BUS 210 Module Six Assignment Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
In this assignment, you will evaluate an existing organizational structure. You will recommend structural changes that can help address the organization’s concerns regarding collaboration, communication, and autonomy.
Scenario
You work for an organization that has traditionally been very formalized, and managers have had a very broad span of control over direct reports from multiple departments and functions. This worked well in the past; managers were able to oversee a high number of direct reports because there were many rules and regulations dictating how their work should be performed. However, there were downsides. Employee talent was underused, and there wasn’t a strong team culture, as most work was done independently according to standard operating processes.
Recently, the organization started shifting to less formalized working structures to support more creative, innovative work and provide employees with more autonomy. While employees are happy with the purpose of these new changes, managers are feeling overwhelmed, and employees are feeling a loss of support. This shift has impacted function-specific work the most because, in the past, managers didn’t need to understand in-depth, function-specific tasks, such as the technical aspects of graphic design work or the intricacies of project management. Instead, they had the ability to rely on rules, regulations, and standard operating processes.
You have been asked to collaborate with the human resources department to recommend a new organizational structure. This new structure should address the following goals:
- Reduce the burden on managers.
- Improve communication across teams.
- Enhance support for employees in function-specific tasks.
- Preserve the autonomy and creativity that employees value in the new working environment.
Your task is to design a structure that achieves these goals. Clearly explain how your proposed changes will address the issues the organization is experiencing while aligning with its long-term vision.
Directions
In this two-part assignment, you will create an organizational structure chart and a written explanation for your changes.
- Use the Module Six Assignment Template, linked in the What to Submit section below, to create an updated organizational structure chart for the organization.
- Then, in a separate Microsoft Word document, write a brief explanation of your recommended changes and how they will impact both organizational communication and overall team dynamics.
Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:
- Updated Organizational Structure Chart: Create an updated organizational structure chart that addresses management and communication concerns.
- Explanation of Changes: Explain your reasoning for why you made the changes you did to the company’s organizational structure. Include how your changes differ from the original and why you believe they would benefit the organization.
- Impact on Organizational Communication: Describe the impact these changes will have on the company’s overall organizational communication.
- Impact on Team Communication: Describe the impact these changes will have on the company’s overall team communication and reporting structure.
What to Submit
Submit your completed Module Six Assignment Template PPT as a PPT file. Submit your separate, written submission as a 2- to 3-page Microsoft Word document with 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one-inch margins.
A text-only version of the template is available: Module Six Assignment Template Text-Only Version Word Document. If you use this template, submit it as a Microsoft Word file.
Module Six Assignment Rubric
CriteriaExceeds ExpectationsMeets ExpectationsPartially Meets ExpectationsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsValueUpdated Organizational Structure ChartN/ACreates an updated organizational structure chart that addresses management and communication concerns (100%)Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include ensuring details such as organizational communication and team dynamics are taken into account (55%)Does not attempt criterion (0%)25Explanation of ChangesExceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner (100%)Provides reasons for the changes made to the company’s organizational structure, including how they differ from the original and how they would benefit the organization (85%)Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include providing concrete reasons for the changes or including details such as how the changes would benefit the company (55%)Does not attempt criterion (0%)25Impact on Organizational CommunicationExceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner (100%)Describes the impact these changes will have on the company’s overall organizational communication (85%)Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include providing more detail or context about the impact the changes will have on communication (55%)Does not attempt criterion (0%)20Impact on Team CommunicationExceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner (100%)Describes the impact these changes will have on the company’s overall team communication and reporting structure (85%)Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include providing clear details about the impact the changes will have on team communication and reporting structure (55%)Does not attempt criterion(0%)20Clear CommunicationExceeds expectations with an intentional use of language that promotes a thorough understanding (100%)Consistently and effectively communicates in an organized way to a specific audience (85%)Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but communication is inconsistent or ineffective in a way that negatively impacts understanding (55%)Shows no evidence of consistent, effective, or organized communication (0%)10Total:100%
![SNHU logo]()
Module Six Assignment Template Text-Only Version
Complete this template as part of your Module Six assignment submission.
Original Structure
Use this section to review the original organizational structure.
CEO
Director of Product Group
Manager
Data Analyst
Data Analyst
Graphic Designer
Graphic Designer
Developer
Developer
Designer
Designer
QA Specialist
QA Specialist
Project Manager
Project Manager
Manager
Data Analyst
Data Analyst
Graphic Designer
Designer
QA Specialist
Project Manager
Director of Service Group
Manager
Data Analyst
Data Analyst
Graphic Designer
Designer
QA Specialist
Project Manager
Manager
Data Analyst
Data Analyst
Graphic Designer
Designer
QA Specialist
Project Manager
Director of Shared Resources Group
HR Manager
HR Specialist
HR Specialist
HR Specialist
Information Technology Manager
Information Technology Specialist
Information Technology Specialist
Information Technology Specialist
Marketing Manager
Marketing Specialist
Marketing Specialist
Marketing Specialist
New Structure
Use a bulleted list to create a new organizational structure. Use subbullets to clarify reporting structures in the same way as shown in the original structure above.
[Insert text.]
[Insert text.]
[Insert text.]
[Insert text.]
image1.png
image2.svg
,
Original Organizational Structure
Use this chart to view the original organizational structure.
New Structure
Move the boxes around on this slide by dragging and dropping to create a new organizational structure.
image1.PNG
image9.png
image10.png
image11.png
image12.png
image13.png
image14.png
image15.png
image16.png
image17.png
image18.png
image19.png
image20.png
image21.png
image2.PNG
image3.PNG
image4.png
image5.png
image6.png
image7.png
image8.png
Use ERAS as the PICOT
Rubric Introduction
Introduction missing many important aspects of the definition and descriptions of the topic. No definition or description is present = 0 points
0 points
Introduction missing some important aspects of the definition and descriptions of the topic. Minimal definition or description is present
6 points
Introduction is missing one important aspect of the definition and description of the topic
8 points
One page in length. Identify area of clinical interest based on professional expertise. Discuss PICO and frame clinical question.
10 points
Description of the practice problem & statistical relevancy
Does not elaborate on the statistical relevancy of the issue.
0 points
Elaborate on minimal statistical relevancy of the issue.
10 points
Some mentions of the statistical relevancy present but superficial.
19 points
Clearly identify the statistical relevance of the problem, including the demographic affected by the issue, the cost related with the issue, etc.
25 points
Annotated Bibliography
Either included only one or two professional resource; or scholarly references did not support the clinical problem completely. The annotated bibliography on each of original research articles that did not relate the research to the clinical problem. Summary was overall not adequate
0 points
Included minimal professional resource; or scholarly references did not support the clinical problem completely. The annotated bibliography on each of original research articles that did not relate the research to the clinical problem. Summary was overall not adequate
10 points
Either Included less than 5 professional resources or resources did not support the clinical problem completely. The annotated bibliography on each of 5 original research articles that did not clearly relate the research to the clinical problem. Summary was conducted but clarity was lacking is some aspects
13 points
Clearly and succinctly synthesize the literature related to the identified clinical problem in an annotated bibliography format (see example). Provide a summary of a minimum of 5 scholarly references in the annotated bibliography including at least one peer-reviewed regarding the proposed approaches to the identified clinical problem; includes one paragraph that briefly summarizes the reference, a second paragraph about the strengths and weaknesses of the reference, and a third paragraph about the potential importance and usefulness of this reference to your DNP project. Each entry should include: a. The citation of the reference in APA format (this is your level 2 heading for each entry) b. A brief summary of the reference related to the identified clinical problem and PICOT question c. Any statistical component found (sample size, cost, number of people affected, etc.) d. Strengths and weaknesses of the reference e. Potential importance and usefulness of this reference to your DNP project
17 points
References Page
Less than 4 resources correctly referenced.
0 points
Less than 5 resources correctly referenced.
3 points
A minimum of 6 resources correctly referenced.
4 points
All resources correctly referenced
5 points
APA format
APA formatting contains multiple errors and/or several citations are missing.
0 points
APA formatting contains some errors and/or several citations are missing.
5 points
3-5 errors in APA format and/or 1-2 citations are missing.
8 points
APA format correct with no more than 1-2 minor errors.
10 points
DNP 7200 Statistics for the Health and Biological Sciences
Purpose
The purpose of the assignment is to allow you to further explore the practice problem that you have chosen for potential use in your final DNP by exploring the statistical component of your practice problem. You will also build an annotated bibliography and grade your evidences by building a Graded table of evidences.
Each student will:
1. Use your previously conducted focused review of literature related to the identified clinical problem from the course DNP7100 Evaluation of Evidence for Practice.
2. Describe the problem, the significance of the problem using professional references.
3. Describe the statistical relevancy of your problem (how many people affected, the cost, percentages, etc.)
4. State the practice question in PICOT format. (You can use the revised one from the previous course DNP7100).
5. Clearly and succinctly synthesize the literature related to the identified clinical problem in an annotated bibliography format (see example). Provide a summary of 5 scholarly references in the annotated bibliography including at least one peer-reviewed, and one scholarly reference from at least 3 different levels of evidence regarding the proposed approaches to the identified clinical problem.
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcome:
· Assimilate principles of epidemiology with scientific data necessary for epidemiologic intervention and draw appropriate inferences from epidemiologic data.
· Summarize scientific knowledge to determine the nature and significance of a clinical problem at the microsystem level.
· Analyze the application of biostatistics in the role of Doctor of Nursing practice.
· Interpret the role of biostatistics in study design, sample selection, hypothesis testing, and evaluation of research.
· Articulate how to select samples, determine reliability, and assess validity of research data. Evaluate sources, methods, and designs for data collection, management, and analysis.
Program Outcomes
· I-Integrate Scientific Underpinnings into Practice
· III-Apply Clinical Scholarship and Analytical Methods for Evidence-Based Practice
· VIII-Demonstrate advanced levels of clinical judgment, systems thinking, and accountability in designing, delivering, and evaluating evidence-based care to improve patient outcome
Leadership Role-Specific Competencies
· Demonstrate effective communication and relationship building:
· Through the production of written materials
· Through collaborative relationships with DNP stakeholders
· Through engagement of stakeholders
· Demonstrate knowledge of the healthcare environment
· Demonstrating current knowledge of patient care delivery systems across the continuum
· Demonstrating understanding of the regulation and payment issues that affect an organization’s finance
· Articulating the organization’s performance improvement program and goals
· Demonstrate Leadership Skills
· Demonstrating applied critical analysis to organizational issues after a review of the evidence
· Demonstrate Professionalism
· Seeking input and mentorship from other in career planning and development
Due Date
Submit to Moodle by Saturday of Week #6 at 11:59 p.m. ET.
Requirements
a. An introduction and brief discussion of the PICOT and clinical question. (You can use the revised one from the previous course DNP7100).
b. A description of the practice problem including impact on patient/client and family, healthcare system, or society and the statistical impact. (You can use some of the same information from a previous assignment from the DNP 7100).
c. Describe the statistical relevancy of your problem (how many people affected, the cost, percentages, etc.).
d. Clearly and succinctly synthesize the literature related to the identified clinical problem in an annotated bibliography format (see example). Provide a summary of 5 scholarly references in the annotated bibliography including at least one peer-reviewed regarding the proposed approaches to the identified clinical problem; includes one paragraph that briefly summarizes the reference, a second paragraph about the strengths and weaknesses of the reference, and a third paragraph about the potential importance and usefulness of this reference to your DNP project.
Each entry should include:
a. The citation of the reference in APA format (this is your level 2 heading for each entry)
b. A brief summary of the reference related to the identified clinical problem and PICOT question
c. Any statistical component found (sample size, cost, number of people affected, etc.)
d. Strengths and weaknesses of the reference
e. Potential importance and usefulness of this reference to your DNP project
*** Please discuss the findings from your assignment to you DNP Mentor and with the DNP Practice Project Thesis Proposal Mentor. ***
Directions and Grading Criteria
|
Category
|
Points
|
%
|
Description
|
|
Introduction
|
10
|
10
|
Identify area of clinical interest based on professional expertise. Discuss PICOT and frame clinical question.
|
|
Description of the practice problem.
|
25
|
25
|
A description of the practice problem including impact on patient/client and family, healthcare system, or society and the statistical impact. (You can use some of the same information from a previous assignment from the DNP 7100).
|
|
Describe the statistical relevancy
|
25
|
25
|
Describe the statistical relevancy of your problem (how many people affected, the cost, percentages, etc.).
|
|
Annotated Bibliography
|
25
|
25
|
Clearly and succinctly synthesize the literature related to the identified clinical problem in an annotated bibliography format (see example). Provide a summary of a minimum of 5 scholarly references in the annotated bibliography including at least one peer-reviewed regarding the proposed approaches to the identified clinical problem; includes one paragraph that briefly summarizes the reference, a second paragraph about the strengths and weaknesses of the reference, and a third paragraph about the potential importance and usefulness of this reference to your DNP project.
Each entry should include:
a. The citation of the reference in APA format (this is your level 2 heading for each entry)
b. A brief summary of the reference related to the identified clinical problem and PICOT question
c. Any statistical component found (sample size, cost, number of people affected, etc.)
d. Strengths and weaknesses of the reference
e. Potential importance and usefulness of this reference to your DNP project
|
|
References page
|
5
|
5
|
All resources correctly referenced
|
|
APA Format
|
10
|
10
|
APA format correct with no more than 1-2 minor errors
|
|
Total:
|
100 pts
|
100%
|
A quality paper will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.
|
![]()
Doctor of Nursing Practice Program
DNP 7200 Statistics for the Health and Biological Sciences
Practice Problem Summary, Annotated Bibliograph y
|
DNP7200 Practice Problem/Annotated Bibliography/.docx
|
1
|
Grading Rubric
|
Assignment Criteria
|
Meets Criteria
|
Partially Meets Criteria
|
Does Not Meet Criteria
|
|
Introduction
(10 pts)
|
One page in length. Identify area of clinical interest based on professional expertise. Discuss PICO and frame clinical question.
7 – 10 points
|
Introduction is missing one important aspect of the definition and description of the topic.
4 – 6 points
|
Introduction missing many important aspects of the definition and descriptions of the topic. No definition or description is present.
0 – 3 points
|
|
Description of the practice problem & statistical relevancy
(25 pts)
|
Clearly identify the statistical relevance of the problem, including the demographic affected by the issue, the cost related with the issue, etc.
20 – 25 points
|
Some mentions of the statistical relevancy present but superficial.
10- 19 points
|
Does not elaborate on the statistical relevancy of the issue.
0 – 9 points
|
|
Description of statistic relevancy
(25 points)
|
Clearly describe the statistical relevancy of your problem (how many people affected, the cost, percentages, etc.).
20 – 25 points
|
Some description of the statistical relevancy.
10-19 points
|
Does not describe the statistical relevancy.
0 – 9 points
|
|
Annotated Bibliography
(25 points)
|
Clearly and succinctly synthesize the literature related to the identified clinical problem in an annotated bibliography format (see example). Provide a summary of a minimum of 5 scholarly references in the annotated bibliography including at least one peer-reviewed regarding the proposed approaches to the identified clinical problem; includes one paragraph that briefly summarizes the reference, a second paragraph about the strengths and weaknesses of the reference, and a third paragraph about the potential importance and usefulness of this reference to your DNP project.
Each entry should include:
a. The citation of the reference in APA format (this is your level 2 heading for each entry)
b. A brief summary of the reference related to the identified clinical problem and PICOT question
c. Any statistical component found (sample size, cost, number of people affected, etc.)
d. Strengths and weaknesses of the reference
e. Potential importance and usefulness of this reference to your DNP project
20 – 25 points
|
Either Included less than 5 professional resources or resources did not support the clinical problem completely. The annotated bibliography on each of 5 original research articles that did not clearly relate the research to the clinical problem. Summary was conducted but clarity was lacking is some aspects.
10 – 19 points
|
Either included only one or two professional resource; or scholarly references did not support the clinical problem completely. The annotated bibliography on each of original research articles that did not relate the research to the clinical problem. Summary was overall not adequate.
0 – 7 points
|
|
References Page
(5 pts)
|
All resources correctly referenced
5-4 points
|
A minimum of 5 resources correctly referenced.
3-2 points
|
Less than 5 resources correctly referenced.
1-0 points
|
|
APA format
(10 pts)
|
APA format correct with no more than 1-2 minor errors.
7 – 10 points
|
3-5 errors in APA format and/or 1-2 citations are missing.
3 – 6 points
|
APA formatting contains multiple errors and/or several citations are missing.
0 – 2 points
|
|
Total Points Possible = 100 points
|
|
DNP7200 Practice Problem/Annotated Bibliography/.docx
|
3
|
image1.jpg
