+1 (951) 902-6107 info@platinumressays.com

Can someone do my Week 1 discussion in MHA 612 Financial & Managerial Accounting?

 

  • Read Chapters 1, 2, and 3 from the course textbook, Essentials of Health Care Finance.

As Cleverley and Cleverley (2018) suggest,

Until the early 1980s, cost reimbursement by Medicare was the predominant form of payment for most hospitals and other institutional providers. In addition to Medicare, most state Medicaid plans and a large number of Blue Cross plans paid hospitals on the basis of “reasonable” historical cost. Today, the major payers have abandoned historical cost reimbursement and substituted other payment systems. (p.36)

A healthcare organization’s revenue cycle depends on its ability to provide services to patients. Along with this, it is equally important that healthcare providers accurately charge for services rendered.

In other words, capturing what, when, where, how, why, and who received the service produces the revenue. In your initial post,

  • Define the two key elements in historical cost reimbursement (reasonable cost and apportionment); additionally, provide two applicable examples.
  • Discuss the relationship between charge capture, charge entry, and charge master. 
  • Compare and contrast the five major payment units (historical cost reimbursement, specific services, fee schedules, capitated rates, and bundled services).

Guidelines:

  • Your initial post must be a minimum of 500 words.
  • Cite sources, if necessary, using APA style.
  • Refer to APA StyleLinks to an external site. for citing within your paper and formatting your references list.
  • Use your textbook or other sources as needed.

    Collaboration 584 week 8

     Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the Collaboration Café. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.

    Include the following sections:

    1. Application of Course Knowledge: Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail.
      • Reflect on your learning experience in this course. Which concepts stood out to you and made an impact?  How do you envision using these concepts in your future nursing practice as a master’s prepared nurse practitioner?
      • Describe how course learning activities and assignments will help you achieve Program Outcome 3: Engage in lifelong personal and professional growth through reflective practice and appreciation of cultural diversity. (Cultural Humility)
      • Describe how course assignments or activities will help you achieve ONE of the sub-competencies from the advanced-level nursing education competencies from AACN Essentials Competency 5.2 Contribute to a culture of patient safety.
        • 5.2g Evaluate the alignment of system data and comparative patient safety benchmarks.
        • 5.2h Lead analysis of actual errors, near misses, and potential situations that would impact safety.
        • 5.2i Design evidence-based interventions to mitigate risk.
        • 5.2j Evaluate emergency preparedness system-level plans to protect safety.

    Please provide AI and Similarity report 

      Collaboration 583 week 8

      Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the Collaboration Café. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.

      General Instructions

      Include the following sections:

      1. Application of Course Knowledge: Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail.
        • Reflect on your learning experience in this course. Which concepts stood out to you and made an impact?  How do you envision using these concepts in your future nursing practice as a master’s prepared nurse?   
        • Describe how course learning activities and assignments will help you achieve Program Outcome 5: Advocates for positive health outcomes through compassionate, evidence-based, collaborative advanced nursing practice. (Extraordinary Nursing). 
        • Describe how course assignments or activities will help you achieve ONE of the sub-competencies from the advanced-level nursing education competencies from AACN Essentials Competency 8.1 Describe the various information and communication technology tools used in the care of patients, communities, and populations. 
          • 8.1g Identify best evidence and practices for the application of information and communication technologies to support care.
          • 8.1h Evaluate the unintended consequences of information and communication technologies on care processes, communications, and information flow across care settings.
          • 8.1i Propose a plan to influence the selection and implementation of new information and communication technologies.
          • 8.1j Explore the fiscal impact of information and communication technologies on health care.
          • 8.1k Identify the impact of information and communication technologies on workflow processes and healthcare outcomes.

      Please provide AI and Similarity report. Thank you.

        Applied Sciences REFLECTION ASSIGNMENT

         
        INSTRUCTIONS
        Please address the following:
        1. How has your view of theology changed over the duration of this course? (approximately
        200 words).
        2. How have you been able to practice the principles you learned from the course in your
        own life? (approximately 200 words). In this section, note at least one specific doctrine,
        topic, concept, or principle that has impacted your life as a result of taking this course.
        3. How will you pass on the information you have learned in this course to those within
        your circle of influence? (approximately 200 words). In this section, again, include at
        least one specific example of a doctrine, truth, or concept learned in this course that you
        will pass on to those within your circle of influence.
        Refer to the "Course Policies" in the course syllabus for the formatting expectations in this
        course.
        Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

          Logical and Physical Design

           

          In order to ensure optimal database performance, the logical and physical design should consider the user requirements thoroughly. Suppose you have been hired to transform a conceptual model into a logical model for a sales database.

          • Describe the specific steps that you must perform in order to appropriately construct the database model.
          • Speculate the risks that might present themselves for each step mentioned, and how you would avoid or mitigate those risks.

            help

            Hyperemesis gravidum 8 pages

            1. Introduction (Identification of the problem) with a clear presentation of the problem as well as the significance and a scholarly overview of the paper’s content. No heading is used for the Introduction per APA current edition. 
            2. Background and Significance of the disease, including: Definition, description, signs, and symptoms. Incidence and prevalence of statistics by state with a comparison to national statistics pertaining to the disease. If after a search of the library and scholarly databases, you are unable to find statistics for your home state, or other states, consider this a gap in the data and state as much in the body of the paper. For instance, you may state something like, “After an exhausting search of the scholarly databases, this writer is unable to locate incidence and/or prevalence data for the state of …. This indicates a gap in surveillance that will be included in the “Plan” section of this paper. Provide a table of this data in this section- Place it as an appendix. 
            3. Surveillance and Reporting: Current surveillance methods and mandated reporting processes as related to the health condition chosen should be specific. 
            4. Epidemiological Analysis:  Conduct a descriptive epidemiology analysis of the health condition. Be sure to include all of the 5 W’s: What, Who, Where, When, Why. Use details associated with all of the W’s, such as the “Who” which should include an analysis of the determinants of health. Include costs (both financial and social) associated with the disease or problem. 
            5. Screening and Guidelines: Review how the disease is diagnosed and current national standards (guidelines). Pick one screening test and review its sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, and cost. 
            6. Plan: Integrating evidence, provide a plan of how you as a women’s health nurse practitioner will address this chronic health condition after graduation. Provide three specific interventions that are based on the evidence and include how you will measure outcomes (how will you know that the interventions have utility, and are useful?) Note: Consider primary, secondary, and tertiary interventions as well as the integration of health policy advocacy efforts. All interventions should be based on evidence – connected to a resource such as a scholarly piece of research. 
            7. Summary/Conclusion: Conclude in a clear manner with a brief overview of the key points from each section of the paper utilizing the integration of resources. 
            8. The paper should be formatted and organized into the following sections which focus on the chosen chronic health condition. 
            9. Adhere to all paper preparation guidelines (see below). 

            Scholarly Paper Guidelines

            • Page length: 8-10 pages, excluding title page and references.
            • APA format current edition
            • Include scholarly in-text references throughout and a reference list.
            • Include at least one table that the student creates to present information. Please refer to the “Requirements” or rubric for further details. APA formatting is required.

              PHASE 5 PP

              PLEASE SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS FOR RUBRIC, INSTRUCTIONS, AND THE LECTURE YOU NEED TO COMPLETE THE PP.

              THIS ASSIGNMENT CONSIST OF A PHASE 5 OF PREVIOUS SECTION 1 TO 4, THIS PAHSE 5 IS THE COMBINATION OF ALL PREVIOUS PARTS BUT INSTEAD OF BEEN IN A WORD DOCUMENT FORMAT, GOING TO BE AS A PRESENTATION IN POWER POINT FORMAT.

              I HAVE ATTACHED THE FULL DOCUMENT FROM PART 1 TO 4.

              I HAVE ATTACHED THE POWERPOINT WITH THE INSTRUCTIONS FROM MY PROFESSOR

              I HAVE ATTACHED THE RUBRIC FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT

              I NEED SPEAKER NOTE IN ALL SLIDES PLEASE, NOT MORE THAN 10% PLAGIARISM WILL BE SUBMITTED VIA TURNIN IN.

              DUE DATE AUGUST 18,2025

              Phase 5

              Rubric

              PowerPoint Presentatio n 14.4 points- 60%

              Outstanding

              Very Good

              Good

              Unacceptable

              Phase 1

              15%

              The presentation demonstrates that the author understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Concepts are integrated into the writer’s own insights. The writer provides concluding remarks that show analysis and synthesis of ideas

              The presentation demonstrates that the author, mostly, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Some conclusions, however, are not supported in the body of the presentation.

              The presentation demonstrates that the author, to a certain extent, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course.

              The presentation does not demonstrate that the author has understood, and applied concepts learned in the course.

              Phase 2 15%

              The presentation demonstrates that the author understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Concepts are integrated into the writer’s own insights. The writer provides concluding remarks that show analysis and synthesis of ideas

              The presentation demonstrates that the author, mostly, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Some conclusions, however, are not supported in the body of the presentation.

              The presentation demonstrates that the author, to a certain extent, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course.

              The presentation does not demonstrate that the author has understood, and applied concepts learned in the course.

              Phase 3 15%

              The presentation demonstrates that the author understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Concepts are integrated into the

              The presentation demonstrates that the author, mostly, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Some conclusions, however, are not

              The presentation demonstrates that the author, to a certain extent, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course.

              The presentation does not demonstrate that the author has understood, and applied concepts learned in the course.

              writer’s own insights. The writer provides concluding remarks that show analysis and synthesis of ideas

              supported in the body of the presentation.

              Phase 4 15%

              The presentation demonstrates that the author understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Concepts are integrated into the writer’s own insights. The writer provides concluding remarks that show analysis and synthesis of ideas

              The presentation demonstrates that the author, mostly, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Some conclusions, however, are not supported in the body of the presentation.

              The presentation demonstrates that the author, to a certain extent, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course.

              The presentation does not demonstrate that the author has understood, and applied concepts learned in the course.

              15-20 slides (including the title and reference slides).

              15-20 slides (including the title and reference slides).

              Less than 15 slides

              Less than 12 slides

              Less than 10 slides

              APA,

              grammar,

              spelling

              Basic principles

              of presentation

              development and

              APA style are

              applied.

              All sources are

              from evidence-

              based

              professional

              websites or peer-

              reviewed journals

              to validate and

              support the

              information

              presented.

              Sources are

              current (within 5

              years).

              In-text citations

              included on each

              Basic principles

              of presentation

              development and

              APA style are

              applied, with no

              more than 3

              errors.

              Not all sources

              are from

              evidence-based

              professional

              websites or peer-

              reviewed journals

              to validate and

              support the

              information

              presented. Not

              all sources are

              current (within 5

              years).

              Basic principles of presentation development and APA style are applied, with no more than 5 errors. Not all sources are from evidence-based professional websites or peer- reviewed journals to validate and support the information presented. More than 3 sources are not current (within 5 years). In-text citations are not included on each slide with

              Basic principles of presentation development and APA style are not applied, with more than 5 errors. Not all sources are from evidence- based professional websites or peer- reviewed journals to validate and support the information presented. Not all sources are current (within 5 years). In-text citations are not included on each slide with information from a

              slide with

              information from

              a source.

              Citations

              formatted

              following APA.

              All statements

              originally found

              in scholarly

              references/source

              s are cited in the

              presentation.

              Pictures or

              graphics included

              that are not clip

              art included the

              website and are

              not copyright

              protected. APA

              format was

              followed.

              In-text citations

              are not included

              on each slide with

              information from

              a source. Not all

              citations are

              formatted

              following APA.

              Not all statements

              originally found

              in scholarly

              references/source

              s are cited in the

              presentation.

              Pictures

              or graphics

              included that are

              not clip art

              include the

              website and are

              not copyright

              protected. APA

              format was

              somewhat

              followed.

              information from a source. More than 5 citations are not formatted following APA. Not all statements originally found in scholarly references/source s are cited in the presentation. Pictures or graphics included that are not clip art include the website and are not copyright protected. APA format was somewhat followed.

              source. Not all citations are formatted following APA. Not all statements originally found in scholarly references/source s are cited in the presentation. Pictures or graphics included that are not clip art include the website and are not copyright protected. APA format was somewhat followed.

              ,

              Phase Five PowerPoint Presentation

              Phase 4- Pulling it all together

              Throughout the semester we have been working at completing papers and different phases remember that you started out with Phase One, then you begin working on Phase Two, then Phase Three, Phase Four and now for Phase Five of your research project, this is where it all comes together.

              Before assembling your final project, please review your previous issues to ensure that prior errors are corrected, or any feedback is addressed.

              Very Important Class – please make sure that your presentation is in PowerPoint Format – do not use pdf or any other format, it cannot be accepted for grading.

              Important Items for Review

              Aesthetics – How does my PowerPoint and Abstract look?

              Am I submitting scholarly work?

              Is it formatted properly?

              Is the abstract and presentation free of grammaticalerrors?

              Did I follow APA 7th edition guidelines?

              Content – is my abstract and presentation organized?

              Do the prior sections flow properly?

              Are the titles present? Did I use proper heading levels?

              Did I check for plagiarism? Did I keep my similarity index < 20%?

              Phase V –PowerPoint Presentation

              The final submission is the combination of the other four phases into one presentation

              You will combine Phase I, Phase II, Phase III, and Phase IV to make Phase V.

              You are responsible for editing and formatting your abstract and presentation

              so that it will flow for the reader.

              This presentation will need to be corrected with all the feedback provided from previous papers.

              Include conclusion and learning experiences from the essentials and from the class.

              Do not forget to document limitations and implications for future research/practice.

              Review of Phase One

              The purpose of this project is for the student to complete all the different steps necessary to implement a nursing research project.

              This project will be subdivided into 4 different papers that will be submitted throughout the entire semester.

              The final presentation will be the combination of the four areas.

              Always remember to review the grading rubric on your syllabus before completing any assignment.

              Your grading rubric can be located within your Blackboard Submission tab for the assignment

              Review of Phase One

              Phase 1 is the planning stage of a research project; students are to prepare a 4-5-page paper identifying a specific topic that you would like to investigate and relates to transitional nursing. You will provide a brief introduction to the situation by utilizing published nursing research articles to support your statement. This paper will also include

              1- Introduction to the Problem

              2- Clearly Identify the Problem

              3- Significance of the problem to Nursing

              4- Purpose of the research (what do you seek to accomplish)

              5- Research questions (this will guide your research)

              6- Master's Essentials that aligned with your topic

              Review of Phase Two- Design

              You will continue with your research topic.

              In this paper will perform a brief literature review on the topic.

              Will need at least 5 support articles (scholarly research).

              Provide the desired methodology for the project.

              1- Brief literature review

              2- Methodology and design of the study (Be as detailed as possible – qualitative/quantitative)

              3- Sampling methodology

              4- Necessary tools

              5- Any algorithms or flow maps created

              Review of Phase 3 Implementation

              Phase 3- part 1- of the research project is the implementation phase.

              The implementation phase will be written in the future state as we will not be implementing the actual project.

              This phase focuses on providing steps by steps instructions on how the program will be implemented.

              A table describing the time frame of the project, if there is any budget that needs to be considered, and any resources or statistical tools required.

              Review of Phase 3-[ part 2]- Results

              Phase 3- part 2- is all about results.

              This part of the paper will be based on the hypothetical analysis.

              Meaning since we will not be implementing the process, the results described will be based on whatever the students would like the research results to be.

              You will need to provide results for all the statistical tools mentioned and provide descriptive data (demographics of the population, different descriptive data points, etc.).

              Make sure to also include research limitations to improve for future studies.

              Phase 4- All Phases Combined

              The final submission is the combination of the other four phases into one paper.

              You will combine Phase I, Phase II, & Phase III to make Phase V.

              You are responsible for editing and formatting your paper so that your paper will flow for the reader.

              This paper will need to be corrected with all the feedback provided from previous papers.

              Include conclusion and learning experiences from the essentials and from the class.

              Do not forget to document limitations and implications for future research/practice.

              Final Thoughts

              Please ensure that all phases are present in your presentation

              Review your grading rubric that is within your syllabus.

              Make sure that your in text citations and references are present.

              Ensure that you strive to keep your plagiarism score at 20% or below.

              Although many components of this assignment were hypothetical – think about the seriousness of research and how it impacts nursing practice at all levels of our discipline.

              Begin to ensure that research becomes a part of your nursing practice.

              Thank you for a job well done and best wishes unto all.

              image4.jpg

              image5.png

              image6.png

              image7.jpg

              image8.jpg

              image9.png

              image10.jpg

              image11.jpg

              image12.jpg

              image1.jpg

              image2.png

              image3.png

              ,

              1

              Phase IV Results

              Student's name: Yulexis Moreda

              Instructor: Aciel Sagrera-Mulen

              Course: Nursing Research and Evidence-Based Practice

              Date: August 16, 2025

              Reducing Hospital Readmissions for Heart Failure Patients

              Abstract

              Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of hospital readmissions in the United States, particularly among older adults, with nearly one in four patients readmitted within 30 days of discharge (Dhaliwal & Dang, 2024). Such high rates are most likely provoked by disconnected care, inappropriate discharge education, and post-discharge follow-up. The project was to investigate how nurse-led transitional care interventions, namely enhanced discharge planning and patient education, affected the rate of 30-day readmissions of HF patients.

              Phase I made it possible to define the scope and nursing importance of the problem, which illustrated the role of nurses in discharge planning, patient education, and care coordination. This was to assess follow-up calls, visits at home, telemonitoring and medication reconciliation interventions and their impact on the readmission rates, compliance of patients with the medications, and satisfaction to the patients (Shamali et al., 2025).

              Phase II conducted quasi-experimental pre-post design in a mid-sized urban hospital. The data collected on 30 days HF readmission in terms of baseline in six months were compared to the results of interventions after the implementation of a more enhanced protocol of discharge. They represented the key interventions provided as early discharge planning during admission, individual education based on the teach-back method, discharge checklist, medication reconciliation, follow-up visit during a discharge, and a phone call placed by a nurse within 72 hours after the discharge. Outcomes measured included readmission rates, medication adherence (MMAS-8), patient satisfaction (HCAHPS), and emergency department visits.

              Phase III revealed hypothetical findings showing a significant reduction in 30-day readmissions from 23% pre-intervention to 11% post-intervention (p = .001). High medication adherence improved from 28% to 54% (p < .001), patient satisfaction scores rose from 78 to 89 (p < .001), and HF-related emergency visits declined from 17% to 8% (p = .005). Logistic regression verified that post intervention participation and high medication adherence were effective predictors in a strong reduction of readmission risk (Williams, 2025).

              In conclusion, this study show that nurse-led, structured discharge planning can provide a significant improvement in clinical and patient-centered outcomes of HF patients.

              Nursing implications of this study encompass reaffirming the importance of transitional care education, incorporation of evidence-based discharge procedures in nursing educational standards, and the promotion of policies that allow coordination of nurse led care and minimize readmissions whilst maximizing the quality of care and health care expenses.

              Introduction to the Problem

              HF is one of the most common chronic diseases in the United States, especially among older adults. According to Roger (2021), "HF is far more prevalent in older age groups, reaching 4.3% among persons aged 65 to 70 years old in 2012 and projected to increase steadily through year 2030 when the prevalence of HF could reach 8.5%". As Khan et al. (2021) report, "Nearly 1 in 4 heart failure (HF) patients are readmitted within 30 days of discharge and approximately half are readmitted within 6 months". This high readmission rate is a serious issue in healthcare provision, commonly indicating unacceptable transitional care and inadequate post-discharge patient support.

              Hospital discharge to home is a sensitive period, especially in the case of HF patients who must deal with multiple self-care and follow-up tasks. Studies indicate that readmissions are generally avoidable with proper transitional care measures. Transitional nursing aims to bridge the care gap by implementing systematic interventions, such as patient education, discharge planning, follow-up phone calls, and coordination with outpatient practitioners. When implemented by nurses, these interventions have been found to decrease hospital readmissions and enhance patient outcomes. The goal of this project is to investigate how nurses' transitional care strategies impact the reduction of preventable hospital readmissions for patients with heart failure.

              Identifying the Problem

              The most significant problem is the high percentage of 30-day hospital readmissions among patients with heart failure. Transitions are most frequently associated with care fragmentation for hospital-to-home discharge, e.g., poor discharge teaching, medication abuse, failure to follow up on time, and poor patient comprehension of their disease (Sakowitz et al., 2023). Although post-discharge care has been optimized, most hospitals lack the capability to offer uniform, high-quality transitional services for HF patients.

              There is also a shortage of standard, evidence-based treatments. Patients are commonly discharged from the hospital with minimal information about their drugs, diet, and warning signs of collapse. Interchanges also among hospital groups and community-based carers are frequently poor, resulting in discontinuity of care. That breakdown significantly enhances the risk of avoidable complications and readmission, which consumes healthcare resources and damages patient well-being.

              Significance of the Issue to Nursing

              The problem of readmission for heart failure is especially relevant to the field of nursing practice. Nurses are at the forefront of discharge planning and patient education, and their role in transitional care is critical to ensuring that patients are adequately prepared upon hospital discharge. Marques et al. (2022) note that "Outpatient care provided by nurses to patients with HF has been the focus of studies, showing a reduction in hospital readmissions". Advanced practice nurses are also well-suited to facilitate and direct care transition models that encourage communication, track patient progress, and maintain post-discharge adherence to care plans.

              High rates of readmission are quality markers of care and are associated with financial penalties in value-based reimbursement systems for care. Nurses are dedicated to acting on these quality markers through evidence-based practice. Transitional care is an outgrowth of the nursing process with a focus on assessment, planning, intervention, and evaluation. Nurses can play a highly influential role in reducing readmissions, improving patient satisfaction, and making the healthcare system more sustainable by taking the lead on transitional care initiatives (Marques et al., 2022).

              In addition, transitional care supports nursing's holistic philosophy because it extends beyond the repair of physical well-being to address the emotional, social, and educational health needs of patients. Nurses reassure, explain physicians' orders, and represent the patient's interests throughout the continuum of care. A readmission reduction not only enhances clinical outcomes but also fosters trust and involvement among patients and healthcare providers.

              Purpose of the Research

              “The primary objective of this research is to assess the impact of nurses' transitional care interventions on the 30-day readmission rates of heart failure patients to hospitals” (Bradley et al. 2022). The study will quantify the effectiveness of various interventions, including follow-up phone calls, home visits, telemonitoring, and medication reconciliation, in preventing readmissions. Besides clinical outcomes, the study will assess patients' views of the care provided and nurses' experiences with implementing these strategies.

              Knowing which elements of transitional care yield the most beneficial results can enable institutions to allocate resources effectively and emulate successful methods. By identifying where implementation is likely to be least successful, this research can also inform educational and policy initiatives, enabling nurses to deliver high-quality care during transitions of care. Finally, the results will further establish an evidence base supporting safe, patient-oriented care and facilitating professional development for nurses in extended roles.

              Research Questions

              This research will be informed by a set of guiding questions: What is the most effective nurse transitional care programs to minimize 30-day hospital readmission of heart failure? How do patients assess the quality and efficacy of transitional care services from nurses following hospital discharge? What are nurses' challenges in implementing transitional care among heart failure patients?

              Responding to these questions will help construct a deeper understanding of how transitional care can be maximized to meet the needs of vulnerable populations, most critically those with chronic cardiovascular disease.

              Master's Essentials that aligned with this topic

              This project aligns with several of the Essentials of the “American Association of Colleges of Nursing” (AACN) Essentials for Master's Education. Essential I, which involves the integration of scientific knowledge from both the sciences and humanities, is evident in comprehending the multifaceted pathophysiology and psychosocial dynamics of heart failure care. Essential II, Organizational and Systems Leadership, emphasizes the design and testing of interventions that necessitate strategic planning, interprofessional collaboration, and quality improvement.

              Core IV, Translating and Integrating Scholarship into Practice, is paramount to this study, as it involves the implementation of existing evidence into the practice of practical nursing interventions. Core VI, Health Policy and Advocacy, is met by confronting systemic barriers and policy dilemmas related to transitional care services. Finally, Core IX, Master ''s-Level Nursing Practice, is confronted by addressing leadership, clinical decision-making, and care coordination, all key elements of advanced nursing practice in transitional care facilities.

              Planning and Patient Education

              Brief Literature Review

              HF causes a substantial number of hospitalizations and readmissions of older adults, as it is one of the primary causes of both hospitalization and readmission. The transition from Hospital to home is an important opportunity for intervention, especially in terms of successful discharge planning and patient education. This literature consistently advocates for the effectiveness of structured discharge in helping to reduce the rate of hospital readmission among patients with HF.

              Bradley et al. (2022) conducted an informative review of discharge planning interventions and their impact on patient outcomes. The authors state that “A structured discharge plan that is tailored to the individual patient probably brings about a small reduction in the initial hospital length of stay and readmissions to hospital for older people with a medical condition, may slightly increase patient satisfaction with healthcare received” (Bradley et al., 2022). To support the above-mentioned ideas, the study noted that customized discharge planning may significantly decrease readmission levels and improve patient satisfaction. Key aspects, such as involving the family and patient, early introduction of discharge planning, and follow-up in the post-discharge period, are linked to better outcomes.

              On the other hand, Browder and Rosamond (2023) specifically addressed socioeconomic factors in HF readmissions. They discovered that low socioeconomic patients are the worst offenders as a result of the inactive discharge planning besides the inability to avail post-discharge services. The interventions that helped to overcome these barriers (including transportation, medications, and telehealth based on the needs of patients) had the potential of eliminating the risks of readmission. According to the authors, “there was a reduction in readmissions after the implementation of HRRP” (Browder & Rosamond, 2023).

              Burse (2024) assessed a discharge planning and education program in the clinical environment of a real-life hospital and found a significant reduction in 30-day readmission. Her results validate the significance of well-planned education that is accompanied by the help of nurses, the role of which is based on focusing on adhering to medications, monitoring symptoms, and follow-ups. It was established that another significant line of treatment to be applied and that can help to improve patient outcomes is multidisciplinary care teams involving discharge planners.

              Fatani et al. (2025) examined the effect of discharge planning teams on the length of stay and readmission outcomes in neurological patients. Although the study is not HF specific, it presents an argument about whether principles of discharge as a diagnosis can be generalized or not. The reduced length of stay and readmission in general was also attributed to the existence of a special team, and that fact confirmed that the organizational component may contribute to the discharge outcomes greatly Wu et al. (2024).

              .

              Research design and study methods

              This study will “employ a quasi-experimental pre-post research design to examine the effectiveness of an enhanced discharge planning and education protocol among patients with heart failure” (Bradley et al. 2022). The context in which the intervention will be delivered is a mid-sized urban hospital that accepts a diverse population.

              The research will consist of two stages: the baseline data collection stage and the intervention stage. In the baseline phase, information on 30-day readmissions, including those of HF patients in the 6 months preceding the intervention, will be obtained retrospectively. During the intervention stage, a standard discharge planning and education program will be implemented for all patients who have been admitted based on their primary diagnosis of heart failure.

              The intervention will comprise interventional discharge planning initiated at the time of admission, a discharge checklist, medication reconciliation, patient-centered education to learn how to manage heart failure, scheduling of follow-up appointments before discharge, and a post-discharge telephone call made by a nurse within 72 hours. The education part will rely on the teach-back technique to ensure the patient. Written materials, medication calendars, and symptom checking logs will be provided to patients.

              The significant results will include rates of readmission over 30 days, patient satisfaction, and medication compliance, which will be assessed through pharmacy refill records. Secondary endpoints will include hospitalizations and emergency department visits. The electronic health records of the patients (EHRs), the survey, and the telephone interviews will be used to gather data.

              “The hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB)” will ethically approve the study, and an informed consent will be signed by all participants. This design ensures internal validity while also facilitating real-world applicability and minimizing disruption to standard care practices.

              Sampling Methodology

              In the study, the non-randomized convenience sampling technique, which fits the quasi-experimental design, will be employed. Potential participants will be adult patients (18 years old and beyond) who were admitted to the Hospital with HF as the primary diagnosis in the internal medicine or cardiology departments of the Hospital.

              Criteria of inclusion will take the form of: (1) proven heart failure as per the ICD-10 coding and through clinical assessment of the patient, (2) has been discharged home or to self-care, and (3) able to provide informed consent. There will be exclusion criteria including: (1) patients who have been transferred to long-term care or hospice, (2) patients with extreme cognitive impairment with no available caregiver who may attend education, and (3) non-English speaking patients without an interpreter.

              A power analysis will be conducted to “determine the sample size required to detect a statistically significant decrease in readmission rates with a power of 80% and an alpha level of 0.05” (Rohde et al., 2023). Using the data from the past, it is projected that an estimated sample size of 200 patients per group (pre-intervention and post-intervention) will be recorded.

              Although the sampling plan may limit the generalizability of the findings to other populations, it provides viable access to participants in the target demographic. It ensures a reasonable level of integration within the prevailing hospital framework. Mixed methods will be employed to gather both quantitative and qualitative opinions related to readmission rates (admission rates, medication adherence), as well as patient perceptions towards the discharge process.

              Necessary Tools

              A series of tools will be utilized in the study for collecting and evaluating data. The tools to be used for collecting primary data will include the electronic health record audit template, validated patient satisfaction surveys, and structured interview guides. The “Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8)” is a rated instrument that will serve as a tool in assessing medication adherence in chronic disease studies, as it is a valid instrument.

              The checklist for discharge education will become one of the main tools for ensuring the consistency of interventions. Some of the items it will contain include learning about dietary prohibitions, tracking symptoms, understanding the side effects of medications, knowing when to call in, and scheduling follow-up visits. The nurses will record the list of checklist completions in EHR.

              The teach-back method will be used to assess patient comprehension. To gauge the patients' comprehension, nurses will require them to recall major concepts addressed in the discharge education process. The teach-back assessment rubric will be used to score responses and document them in the patient's medical record.

              The follow-up calls will be conducted using a structured script that evaluates the patient's symptoms, medication use, follow-up visits, and any impediments to care. Information provided during these calls will be used to measure current compliance and identify initial signs of disengagement.

              “The Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey” will be used to measure patient satisfaction with the discharge process, specifically regarding discharge information and care transition items. Such data will be summed up and analyzed before and after the intervention.

              SRSP software will be used in data analysis. Demographic and clinical characteristics will be summed up using descriptive statistics. Chi-square tests, along with logistic regression, will be used to evaluate the differences in outcomes between the pre- and post-intervention populations using inferential statistics.

              Illustrations

              Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8)

              Question

              Yes

              No

              Do you sometimes forget to take your medications?

              Over the past two weeks, was there a day when you skipped taking your medications?

              Have you ever stopped taking medication without notifying the doctor?

              Do you sometimes forget your medications when you travel?

              Did you take your medication yesterday?

              Do you sometimes stop taking your medication when you feel better?

              Do you find it challenging to stick to your treatment plan?

              How often do you have trouble remembering to take your medication?

              Scoring

              Items 1–4, 6, 7: Yes = 1, No = 0

              Item 5: Yes = 0, No = 1

              Item 8: Score based on the option selected

              Interpretation:

              Total score 0 = High adherence

              Score 1–2 = Medium adherence

              Score ≥3 = Low adherence

              Results (Hypothetical)

              This section presents the hypothetical findings of the quasi-experimental pre-post study designed to evaluate the effectiveness of an enhanced nurse-led discharge planning and patient education protocol for individuals hospitalized with heart failure (HF). The statistics presented in this paper will entail the projected results based on the trends of the literature and the impact of the designed transition care program. The outcomes are a descriptive statistic, primary and secondary outcomes, including statistics prepared thereon, and interpretation of findings. The limitations of the study are to be discussed, as well as the recommendations for future research.

              Descriptive Statistics

              The population of the research consisted of 400 adult patients, with the first 200 respondents constituting the pre-intervention cohort and the remaining 200 forming the post-intervention group. Inclusion criteria were satisfied by all the participants. These inclusion criteria consisted of a confirmed diagnosis of HF and discharge home or to self-care. There were no exclusion criteria, including transfer into long-term care or marked cognitive impairment without a caregiver.

              The demographic characteristics of the population covered in the research showed that the mean age was approximately 70 years. The research participants ranged from 45 to 70 years, with the smallest number of people below 45 years. The gender of the respondents in both groups was nearly the same, with males making up over half of the respondents. The average of the racially and ethnically diverse group was White/African American, followed by Hispanic/Latino, and finally, other races. Most of the insurance was Medicare, then Medicaid; some were privately insured, and the remaining were uninsured.

              Clinical characteristics of the pre- and post-interventional groups of the population were equalized. The New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification revealed that most patients were in Class II or III, with a smaller subset in Class IV, indicating advanced disease (Rohde et al., 2023). “The prevalence of comorbidities was similar across groups, with hypertension being the most common, followed by diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)” (Rohde et al., 2023). Mean ejection fractions between the two groups had no significant difference, thus suggesting that both groups had similar levels of impairment of cardiac functions. These similarities show that overall, the sample did not differ in the background characteristics or clinical outcomes, so the likelihood of a confounding factor interfering with the results is lower.

              Primary Outcomes

              The primary outcome of the study was the 30-day readmission rate of hospitalization due to HF exacerbation (Gangu et al., 2022). In the initial sample of the group of patients at the beginning of the intervention, 23 percent represented cases of readmission rates in the initial month of discharge. In contrast, the post-intervention sample showed a low and conspicuous readmission rate of 11 percent. Statistical analysis using the Chi-square test confirmed that this reduction was statistically significant (p = .001).

              Medication adherence, measured by the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8), also showed considerable improvement following implementation of the intervention. At the pre-group level, 28 percent of the patients were assigned high adherence scores, and the remaining part belonged to medium and low adherence. The post-intervention group, in turn, achieved high adherence in 54 percent of the patients, whereas the percentage of patients with low adherence drastically reduced. The Chi-square test confirmed that these changes were statistically significant (p < .001).

              Patient satisfaction, assessed using the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey focusing on discharge and care transition items, also improved (Bispott, 2024). The pre-intervention group's average score was 78, whereas the post-intervention group reached almost 89. Independent samples t-test analysis revealed that this increase in satisfaction was statistically significant (p < .001). These results indicate that the perception of patients subjected to the implemented intervention became better if the discharge process is considered more supportive, organized, and informative following the introduction of the intervention into practice.

              Secondary Outcomes

              Reduced effects of the intervention occurred in secondary outcomes. Emergency department (ED) visits for HF-related issues within 30 days of discharge decreased from 17 percent in the pre-intervention group to 8 percent in the post-intervention group, with statistical testing confirming the significance of this reduction (p = .005). This observation shows that not only was the step of hospital readmission reduced through improved discharge planning and education now, but also there was an opportunity to avoid crisis occasions, which might have required ED evaluation.

              The length of stay (LOS) for the index hospitalization decreased modestly from an average of 5.8 days in the pre-intervention group to 5.2 days in the post-intervention group. While the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = .062), the trend aligns with prior research suggesting that effective discharge planning can contribute to more efficient care and earlier patient discharge without compromising safety.

              Descriptive Analysis, Logistic Regression, and identification of S 30 30-day readmission. Group assignment emerged as a strong independent predictor, with patients in the post-intervention group demonstrating significantly lower odds of readmission compared to those in the pre-intervention group (odds ratio = 0.42, p = .001). High medication adherence was also associated with a lower risk of readmission (odds ratio = 0.38, p < .001). Conversely, having NYHA Class IV heart failure increased the likelihood of readmission (odds ratio = 2.14, p = .021). These outcomes prove the importance of the intervention and adherence behaviors in reducing readmission. Also, they emphasized the fact that the advanced HF patients remain at high risk even after the improvement in the discharge practices.

              Interpretation of Hypothetical Findings

              The research findings show that the nurse-led discharge planning and patient education intervention significantly improved clinical and patient-centered results (Amini, 2024). It is noteworthy that the 30-day readmission rate declined, especially as the indicator has been a long-established indicator of healthcare and the focus of the value-based payment initiatives in healthcare. The improvement in medication adherence suggests that it will be possible to schedule education interventions and carry them out in a way that empowers the patient to take control of their health.

              The fact that the rates of satisfaction with the interventions increased significantly demonstrates that it is not only the medical component of it, but also the modality of compliance with the same tenets of the patient-centered concept. The patients reporting that they feel supported, informed, and prepared to engage in self-management once they leave the hospital have better chances of having smoother transitions and fewer complications, as well as feel more confident about their capability to manage HF on their own (Amini, 2024).

              The further consequences of the research, i.e., the reduction of ED visits and the potential trend of reduced hospital stay duration, again support the cross-lingual positive influence of the holistic nature of the discharge planning. These advantages show that the intervention has potential economic benefits as well because it will likely lower the number of costs incurred due to unnecessary healthcare, since no unnecessary visits to the hospital are present, and the inpatient care remains efficient and optimized as well.

              Research Limitations

              The interpretation of such hypothetical results has several limitations that one should remember. The quasi-experimental design is a convenient trial to be conducted in the real-life scenario of a hospital; nevertheless, the design lacks randomization to eliminate selection bias. This limits the strength of causal inferences, since the findings may have relied on unobserved variables. Another aspect that will cast its shadow on the generalizability of the findings is the use of convenience sampling, as the sample may not be representative of a large population of HF patients in other hospitals or geographic regions.

              Also, the research was based partially on self-reported measures of medication non-adherence and satisfaction, that is prone to social desirability bias and recall bias (Fahrni et al., 2022). The good acts or satisfaction may be overreported, particularly when probed by care personnel during patient release. The study was done in a single site, which implies that a variety of contextual factors peculiar to this hospital (including expertise of its staff, institutional culture, or the resources available) may have been among the contributing factors of the intervention's success.

              Recommendations for Future Research

              In future studies, it would also be important to consider the conduct of randomized controlled designs across various geographical locations of hospitals that would allow greater generalizability and internal legitimacy of findings to enhance the evidence base and address the identification gaps. In a bid to enhance the credibility of findings, the study population should become more representative in terms of demographic and socioeconomic groups of patients to determine whether the interventions are also equitable and effective for various patients.

              A longer-term follow-up, such as after the discharge period of 30 days, would better explain the findings on whether the benefits of interventions are sustainable over more extended periods of health-related outcomes, such as 90-day readmissions, mortality rates, and health-related quality of life. Moreover, the interviews could also include cost-effectiveness analyses to enable healthcare organizations to estimate the financial consequences of adopting care units with similar nurse-led discharge planning procedures (Fahrni et al., 2022).

              Lastly, specific studies of high-risk subgroups (i.e., patients with severe HF, patients with numerous comorbidities, or patients with low health literacy) may inform the creation of individualized interventions. Such possible examples might be higher telemonitoring, more frequent contact with patients during follow-ups, or cooperation with community health workers to address social determinants of health resulting in readmissions.

              Conclusion

              Heart failure readmissions are another ongoing issue that, in many cases, may be addressed with the help of enhanced discharge planning and education. The evidence in the literature is overwhelming regarding the use of structured discharge protocols and nurse-led education as an effective strategy to reduce readmissions and positively impact patient outcomes. This evidence-based quasi-experimental research, employing a rigorous methodology, is proposed to determine the effect of a holistic discharge planning program on 30-day readmission rates, patient satisfaction, and medication adherence. With the use of validated instruments and effective interventions, the study can provide policy and clinical practice guidelines for the transition of care in patients with heart failure. The challenge of high hospital readmission of patients with heart failure is of concern to the healthcare of today, one that nurses can solve. Transitional care nursing is a solution whose time has arrived, providing continuity, safety, and education during the hazardous post-discharge period. This study aims to reiterate the importance of nurse intervention in enhancing patient outcomes and contributing to a more efficient, patient-focused healthcare system. The implications of the proposed quasi-experimental study, where it is presumed that the structured nurse-led discharge planning, which is considered part of the comprehensive patient education, can significantly reduce the number of hospital readmissions for heart failure patients within the first 30 days of readmission, are pretty profound. Moreover, it implies that the intervention positively impacts medication adherence and patient satisfaction and reduces the use of emergency services. Despite a few limitations inherent in the design and scope of the conducted research, these speculative findings are consistent with existing evidence, which determines the potentially crucial role of nursing in the development of safe and effective transitions of care. The paper has revealed the significance of transitional care as a pillar of good nursing, considering both clinical and patient-oriented outcomes. Utilizing similar steps in clinical practice, underpinning the identified restrictions, could help make the life of HF patients substantially easier and reduce the scope of readmission to the healthcare system

              References

              .

              Amini, M. (2024). Nurse-led patient education to reduce hospital readmission. Umsystem.edu. https://hdl.handle.net/10355/106181

              Bispott, J.-D. (2024). Effect of Medication and Discharge Instructions on Heart Failure Readmission Rates. Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/15762/

              Bradley, D. C., Lannin, N. A., Clemson, L., Cameron, I. D., & Shepperd, S. (2022). Discharge planning from the Hospital. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2022(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd000313.pub6

              Browder, S. E., & Rosamond, W. D. (2023). Preventing Heart Failure Readmission in Patients with Low Socioeconomic Position. Current Cardiology Reports, 25(11). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-023-01960-0

              Burse, C. (2024). Reducing Congestive Heart Failure Readmissions through Discharge Planning and Education. The Aquila Digital Community. https://aquila.usm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1295&context=dnp_capstone

              Dhaliwal, J. S., & Dang, A. K. (2024, June 7). Reducing Hospital Readmissions. Nih.gov; StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/books/NBK606114/

              Fahrni, M. L., Saman, K. M., Alkhoshaiban, A. S., Naimat, F., Ramzan, F., & Isa, K. A. M. (2022). Patient-reported outcome measures to detect intentional, mixed, or unintentional non-adherence to medication: a systematic review. BMJ Open, 12(9), e057868. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057868

              Fatani, A., Alzebaidi, S., Alghaythee, H. K., Alharbi, S., Bogari, M. H., Salamatullah, H. K., Alghamdi, S., & Makkawi, S. (2025). The role of the discharge planning team on the length of hospital stay and readmission in patients with neurological conditions: A single-center retrospective study. Healthcare, 13(2), 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13020143

              Gangu, K., Bobba, A., Chela, H. K., Avula, S., Basida, S., & Yadav, N. (2022). In-Hospital Mortality Rate and Predictors of 30-Day Readmission in Patients With Heart Failure Exacerbation and Atrial Fibrillation: A Cross-Sectional Study. International Journal of Heart Failure, 4(3), 145. https://doi.org/10.36628/ijhf.2022.0002

              Khan, M. S., Sreenivasan, J., Lateef, N., Abougergi, M. S., Greene, S. J., Ahmad, T., … & Butler, J. (2021). Trends in 30-and 90-day readmission rates for heart failure.  Circulation: Heart Failure14(4), e008335. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.121.008335

              Marques, C. R. D. G., de Menezes, A. F., Ferrari, Y. A. C., Oliveira, A. S., Tavares, A. C. M., Barreto, A. S., … & Santana-Santos, E. (2022). Educational nursing intervention in reducing hospital readmission and the mortality of patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.  Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease9(12), 420. https://www.mdpi.com/2308-3425/9/12/420

              Roger, V. L. (2021). Epidemiology of heart failure: a contemporary perspective.  Circulation research128(10), 1421–1434. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318172

              Rohde, L. E., Zimerman, A., Vaduganathan, M., Claggett, B. L., Packer, M., Desai, A. S., Zile, M., Rouleau, J., Swedberg, K., Lefkowitz, M., Shi, V., McMurray, J. J. V., & Solomon, S. D. (2023). Associations Between New York Heart Association Classification, Objective Measures, and Long-term Prognosis in Mild Heart Failure: A Secondary Analysis of the PARADIGM-HF Trial. JAMA Cardiology, 8(2), 150–158. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2022.4427

              Sakowitz, S., Madrigal, J., Williamson, C., Ebrahimian, S., Richardson, S., Ascandar, N., … & Benharash, P. (2023). Care fragmentation after hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction.  The American Journal of Cardiology187, 131–137. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.121.008335

              Shamali, M., Østergaard, B., Svavarsdóttir, E. K., Shahriari, M., & Konradsen, H. (2025). The Role of Nurse Social Support in Hospital Readmission in Patients With Heart Failure: A Cross‐Sectional Study. Health Science Reports, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.70444

              Williams, J. P. (2025). Quality Improvement Project Impact of Multidisciplinary Patient Education on Heart Failure 30-Day Readmission Rate. ARCH: A-State Research & Creativity Hub. https://arch.astate.edu/dnp-projects/116/

              Wu, X., Li, Z., Tian, Q., Ji, S., & Zhang, C. (2024). Effectiveness of nurse-led heart failure clinic: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 11(3), 315–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2024.04.001

              wikenina

              Refresh otakmu dengan hiburan dari https://jacksonsfamilyfarm.com/ yang seru banget. Tenangkan pikiran dengan main di IDNPlay, bisa sambil cuan juga!

              Hibur dirimu di tengah kesibukan dengan main di https://kaniapay.com/ . Main game sambil kumpulin hadiah? Hanya di IDNPlay!

              Hiburan nggak perlu mahal, cukup buka https://shorturl.at/gkXNw aja. Cari kesenangan? Di IDNPlay kamu bisa ketawa dan menang hadiah!

              Malam minggu sendirian? dengan link https://shorturl.at/j7kdt bisa jadi temen setia. Bikin harimu lebih seru dengan main di IDNPlay!

                Platinum Essays