No plagiarism. Takes time to read and understand assistance needed. help me with questions if needed. Deliver quality tutor on time.
Final Project – Strategic Assessment Project (PowerPoint presentation plus References page)
Introduction: Managers who want to improve the effectiveness of the future outcomes of their organization employ strategic planning. In a 20-25-slide PowerPoint presentation, present a strategic plan for your organization, accompanied by a References-only page as a Word.doc that contains the minimum 10 sources used in the development of the presentation. Your presentation may be a re-developed plan based on the plan your organization already uses. If you are in the military, you may elect to choose a company where you previously worked or select a company. In any case, you will need to begin by providing a brief history of the company, and then delve into the process detailed more fully below. Accompany your writing with a minimum five scholarly journal articles that support the assertions made in your strategic plan. You will also need to use at least five other sources—books, magazines, websites, and even interviews—to augment your data support for the presentation.
Your strategic plan should address [Suggested number of PPT slides in brackets]:
The Name of the Company/Firm [1 PPT slide]
Brief History of the Company (or Organization), its Mission and Vision [2-3 PPT slides]
Organizational Analysis [5-6 PPT slides] : This section will present your identification of the firm's strengths and weaknesses, which emanate from your value chain and functional analyses. There is a maximum of five strengths and five weaknesses and your presentation of them should be prioritized. Exhibits are effective tools to provide strong support for each strength and weakness. Please be as specific as possible and quantify your analysis where appropriate. This section will provide the first part of the foundation for your identification of strategic issues and related recommendations through your analysis of the organization's core competencies, competitive advantages and organizational weaknesses.
Environmental Analysis [5-6 PPT slides]: This section will present your identification of the major external threats and opportunities currently facing the organization. These will be generated from your analysis of the industry and general environmental factors in light of the organization's strengths and weaknesses. A maximum of five threats and five opportunities should be identified and should be presented in a prioritized order. Use power point exhibits to support your analysis, be specific and quantify your analysis where possible. This section will provide the second part of the foundation for your identification of a strategic issue and the formulation of related recommendations through your analysis of driving forces, key success factors and industry attractiveness.
Strategic Issues And Recommendations [6-7 PPT slides]: Identify (with support) the most important strategic issue facing your organization. It is extremely important that you clearly integrate the strategic issue with your analysis to the organization's SWOT. There may be interrelationships between particular weaknesses and threats or missed opportunities, which should be recognized. It may be possible that 2 different weaknesses, 1 threat and 1 opportunity could be combined, due to their relatedness, to form one strategic issue. Similarly, your recommendations should attempt to capitalize and build upon strengths, competitive advantages and opportunities that you identified. The point is to clearly ground your issue and recommendations with the internal and external analyses so that the presentation is clear.
Conclusion/Summary [1-2 PPT slides]
PowerPoint Suggestions:
· The slides need to be detailed, ready for presentation, and professional in appearance. View the example in the attachment provided (below). Note how the citations are placed directly on the slides. Be sure to provide a separate references page that links to the citations on the PowerPoint. An example of how a references page should look is not provided, since you already should be able to construct that document as you would any other references page in APA.
· The scholarship required for this project must be cited on the slides, i.e., 10 overall sources minimum, as specified in the Introduction above.
· Always present in "third person"
Other Important Details:
· BE CAREFUL REGARDING ORIGINALITY. There will be some details that may be unavoidably worded in a way that creates TurnItIn problems. Therefore, paraphrase, paraphrase, paraphrase. Only 20% unoriginality is allowed.
Briefly describe how the principle of selection applies to the development of operant behavior.
APA Style
Check for plagiarism and AI
Rubric attached
Discussion Post Rubric 20 Possible Points
Category 4 Points 2 Points 0 Points
Length of Post – Enough content to convey a scholarly message
The author’s post consisted of 150 – 200 words (Not counting reference citations)
The author’s post consisted of 100-149 words (Not counting reference citations)
The author’s post consisted of 100 words or less (Not counting reference citations)
Grammar, Usage, Spelling – The author proofread using software for obvious errors in grammar, usage, and spelling
The author’s post contained less than 2 grammar, usage, or spelling errors.
The author’s post contained 3-4 grammar, usage, or spelling errors.
The author’s post contained more than 5 grammar, usage, or spelling errors and proofreading was not apparent.
Referencing and Utilizing Outside Sources – The author referenced all assigned readings and (1) unique reference
The author posted a unique reference from a peer-reviewed document AND all the assigned readings.
The author was missing a unique reference from a peer-reviewed document or did not cite all the assigned readings.
The author neither used a unique reference from a peer-reviewed document and/or did not cite all the assigned readings.
Promotes Discussion – The author produces content beyond a summary and applies it to a logical argument.
The author’s post clearly responds to the assignment prompt, develops ideas cogently, organizes them logically, and supports them through empirical writing. The author’s post also raises questions or stimulates discussion.
The author’s post responds to the assignment prompt but relies heavily on definitional explanations and does not create and develop original ideas and support them logically. The author’s post may stimulate some discussion.
The author’s post does not correspond with the assignment prompt, mainly discusses personal opinions, irrelevant information, or information is presented with limited logic and lack of development and organization of ideas Does not support any claims made.
Demonstrates Application – The author is able to apply content to an example or real world application
The author’s post clearly demonstrates application and relationship to the week’s assigned reading/topic.
The author’s post refers to the assigned topic/reading tangentially but does not demonstrate application.
The author’s post does not demonstrate application of the week’s assigned topic/reading.
Be advised, there are also response costs associated with specific behaviors:
● A response cost of 3 points will be administered for not responding to a peer’s post ● A response cost of 3 points will be administered for late submissions (up to 2 days) ● Discussion posts that are more than two days late will not be accepted unless excused by the
instructor
Describe the use of a specific screening tool (4-5pg)
Discuss what diagnosis you are using the tool for, how to score the tool and support use of the tool with evidence and rationale. Next develop a treatment plan for the patient based on your findings in the diagnostic test and interpretation.
Sections should include:
- Introduction to diagnostic tool
- Discussion of Tool: why it is used, how, and for what diagnosis
- Discussion of Interpretation of Scoring for the Tool
- Treatment Plan for patients with positive results from the tool, include, non-pharmacological and pharmacological approaches, patient education, additional testing required, and follow-up as needed.
- Conclusion
Write a 4-5 page paper describing use of a specific screening tool.
Discuss what diagnosis you are using the tool for, how to score the tool and support use of the tool with evidence and rationale. Next develop a treatment plan for the patient based on your findings in the diagnostic test and interpretation.
Sections should include:
· Introduction to diagnostic tool
· Discussion of Tool: why it is used, how, and for what diagnosis
· Discussion of Interpretation of Scoring for the Tool
· Treatment Plan for patients with positive results from the tool, include, non-pharmacological and pharmacological approaches, patient education, additional testing required, and follow-up as needed.
· Conclusion
Your writing Assignment should:
· follow the conventions of Standard English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.);
· be well ordered, logical, and unified, as well as original and insightful;
· be a minimum of 4 pages in length, not including cover or reference page;
· display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics; and;
· use APA formatting and citation style.
PLEASE SEE GRADING RUBRIC BELOW:
Grading Rubric:
|
Assignment Criteria
|
Level III
|
Level II
|
Level I
|
Not Present
|
|
Criteria 1
|
Level III Max
Points: 15
|
Level II Max
Points: 13
|
Level I Max
Points: 9
|
Not Present
0 Points
|
|
Content of Paper
|
1. Demonstrates a well-articulated understanding of the subject matter in a clear, complex, and informative manner
1. Develops content and theories are well
1. Links content to the paper requirements and practical experience
1. Includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper
1. Uses scholarly resources that were not provided in the course materials
1. Completes all instruction requirements
|
1. Demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter
1. Explains and applies knowledge of evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role
1. Uses a variety of scholarly resources from the course material and some that were not provided in the course materials
1. Includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper.
1. Completes all instruction requirements
|
1. Demonstrates a moderate understanding of the subject matter
1. Summarizes content with minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role-development
1. Presents content but is missing depth and or development
1. Uses only scholarly resources that were provided in the course materials Completes most instruction requirements
|
1. Does not meet the criteria
|
|
Criteria 2
|
Level III Max
Points: 15
|
Level II Max
Points: 13
|
Level I Max
Points: 9
|
Not Present
0 Points
|
|
Analysis and Synthesis of Paper Content and Meaning
|
1. Provides critical analysis in an accurate, clear, concise, and complete presentation of the required content
1. Synthesizes information from scholarly resources
1. Provides new information or insight related to the context of the assignment with both supportive and alternative information or viewpoints
1. Completes all instruction requirements
|
1. Provides evidence of further synthesis of course content via scholarly resources
1. Synthesizes information to help fulfill paper requirements
1. Supports content with at least one viewpoint.
1. Completes all instruction requirements
|
1. Lacks clarification or new information
1. Supports content with scholarly reference without adding any new information or insight
1. Provides content that may be confusing or unclear, and the summary may be incomplete
1. Completes most instruction requirements
|
1. Does not meet the criteria
|
|
Criteria 3
|
Level III Max
Points: 10
|
Level II Max
Points: 8
|
Level I Max
Points: 6
|
Not Present
0 Points
|
|
Application of Knowledge
|
1. Offers a multidisciplinary approach via scholarly resources
1. Applies practice that is accurate and plausible
1. Supports practice with additional scholarly resources
1. Answers all questions posed within the assignment in a well-developed manner with citations for validation
1. Completes all instruction requirements
|
1. Presents a summary of the paper’s content, findings, and knowledge gained
1. Indicates how the information will be used within their professional practice
1. Completes all instruction requirements
|
1. Lacks objective criteria
1. Applies superficial bridge between the assignment and the broader course content
1. Indicates how they will apply this new knowledge to their clinical practice in a vague manner
1. Completes most instruction requirements
|
1. Does not meet the criteria
|
|
Criteria 4
|
Level III Max
Points: 5
|
Level II Max
Points: 4
|
Level I Max
Points: 3
|
Not Present
0 Points
|
|
Organization
|
1. Provides well-organized content with a clear and complex purpose statement and content argument
1. Provides concise writing with a logical flow of ideas
|
1. Provides organized content with an informative purpose statement and supportive content and summary statement
1. Provides argument content with minimal issues in content flow
|
1. Provides poor organization, and flow of ideas distract from content
1. Provides a purpose statement
1. Provides narrative that is difficult to follow and frequently causes reader to reread work
|
1. Does not meet the criteria
|
|
Criteria 5
|
Level III Max
Points: 5
|
Level II Max
Points: 4
|
Level I Max
Points: 3
|
Not Present
0 Points
|
|
College-level academic writing
|
1. Includes no more than three grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability
1. Meets the assignment length requirements
|
1. Includes no more than four grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability
1. Meets the length requirements
|
1. Includes five or more grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors makes understanding parts of assignment difficult, but does not interfere with readability
1. Meets the length requirements
|
1. Does not meet the criteria
|
|
Maximum Total Points
|
50
|
42
|
30
|
0
|
|
Minimum Total Points
|
43 points minimum
|
31 points minimum
|
1 point minimum
|
0
|
