The collection of evidence is an activity that occurs with an endgame in mind. For example, law enforcement professionals collect evidence to support a decision to charge those accused of criminal activity. Similarly, evidence-based healthcare practitioners collect evidence to support decisions in pursuit of specific healthcare outcomes.
In this Assignment, you will identify an issue or opportunity for change within your healthcare organization and propose an idea for a change in practice supported by an EBP approach.
To Prepare:
- Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you critically appraised in Module 4, related to your clinical topic of interest and PICOT.
- Reflect on your current healthcare organization and think about potential opportunities for evidence-based change, using your topic of interest and PICOT as the basis for your reflection.
- Consider the best method of disseminating the results of your presentation to an audience.
The Assignment: (Evidence-Based Project)
Part 4: Recommending an Evidence-Based Practice Change
Create an 8- to 9-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:
- Briefly describe your healthcare organization, including its culture and readiness for change. (You may opt to keep various elements of this anonymous, such as your company name.)
- Describe the current problem or opportunity for change. Include in this description the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with change implementation in general.
- Propose an evidence-based idea for a change in practice using an EBP approach to decision making. Note that you may find further research needs to be conducted if sufficient evidence is not discovered.
- Describe your plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation.
- Explain how you would disseminate the results of your project to an audience. Provide a rationale for why you selected this dissemination strategy.
- Describe the measurable outcomes you hope to achieve with the implementation of this evidence-based change.
- Be sure to provide APA citations of the supporting evidence-based peer reviewed articles you selected to support your thinking.
- Add a lessons learned section that includes the following:
- A summary of the critical appraisal of the peer-reviewed articles you previously submitted
- An explanation about what you learned from completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template (1-3 slides)
References:
- Hoffman, T. C., Montori, V. M., & Del Mar, C. (2014). The connection between evidence-based medicine and shared decision makingLinks to an external site.. Journal of the American Medical Association, 312 (13), 1295–1296. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.10186
- Kon, A. A., Davidson, J. E., Morrison, W., Danis, M., & White, D. B. (2016). Shared decision making in intensive care units: An American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society policy statementLinks to an external site.. Critical Care Medicine, 44 (1), 188–201. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000001396
- Opperman, C., Liebig, D., Bowling, J., & Johnson, C. S., & Harper, M. (2016). Measuring return on investment for professional development activities: Implications for practiceLinks to an external site.. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, 32 (4), 176–184. doi:10.1097/NND.0000000000000483
- Schroy, P. C., Mylvaganam, S., & Davidson, P. (2014). Provider perspectives on the utility of a colorectal cancer screening decision aid for facilitating shared decision makingLinks to an external site.. Health Expectations, 17 (1), 27–35. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00730.xThe Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. (2019). Patient decision aidsLinks to an external site.. https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/
NURS_6052_Module06_Week10_Assignment_Rubric
7/21/25, 8:33 PM Module 6 : Assignment
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/174419/assignments/2278313?module_item_id=6876439 1/4
Criteria Ratings Pts
Part 4: Disseminating ResultsCreate a, 8-9- slide narrated PowerPoint presentation of your Evidence-Based Project:Briefly describe the following: your healthcare organization and culture, current opportunity for change, scope of issue, and EBP best practice recommendation.Explain how you would plan knowledge transfer and dissemination.Describe measurable outcomes with the implementation of EBP best practice.Summarize lessons learned.
75 pts75 to >67.0 pts Excellent The narrated presentation accurately and completely summarizes the evidence-based project. The narrated presentation is professional in nature and thoroughly addresses all components of the evidence- based project. …The narrated presentation accurately and clearly describes in detail the healthcare organization and culture, current opportunity for change, scope of the issue, and EBP best practice recommendation. …The narrated presentation accurately and clearly describes how to plan for knowledge transfer, disseminate the results of the project to an audience, citing specific and relevant examples. …The narrated presentation clearly and accurately describes measurable outcomes with the implementation of the EBP best practice and summarizes lessons learned.
67 to >59.0 pts Good The narrated presentation adequately summarizes the evidence-based project. The narrated presentation is professional in nature and adequately addresses the components of the evidence- based project. …The narrated presentation accurately describes in detail the healthcare organization and culture, current opportunity for change, scope of the issue, and EBP best practice recommendation. …The narrated presentation accurately describes how to plan for knowledge transfer, disseminate the results of the project to an audience, citing specific and relevant examples. …The narrated presentation accurately describes measurable outcomes with the implementation of the EBP best practice and summarizes lessons learned.
59 to >52.0 pts Fair The narrated presentation vaguely, inaccurately, or incompletely summarizes the evidence-based project. The narrated presentation may be professional in nature and somewhat addresses the components of the evidence- based project. …The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes the healthcare organization and culture, current opportunity for change, scope of the issue, and EBP best practice recommendation. …The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes how to plan for knowledge transfer, disseminate the results of the project to an audience, citing specific and relevant examples. …The narrated presentation vaguely or inaccurately describes measurable outcomes with the implementation of the EBP best practice and summarizes lessons learned.
52 to >0 pts Poor The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately summarizes the evidence-based project or is missing. The narrated presentation is not professional in nature and inaccurately and incompletely addresses the components of the evidence- based project or is missing. …The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately describes the healthcare organization and culture, current opportunity for change, scope of the issue, and EBP best practice recommendation, no examples are provided, or it is missing. …The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately describes how to plan for knowledge transfer, disseminate the results of the project to an audience, citing no specific and relevant examples. …The narrated presentation vaguely or inaccurately describes measurable outcomes with the implementation of the EBP best practice and summarizes lessons learned.
7/21/25, 8:33 PM Module 6 : Assignment
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/174419/assignments/2278313?module_item_id=6876439 2/4
Criteria Ratings Pts
Resource Synthesis
5 pts
Presentation Narration 10 pts
PowerPoint Presentation:The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.
5 pts
5 to >4.0 pts Excellent The narrated presentation fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course- specific resources that fully support the presentation.
4 to >3.5 pts Good The narrated presentation integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course- specific resources that may support the presentation.
3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair The narrated presentation minimally integrates resources that may support the presentation.
3 to >0 pts Poor The narrated presentation fails to integrate any or presents minimal resources to support the presentation.
10 to >0.0 pts Excellent Narration is present.
0 pts Poor Narration is missing.
5 to >4.0 pts Excellent The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.
4 to >3.0 pts Good Eighty percent of the presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.
7/21/25, 8:33 PM Module 6 : Assignment
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/174419/assignments/2278313?module_item_id=6876439 3/4
Criteria Ratings Pts
Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.
5 pts
Total Points: 100
3 to >2.0 pts Fair Sixty to seventy nine percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.
2 to >0 pts Poor Less than sixty percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.
5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4 to >3.0 pts Good Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3 to >2.0 pts Fair Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
2 to >0 pts Poor Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
7/21/25, 8:33 PM Module 6 : Assignment
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/174419/assignments/2278313?module_item_id=6876439 4/4
Project Artifact Deliverable 2. Eco-Map Design Directions
- Create an illustrative representation of the ecosystem relationships and connections, applying your analysis from the Eco-Map Brief. (Healthcare Ecosystem Mapping)
- Adhere to Map Requirements 1, 2, and 3 listed below.
- Choose a simple design that allows for clear identification of each map requirement.
- Submit your map as a PDF with the three project deliverables for the healthcare ecosystem mapping bundle.
- Use a free software tool. Any software you must be able to convert the map to a PDF.
- Your professor cannot assist students with any software tool issues, learning how to use any software tools, or support with any troubleshooting issues.
- Students will need to know how to use the software tool they selected or be able to independently learn how to use the selected tool on their own.
- Essential Learning Tool (Downloads as a PDF): Ecosystem Mapping Resource
Map Requirement 1. Ecosystem Entities – Present the Ecosystem Entities from your Eco-Map Brief:
- Your Personalized Healthcare Scenario:
- Your Primary Healthcare Setting
- Your Primary Project (BIP/BIP Sub-Industry)
- External Healthcare Providers and Healthcare Organizations:
- Minimum of three (3) external healthcare providers and/or healthcare organizations
- External Business Partner:
- Minimum one (1) external business partner
Map Requirement 2. Map Markers Requirements:
2. Map Markers: Use map markers to identify the organizations, the connections between the different healthcare providers, healthcare services, and external business partner, and to show any potential relationships to one another. Map markers can include but are not limited to shapes, colors, lines, errors, images, letters, and/or similar visualizations to identify, define, and describe the information presented.
- The following map markers must be included:
- 2a. Shapes: Use shapes to identify all organizations by by name, type, and/or description on the map
- 2b. Lines and/or Arrows: Include lines or arrows to illustrate the linkages, connections, and/or relationships to the organizations and any other images presented on the map.
- 2c. Colors: Apply colors or a color-coding to the shapes, lines, arrows, and/or details presented on the map.
- 2d. Optional Map Markers: You may elect to use additional map markers on your map. Examples of other map markers can include icons, symbols, patterns, sizing, numerical codes, alphanumeric codes, bubbles, and/or similar visuals.
Map Requirement 3. Legend Criteria Requirements:
3. Legend Criteria: A map legend must be included that adheres to the Legend Criteria provided below.
- Legend Criteria A. Shape Explanations. Shapes can serve several purposes and convey important information. Each shape must be explained. Each organizational shape must clearly identify each organization with text that provides the name, type, and/or description.
- Legend Criteria B. Color Explanations. Colors can serve multiple purposes in an ecosystem mapping project. Each color, or color-coding system, must be explained. Use colors purposefully and consistently throughout the ecosystem mapping project to ensure clarity and readability.
- Legend Criteria C. Lines and/or Arrows Explanations. The lines and/or arrows on the map should represent the relationships to one another. Each type of line and/or arrow must be explained. Using different types of lines and/or arrows could represent some type of meaning various types relationships, interactions, or other influencing factors.
- Legend Criteria D. Additional Markers (if applicable): If you elected to include additional map markers, be sure to explain those markings in the legend.
4
Eco-Map Brief: Ecosystem Design Analysis in Healthcare
Name
Course
Instructor
Date
Eco-Map Brief: Ecosystem Design Analysis in Healthcare
Briefing Point 1: Entities of Ecosystems
Topic 1a: Ecosystem Profile Personalized healthcare scenario
Beyond Blessed Skilled Nursing Home is a long-term care center that gives complete care to its older inhabitants who can no longer live independently because of chronic diseases, disabilities, or old age. Integrated Behavioral Health, the main project, aims to introduce the traditional model of care to mental health services, including psychiatric care, therapy, and counseling. Integrating the services will help BBSNH provide a more holistic perspective of care, not just physical but also mental. The facility's value is to enhance the lives of the people who reside in the facility, lower the number of hospitalizations, and provide a safer and supportive environment. This is aimed at making the care given cater to all areas of the needs of the residents, hence enhancing greater results and satisfaction.
Topic 1b: Third-Party Healthcare Organizations and Business Partners
Three important external healthcare agencies help facilitate the incorporation of behavioral health. The initial outside healthcare provider is a local behavioral health clinic offering psych-screening or psychiatric assessment, treatment, therapy, and counseling services. The clinic will be important to the ecosystem if it is in a position to provide specialized mental health services, since they are a necessity to the residents who grapple with conditions that include depression, anxiety, and other psychiatric illnesses (Celestin & Vanitha, 2023). The behavioral clinic works with BBSNH, offers routine assessments and interventions, and ensures that mental health provision is provided, in addition to physical care. The second external healthcare organization is a home health agency that offers services after discharge, including physical therapy and nursing support. Such agencies play an essential role in the continuity of care, especially when the residents in the nursing home move out of the facility back into their homes, or when they are subjected to special treatment.
Point 2 – Care Population:
2a Population Characteristics
At BBSNH, the most significant proportion of the primary care population is represented by older adults; most residents are above 65 years old. Others cannot afford to stay on their own because of some chronic conditions, disability, or old age. One of this population's demographic features is that it is composed of both sexes, with both male and female residents. However, female residents slightly outnumber male residents. The population is ethnically diverse with Caucasian, African American, and folks of Hispanic background. Most of the residents are widowed and divorced, which is a characteristic of aging. Such residents have low incomes and receive social security, but their support systems are weak (Hawrilenko et al., 2025). Psychographically, the residents treasure respect, ease, and a place of belonging. The social activities they participate in include card games, arts and crafts, and group exercises tailored towards enhancing their physical and mental fitness.
Topic 2b: Health Status
Chronic illnesses and mental health issues are the major causes that affect the health of the care population. A good percentage of the population is plagued with chronic diseases like high blood pressure, diabetes, and rheumatism, and all have to be under medical attention on a long-term basis. Depression, anxiety, and loneliness are also other common mental health issues observed among many residents, and these are caused mainly by isolation and age-related challenges. All these health problems also contribute to the necessity for BBSNH to conduct physical and mental health services so that the needs of residents regarding care are provided to the fullest.
Topic 2c: Healthcare Requirements and Importance
The medical care demands of the BBSNH population are broad and many-faceted. To start with, chronic conditions need to be treated through physical health care, which helps produce as much independence as possible. The medication management, physical therapy, and nursing care are also essential services to maintain the health of the residents and avoid the aggravation of chronic conditions. The second great need will be mental health care. Most residents also have cognitive problems that are not addressed in conventional medical facilities (Wakschlag et al., 2021). Therapy, counseling, and psychiatric care are necessary to minimize the burden of depression, anxiety, as well as other mental illnesses, and, accordingly, enhance the overall well-being and quality of life for residents.
Briefing Point 3: Mandatory Services to Take Care of the Population
3a Personalized Healthcare Scenario Essential Services
Skilled nursing care is the necessary service that takes a central position in Beyond Blessed Skilled Nursing Home. The role of this service is essential as it directly contributes to the residents' physical health, manages patients with chronic conditions, provides them with medication management, and avoids complications. The nursing staff collaborates with outside parties like hospitals and home health agencies to actively monitor and manage the health of residents.
Topic 3b: Business Partner, Essential Services, and External Healthcare Entities
In the case of the local hospital, the critical service offered is that of acute care services required when residents meet with medical emergencies, such as getting hospitalized. The service is essential as it guarantees that residents can receive highly-professional medical support when their health conditions aggravate suddenly. The hospital is a partner of BBSNH as they smoothly transition the residents and allow them to be adequately treated in the hospital.
References
Celestin, P., & Vanitha, N. (2023). Mental health matters: How companies are failing their employees. Mental Health Matters: How Companies Are Failing Their Employees (December 21, 2023). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5041191
Hawrilenko, M., Smolka, C., Ward, E., Ambwani, G., Brown, M., Mohandas, A., … & Chekroud, A. (2025). Return on investment of enhanced behavioral health services. JAMA Network Open, 8(2), e2457834-e2457834. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/article-abstract/2829859
Wakschlag, L. S., Tandon, D., Krogh‐Jespersen, S., Petitclerc, A., Nielsen, A., Ghaffari, R., … & Alshurafa, N. (2021). Moving the dial on prenatal stress mechanisms of neurodevelopmental vulnerability to mental health problems: A personalized prevention proof of concept. Developmental Psychobiology, 63(4), 622-640. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/dev.22057