summary and evaluation of the article you critiqued
include the following:
• Purpose & research question
• Study design
• Sample/setting
• Key findings
|
Reference (in APA style): |
||
|
1. Study Design |
||
|
|
Objective and unbiased outcome criteria are used. |
Highlight your response in Yellow: 0 1 2 N/A
Provide a rationale for the appraisal: |
|
2. Participants |
||
|
|
(a): The criteria for inclusion in the sample are clearly defined. |
Highlight your response in Yellow: 0 1 2 N/A
Provide a rationale for the appraisal: |
|
|
(b): The study participants and the setting are described in detail. |
Highlight your response in Yellow: 0 1 2 N/A
Provide a rationale for the appraisal: |
|
|
(c): The sample is representative (i.e., accurately reflects the characteristics) of the target population. |
Highlight your response in Yellow: 0 1 2 N/A
Provide a rationale for the appraisal: |
|
|
(d): Reasons are given to explain why some participants didn’t complete the study. |
Highlight your response in Yellow: 0 1 2 N/A
Provide a rationale for the appraisal: |
|
|
(e) for experimental and quasi-experimental studies only: The participants are randomly assigned to the intervention and control groups. |
Highlight your response in Yellow: 0 1 2 N/A
Provide a rationale for the appraisal: |
|
|
(f) for experimental and quasi-experimental studies only: The participants and researchers are blind to the study group assignment. |
Highlight your response in Yellow: 0 1 2 N/A
Provide a rationale for the appraisal: |
|
3. Data Collection |
||
|
|
The timing of the outcome measurements (e.g., the follow-up period) is sufficiently long enough to detect the outcomes of interest. |
Highlight your response in Yellow: 0 1 2 N/A
Provide a rationale for the appraisal: |
|
4. Data Analysis |
||
|
|
The analysis adjusted for important risk factors and confounding variables. |
Highlight your response in Yellow: 0 1 2 N/A
Provide a rationale for the appraisal: |
|
5. Results |
||
|
|
The magnitude of the primary results (e.g., of the relationship between predictors and targeted outcome, or the intervention/treatment effects) is large enough to warrant practical significance. |
Highlight your response in Yellow: 0 1 2 N/A
Provide a rationale for the appraisal: |
|
6. Conclusions |
||
|
|
(a): The study participants are similar to my population of interest. |
Highlight your response in Yellow: 0 1 2 N/A
Provide a rationale for the appraisal: |
|
|
(b): I would be able to use the results to counsel my patients or population of interest. |
Highlight your response in Yellow: 0 1 2 N/A
Provide a rationale for the appraisal: |
|
Study Validity Total earned score in “Study Design” and “Participants” = ___; Total possible score = 14 Overall percentage: total earned score/14 = ___% Overall Appraisal: highlight your rating in Yellow: high, moderate, low |
||
|
Study Reliability Total earned score in “Data Collection,” “Data Analysis,” and “Results” = ___; Total possible score = 6 Overall percentage: total earned score/6 = ___% Overall Appraisal: highlight your rating in Yellow: high, moderate, low |
||
|
Study Applicability Total earned score in “Conclusions” = ___; Total possible score = 4 Overall percentage: total earned score/4 = ___% Overall Appraisal: highlight your rating in Yellow: high, moderate, low |
||
|
Your Overall Appraisal of this Study Overall percentage: total earned score/24 = ___%
Overall strength vs. limitations: (highlight your rating in Yellow) high, moderate, low |
||
|
*Remember to remove 2 pts from the divisors below for every question that is N/A*. |
Grading Rubric: Rapid Critical Appraisal (10 Points Total)
|
Criteria |
Description |
Points |
|
Completion of RCA Tool |
All appraisal questions answered clearly with thoughtful responses and appropriate page references. |
4 points |
|
Quality of Summary |
Summary clearly communicates purpose, findings, strengths, and weaknesses of the article. |
2 points |
|
Use of Evidence |
Responses are well-supported with evidence and page numbers from the article. |
2 points |
|
Formatting & Submission |
Well-organized, free of major grammar/spelling errors, all components included, submitted on time. |
2 points |

