Required Resource
Thomas, G. (2024). How to Do Your Literature Review (3rd ed.). Sage Publications, Ltd. ISBN: 9781529755909
Thomas, G. (2021). How to Do Your Case Study (3rd ed.). Sage Publications Ltd. ISBN: 9781529685794
The resources below is provided in the course at no cost to the student. However, if the student prefers a physical copy of the resources, he or she may purchase it through the Liberty University Online bookstore, BNC Virtual. The purchase of physical copies is optional.
Gallagher, J. R. (2024). Case Study Research in the Digital Age (1st ed.). Routledge.
Recommended Resource
American Psychological Association. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (current ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Read: Thomas (2021): Chapters 1,2,4,6,7
- Read: Gallagher: Chapter 1
- https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/mono/10.4324/9781003402169-2/definitions-descriptions-entities-john-gallagher?context=ubx&refId=26a045e6-a0f4-4efe-9730-dd04da0160ab
- Read: Short and sweet: Multiple mini case studies as a form of rigorous case study research.
- https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10257-024-00674-2
- Watch: Different Types of Case Studies
-
Watch: What Are Validity & Reliability In Research? SIMPLE Explainer (With Examples)
Overview of Case Studies Assignment
BUSI 830
Overview of Case Studies Assignment Instructions
Overview
Each case study type and its design are slightly different. These differences are important for researchers to consider when selecting a case study type most appropriate for their research. Regardless of the type or design, each case study centers around its subject and object. Researchers typically build their cases around the purpose that drives a type and design. Biblical integration IS required in this assignment.
Instructions
After reviewing the required material stated in this week’s module, address the following in a written paper using the current APA format:
· Provide an introduction to case study types and provide an applicable example.
· As most case study designs are driven by their purpose, explain the primary case study designs/structures (formats).
· With regard to ‘quality of research and it’s design’, describe the tests of validity and reliability.
· As it pertains to ‘digital’ case studies, explain ‘networked phenomena’
Required Format
Cover page
Abstract
Introduction (remember, we don’t use this word, but the intro is the text after the title up to the first L1 heading)
Case Study Types
Case Study Primary Designs
Validity and Reliability
Networked Phenomena
Conclusion
References
Additional Requirements
Use the provided Overview of Case Studies Assignment Template .
This 1,000 minimum, 1,500 maximum word paper needs to be written to include these guidelines:
· The required cover page, abstract, and reference pages are not included in the required assignment word count but are required as part of your paper (meaning the word count is all material from after the abstract keywords up to the References).
· Materials submitted to fulfill requirements in one course may not be submitted in another course. Concerns about the propriety of obtaining outside assistance and acknowledging sources should be addressed to the instructor of the course before the work commences and as necessary as the work proceeds.
· In addition to the course texts and the Bible, this paper must include at least 6 references from peer-reviewed scholarly articles that have publication dates no older than 5 years. Do not use any books other than the Bible and the books.
· All parts of the assignment must be based on peer-reviewed scholarly sources, Biblical literature, and course texts.
· There should be at least one instance of Biblical integration (at least one scripture reference) within the body of the paper, not in the abstract, introduction, or conclusion.
· In-text citations are required to support your (a) statements, (b) points, (c) assertions, (d) issues, (e) arguments, (f) concerns, (g) paragraph topic sentences, and (h) statements of fact and opinion. Refer to Section 8.1, Appropriate Level of Citation on pages 253 and 254 in the APA Manual (7th ed.).
· Do not provide any personal opinions.
· Since the assignment is short in word count, the introduction and conclusion sections should not be longer than ½ page each.
· Refrain from using phrases such as, “in this paper.”
· Sources of information from Wikipedia, dictionaries, websites, blogs, and encyclopedias will not be accepted.
· A paragraph is defined in this course as being at least 4 sentences in length and structured in a cohesive manner. Consider using the MEAL approach for writing paragraphs:
· M – Main topic using peer-reviewed scholarly sources.
· E – Evidence to support the main topic using peer-reviewed scholarly sources.
· A – Analysis (e.g., for and against) of the evidence using peer-reviewed scholarly sources.
· L – Lead back to the main topic or to the main topic in the next paragraph using peer-reviewed scholarly sources.
· Avoid (a) clichés, (b) slang, (c) jargon, (d) exaggerations, (e) abbreviations, (f) figurative language, and (g) language that is too informal and too subjective.
· Submit your final document for grading with file name syntax: LastNameFirstInitial Assignment Name #. For example: SmithJ_Assignment Name.doc (no .pdfs)
Grading Metrics
Consult the accompanying rubric for how this assignment will be graded. Also, any form of plagiarism, including copying and pasting, will result in zero points for the entire assignment. All quoted materials must be properly cited in the current APA format.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Page 1 of 1
,
Overview of Case Studies
Your Name
School of Business, Liberty University
Author Note
By submitting this assignment, I attest this submission represents my own work, and not that of another student, scholar, or internet source. I understand I am responsible for knowing and correctly utilizing referencing and bibliographical guidelines. I have not submitted this work for any other class.
1
OVERVIEW OF CASE STUDIES 1
Abstract
(abstract content)
Keywords: (3-5 keywords – all lower case)
Overview of Case Studies
Provide an introductory paragraph to the paper (Biblical Integration is included somewhere in the main body (not the abstract, introduction, or conclusion)).
Remove all guidance verbiage in this document (i.e., do not repeat the instructions prompt). Adjust headings such as Design 1 to be more descriptive (i.e., Embedded), etc., otherwise, keep all other headings.
Case Study Types
Discuss the purpose of different case study types for research.
Exploratory Case Studies
Provide a description of exploratory case studies.
Application of Exploratory Case Studies
Provide a discussion of the application of exploratory case studies with a minimum of one example.
Explanatory Case Studies
Provide a description of explanatory case studies.
Application of Explanatory Case Studies
Provide a discussion of the application of explanatory case studies with a minimum of one example.
Descriptive Case Studies
Provide a description of descriptive case studies.
Application of Descriptive Case Studies
Provide a discussion of the application of descriptive case studies with a minimum of one example.
Case Study Primary Designs
(Design 1)
Provide a description of case study design 1
(Design 2)
Provide a description of case study design 2
(Design 3)
Provide a description of case study design 3
(Design 4)
Provide a description of case study design 4, etc.
Validity and Reliability
With regard to ‘quality of research and it’s design’, describe the tests of validity and reliability.
‘Networked Phenomena’
As it pertains to ‘digital’ case studies, explain ‘networked phenomena’.
Conclusion
Provide a concluding/summarizing paragraph to the paper highlighting key information (i.e., main L1 topics) (do not begin this section with ‘In conclusion…’ – your paper’s heading already says that).
References
OVERVIEW OF CASE STUDY TYPES 20
Format references using the current APA style. Ensure all DOIs or journal URLs are active hyperlinks. (Note the hanging indent)
,
Criteria Ratings Points
Abstract, Introduction
6 to >5 pts
Advanced
Abstract clearly states the purpose and main conclusion and Introduction provides a complete overview of the discussion.
5 to >4 pts
Proficient
Abstract and Introduction provides a partial purpose, main conclusion and overview of the discussion.
4 to >0 pts
Developing
Abstract and Introduction present but does not provide an overview of the discussion.
0 pts
Not Present
6 pts
Description of each of the 3 Case Study Types
10 to >9 pts
Advanced
A complete description of each of the case study types and applicable example is discussed, and flow is logical, and fully cited
9 to >8 pts
Proficient
A partial description of each of the case study types or applicable example is discussed, or flow is mostly logical, or partially cited.
8 to >0 pts
Developing
The descriptions of each of the three case study types are inaccurate or insufficient or little to no example is discussed, or flow is not logical, or insufficiently cited.
0 pts
Not Present
Not completed or not related to requirements for the section.
10 pts
Explanation of 4 Primary Case Study Designs/ Formats
10 to >9 pts
Advanced
A complete discussion of each of the primary case study designs/ formats is discussed, and flow is logical, and fully cited.
9 to >8 pts
Proficient
A partial discussion of the primary case study designs/ formats is discussed, or low is mostly logical, or partially cited.
8 to >0 pts
Developing
Minimal discussion of the primary case study designs/ formats or are incorrect, or flow is not logical, or insufficeintly cited.
0 pts
Not Present
Not completed or not related to requirements for the section.
10 pts
Description of the Quality Tests of Validity and Reliability
10 to >9 pts
Advanced
A complete and thorough discussion of validity and reliability, identifying key points of each is discussed, and flow is logical, and fully cited.
9 to >8 pts
Proficient
A partial discussion of validity and reliability, or partially identifying key points of each is discussed, or flow is mostly logical, or partially cited.
8 to >0 pts
Developing
A minimal discussion of validity and reliability, or identifying key points of each is discussed, or flow is not logical, or insufficiently cited.
0 pts
Not Present
Not completed or not related to requirements for the section.
10 pts
Overview of Case Studies Assignment Grading Rubric | BUSI830_B06_202540
Criteria Ratings Points
Description of Networked Phenomena
20 to >18 pts
Advanced
A thorough discussion of networked phenomena is present and flow is logical, and fully cited.
18 to >16 pts
Proficient
A partial discussion of networked phenomena is present, or flow is mostly logical, or partially cited.
16 to >0 pts
Developing
Little to no discussion of networked phenomena is present or flow is not logical, or insufficiently cited.
0 pts
Not Present
Not completed or not related to requirements for the section.
20 pts
Conclusion & Biblical Integration
4 to >3 pts
Advanced
Conclusion provides a complete summary of the discussion and highlights key points as well as a thoroughly integrated biblical worldview with at least 1 scripture reference.
3 to >2 pts
Proficient
Conclusion provides a partial summary of the discussion and highlights at least one key point and a partially integrated biblical worldview with at least 1 scripture reference.
2 to >0 pts
Developing
Conclusion present but does not summarize discussion or highlight key points and either a reference to a biblical worldview or no scripture reference.
0 pts
Not Present
Not completed.
4 pts
APA Format and Structure, References, and Citations, Grammar, Spelling, Mechanics, Composition
18 to >16 pts
Advanced
APA formatting and structure are followed, all references and citations correspond to each other and are formatted according to APA 7th ed. guidelines, and all assertions are supported by peer-reviewed scholarly sources. Grammar, spelling, mechanics and composition are all correct, and well-developed paragraphs.
16 to >15 pts
Proficient
APA formatting and structure are mostly followed, most references and citations correspond to each other or are mostly formatted according to APA 7th ed. guidelines, or most assertions are supported by peer-reviewed scholarly sources. Minor errors in grammar, spelling, mechanics and composition are all correct, and partially-developed paragraphs.
15 to >0 pts
Developing
APA formatting and structure are insufficiently followed, many references and citations do not correspond to each other or are not formatted according to APA 7th ed. guidelines, or most assertions are not supported by peer-reviewed scholarly sources. Significant number of errors in grammar, spelling, mechanics and composition, and isufficiently-developed paragraphs.
0 pts
Not Present
There are many errors in mechanics, composition, grammar.
18 pts
Overview of Case Studies Assignment Grading Rubric | BUSI830_B06_202540
Criteria Ratings Points
Sources/ Word Count
7 to >6 pts
Advanced
Six or more peer-reviewed scholarly sources are provided. The book sources provided are assigned course texts or the Bible only. Word Count is thorough (1000-1500 words).
6 to >5 pts
Proficient
Four to five peer-reviewed scholarly sources are provided. Books other than assigned course texts or the Bible are used as sources. Word Count is satisfactory (+/- 4%).
5 to >0 pts
Developing
One to three peer-reviewed scholarly sources are provided. Books other than course texts or the Bible are used as sources. Non-peer-reviewed sources are provided. Word Count is insufficient (>+/- 4%, <+/-10%).
0 pts
Not Present
No structure or formatting provided. Missing references and/or citations are rare, repetitious or non-existent. Word count (>+/-10%)
7 pts
Total Points: 85
Overview of Case Studies Assignment Grading Rubric | BUSI830_B06_202540
