA Style

Burglary Report: Administrative policy elements

Burglary Report: Administrative policy elements

In this supplemental report, your job as the acting supervisor of the Criminal Investigation Division (CID) is to address policy problems from an investigative standpoint (i.e., are the officers at your police department responding to crime scenes effectively).  Policy problem areas to focus on include, but are not limited to, the following considerations: spelling/grammatical errors, the officer not listing the correct charges, an incomplete or incorrect list of stolen or damaged items, or not verifying serial numbers in the NCIC database. These are just some policy areas that could be noted while you read this report. Please note that spelling and grammatical errors were deliberately inserted into this burglary report to see if the students can recognize them.

Create a Word document that will address the administrative policy elements (or pitfalls) you observed while reading the patrol I/O report. 

Please upload a Microsoft Word Document to answer the questions below:

1. Is the narrative structured correctly? If so, then outline how the narrative is structured. If the narrative is not structured, provide policy guidance and implementation procedures that are based on currently accepted empirical practices.

2. Is it factual, accurate, objective, complete, concise, clear, and free of grammatical/spelling errors?  If the narrative is factual, accurate, and objective, outline how it meets these qualifications. If not, provide policy guidance and implementation procedures that are based on currently accepted empirical practices.

3. Is it audience-focused? If the narrative is audience-focused, then outline how it is audience-focused. If the narrative is not audience-focused, provide policy guidance and implementation procedures based on currently accepted empirical practices.

4. Are the criminal statutes appropriate? In other words, should additional charges be added to the case?  If not, what charges are applicable, and provide policy guidance and implementation procedures that are based on currently accepted empirical practices.

5. Was the crime scene processed thoroughly? If not, what steps would an investigator have to follow up on? If not, provide policy guidance and implementation procedures that are based on currently accepted empirical practices.

1. 4th amendment considerations: Never assume a victim of a burglary automatically gives a patrol officer who responds to a burglary complaint full access to search the complainant’s home.

2. Evidence Oversight Policy Issues, such as not comprehensively documenting the scene (i.e., photography), not collecting or addressing sources of inculpatory and exculpatory evidence items, not adhering to crime scene perimeter check policies (i.e., sometimes referred to as “neighborhood canvas” —-verification of other homes, etc.).

6. Was the accuracy of the NCIC information verified by the patrol officer through official receipts provided by the victim? If not, what steps could the investigator take to verify the victim’s information (i.e., serial number of stolen items)? If not, provide policy guidance and implementation procedures that are based on currently accepted empirical practices.

1. Think about this: What “proof” (other than the complainant’s word of mouth) would a criminal investigator be able to use in court that the reported serial number on the weapon was, in fact, the serial number?

2. In other words, serial numbers given to a responding officer MUST BE INDEPENDENTLY verified before being entered into the NCIC database. Moreover, what checks and balances exist, in terms of policy, to ensure that the dispatcher entered the correct serial number into NCIC (think about the times that you have mistyped a number—if a dispatcher types in the wrong serial number into NCIC, major issues follow).

Get a Custom Essay on Burglary Report: Administrative policy elements Here