DNP 801 Topic 1 DQ 1

DNP 801 Topic 1 DQ 1
DNP 801 Topic 1 DQ 1
https://nursingmasters.blog/dnp-801-topic-1-dq-1-identify-the-concepts-principles-theories-and-other-information-in-the-course-readings-lectures-and-other-resources-that-relate-to-the-discussion-questions-prompts/
Topic 1 DQ 1
General Requirements

Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on DNP 801 Topic 1 DQ 1 done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Meet my deadline

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
Refer to the document “Discussion Forum Philosophy.” Download the file, print it, and use the information to guide your participation in the Main Forum. This information can also be found in the GCU University Policy Handbook.
Use the following links to explore the GCU Library:
http://library.gcu.edu/
http://libguides.gcu.edu/refworksandendnote​
Per the University Policy Handbook, each week, two initial posts and three ongoing contributions are required for a minimum of five separate posts on 3 separate days of the topic.
Directions:
Perform the following tasks to complete this assignment:
Identify the discussion questions/prompts in the Main Forum for the topic.
Identify the concepts, principles, theories, and other information in the course readings, lectures, and other resources that relate to the discussion questions/prompts.
Locate at least one scholarly research source which supports your initial response to each question/prompt. The reference may come from the topic readings.
Write an initial substantive response of 150-250 words in length. Begin your response with a restatement of the question/prompt, and include in-text citation(s) and a reference for each scholarly source used according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide located in the Student Success Center. The restatement of the question/prompt, the references, and the citations are not included in your response word count.
Post your substantive initial response to the Main Forum for the topic. Your initial response to question/prompt 1 must be posted by day 3 of the topic. Your initial response to question/prompt 2 must be posted by day 5 of the topic.
Contribute to discussion by posting at least one substantive response to another learner’s post on 3 days of the topic. Respond in a manner that initiates or contributes to discussion.
Question:
After reading, “Dr. Ronald Berman on Time Management” and viewing the video at the conclusion of the article, describe two strategies you will implement in order to improve your time management skills? How will you change your approach to time management using that information?
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:DNP 801 Topic 1 DQ 1
Congratulations on your acceptance into the Doctor of Nursing Practice program
at Grand Canyon University. Earning a DNP is a major milestone for you
personally and a significant contribution to your community and profession. In
keeping with the expectations of DNP professionals, learners enrolled in this
program are expected to display courteous and professional conduct and develop
strong scholarly skills. This course will begin to prepare you for your professional
journey.
In a few words, explain how your future role as a Doctor of Nursing Practice
leader will serve your profession and your personal community. On a personal
level, what do you expect to achieve from this program? (This response does not
require research support.)
Review the "Discussion Forum Philosophy" located in the Class Resources. You are
expected to post in the forum according to these guidelines without further prompting
for the duration of the program.
DNP 801 Topic 1 DQ 1
Margaret Williams
Posted Date
Feb 21, 2022, 11:56 PM
Unread
Replies to Margaret Williams
My future role as DNP leader will allow me to further facilitate my growth as a provider as strong
leader in understanding and developing research that will provide for more effective evidence-
based practices in collaboration with other healthcare providers and healthcare systems that will
lead to clearer practices in providing quality care and patient safety.
This new role will help me develop teaching skills to provide for future nurses at all levels of
learning. My goal in advancing my degree is to be an instructor who can teach others the power of
strong leadership skills that will allow them to build a successful practice in helping to advocate for
a better, stronger healthcare system that they can be proud of just like I feel about this journey I
am embarking on today.
REPLY
 EN
Elsie Nlerum
replied toMargaret Williams
Feb 23, 2022, 3:28 PM
Unread
Replies to Margaret Williams
Hello Margaret,
I am in agreement with you that a DNP degree will facilitate your growth as a provider in
understanding and developing research. One of the best ways for nurses to acquire strong
leadership skills is by earning a Doctor of Nursing Practice (D.N.P.) degree. Equipped with
D.N.P. leadership skills, nurses can move into a variety of leadership roles. Those roles
enable nurses to make valuable and lasting contributions to the quality of health care delivery
and promote a positive working environment for all health care professionals and critical in
ensuring that patients receive high-quality and efficiently delivered health care.
REPLY
ES
EMANUELA SALAJEAN
Posted Date
Feb 19, 2022, 3:10 PM
Unread
Replies to Margaret Williams
As a Patient Care Manager, I find myself attempting to fix issues, concerns and quality fall outs on
a daily basis. Evidence-based research and implementation of practice has grown in all healthcare
settings. My role as a Doctor of Nursing Practice is to continue to serve the community in order to
enhance patient outcomes. I serve in several committees in order to better service the homeless
population, those that are uninsured and others without home assistance in collaboration with
social work and case management. The DNP program will assist me in furthering my education in
order to establish better processes and protocols for the needs of all patients. I have assisted in
several quality improvement projects however it is quite challenging to know where to get started
without proper education and background. I know that I can gain this knowledge throughout this
program. My main focus and goal is to make change and a positive impact especially on
processes that are failing frequently. There are many processes that I know can be enhanced
however I don’t actually know where to start. I also see this from bedside nurses. The nurses are
always full of ideas for great quality improvement projects however similar to myself, it is
challenging to decide a start point or to educate on how to move forward with great ideas.
Altogether, change is always needed in order to save lives in our fast growing healthcare system.
The census and acuity of patients from five years ago is severely different from today’s which
means process and improvements are needed to better care for each individual.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid (CMS) has benchmarks regarding Sepsis, Stroke, CLABSI,
CAUTI’s and HAPI’s. The hospital gathers nurses champions, MD’s, Advance Practice Providers,
project managers, IT, and DNP’s in order to assist in developing processes to meet these
benchmarks in order to have a positive impact on patient outcomes. I am eager and excited to be
involved and assist in workgroups such as these.
Name:  Discussion Rubric

Grid View
List View

 
Excellent 
90–100
Good 
80–89
Fair 
70–79
Poor 
0–69

Main Posting: 
Response to the Discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
40 (40%) – 44 (44%) 
Thoroughly responds to the Discussion question(s).
Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.
Supported by at least three current credible sources.
35 (35%) – 39 (39%) 
Responds to most of the Discussion question(s).
Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth.
Supported by at least three credible references.
31 (31%) – 34 (34%) 
Responds to some of the Discussion question(s).
One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.
Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Cited with fewer than two credible references.
0 (0%) – 30 (30%) 
Does not respond to the Discussion question(s).
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Contains only one or no credible references.

Main Posting: 
Writing
6 (6%) – 6 (6%) 
Written clearly and concisely.
Contains no grammatical or spelling errors.
Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) 
Written concisely.
May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors.
Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%) 
Written somewhat concisely.
May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Contains some APA formatting errors.
0 (0%) – 3 (3%) 
Not written clearly or concisely.
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Posting: 
Timely and full participation
9 (9%) – 10 (10%) 
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.
Posts main Discussion by due date.
8 (8%) – 8 (8%) 
Meets requirements for full participation.
Posts main Discussion by due date.
7 (7%) – 7 (7%) 
Posts main Discussion by due date.
0 (0%) – 6 (6%) 
Does not meet requirements for full participation.
Does not post main Discussion by due date.

First Response: 
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.
9 (9%) – 9 (9%) 
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Responds to questions posed by faculty.
The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
8 (8%) – 8 (8%) 
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.
7 (7%) – 7 (7%) 
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
0 (0%) – 6 (6%) 
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

First Response: 
Writing
6 (6%) – 6 (6%) 
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) 
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.
Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.
Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources.
Response is written in standard, edited English.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%) 
Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Few or no credible sources are cited.
0 (0%) – 3 (3%) 
Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.
Response to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited.

First Response: 
Timely and full participation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) 
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.
Posts by due date.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%) 
Meets requirements for full participation.
Posts by due date.
3 (3%) – 3 (3%) 
Posts by due date.
0 (0%) – 2 (2%) 
Does not meet requirements for full participation.
Does not post by due date.

Second Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.
9 (9%) – 9 (9%) 
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Responds to questions posed by faculty.
The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
8 (8%) – 8 (8%) 
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.
7 (7%) – 7 (7%) 
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
0 (0%) – 6 (6%) 
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

Second Response:
Writing
6 (6%) – 6 (6%) 
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) 
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.
Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.
Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources.
Response is written in standard, edited English.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%) 
Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Few or no credible sources are cited.
0 (0%) – 3 (3%) 
Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.
Response to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited.

Second Response:
Timely and full participation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) 
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.
Posts by due date.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%) 
Meets requirements for full participation.
Posts by due date.
3 (3%) – 3 (3%) 
Posts by due date.
0 (0%) – 2 (2%) 
Does not meet requirements for full participation.
Does not post by due date.

Total Points: 100

Name:  Discussion Rubric