+1 (951) 902-6107 info@platinumressays.com

NURS 6630 Week8 Mood Stabilizers Meds

NURS 6630 Week8 Mood Stabilizers Meds

Construct a 5- to 6-page paper  discussing each of the four traditional mood stabilizer medications: carbamazepine, lamotrigine, lithium, and valproate products. Support your answers with  five (5) evidence-based, peer-reviewed scholarly literature.

Note: APA style format will apply.

Your paper should include the following for each:

· Proposed mechanism of action

· Baseline assessment, laboratory considerations, and frequency of ongoing labs and assessments Note:Discuss the importance of assessment and labs.

· Special population considerations (birth assigned gender, age, other medical comorbidity considerations)

· FDA approval indications

· Typical dosing with discussion on therapeutic endpoints for psychiatric use

· Major drug–drug interaction considerations

· For each of these medications, please review potential drug–drug interactions listed below. Consider alternative dosing schedules, clinical implications for the drug interactions, additional patient education needed, any additional monitoring recommended, or collaboration needed with other medical professions (such as, primary care providers)

· Lamotrigine + Valproate

· Lamotrigine + Rifampin

· Valproate + Estrogen containing birth control.

· Valproate + Amitriptyline

· Lithium + Furosemide

· Lithium + Lisinopril

· Carbamazepine + Lurasidone

· Carbamazepine + Grapefruit juice

· Discuss the ethical, legal, and social implications related to prescribing bipolar and other related mood-disorder diagnoses therapy for patients.

Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references.

NURS_6630_Week8_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6630_Week8_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFor each of the four (4) traditional mood stabilizers, response includes proposed mechanism of action, baseline assessment, laboratory considerations, and frequency of ongoing. Discusses the importance of assessment and labs. Indication of special population considerations FDA approval. Discusses typical dosing with focus on therapeutic endpoints for psychiatric use of major drug-drug interaction considerations.
50 to >36.0 pts

Excellent

The response comprehensively and clearly describes all of the elements for each of the four (4) mood stabilizers.

36 to >24.0 pts

Good

The response clearly describes at least 75% the Assignment elements for three to four (3–4) mood stabilizers.

24 to >11.0 pts

Fair

The response describes at least 50% the Assignment elements for each mood stabilizer or only two (2) mood stabilizers discussed.

11 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that describe 25% or less of the Assignment elements for one (1) mood stabilizer, or some or all are missing.

 

50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReviews the potential drug–drug interactions of the following: *Lamotrigine + Valproate; *Lamotrigine + Rifampin; *Valproate + Estrogen containing birth control; *Valproate + Amitriptyline; *Lithium + Furosemide; *Lithium + Lisinopril; *Carbamazepine + Lurasidone; *Carbamazepine + Grapefruit juice. Consider alternative dosing schedules, clinical implications for the drug interactions, additional patient education needed, any additional monitoring recommended, or collaboration needed with other medical professions.
20 to >18.0 pts

Excellent

Reviews all seven (7) of the potential drug–drug interactions with clear and accurate Discussion of alternative dosing, patient education, monitoring recommendation, and when to collaborate.

18 to >15.0 pts

Good

Reviews five to six (5–6) of the potential drug–drug interactions with clear and accurate Discussion of alternative dosing, patient education, monitoring recommendation, and when to collaborate.

15 to >10.0 pts

Fair

Reviews three to four (3–4) of the potential drug–drug interactions with some Discussion and minor inaccuracies of alternative dosing, patient education, monitoring recommendation, and when to collaborate.

10 to >0 pts

Poor

Reviews all seven (7) of the potential drug–drug interactions with vague and major inaccuracies noted in Discussion including alternative dosing, patient education, monitoring recommendation, and when to collaborate.

 

20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscusses ethical, legal, and social implications related to prescribing these medications to patients.
10 to >7.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and clearly discusses ethical, legal and social implications. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the Discussion.

7 to >4.0 pts

Good

The response accurately discusses ethical, legal and social implications. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the Discussion.

4 to >1.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely discusses ethical, legal and social implications. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the Discussion.

1 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely discusses ethical, legal and social implications, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the Discussion, or it is missing.

 

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe paper is succinct and is 5–6 pages. Five (5) evidence-based, peer- reviewed scholarly references outside of course resources.
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

The paper is succinct and is 5–6 pages. Five (5) evidence-based, peer- reviewed scholarly references outside of course resources

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

The paper is succinct and is 7–8 pages. Four (4) evidence-based, peer- reviewed scholarly references outside of course resources

3 to >1.0 pts

Fair

The paper is somewhat succinct and is 8–9 pages. Two or three (2 or 3) evidence-based, peer- reviewed scholarly references outside of course resources

1 to >0 pts

Poor

The paper is not succinct and is 10+ pages. One (1) or no evidence-based, peer- reviewed scholarly references outside of course resources

 

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the Assignment is stated yet is brief and not descriptive.

3 to >1.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the Assignment is vague or off topic.

1 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

 

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >1.0 pts

Fair

Contains three or four grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

1 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains five or more grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

 

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains one or two APA format errors.

3 to >1.0 pts

Fair

Contains three or four APA format errors.

1 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains five or more APA format errors.

 

5 pts
Total Points: 100

Previous Next

Health Promotion Week 4

Health Promotion Week 4

Nutrition’ status affects our clients in multiple areas physically and emotionally. APRNs play an important role on educating and promoting nutritional wellbeing. This week will discuss nursing interventions to promote nutritional wellness. For this week discussion name TWO wellness problems affecting todays’ population, and at least two nursing interventions to promote nutritional wellness apply to each problem you identified.

Discussion 1 graded, review the comments in your grades for feedback/ explanation of the grade. PLEASE I CANNOT STRESS ENOUGH THAT:

· Initial post at least 250 words not including reference and at least three APA style references

· Peers’ responses to contain at least 150 words, and at least one reference. PEER RESPONSES NOT TO BE POSTED THE SAME DAY

This is an online course were participation in different days important.

Discussion: History and Development of Cognitive Neuropsychology

Discussion: History and Development of Cognitive Neuropsychology

The field of cognitive neuroscience includes a wide array of disciplines and professions. For example, a research neuroscientist focuses on investigating the differences in brain structures and functions of individuals with a specific diagnosis and those without. A clinical neuropsychologist assesses patients at a medical center. In your discussion post, answer each of the following questions:

● How do you see cognitive neuroscience benefiting the field of psychology?

● How do you see cognitive neuroscience benefiting the patients who seek mental health services?

● How do you see cognitive neuropsychology benefiting society at large?

● How do you think cognitive neuroscience could affect the primary and secondary education of children and adolescents?

● What historical developments in neuroscience have had the greatest effect on the larger field of psychology? Provide examples to support your thinking.

To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric.

 

CNO Practice Standard Discussion

CNO Practice Standard Discussion

This is to analyze the case study below and make three practice recommendations. Rationale and support is to be provided from three scholarly resources and at least two CNO Documents (A Practice Standard and the Code of Conduct).

· Title page: follows APA 7th edition guidelines.

· Introduction: Describes the context of the paper, the topic, and what the reader can expect.

· Case Study Summary: includes a summary of important data from case study.

· CNO Practice Standard Discussion: includes an explanation of the chosen CNO Standard, describes the relevant indicators from the CNO document and how they relate to the case. Include relevant Code of Conduct Statements.

· Recommendation One: includes a recommendation for the RPN’s practice, with discussion around reflection. Support this recommendation with information from one scholarly peer-reviewed journal article and CNO Documents.

· Recommendation Two: Includes a recommendation for the RPN’s practice, with discussion around improving competence through education. Support with information from one scholarly peer-reviewed journal article and CNO documents.

· Recommendation Three: Includes a recommendation for the RPN’s practice, with discussion around taking accountability for their actions. Support with information from one scholarly peer reviewed journal article and CNO documents.

· Conclusion: includes a comprehensive summary of the discussion.

· Reference Page: follows APA guidelines, includes the three selected research articles, and all CNO documents used in the paper

· Appendix A: includes a list of ALL research articles found (one for each team member) with the name of which team member was responsible for each article

Case study

Olivia has a history of anxiety and depression. She experiences frequent challenging periods every year and has been admitted to the local hospital’s Mental Health Unit on four occasions over the past 10 months. She has been struggling to deal with a family crisis that took place 12 months ago.

During her last 3 admissions, Gordon, an RPN on the Mental Health Unit has been Olivia’s primary nurse providing care. Olivia has developed a comfort in talking with Gordon and sharing details about the problems and challenges she faces.

Olivia feels her recovery with each admission is partly because of the support she has received from Gordon. Olivia expresses this to her sister and also reveals that she is very attached to him and feels emotionally attracted to him.

Prior to her final discharge she expressed her gratitude and tells Gordon that it is because of him that she feels so much better. She thanks him with a gift, which he accepts, not wanting to hurt her feelings. Olivia goes home and that week, discovers Gordon’s social media account through a friend. She sends him a message, which he replies to, and they begin to message back and forth over the next several months.

Six months after the discharge Olivia and Gordon, along with four other individuals, two friends of each, decide to rent a house together. While being roommates, Olivia faces two admissions to the Mental Health Unit where Gordon still works. Despite the fact that they are roommates, Gordon provides care to Olivia and does not disclose their roommate relationship at work.

Payment Models And Value-Based Care Delivery – Prepare An Executive Summary

Payment Models And Value-Based Care Delivery – Prepare An Executive Summary

Metropolitan Memorial is seeking to expand its service offerings into underserved rural communities. The Board of Directors has expressed concerns given the emergence of new payment models, low reimbursement from Medicare and Medicaid, and uncertainty in terms of provider incentives offered through the Affordable Care Act. The Board of Directors has requested an executive summary outlining the organization’s financial viability given the challenges facing health organizations, particularly those operating in rural communities.

Instructions

The CEO has asked you to prepare an executive summary to present to the Board of Trustees, discussing the following information:

  • Identify the different types of healthcare payment models that could be utilized by Metropolitan Memorial.
  • Research the Triple AIM and discuss ways the organization can achieve the goals of the Triple AIM (improving the experience of care, improving the health of populations, and reducing per capital costs of health care ).
  • Discuss possible ways the payer mix may impact hospital revenue.

Explain how value-based healthcare delivery could be utilized to save money.

Deliverable3Instructions.docx

HSA5400CBE Section 01CBE Healthcare Financial Management and Economics

Deliverable 3 – Payment Models and Value-Based Care Delivery

Competency

Evaluate the role and impact of financial principles on healthcare organizations.

PSYCHOTHERAPY FOR CLIENTS WITH ADDICTIVE DISORDERS

PSYCHOTHERAPY FOR CLIENTS WITH ADDICTIVE DISORDERS

In a 5- to 10-slide PowerPoint presentation, address the following. Your title and references slides do not count toward the 5- to 10-slide limit.

  • Provide an overview of the article you selected.
    • What population (individual, group, or family) is under consideration?
    • What was the specific intervention that was used? Is this a new intervention or one that was already studied?
    • What were the author’s claims?
  • Explain the findings/outcomes of the study in the article. Include whether this will translate into practice with your own clients. If so, how? If not, why?
  • Explain whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings/outcomes presented in the article.
  • Use the Notes function of PowerPoint to craft presenter notes to expand upon the content of your slides.
  • Support your response with at least three other peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources. Explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. Provide references to your sources on your last slide. Be sure to include the article you used as the basis for this Assignment.

SOURCES:

AllCEUs Counseling Education. (2017, November 4). 187 models of treatment for addiction | Addiction counselor training seriesLinks to an external site. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQkA0mIWx8A

LITERATURE REVIEW: THE USE OF CLINICAL SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE OUTCOMES AND EFFICIENCIES

LITERATURE REVIEW: THE USE OF CLINICAL SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE OUTCOMES AND EFFICIENCIES

New technology—and the application of existing technology—only appears in healthcare settings after careful and significant research. The stakes are high, and new clinical systems need to offer evidence of positive impact on outcomes or efficiencies.

Nurse informaticists and healthcare leaders formulate clinical system strategies. As these strategies are often based on technology trends, informaticists and others have then benefited from consulting existing research to inform their thinking.

In this Assignment, you will review existing research focused on the application of clinical systems. After reviewing, you will summarize your findings.

RESOURCES

 

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

To Prepare:

· Review the Resources and reflect on the impact of clinical systems on outcomes and efficiencies within the context of nursing practice and healthcare delivery.

· Conduct a search for recent (within the last 5 years) research focused on the application of clinical systems. The research should provide evidence to support the use of one type of clinical system to improve outcomes and/or efficiencies, such as “the use of personal health records or portals to support patients newly diagnosed with diabetes.”

· Identify and select 4 peer-reviewed research articles from your research.

· For information about annotated bibliographies, visit  https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/annotatedbibliographiesLinks to an external site.

The Assignment: (4-5 pages not including the title and reference page)

In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Assignment as an Annotated Bibliography. Be sure to address the following:

· Identify the 4 peer-reviewed research articles you reviewed, citing each in APA format.

· Include an introduction explaining the purpose of the paper.

· Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples.

· In your conclusion, synthesize the findings from the 4 peer-reviewed research articles.

· Use APA format and include a title page.

· Use the Safe Assign Drafts to check your match percentage before submitting your work.

BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 8

Submit your completed Assignment.

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the  Turnitin Drafts from the  Start Here area.

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as  WK8Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial

2. Then, click on  Start Assignment near the top of the page.

3. Next, click on  Upload File and select  Submit Assignment for review.

LEARNING RESOURCES

Required Readings

· McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2022).  Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

· Chapter 14, “The Electronic Health Record and Clinical Informatics” (pp. 293–316)

· Chapter 15, “Informatics Tools to Promote Patient Safety, Quality Outcomes, and Interdisciplinary Collaboration” (pp. 323–349)

· Chapter 16, “Patient Engagement and Connected Health” (pp. 357–378)

· Chapter 17, “Using Informatics to Promote Community/Population Health” (pp. 383–397)

· Chapter 18, “Telenursing and Remote Access Telehealth” (pp. 403–432)

· Benda, N. C., Veinot, T. C., Sieck, C. J., & Ancker, J. S. (2020).  Broadband internet access is a social determinant of health!Links to an external site. .  American Journal of Public Health,  110(8), 1123-1125. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305784

· Dykes, P. C., Rozenblum, R., Dalal, A., Massaro, A., Chang, F., Clements, M., Collins, S. …Bates, D. W. (2017).  Prospective evaluation of a multifaceted intervention to improve outcomes in intensive care: The Promoting Respect and Ongoing Safety Through Patient Engagement Communication and Technology Study  Download Prospective evaluation of a multifaceted intervention to improve outcomes in intensive care: The Promoting Respect and Ongoing Safety Through Patient Engagement Communication and Technology Study .  Critical Care Medicine, 45(8), e806–e813. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000002449

· HealthIT.gov. (2018c).  What is an electronic health record (EHR) ?Links to an external site.  Retrieved from  https://www.healthit.gov/faq/what-electronic-health-record-ehr

· Rao-Gupta, S., Kruger, D. Leak, L. D., Tieman, L. A., & Manworren, R. C. B. (2018).  Leveraging interactive patient care technology to Improve pain management engagementLinks to an external site. .  Pain Management Nursing, 19(3), 212–221.

· Sieck, C. J., Sheon, A., Ancker, J. S., Castek, J., Callahan, B., & Siefer, A. (2021).  Digital inclusion as a social determinant of healthLinks to an external site. .  NPJ Digital Medicine,  4(1), 52.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-021-00413-8

· Skiba, D. (2017).  Evaluation tools to appraise social media and mobile applicationsLinks to an external site. .  Informatics, 4(3), 32–40.

· Sharma, P., & Patten, C. A. (2022).  A need for digitally inclusive health care service in the United States: Recommendations for clinicians and health care systemsLinks to an external site. .  Permanente Journal,  26(3). https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/21.156

Required Media

Optional Resources

· Iott, B. E., Adler-Milstein, J., Gottlieb, L. M., & Pantell, M. S. (2022).  Characterizing the relative frequency of clinician engagement with structured social determinants of health dataLinks to an external site. .  Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 30(3), 503-510.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocac251 Links to an external site.

· Lyles, C. R., Sharma, A. E., Fields, J. D., Getachew, Y., Sarkar, U., & Zephyrin, L. (2022).  Centering health equity in telemedicineLinks to an external site. .  The Annals of Family Medicine,  20(4), 362-367. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2823

· Romain, C. V., Trinidad, S., & Kotagal, M. (2022).  The effect of social determinants of health on telemedicine access during the COVID-19 pandemicLinks to an external site. .  Pediatric Annals,  51(8), e311-e315. https://doi.org/10.3928/19382359-20220606-04

· Singh, P., Jonnalagadda, P., Morgan, E., & Fareed, N. (2022).  Outpatient portal use in prenatal care: differential use by race, risk, and area social determinants of healthLinks to an external site. .  Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association,  29(2), 364-371. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocab242

· Ye, J., & Ma, Q. (2021).  The effects and patterns among mobile health, social determinants, and physical activity: a nationally representative cross-sectional studyLinks to an external site. .  AMIA Summits on Translational Science Proceedings, 653-662.  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8378627/

Psychology Unit 4 Assignment Forum: Visual Representation Of Motivational Theories

Psychology Unit 4 Assignment Forum: Visual Representation Of Motivational Theories

Overview: This unit addresses four main theories as they apply to motivation: Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, Behavioral Learning Theory, Attribution Theory, and Expectancy Theory. For this assignment, you are tasked with creating your own unique visual representation that depicts a comparison of these four theories. By the Friday deadline, share your work with the class in the Unit 4 Assignment Forum. By the Sunday deadline, review your classmates’ work and provide at least one reply.

Instructions: You can choose how you would like to create your visual representation of these four (4) theories – perhaps by making a simple graph or chart in a Word document, creating a PowerPoint slide, or using an infographic. Whichever way you decide to create it, your visual representation must include the following:

• Key Concepts: Identify and briefly describe the key concepts of each theory.

• Application to Classroom: Provide two (2) brief examples of how each theory might be

applied intentionally in a classroom setting [a total of eight (8) examples in all].

o (Example: Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs – Provide breakfast to all students at the

beginning of day to ensure that Physiological Needs (first tier of hierarchy) are met for

students to prepare for optimal learning).

Requirements:

• Provide at least one (1) peer response that elaborates on your classmate’s ideas with further comment or observation, presents a relevant new idea or viewpoint for consideration, and raises a question, or politely offers an alternative perspective.

• Include at least two (2) reference citations in correct APA style formatting.

• Post the visual representation and your response to the Assignment Forum by the due dates listed above.

PSY260 – Educational Psychology

Unit 4 Assignment: Visual of Motivational Theories

PSY260–EducationalPsychology Unit 4 Assignment:Visual ofMotivational Theories

 

 

 

 

 

Be sure to read the criteria by which your work will be evaluated before you write and again after you write.

Evaluation Rubric for Visual of Motivational Theories Assignment

 

CRITERIA Deficient Development

Needed Satisfactory Proficient

Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs

(0-11 Points) (12-15 Points) (16-17 Points) (18-20 Points)

Did not correctly identify key concepts of this theory and did not provide a relevant description.

Missing some key concepts and/or description is lacking clarity or important details.

Identified the key concepts of this theory, but the description may be lacking a few important details.

Identified all key concepts of this theory and provided an accurate, concise description.

Behavioral Learning Theory

(0-11 Points) (12-15 Points) (16-17 Points) (18-20 Points)

Did not correctly identify key concepts of this theory and did not provide a relevant description.

Missing some key concepts and/or description is lacking clarity or important details.

Identified the key concepts of this theory, but the description may be lacking a few important details.

Identified all major key concepts of this theory and provided an accurate, concise description.

Attribution Theory

(0-11 Points) (12-15 Points) (16-17 Points) (18-20 Points)

Did not correctly identify key concepts of this theory and did not provide a relevant description.

Missing some key concepts and/or description is lacking clarity or important details.

Identified the key concepts of this theory, but the description may be lacking a few important details.

Identified all key concepts of this theory and provided an accurate, concise description.

Expectancy Theory

(0-11 Points) (12-15 Points) (16-17 Points) (18-20 Points)

Did not correctly identify key concepts of this theory and did not provide a relevant description.

Missing some key concepts and/or description is lacking clarity or important details.

Identified the key concepts of this theory, but the description may be lacking a few important details.

Identified all key concepts of this theory and provided an accurate, concise description.

(0-2 Points) (3 Points) (4 Points) (5 Points)

 

 

 

 

 

CRITERIA Deficient Development

Needed Satisfactory Proficient

Reference Citation in APA Style Formatting

Reference citations were not present, and/or APA style formatting has significant errors.

Some citations were missing, and/or citations have some issues with APA style formatting.

All references were cited, but citations have minor errors in APA style formatting.

Reference citations were included and correctly formatted in APA style.

Peer Response

(0 Points) (5 Points) (8 Points) (10 Points)

No response post made to a classmate’s visual.

Peer response provided, though minimal and lacking depth by restating or summarizing what was already expressed, details, and new ideas missing or lacking.

Peer response elaborates on classmate’s ideas with further comment but does not raise a question or offer an alternative perspective.

Peer response elaborates on classmate’s ideas with further comment or observation; presents a relevant new idea or viewpoint for consideration; raises a question or politely offers an alternative perspective.

Posting Due Dates

(0 Points) (3 Points) (5 Points)

The visual and response were not posted by the due dates of the unit.

Either the visual or the response was not posted by the due date of the unit.

Both the visual and response were posted by the due dates of the unit.

Platinum Essays