Benchmark – Critical Thinking Essay

Benchmark – Critical Thinking Essay

PSY 510 Week 3 Assignment Benchmark – Critical Thinking Essay
Benchmark – Critical Thinking Essay Details:
The following is a list of acceptable topics that can be selected from. (Please note that this is a list of suggestions. A different topic can be selected if you have a preference for a topic that is not listed):

Right to Die
Drug Therapy
Children and Medication
Diagnosis of ADHD
Television or Video Games and Violent Behavior
Using Deception in Research
Spanking
Using Animals in Research
Recovered Memories

Use the GCU library to locate two peer-reviewed articles on your chosen topic. The articles should argue opposite sides of the controversy.
ORDER NOW FOR INSTRUCTIONS-COMPLIANT, ORIGINAL PAPER
In 1,250-1,500 words:

Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on Benchmark – Critical Thinking Essay done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Meet my deadline

Briefly explain the claims of both articles as well as the background of the controversy and how it became controversial. Including how historical perspectives and theories add to the controversy.
Examine the evidence given in the articles and explain which article creates a stronger argument.
Identify any logic fallacies that exist in both and explain what makes them logic fallacies (For a list of logical fallacies, follow this link https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/659/03/).
Describe why the article’s argument is stronger than the other. Give examples from both. Include how current perspectives and theories support your rationale.
Describe how the controversy you chose is applicable and significant to the world.

Prepare this Benchmark – Critical Thinking Essay assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This Benchmark – Critical Thinking Essay assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this Benchmark – Critical Thinking Essay assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
This benchmark Benchmark – Critical Thinking Essay assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies: 1.1: Describe key historical perspectives and theories in psychology, 1.2: Differentiate among current perspectives and theories in psychology, and 1.3: Describe applications of psychology.
PSY 510 Topic 4 DQ1
Describe three to five different ways in which a psychologist or counselor may acquire or maintain competence in a specific area of practice. Does supervision play a role in any of the ways you described? Explain.
PSY 510 Topic 4 DQ2
Explore the divisions of APA (http://www.apa.org/about/division/). Which would you join? How would you use those divisions to continue your education/training in the field of psychology? Are there other ways to gain expertise in a psychological emphasis (i.e., forensic, development)? Explain.
PSY 510 Week 4 Assignment Case Study: Handling Disparate Information
Details:
Read Case 7: Handling Disparate Information for Evaluating Trainees on pages 364-366 in your textbook. Once you have read the case study completely, answer the discussion questions found in the attached document “Case 7” under the assignment tab.
While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
PSY 510 Topic 5 DQ1
Discuss why it is important to maintain professional boundaries when working within the field of psychology?
PSY 510 Topic 5 DQ2
What are some potential consequences if a professional has loose or poor professional boundaries? What are some factors that may make it difficult to maintain professional boundaries?
ORDER NOW FOR INSTRUCTIONS-COMPLIANT, ORIGINAL PAPER
PSY 510 Week 5 Case Study: Duty to Protect
Read Case 4: Research on Intimate Partner Violence and the Duty to Protect on pages 359-360 in your textbook. Once you have read the case study completely, answer the discussion questions found in the attached document “Case 4” under the assignment tab.
While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
PSY 510 Week 6 Topic 6 DQ1
There is much controversy on record keeping. Agencies require records after each session, and private therapists say less is better so courts cannot interpret the notes in the wrong context. What do you feel is practical and still within your legal obligation?
PSY 510 Topic 6 DQ2
Describe how website advertising can potentially lead to the violation of other ethical standards.
PSY 510 Week 6 Assignment Case Study: Ethical Consultation
Details:
A local shelter that receives funding from the National Institute of Health and Mental Health is upgrading its website. Along with several upgrades to the website, the web developer/consultant makes a suggestion that the shelter add a testimonial page where local citizens can describe their positive interactions with the shelter and its services. Since the web developer/consultant want to get that page up and running first, the developer suggests using some positive ratings and responses from Angie’s List® and other similar ratings sites that already have positive stories and experiences with the shelter.
The director of the shelter loves the idea of a testimonial page. She thinks it would really add to the community feel of the shelter. However, knowing her funding source, she researches the APA Ethics Code and believes the shelter would be acting inappropriately. To discuss the matter in further detail, the director of the shelter calls you for an ethics consult.
Adapted from: http://www.ethicalpsychology.com/2012/06/vignette-14-psychology-of-advertizing.html
In 500-750 words, explain the advice you would give:

Describe the ethical issues involved in this situation.
Discuss any other concerns about the web developer/consultant’s strategies.
Explain some recommendations that you would make to the shelter.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
PSY 510 Topic 7 DQ1
Discuss some areas on which you hold biases (divorce, domestic violence, death penalty). Biases can be personal or professional in nature. Confronting biases can help to overcome them. What are your personal/professional biases? What harm can result from not being aware of them? What standards are violated if they are not acknowledged and addressed?
PSY 510 Topic 7 DQ2
You have a client who is of a different culture and faith than your own. You are not comfortable dealing with them due to past negative feelings from childhood. What are your ethical and legal obligations? Why are these legal and ethical obligations in place?
PSY 510 Week 7 Assignment Ethics of Religion
Details:
In 1,250-1,500 words, describe the ethical implications of implementing religion or spirituality into therapy. Consider topics such as:

Competence
Multiple relationships
Imposing religious values in therapy
Informed consent

Use a minimum of three peer-reviewed sources as well as the textbook and the APA Code of Ethics with APA formatted in-text citations and references.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
PSY 510 Topic 8 DQ 1
Ethical issues can arise between psychology and the legal system. What are some examples of ethical issues arising between these two entities? Use examples from this week’s required readings to support your claims.
PSY 510 Topic 8 DQ 2
Compare the legal definition of insanity with the psychological concept of mentally ill. How do these two terms differ? How does this distinction affect the validity of the insanity defense?
PSY 510 Week 8 Assignment Forensic Psychology and Ethical Implications
Details:
For this paper, you will examine the ethical implications of a controversial topic related to forensic psychology.
Choose from the following topics:

Psychologists’ involvement in military interrogations
Psychologists’ involvement in assessments related to death penalty cases

In 1,000-1,250 words, consider the following:

Discuss human rights as it relates to the controversy.
Explain ethical implications that may arise for both sides of the controversy.

A minimum of three peer-reviewed sources and the textbook should be used to support this paper.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Don’t wait until the last minute
Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.
Start My Order