+1 (951) 902-6107 info@platinumressays.com

Cost of Treating Disease

Please respond to the following:

  • Using online resources or the Strayer Library, research the cost of treating infectious diseases in the United States compared to the cost in the United Kingdom.
  • Evaluate the cost of treating infectious diseases in the United States compared to the United Kingdom in terms of person, time, and place.
  • Discuss the specifics of your findings, determining whether the economic cost is justified.
  • Be sure to respond to at least one of your classmates' posts.

    Program Evaluation: Societal Changes and Collaboration

    This week we read a sample theoretical research and a program evaluation. Using the program you found in Week 1, identify the elements of the program.

    Engage in a conversation with your course community about one of the following:

    • What is the process by which it's trying to create change? Discuss some of the sociocultural, political, or economic contexts that factor into the need for this program.
    • How would you consider approaching the program to collaborate on an evaluation?

    As always, if you are relying on someone else's ideas when presenting yours, you should reference their paper, article, etc. This includes sharing references to your fellow students' ideas!

    Response Guidelines

    • Your Participation: This discussion is an opportunity for you to review the work of other learners to inform your own learning. Your interactions and anything you share should be courteous, succinct, professional, well-written, and organized. Communicating clearly with proper grammar and punctuation will foster more and better interactions with your classmates.
    • Your Post: Create a post responding to one of the discussion prompts. Do not create your post as a reply to another post.
    • Responding to Peers: As you respond to one of your classmates, please make sure your response is substantive by sharing your professional experiences and helpful thoughts and feedback about ideas they have shared. Try to comment on those where you feel you have the most useful information to share and consider the following:
      • How have your experiences resonated with their ideas?
      • What can you add to their ideas, building upon the connections you have made to the material so far? Supplement course resources and extend consideration of the topic by including new information or findings from current journal articles, discussing more in-depth critical thinking questions, or providing constructive or corrective feedback or an alternative viewpoint supported by empirical evidence.

      Advanced Pathology Week 4

       Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the collaboration café. Contact your course faculty if you have questions. 

      General Instructions 

      During the past four weeks, you have examined conditions affecting the immune, hematologic, cardiovascular, pulmonary, and renal systems. Some conditions can affect all of these conditions, including autoimmune disorders like systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) that cause inflammation in multiple body systems. Follow the steps below to analyze the effects of SLE on various body systems. 

      Step 1: Review your assigned body system from weeks 1-4. Your assignment is based on the first letter of your last name in the chart below.

      Last NameBody System

      A – F Immune System  

      G – K Hematologic System 

      L – P Cardiovascular System  

      Q – U Pulmonary System

      V – Z Renal System

      Step 2: Reflect on how SLE impacts your assigned body system. 

      Step 3: Answer the discussion prompts below with explanation and detail, providing complete references for all citations.

      Step 4: Reply to a peer with a different assigned body system. 

      Include the following sections: 

      1. Application of Course Knowledge: Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail. 

      1. Describe the specific pathophysiological processes in SLE that lead to the manifestations observed in your assigned body system. How does SLE affect your assigned body system? 
      2. Discuss the symptoms and clinical manifestations of SLE on your assigned body system. How do these symptoms impact the client’s function and quality of life? Can changes in your assigned body system affect or be affected by other body systems in clients with SLE? 
      3. Discuss the diagnostic tests used to diagnose SLE-related complications in your body system. What challenges are associated with diagnosing SLE if only looking at your assigned body system? 
      4. Explore the current treatments for managing SLE symptoms associated with your assigned body system. What are the goals of these treatments and how effective are they in mitigating the impact of SLE on the body?  

      2. Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue: Engage peers by asking questions and offering new insights, applications, perspectives, information, or implications for practice: 

      1. Respond to at least one peer.  
      2. Respond to a second peer post.  
      3. Communicate using respectful, collegial language and terminology appropriate to advanced nursing practice. 

      3. Professionalism in Communication: Communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.  

        Prepare an annotated bibliography, 1 paragraph introduction on the six research articles : quantitative, qualitative, MMR

         

        • Use the Walden library databases to search for quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research articles from peer-reviewed journals on your topic of interest.
        • Before you read the full article and begin your annotation, locate the methodology section in the article to be sure that it describes the appropriate research design.
          • For quantitative research articles, confirm that a quantitative research design, such as a quasi-experimental, casual comparative, correlational, pretest–posttest, or true experimental, was used in the study.
          • For qualitative research articles, confirm that a qualitative research design or approach, such as narrative, ethnographic, grounded theory, case study, or phenomenology, was used in the study.
          • For mixed methods research articles, confirm that a mixed methods research (MMR) design was used in the study. There are several design classifications in MMR; some examples of MMR types or families of design are parallel, concurrent, sequential, multilevel, or fully integrated mixed methods design.
        • Prepare an annotated bibliography that includes the following:
          • A one-paragraph introduction that provides context for why you selected the six research articles you did: two quantitative, two qualitative, and two MMR.
          • A reference list entry in APA Style for each of the six articles that follows proper formatting. Follow each reference list entry with a three-paragraph annotation that includes:
          • A one-paragraph conclusion that presents a synthesis of the six articles.
        • Format your annotated bibliography in Times New Roman, 12-point font, double-spaced. A separate References list page is not needed for this assignment.
        • Submit your Annotated Bibliography.

          Business Finance – Management A-Bible and Organizations Assignment

           OVERVIEW
          The Word of God instructs us “Whatever you do, work at it with all your heart, as working for
          the Lord, not for human masters, since you know that you will receive an inheritance from the
          Lord as a reward. It is the Lord Christ you are serving” (New International Version, 1973/2011,
          Colossians 3:22-24). Thus, it is very important to understand that without surrendering our hearts
          to Jesus Christ and building our lives on faith in Him, all we do is meaningless and futile. This
          assignment is a small component that prompts you to apply the biblical truth to the study of
          organizations. 

            DISCUSSION: THE DNP-PREPARED NURSE AND THEIR COMMUNITIES OF PRACTICE

            • Review this week’s Learning Resources, paying special attention to the various examples communities of practice you encounter.
            • Use the Communities of Practice template, located in this week’s Learning Resources, to help you identify the various communities of practice with which you are currently involved and those you may want to become involved with in the future.
            • Select one of these communities of practice on which to focus for this Discussion.
            • Consider the most important needs, challenges, or issues facing the community of practice you selected.
            • Select one of these needs, challenges, or issues on which to focus for this Discussion.
            • Using Walden Library and the internet, search for and identify three scholarly, peer-reviewed articles (within the last 5 years) that address the need, challenge, or issue you selected.
            • Consider the kinds of practice changes you might recommend to address this need, challenge, or issue.
            • Consider how your recommendations align with specific Domains from The Essentials.

            Journal of Professional Nursing

            Volume 49, November–December 2023, Pages 21-25

            Journal of Professional Nursing

            Research, Practice and Teaching United: Implementing AACN Academic Guidelines in a Community Based Behavioral Health Setting

            Author links open overlay panelRachel H. Adler PhD, APRN, PMHNP-BC, AGNP-C, Cindy Sickora DNP, MS, RN, FAAN

            Show more

            Add to Mendeley

            Share

            Cite

            https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2023.08.001 Get rights and content

            Full text access

            Highlights

            · •

            The achievement of nursing student competencies and nursing faculty development are complementary endeavors.

            · •

            The Boyer Model undergirds faculty and student work by bridging the academic pillars of education, practice and research.

            · •

            Faculty research can enhance student learning when students are provided an opportunity to participate.

            · •

            Community engaged scholarship facilitates student learning.

            Abstract

            The Essentials: Core Competencies for Professional  Nursing Education  (2021) published by the American Association of Colleges of Nursing encourages bridging the gap between education and practice and continues to support the importance of providing clinical educational experiences in diverse settings. Another AACN document,  Defining Scholarship for Academic Nursing Task Force Consensus Position Statement (2018), strongly encourages nursing faculty to engage in scholarship, a tradition that is integral to academic positions. This article demonstrates how these two important documents, one aimed at student competencies and curriculum and the other at nursing faculty development, can be connected to the mutual benefit of faculty and students alike. By revisiting Boyer's model of scholarship, the authors offer a new look at the integration of experiential learning that includes clinical practice, research, and competency-based education. The case study demonstrates that students and faculty can meet the tripartite mission of nursing education by creatively engaging in a community-based setting where they actively participate in all three pillars of academic nursing.

            · Previous article in issue

            · Next article in issue

            Introduction

            The Essentials: Core Competencies for Professional  Nursing Education  (2021) published by the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 2021) defines domains and competencies that embody nursing as a  profession . The document is key for building curricula that effectively prepare student nurses to be competent nursing professionals. Another AACN document,  Defining Scholarship for Academic Nursing Task Force Consensus Position Statement (2018), strongly encourages nursing faculty to engage in scholarship, which it defines as, “the generation, synthesis, translation, application, and dissemination of knowledge that aims to improve health and transform health care (American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 2018, pg. 2),” recognizing that this is a tradition that is integral to academic positions in most other fields. This article shows how these two important documents, one aimed at student competencies and curriculum and the other at nursing faculty development, can be connected to the mutual benefit of faculty and students alike.

            As an art and science (Chen, 2022; Palos, 2014; Weaver, 2021; Younas & Parsons, 2019) nursing has spent decades working towards integration of education, research, and practice in the academic setting to develop the profession (Burns & Foley, 2005; Camiah, 1997; Francis-Baldesari & Williamson, 2008). Since the 1970's nursing has put a great deal of effort into nursing science contributions and evidence-based practice initiatives (Patelarou et al., 2020). Engagement in scholarship is critical both for the continuous development of the professional science and to educate the next generation of nurses to provide evidence-based  nursing care . Integration of education, research and practice is becoming the required norm in nursing education. As far back as the AACN 2008  The Essentials of Baccalaureate Education for Professional Nursing Practice, integration of education, practice and research/scholarship was identified as critical to enable graduates to practice within complex healthcare systems and “assume the roles: provider of care; designer/manager/coordinator of care; and member of a profession” (American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 2008, pg. 1).

            Nursing, unlike liberal arts and other science disciplines, is a practice profession and has relied heavily on the clinical component of education as opposed to scholarly endeavors. In the liberal arts, there is less often an applied or professional aspect to a discipline. In nursing, there has been a blurring between practice and academic nursing scholarship. Some have defined the relationship of scholarship and practice in nursing as a contentious one (Nahm et al., 2023) and integrating the pillars of academic nursing has long been a challenge (Letcher, Massey, Nelson, & Elverson, 2020; Mittelman, 2010). This problem is compounded by the national nursing faculty crisis and the lack of doctorally prepared  nurse educators  who understand the importance of ongoing creation of new knowledge (American Association of College of Nursing, 2022). Findings regarding the importance of practice and research integration are robust (Curtis, Fry, Shaban, & Considine, 2017; Hansen et al., 2022; Jones, 2015; Menzies, Emms, & Valler, 2021) with a body of literature describing teaching methods as they relate to practice, especially in the community (e.g., Adams, 2020; Dexter, 2021; Fong, Yee, Ng, Chow, & Lo, 2022; Mumba, Kaylor, Townsend, Barron, & Andrabi, 2022; Yoong, Liao, Goh, & Zhang, 2022). The current shortcoming is integration of all three pillars of academic nursing which is basic to the implementation of both the  Defining Scholarship for Academic Nursing Task Force Consensus Position Statement and  The Essentials: Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education. The authors contend that employing the Boyer (1990) model of scholarship as described herein, supports both documents and provides a unique opportunity for faculty to meet the goal of integrating practice, research and education. This approach provides a robust learning opportunity for students, meeting competency-based nursing education metrics, and allows both students and faculty to actively participate in the tripartite mission of nursing academia.

            ACCN Vision and the Boyer Model.

            AACN's  The Essentials: Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Educationstrongly encourages  bridging the gap between education and practice ( American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 2021, p. 1) with all 10 domains addressing integration of practice into diverse clinical settings, applying evidence to nursing care across settings and evaluating nursing education outcomes through competencies that reflect an understanding of scientific inquiry. The domains are broad categories that identify areas where student nurses must demonstrate competency in the art and science of the profession. Bridging the scholarship gap between education, research and practice can often be a challenge for faculty to model for students. At the same time, the AACN's  Defining Scholarship for Academic Nursing Task Force Consensus Position Statement sets a high mark for nursing faculty, as they are encouraged to broadly envision their scholarship by engaging in activities that encompass all three pillars. Yet, it is not often that faculty can participate, and showcase for students, all three pillars simultaneously.

            Ernest  Boyer's, 1990 work provides a segue and a bridge between academic pillars, contending that there is an environment that transforms the definition of productivity in the academic setting. Boyer's model states that scholarship takes place in each of the academic missions: teaching; practice; and research. The model provides exceptional relevance to  The Essentials: Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education which recommends weaving the academic pillars through nursing curricula. It is also significant to  Defining Scholarship for Academic Nursing Task Force Consensus Position Statement, as faculty are provided an opportunity to integrate the pillars demonstrating the “scholarship of discovery” (see Fig. 1) through teaching, practice, and research. Although Boyer's model has been used to professionally reward academic faculty for work outside of traditional research (Crow et al., 2018) in the case described here, the model also demonstrates its impact as a prototype for teaching undergraduate student nurses how to integrate the pillars by providing care to an  underserved population  and for implementing a study that contributes to what we know about the mental health needs of homeless veterans. This case study offers nurse educators the opportunity to cultivate clinical opportunities that demonstrate the breadth of nursing education. In this case, the undergraduate students participated in most aspects of the early stage of the research project experiencing, firsthand, the influence of an integrated education model.

            Fig. 1

            1. Download: Download high-res image (110KB)

            2. Download: Download full-size image

            Fig. 1. The Boyer model of faculty scholarship in nursing.

            Background

            Case study: Nursing scholarship at a local non-profit agency

            As faculty members at the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio School of Nursing (SON) the authors are expected to contribute to the tripartite mission of the SON making contributions to either education, practice, or research. Boyer's model supports the success of the nurse-teacher-scholar to achieve success moving through academic ranks by scholarship productivity in any one of the pillars. The authors contend that it is possible to achieve multiple scholarly endeavors simultaneously through research, education and practice activities while achieving outstanding outcomes for students, patients, and the science of nursing.

            The principal investigator (PI) for this project is a psychiatric  mental health nurse practitioner (PMHNP) with a doctorate in cultural anthropology. The PI's research interest and expertise is in men's mental health, especially suicide prevention. The PI's teaching assignments include  psychiatric nursing  and population health, each of which can be taught in community-based settings. In addition to teaching and performing research, the PI maintains a clinical practice as a psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner (PMHNP). The clinical practice opportunity is part of the SON Faculty Practice, Clinical Enterprise. The practice site is located within a community organization that has multiple programs serving men, including a halfway house for former federal prison inmates, a residential rehabilitation program for homeless veterans, and an  outpatient clinic  that serves the residents (both federal bureau of prisons inmates and veterans). Practice occurs one day per week, providing an opportunity to become familiar with the organization, community resources, and the patient population. Learning early in the partnership that the suicide death of a homeless veteran created program set-backs the PI, an expert in men's suicide, set-out to design a research project focused on suicide prevention. Engaging students at the site as part of their population health clinical experience provided the final academic nursing opportunity to educate students at a site where one is practicing and performing research. The experience meets several domains in  The Essentials: Core Competencies for Professional  Nursing Education , specifically: Knowledge for Nursing Practice (Domain 1); Person-Centered Care (Domain2); Population Health (Domain 3); Scholarship for Nursing Practice (Domain 4); Inter-Professional Partnerships (Domain 6) and Professionalism (Domain 9). Importantly, it meets these domains while demonstrating the integration of the tripartite academic mission of nursing scholarship as embodied in  Defining Scholarship for Academic Nursing Task Force Consensus Position Statement.

            Method

            The course

            The course is the clinical component of Population Focused Health, a senior level community health course offered to both traditional and accelerated BSN students. It is worth two semester hours of credit. Students must complete ninety hours in the clinical setting. The course itself is designed to embody  The Essentials: Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education as course outcomes are linked to domains within the syllabus. Table 1 lists relevant course outcomes with the specific domains from  The Essentials: Core Competencies for Professional Nursing.

            Table 1. Course outcomes and essentials domains.

            Population focused health: relevant course outcomes

            Essentials domains

            Adapt approaches to providing nursing care to groups and populations related to their cultural differences, genomics, spirituality, knowledge level, and preferred language.

            Domain II: Person-Centered Care; Domain VI: Interprofessional Partnerships

            Apply evidence from research and other credible information sources as a basis for nursing practice with populations.

            Domain III: Population Health

            Apply ethical principles to the collection, maintenance, use, and dissemination of data and information.

            Domain IV: Scholarship for the Nursing Discipline

            Demonstrate professional nursing skills, knowledge, and attitudes in all interprofessional and client interactions.

            Domain IX: Professionalism

            What is unique about the course, and what makes it possible for faculty to deliver  The Essentials: Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Educationcompetencies to their students while advancing their own scholarship as set forth in  Defining Scholarship for Academic Nursing Task Force Consensus Position Statement, is the flexibility and independence afforded faculty to choose their own clinical settings. There is one set of course outcomes for all clinical sections, and there are some commonalities, such as assignments and grading rubrics, for all clinical groups. Individual faculty choose their own main clinical sites, and may even opt to select multiple other sites, affording students a varied and rich set of clinical learning opportunities.

            There are set assignments for all clinical sections, and these are completed outside of clinical time. How students spend their time while in the clinical setting is determined by each instructor. Some instructors have students take vital signs, provide  vaccinations  or conduct health screenings, for example. As long as the activities are directly related to course outcomes, there is great flexibility in how instructors can structure student clinical experiences.

            In the case presented here, the professor selected as the main clinical site a location where she both practices and was initiating a research study, and the clinical activities involved students participating in planning and executing early stages of the research. While this was one site among many (another clinical site that semester was an emergency homeless shelter), the ability of individual faculty to choose the clinical experiences that enable students to meet course outcomes is key to the success of this enterprise, as faculty can opt for sites that will enhance their own scholarship.

            The study

            The purpose of the study, which was approved by the university's Institutional Review Board (IRB), was to assess the needs of the homeless veterans' program at a local non-profit organization, with the intention of developing future research that will translate findings into clinical practices that improve services and health outcomes for their clients. The study also contributed new knowledge about suicide and veterans. Homeless veteran clients are particularly vulnerable because not only are they encountering housing insecurity, but they are also at high risk for suicide as most embody multiple risk factors such as male gender, veteran status, unemployment, family dysfunction, a history of substance abuse and  psychiatric diagnoses  that may involve post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression. The first phase of the research was a needs assessment, whereby the partner organization staff were interviewed to find out their perspectives about the existing program and how it could be improved or otherwise changed. In the second phase, veteran consumers were interviewed. The research project was designed with direction from the Population Focused Health course objectives, as the students would be engaged in clinical hours at the facility and assist and observe the first phase of the research.

            The research proposal, which was successfully funded by the Nursing Advisory Council of the School of Nursing at the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio listed the following objectives:

            1. To establish a more comprehensive collaboration between the veterans program and the university's SON, that includes research as well as practice and teaching.

            2. To involve the university's SON undergraduate students in the development of a community engaged research project as part of their senior year experience and include  SON graduate students  in faculty-initiated research.

            3. To assess the needs of the veterans program with the goal of developing translational research projects to address these needs. The research will add to nursing science to improve nursing practice and provide the organization with effective solutions to programmatic problems with which they have identified.

            The project brought the classroom to the community by allowing population health students to actively participate in phase one. The research endeavor created a rich learning environment for students and made course content relevant to them as they engaged in active learning about both population health and research methods. In this work the PI was acting not only as researcher, but also as teacher and provider. This integration of  nurse educator  roles allowed students and the community to benefit from nursing scholarship meeting the requirements of  The Essentials: Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education and establishing a fresh new look at the Boyer model for academic scholarship.

            There were ten students in the clinical section. To prepare the students for their clinical experience at the non-profit organization, the professor (PI) organized an onsite orientation, in which staff presented the goals and mission of their various programs. The research proposal was also made available for students to read, so that they understood the project and how they would be participating. Students reacted positively and were excited by the prospect of observing and participating in research firsthand. Finally, students were taught about qualitative methods, including ethical principles such as maintaining confidentiality, data collection techniques and analysis.

            Findings.

            During several visits to the organization, four staff members were interviewed. For each interview, two to three students observed. Students were asked to formulate follow up questions, and at the end of each interview they were afforded the opportunity to ask their own questions of the interviewee. Immediately following each interview, the faculty and students discussed the highlights. Students were remarkably perceptive and shared important insights about the interviews.

            The interview guide included the following questions:

            1. What are the goals of the veterans Program?

            2. How is the organization meeting those goals?

            3. How is the organization not meeting those goals?

            4. What are your personal goals for the program?

            5. What recommendations do you have for improving services here?

            6. In what ways is the veterans program addressing suicide risk?

            7. In what ways can the veterans program improve its services as it pertains to suicide risk?

            Students who were not attending interviews, conducted participant observation with the veterans in the common area where residents can play games, eat snacks and participate in community activities. Students sat and conversed with the veterans, with the goal of finding out their thoughts about the program. During the post-conference, students shared their observations with the professor and the rest of the class. This provided them with another opportunity to practice research skills by presenting the data that they collected and helped the nurse-scholar better understand the perspective of the veteran residents. The veterans genuinely enjoyed interacting with students which made the intervention a positive experience for all.

            At the conclusion of the course students evaluated their experiences. Students shared that they enjoyed and valued the opportunity to observe and participate in faculty research. These students were in the accelerated BSN program and earn a second bachelor's degree. A few expressed a desire to pursue graduate work in the future.

            Discussion

            The Essentials: Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education is a competency-based education model recently implemented by schools of nursing around the country. Students are expected to demonstrate competencies to complete curricular requirements. The course highlighted here provided students the opportunity to demonstrate core competencies meeting five domains of the document. First, the students observed and engaged with a vulnerable population of veterans experiencing multiple levels of mental health disorders addressing the  Population Health Domain (III). Next, students had the opportunity to interact on an individual level with the clients in a non-acute setting, alongside other health professionals, addressing  the Person-Centered Care (I), Interprofessional Partnerships (VI) and Professionalism Domains (IX). Finally, students learned firsthand about conducting research with vulnerable populations by actively participating in the research process, addressing the  Scholarship for the Nursing Discipline (IV).

            The students had the opportunity to be part of the creativity and hard science of research activities from IRB application through collection of data. They learned about research with vulnerable populations and the necessary protection that must take place in the process. Hence, this experiential learning opportunity provided students the ability to demonstrate competencies in the multiple domains of  The Essentials: Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Educationand provided the professor/PI to actively practice, teach and implement research. The specific competencies and sub-competencies met by students in the course are found in Table 2. These competencies were assessed and evaluated in the 

             

            Lab 9
            Concept Map of Body Fluids

            Overview: You probably noticed that our current unit (Body Fluids) does not contain a “Lecture Notes” tab with a concept map. That is because you will be creating your own concept map related to body fluids for Lab 9! 

            Lab Expectations

             For this assignment, you will develop a comprehensive, computer-generated concept map of body fluid chemistry. This map should resemble the maps that I include in the “lecture notes” section of each of our units, and should feature what you believe are the most important details from our video links in this unit! 

             Please make sure your map is saved as a .jpg file! Questions? Just ask!

             Concept Mapping Resources

            Directions: Everyone should visit the first link to gain a general understanding of what concept mapping is, how to create a concept map, and the reasons for creating and using concept maps. Then, everyone will need to use concept mapping software to use for this assignment, or use an online app. Two options are provided below (you only need to use one form of concept mapping software, not both!).  

             1. This is the software that I use to create our “lecture notes” maps. When you visit the following site, click on Downloaded and follow the instructions that appear. Pros and Cons: Some people say that this software is not as easy to use or as fancy as Inspiration concept mapping software. However, it is absolutely free – you may download it for free, with no time limit on its use!

            http://cmap.ihmc.us/

             2. Free Online App! Some of my former students have commented that SmartDraw, below, is easy to use.

            https://www.smartdraw.com/?id=104640&gclid=Cj0KCQjwn7j2BRDrARIsAHJkxmxouDPwHbISodwPvv8EP4w3Wd5MlHoXmdYjH7BLvqQ5QuZjieaKS5YaAm_KEALw_wcB

            Submission

              Discuss the difference between race and ethnicity with examples

               

              Your answers have to be very detail.

              Read the case and answer the questions below.

              Write down the questions and your answers below each question.

              1. What are the current strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) facing Nokia? (40) Please, be detail.

              2. Nokia is considering issuing debt, issuing equity, eliminating its dividends, or decreasing cash to meet its funding needs. What are the benefits and costs of each alternative? Please, explain in detail. (20)

              3. Given the current situation, what do you think the CFO's uppermost goal and objective for the firm is? (10) What would you do if you were him? (10) Apply biblical principles in your answer. (10) Please, explain in detail for each question.

              Overall format of your paper; writing the questions, title page, font (12 Times New Roman), double space. (10)

                Platinum Essays